Take the Yangpill anons. Most abortions are done by black people anyway blackgenocide.org/black.html "Minority women constitute only about 13% of the female population (age 15-44) in the United States, but they underwent approximately 36% of the abortions. According to the Alan Guttmacher Institute, black women are more than 5 times as likely as white women to have an abortion"
Shills are devoting a ton of resources and time into Yang because they feel threatened. The constant threads mean they’re scared and there’s so many of them you can’t tell who’s real and who’s a shill at times. The $1,000 meme is dead and the spam about Todd Barry’s $2,000 proves it’s just a big joke to them. It’s a psyop to see if our political values are that weak that we would just switch to a democratic socialist for free money. Or to see how nihilistic we really are and using that to their advantage.
>How about we build a wall and deport em one by one? Not going to happen. The one candidate that advocated that won't do it and now wants to bring in more immigrants.
Yes accelerationism is the only way but this is just a retarded amount of shilling and he’s way too centrist compared to other candidates to really accelerate.
HangWithYang 2020 Socialists will die like pigs uwu
Jack Morales
We have to face facts that there are over 11 million undocumented immigrants in this country. Millions of them pay taxes and have American children. Deporting them is impossible and inhumane. Having them continue to live in the shadows brings with it many problems and drawbacks. The best path forward is to provide a pathway to citizenship for those who are here illegally. We need to bring them into the formal economy out of the shadows. I am the son of immigrants and understand those who have come here to build a better life for themselves and their families.
federal minimum wage will be removed, there will be no reason to hire an immigrant over someone born here other than they work harder. whats wrong with that?
Zachary Thompson
I can't wait for Yang to win and completely destroy the U.S, but only for real this time.
I would like to know how military disability would be effected by UBI since it's a different budget.
Nathan Roberts
There is no way he won't. Yangs party, the democrats, will take us back to square one. The economy is going to turn into a fine dust and get blown into the wind when he wins and all the jewish funny money in the world won't me shit when it happens. Can't wait honestly. Getting to use my survival gear > your $1000 fiat currency monopoly money.
Good point. We'll give those illegal spics all the benefits of being a citizen, but it don't get official until they've gotten those benefits for 18 years. Sounds like a good plan. And to think I doubted you faggots when you said he cared about white people.
Kayden Bell
How do I become a citizen before 2020 and vote for him
Xavier Adams
>survival gear kek
Leo Williams
Yeah and there's also illegals getting 24,000 dollars worth of tax returns to which in that case they can send them all fucking back i don't give a shit
Jordan Ross
just illegaly buy citizenship from the dark web
Camden Anderson
Will Yangs UBI it's an either/or to other welfare programs So if its in excess of 1000/month then you'd choose which one you want, if its below you can choose benefits+leftover UBI to 1000/month or just UBI
>Good point. We'll give those illegal spics all the benefits of being a citizen, but it don't get official until they've gotten those benefits for 18 years. They don't get Yangbux migapede. And they are already within your nation because trump is a cuck.
this yang thing aint gonna work ya know.People on pol don't vote. They larp and play devils advocate. Fuck of itatlian faggot talking about American politics anyway
Bentley Sanders
Isn't that kind of fucked up though? People signed up with the promise of an advantage and now he wants to take that away. Wil people get a chance to leave leavethe military based on a broken promise? Will there be some kind of restitution? Or does Yang not care about the promises made to our troops?
Tyler Russell
We are all on to you and we know where you came from we all fucking know who you are quit wile your ahead
Thomas Ortiz
Based Italian
Xavier Garcia
"In fact, his English is really good"
One of Anglin's funniest lines ever. Chairman Yang has inspired the Daily Stormer. Is there nothing he can't do?
Cameron King
NOOO if they have to pay taxes mr bossman will have to pay them more for working his fields!! How will he ever afford his sixth vacation home then!!
Thomas Turner
the right answer is "based", you trumptard. he stands at least for something Trump didn't get shit trough congress, everybody faces the same issue, but this stopped anyone voting for blabbermouth
Brandon Morales
>They don't get the Yangbux migapede Show me those proofs, xir
Sebastian Powell
>yangganganime Jesus fucking christ, do you ever cringe looking in the mirror you fat insignificant fuck? Having to fight between a ziondon and a insectoid, what the fuck is wrong with this shithole
Carson Harris
>It's ok when cars do it. YANG NO NOT LIKE THIS
Robert Campbell
fuck off you kikes yang is a puppet of the jews and if you are stupid enouf to vote on him you are the reason why the west and the white race are dying
Jonathan Johnson
They also get cucked by any inflationary effect of UBI and may move away for a better standard of living. It will be nice when UBI makes Citizens a privileged class of the nation again.
Jacob Hernandez
a thousand dollars
Andrew Rivera
He's not you MIGA Boomer I bet you're not even white faggot
Leo Hernandez
The west died when Freemasons decided to off the aristocrats. the white race is dying out because the cost of living within our nations is climbing faster than the youths ability to acquire wealth. UBI will keep young people out of the cities and producing children.
Ryan Lee
>fuck off you kikes yang is a puppet of the jews and if you are stupid enouf to vote on him you are the reason why the west and the white race are dying >you're the reason the west is dying >the reason OK Mr. Shekelstein
>Yang invokes three common economic fallacies to support his proposal:
>1. Technology destroys demand for labor and dooms future generations to economic misery Yang’s claim that robots and automation are leaving less work for humans and dooming American’s to economic misery is an old and tired line that has existed as long as capital has been accumulated and utilized to make technological breakthroughs. This line of thinking is a continuation of the logic espoused by English Luddites of the 19th century which protested against the substitution of manual labor for employing even the most basic forms of machinery. This is the same line of thinking that leads to protectionist trade policies. After all, a robot or machine isn’t the only form of competition for labor. Free trade, which allows for accessing skills and goods for lower prices globally than can be had domestically was also claimed to be a job killer and economic death sentence. Over the past century, the protectionists have of course been proven wrong as the rise of global trade has led to both domestic and global economic growth resulting in staggering declines in poverty and rising standards of living.
Sure, instead of petitioning to end the use of technology in business Yang and the supporters of UBI are suggesting government handouts via redistribution, but their entire basis for the need for a UBI emerges from this view that Americans are doomed to be displaced by technology and left worthless in the labor market. It seems hard to believe that after witnessing the last two centuries of employing ever more technology in the workplace, and the commensurate rise in objective measures of standards of living over that time, that anyone could even make such a claim in good faith.
Sorry Yang Gang, I'm a single issue voter, and that issue is who pays the most for my vote. Right now, your boy is offering to pay $1000 a month for my vote. Todd is offering $2000 a month and a free govt issued GF (I doubt he can deliver on the GF, but again, I'm a single issue voter). $2000 is twice as good as $1000. Simple math, very simple math for a chinaman. AOC said she wanted to buy our votes, but failed to give us a definite number. Unless Yang makes a counter offer, or AOC and Bernie make a better deal, I'm Todd Squad.
Adrian Lee
2. Maximizing employment as an economic goal rather than maximizing wealth Yang claims the US needs a VAT to stick it to companies like Amazon who are innovating away the need for labor, so that this tax revenue can be used to fund the UBI and create millions of new jobs. Not only do empirical studies find that the rise of technology throughout history does not lead to a long term rise in unemployment, but this leads us directly to the second fallacy of making maximizing employment the measure of economic success and an economic goal in and of itself. Even if the labor force participation rate was set to decline due to the rise of technology, that isn’t something to necessarily fear. The fallacy arises in part due to the fact that the unemployment rate is discussed as being nearly synonymous with the strength of the economy.
Intuitively we should all know that we do not value work for work’s sake - we value wealth, not jobs per se. If simply employing the most labor and resources, instead of creating wealth is what is to be valued, then we would simply make every process as inefficient and labor intensive as possible. But we don’t. What makes people’s lives more enjoyable, what raises their standard of living, is that which makes food and other key goods and services more abundant. If an abundance of resources can be had with less hours worked surely we would all be in favor. In fact, it is clear by our very actions that we value wealth more than work for works sake.
People who speak alarmingly over the rise of automation and technology displacing human labor must be appalled by the fact that the average number of hours worked by full time workers declined by over 33% over the course of the 20th century as technology was increasingly utilized. After all, if employment of human labor is a good in and of itself, we should want to work more hours rather than less. But of course that’s not the case.
William Phillips
3. Consumer spending is the basis of economic growth Following the Keynesian framework, Yang employs the fallacy of consumer spending as the basis for economic growth. Of course, if you measure economic growth as a measure of spending like GDP, less spending necessarily means less growth. Under the current GPD fixated Keynesian framework, it is spending rather than savings that makes the economy grow. But this is merely a matter of the mathematical formula that makes up GDP and says nothing about the logical considerations or intertemporal allocation of resources that should actually be examined when trying to judge what determines economic success.
As Yang’s Keynesian consumption fixated model goes, putting cash in the hands of individuals gives them confidence to spend. And when they spend more money other people receive more money and their confidence rises and they spend more money. And this circular flow continues. Yang employs this narrative as justification to hand out money under the UBI. This is the foundation of the Keynesian framework, which suggests that aggregate demand for goods is what drives the economy and a lack of demand for goods is what causes economic contraction. He seems unaware that great thinkers like Henry Hazlitt intellectually destroyed this framework many years ago.
This model for viewing the economy ignores the fundamental tradeoff between producing consumption goods and producing investment goods. That is to say, it ignores the very notion of scarcity. Before more of something can be consumed, more of that thing must be produced. Producing more of a good first requires investment in capital goods like tractors, or welders, or production facilities. Investment in those capital goods necessarily requires savings, which is to say consuming less than otherwise possible.
Jordan Gomez
vai te fuder seu caralho filho de mil gerações de putas. you yanggang are just a bunch of degenerates that sold the west for a thousand dollars
>half the thread is telling yang posters to fuck off >the the other half are literal foreigners yikes
Andrew Perez
why bro?
Alexander Sanders
we nazis support him as well
Sebastian Sullivan
I saw Yang on Joe Rogan. Kinda liked what I heard desu. Heard this chink's policy on guns was garbage, though, and that he didn't want my vote because I hate niggers and spics and Jews.
