Jow Forums I need your help

none of them. give it to a POC

Attached: 1522417166146.png (294x324, 204K)

I keep the flute and I play it while I tell them to go read a fucking book.

B made the flute and Wants the Flute it should have the Flute
Gibbons can wait their turn or l2flutemake

first and second posts are best posts. poorfags fuck off.

A. The flute is otherwise, useless.

Attached: Politics 101.png (1024x768, 134K)

Anyone who doesn’t pick B is genuinely a bad and destructive person who doesn’t belong in civilized society.

B
Wait, there are people that unironically think A or C should get it?

Don't be a fag. You take it away from all of them and chuck it in the bin.

B. Hopefully she sells it to A, but A has no right to demand it. Also C just wants free stuff he doesn't even need or have any use for, so fuck him in every conceivable way.

B, but it's a retarded contrived example. What if child D provided the material? What if child E provided the tools? What if child A concieved the idea of the flute?

Child C can fuck off in every case though

What a retarded question. The flute is obviously not mine to give.

In a civilized society the flute ends up with A while B is compensated. And if B doesnt like that, B should be shunned for wasting fucking wood.

Attached: flutechild.png (960x720, 208K)

Fucking nice

Attached: lmao.jpg (800x800, 137K)

A.

If B or C get the flute, then the flute has no genuine value, because neither can play the flute, it is nothing more then a toy to them.

If A get's the flute, the flute will be morally useful to both A, B and C, because she can play the flute, therefor taking the flute away from child B and giving it to child A is the best choice within this simple dilema.

B should sell it to A if he desires so. C can go get a job.

Child A obviously already has a flute so the greedy cunt can fuck off
Child C has no means to reimburse Child B for the flute
Therefore as Child B currently has the flute she should keep it

id break the flute in 3 pieces and give each one a piece

Child D and child E were unable to create the flute themselves because they didn't have all the parts. They both had given away their materials, with full knowledge that anything to come from those parts no longer comcerns them. Child B gets the flute in every case.

fuck
marry
kill

Commie. Child A doesn't deserve the flute. If Child A gets the flute, how could child B or C learn to play? What if child B wanted to learn how to play the flute? What if child A breaks the flute? Should child B be forced to make a new one? Why would they make a new one at all, since so far it's been shown that their efforts mean nothing, since they don't benefit from them. Why would they put effort into something that doesn't benefit them? If child a wants it so bad, they ahould fucking pay child B for it. Otherwise they can fuck off.

I keep the flute because it's mine and give all three $1000 of Jeff Bezos's money.

B of course, the worker keeps the full value of her work. Anything else would be Capitalism.

B because she made it, if she wants to give it away thats her choice.

B is the only choice

A needs to find a way to get their own god damn flute if she cares about it so much

C can fuck off with that victim mentality

since when has any communist worker, ever, got to keep the fruit of their labour?

If Child A can play the flute, then they clearly already have a flute, and are just being greedy.
If Child C cannot play the flute, then how does them possessing the flute improve their lot in life? In what way will possessing a flute they cannot play make their life better? I't won't. Ooga booga, gibs me dat.

Attached: DAA2EA7E-001F-4DCB-A039-B74BDDEFBA87.png (793x794, 832K)

>Commie. Child A doesn't deserve the flute. If Child A gets the flute, how could child B or C learn to play? What if child B wanted to learn how to play the flute? What if child A breaks the flute? Should child B be forced to make a new one? Why would they make a new one at all, since so far it's been shown that their efforts mean nothing, since they don't benefit from them. Why would they put effort into something that doesn't benefit them? If child a wants it so bad, they ahould fucking pay child B for it. Otherwise they can fuck off.
Actually, you are the commie thinking everyone is equally gifted to make music, they are not, you do not undermine my original argument, giving the flute to A will lead to the maximum amount of utility, because A can play the flute and B does not, maybe B has the right qualities to also become a musician, but that is not part of the image, so I can not discuss that.

Lern2play???

Child B is the right one however, that doesn't mean they can't go and sell it to someone else.

Old meme, please educate yourself.

Child A is basically Socialism.
Child B is basically Capitalism.
Child C is basically Communism.

Fpbp

Child H gets the flute. The rest get gassed for being kikes.

Child B, of course.

Children participating in socialist thought experiments are hereby deemed enemies of their own race, and must be gassed.

It's the only way. The only way.

Child A can play the flute for B and C, and now they have music and can play and get along. A will teach them how to play the flute, B will teach them how to make a flute of their own to avoid this conflict in the future, and C will teach them how to dance and to make the most out of the flute, given that he's most inclined to appreciate it and see the greatest value that the flute has.

Literally the only correct answer.

>Literally the only correct answer.
No, you are assuming that everyone has the ability to play music or create a flute, but most do not, if A is musically gifted and B and C are not and B is gifted as a craftsmen and A and C are not and C is gifted as a dancer and A and B are not, then my standpoint still stands.

You people reject the natural qualities and nobilities in individual human beings, making you more like communists. Not everyone is the same.

If I make something and you try to take it from me Im probably going to righteously shoot you to the roaring applause of 350,000,000 claps

>If I make something and you try to take it from me Im probably going to rhituously shoot you to the roaring applause of 350,000,000 claps
So if you had the cure for cancer and you kept it for yourself and I took it from you, gave it to the world allowing millions of people to survive cancer, then you shoot me and you think that somehow they would take your side and not mine?

Fase it, by being selfish and keeping the flute, you lower the total utility of that flute, you make the world a worse place.

>If I make something and you try to take it from me Im probably going to rhituously shoot you to the roaring applause of 350,000,000 claps
So if you had the cure for cancer and you kept it for yourself and I took it from you, gave it to the world allowing millions of people to survive cancer, then you shoot me and you think that somehow they would take your side and not mine?

Fase it, by being selfish and keeping the flute, you lower the total utility of that flute, you make the world a worse place.

value has to be extracted from the means of production for it becomes worthless in the long term, since these are all moneyless children B will give the flute to A out of good will, seeing how A is the only one who can extract further value from it, and, again, since these are moneyless children, A will play the flute for free out of good will, distributing the value of music equally among all 3 children, since only A and B put any effort into this venture, C child ends up with the biggest net value from the venture, just by existing

Fuck, marry and kill. In that order

>mfw people actually pick something other then B
Do people on this board actually leave their room or are people unironically this detached from reality?

Attached: 195A5F3A-9F88-49ED-9945-20F50A9FD413.jpg (400x532, 20K)

>righteousness
Wew lad......

Attached: 1551912788946.jpg (211x255, 11K)

The wise king Solomon.

Kill C, Bang A, Marry B

I concur the child b should sell the flute to child a, but furthermore, child c should really consider getting a job.

>sell Child A into sex slavery.
>sell Child B to privately owned work camp.
>sell Child C to organ harvesters.

I call the shots, kids. It's why you come to me with such questions.

Attached: Flute.png (354x462, 25K)

Fuck, marry, kill.

t. kike

Attached: 67c[1].jpg (600x775, 48K)

A person is not "naturally" gifted at crafting flutes and that's absurd to believe. You can easily teach a person the skills necessary to survive. Certainly not all people are born equally, but you can teach at least a basic proficiency to most people depending on your ability to teach. You're putting them in boxes based on their most proficient skill instead of considering the possibility that they can learn from each other. Perhaps the rhythmic dancing of child C inspires A to play in a different way, or perhaps child B can offer a percussion backing and transform the music. I just think these problems are often presented as a situation where there's no winning solution and are designed to get you to agree with a specific political ideology, but we can be clever and think out of the box. It never says there can only be one flute or that they're prohibited from playing together. They don't need to learn what the other is proficient at, but they can offer their own proficiency to work together and make up for each other's flaws.

goodwill is literally a line item on a corporate balance sheet.

You're never not expecting something in return, there just isn't a due date.

/thread

Child B supposedly had the flute in her possession originally, so when the fuck did they start fighting over it and why should I care?

>but you can teach at least a basic proficiency
You need more then basic proficiency to make a flute or to play it well, heck most people are unable to become painters, because they lack the eye and steady hand needed.

Again, demanding I think outside some box, whatever that box may be doesn't change the fact that the biggest increase of utility at the moment is to give the flute to A.

People here can make up all kinds of fantasy stories about selling the flute, teaching the kid to play the flute or selling them to organ harvesting farms, but that doesn't change the fact that giving the flute to kid A will increase the total amount of utility in the shorest amount of time and within the context of the image.

This thread was Gay the first time.

A should buy from B and C should get a job
Always has been, always should be.

*tips ghidora

>someone drew this

I remember when it was argued that B didn't need the flute because she had not use for and someone said 'that doesn't matter. It's her's she can use it as a dildo if she wants'.

You anons never disappoint.

Give all 3 $1000 each, the other two can pay the flute maker to also make them a flute.

you did great today Jow Forums.

imagine the noise

Attached: 1552070620899.jpg (960x720, 152K)

if the system is closed, these are all the actors there will ever be and none of the children have any money, what I said WILL happen naturally

the flute will only lose value (break) over time so by keeping it child B gains nothing, giving it to child A it will gain at least the value of the music produced, it doesn't even mater if child B incurred in costs to produce the flute, it will always give the flute to child A, at any price, even for free, because the cost of producing the flute is sunk and the value of the music will at least offset part or the entirety of it

I'm also considering these are well-adjusted children that don't get any value out of being selfish pricks: if child B or A get more value out of keeping the flute to themselves / not playing the flute (just to see the other children get upset because of it) than the value they might get out of the music potentially generated, then yeah they would behave this way instead

To be fair, I'd make it an acorn gathering contest: whoever brings me the most acorns over the next hour gets the flute. Whenever one child brought me some acorns, I'd tell him that the other had actually just dropped off a little more than that a minute ago, so he'd better hurry and gather more acorns. Eventually they'd all start to get concerned that one has more acorns than the other on deposit with me, so about 15 minutes in I'd offer to start issuing them paper acorn certificates, for five acorns, ten acorns, etc, just based on what they'd already given me to hold onto. They'd probably agree to that because it makes it easier to tell who has the most and monitor the competition. At the thirty minute mark, I'd begin to offer paper acorn certificates in exchange for actual goods and services (candy, shoe shine, lemonade, weeding my garden, whatever it is that kids do). By forty five minutes they will have most likely picked the area clean and it will become less profitable to gather acorns than it would be to just do things for me in exchange for paper acorn certificates. At the hour mark I'd ask if they really want to stop the competition right now or keep going, and of course the two losers will outvote the one winner so the game keeps going. If one of them wants to opt out, I'll just remind them why they deserve the flute the most (you're the only one who knows how to play/you don't have any other toys/you made the flute) to stoke the flames of competition. Meanwhile I keep all the acorns and the flute.

Best thing for everyone.

>What if child D provided the material? What if child E provided the tools? What if child A concieved the idea of the flute?

Child B is the one who made it, the other Children gave up their materials for it to be created, that doesn't mean they are entitled to the finish product

It is B’s to do with now and forever.

The others don't play. Child B has a hobby building flutes, so she could just build another. Child c can play with rocks, or maybe ask B to give him one.

B can burn it, break it or anything else with it because it is theirs to do with as they see fit.

My God.
This is why dotr won't work.
End of the day one of us would just start jewing the rest. Like we say about spics food. We don't need spics we have the recipes. Well we also have Jewish recipes too.

Time to give my usual answer to this...
Create a system which rewards B for creating the flute and transferring it to A. Then gas C.
P.S. it's absolutely bullshit that the one boy in the pic is the gibsmedat niggerfaggot, he would absolutely be child B if the creator of this weren't retarded.

its child B's flute.

If child B is smart (which they seem to be) they should sell it to Child A.

If child B is a democrat, they would give it to Child C

Based

Why would child B make a flute that they can't play? How who child B know the flute was made right if they cant play it?

you are all missing the point.
YOU take the flute and sell it or some shit

Give it to B. Or else you are a rapist.

nah m8 don't know when was the last time you interacted with children but boys are really fucking dumb, it makes sense he doesn't know how to do anything except slurp his own snot

boys are borderline retarded until they reach reproductive age, tha'ts when their neurons finally start firing up so they can secure resources to attract a partner to ensure the perpetuation of their lineage

B gets to decide, she can sell it to A, give it to C, or smash it with a hammer in front of them for the lulz if she wants to.

>child b makes a flute she cant play
the flute is worthless and wont make music. i i give it to child a to prove it.

Child C should get the flute, then use it as a dildo to shove it in the ass of child A while child B holds the camera.

Attached: 1533931749005.jpg (480x380, 14K)

Commie bastard

That's Socialism.

Commie would've given it to C because fuck talent, you just need to be thinking the same as the party line.

Take the flute and smash it on the ground.

That way next time the spoiled whinny brats will shut up and quietly share.

Say what you will about capitalism. At least b gets to keep the flute.

B is Capitalism and I agree, the only morally right option out these three.

Attached: CORTEZ EYES.jpg (456x215, 7K)

what if B was the only one given the opportunity to gather the materials as well as tools to produce the flute due to nepotism while she is the only one whose grandparents weren’t born in that place?

Then we put her in a workcamp making flutes until shower time.