I am glad the pigs are keeping us safe from homeless people eating

WAAAAAAAAAAA DEY DIDNT JOIN IN AND SING KOOMBAYA WITH DA POOR HOMELESS PEOPLE WAAAAAAAAAAAAAA OH NO BUT IMAGINE WHAT DEY FEEL AND HOW HUNGRY!! WHAT IF IT WAS UUUUUUUUUUU?!!?!?!

Fuck. You.

Wish the cops actually intervened in the homeless problem in my town. We're drowning in them. Non locals and church groups come out here and give them tons of food and blankets and more and more keep showing up. Stepping in human shit kinda dries up your empathy.

The worst thing about that pic is FEMALE COP

needed a homeless man to take one for the team and eat it anyways. Could have been a nice shitstorm for KC to cover up.

What is this retarded mentality that keeps coming up online. This is the same levels as tumblr whales going
>IM LIEK GIFFINDOR: SO WHOLESOME AND ACCEPTING :DDDD AND (thing i'm not informed about) IS LIKE SLYTHERIN: HOMOPHOBIC AND EVIL BAAAD BAAAD :((( :DDDD

You mean they're just looking out for us?

WHOSE BLEACH OUR BLEACH

Fuck both those colleges. Hufflepuff is where it's at.

>This.

He should visit California. Checkout some tent cities and how the rivers have ecoli from all the human shit.

Attached: 1550789493302.jpg (640x640, 37K)

>tfw harry potter is the bible of leftist yet there wasn't a single gay couple or a single transgender in original 7 books
Now my memory may be failing me but I don't remember slytherin ever being straightforwardly named "evil" either

The standard answer I see for this is they don't want the liability for if someone eats their thrown-out food, gets sick and decides to sue for an easy pay-day.

Hard to be altruistic when no good deed goes unpunished.

Nah, they pretty much are, the characters of the house are undercut for exactly that purpose.

>Calling people monsters

How is this allowed on (((Twitter)))? What about actual monsters who might be offended?

I don't remember how it was in the books, but the movies made them comically bad for the sake of being bad

based and bleach-pilled. Fuck the poor.

>Who gives a shit?
Public health officials

>Send them to Commiefornia. Problem solved for everyone.
Yeah they can get typus in an AOC/Sanders socialist utopia.

>every fucking burgerflag licking boots
I know I shouldn't expect any better but every time I see it it's just disgusting

By doing this they are preventing the city from getting sued for knowing about it and letting it continue and having some homeless person get sick and die because it's expired shit no one wants or something.
It's a liability thing.

This most likely. Social media has stopped people's ability to think critically about why people do things beyond the obvious answer and instead try and post some zinger where they can demonstrate how virtuous they are in opposition to these people. I honestly think social media is largely to blame for how divided the modern west is.

some of you yanks are alright

virtue signaling was a major thing in the 60s, even before the internet

virtue signalling is basically what created the modern art world

It's hard to tell who we are supposed to be angry at here. The cops for enforcing the retarded law, or the government who makes it illegal to sell food without a license? Or, the homeless people for NECESSITATING the licenses because these degenerates look for any reason to sue over finding something in their food?

Link or it didn't happen.

actually.. yeah youre right

>You're better off starving than chancing day old food.

Por que no los tres?

Fuck the cops. "I'm just following orders" is a cop out for poor morals.

Everything that's wrong with America. This is shameful, it's considered a sin to waste food when others starve.

Blame the courts for giving ambulance chasers the time of day.

This is why all pigs need to be killed on the day of the rope

Lets break it down for you idiots

>unaccredited random people want to feed the homeless in mass without any documentation where the food is coming from
>lots of people get sick
>sue the city for allowing random people to feed you without regulation

These laws dont just fall out of the fuckin sky you children

In what way is it immoral for cops to make sure taxpayers aren't putting up millions in lawsuits on account of like lawyers and broke niggers.

According to homeless people, yes- cause they will lawyer the first chance they get.

If they won't take the steps they need to become not homeless, like getting off drugs, then it's better for everyone if they were dead

Why are American cops overweight? Why isn't physical fitness a requirement?

These authorities are a bunch of faggots who can burn in hell some day soon.

Most homeless are whites who have fallen on hard times like vets. These kikes in blue want to deny them a meal. Let that sink in white man.

I love how both sides managed to make this a left/right issue somehow - and now you retards are arguing over that - instead of seeing Paternalistic government growing ever so larger, to the point of needing a government "license" to feed homeless people. Disgusting NPCs.

I wish they executed the homeless.

It is when you first join but they don't require keeping up afterwards.

France is more civilized on the matter, might want to take a leaf out of their book.

And why is that? There must be a logical reason.

So how does pouring bleach on it make it safer, let alone pour bleach if it's already bad? It's clearly about how it wouldn't generate money the govt can tax.

>get all your food destroyed for not having a permit
>all the bootlickers cheering because "it's against the law"
Cuckservatives never fail to amaze me in their ability to ally with those who hate them

Attached: Screenshot_20190214-194403_Instagram.jpg (1077x923, 515K)

This is inherently left vs right retard. Leftists are the ones who push for big government. Have fun voting NDP next election retard

>virtue signalling is basically what created the modern art world
So you are using the phrase 'virtue signalling' to just mean 'Jews'

The only correct answer

Attached: Screenshot_20190124-110149_Instagram.jpg (1074x594, 243K)

These issues stem from the industrial revolution in which people en masse gave up a lot of individial responsibility to the corporation whose main motive is profit needed to be regulated by the government

Poor morals is allowing these vermin to stay in your town in the first place faggot.

So what's the reason the most "socialist" state in the country can't find the money to outlaw homelessness while providing the basest of necessities- a clean bed/sheets, shower, toilet food/water and a small tv (to keep people out of trouble while you find them a job), while you find them a permanent job/place to live once they can support themselves..... instead of leaving them to sleep/shit doors, eat garbage, and contract/spread diseases?

One wold think that at least from a public health of view that this would make sense; but no one ever proposes it. Why not?

Attached: 1479890385283.jpg (768x768, 209K)

Why the fuck would the city get sued because you ate some bad chicken? America is retarded lmao.

we're cheering because we hate homeless people you fucking hippie.

They eat the food, get sick and sue someone.
On the cops side.

Same here. Left wing town in right wing state, so all the homeless flock here. A homeless guy hastled me for money when I stopped to go in to a restaurant. Told him I only carry a card (true). When I came back out, he had broke off my side view mirrors and peed on my car.

Called the cops. They didn't do anything except talk to him. Then they told me I had to call a tow truck because I can't drive without sideview mirrors. I gave serious thought to following him and stabbing him to death when he slept.

>basest of necessities
>clean bed/sheets, shower, toilet food/water and a small tv
>you find them a permanent job/place to live
>you
LOL why is it my burden to pamper some fucking grown ass heroin baby? I dont give a shit what your place does with them, but I wish mine would either put them in a labor camp or kick them outside our town limits when they showed up.

No one proposes it because no one wants to be responsible for feeding, bathing, sheltering, and finding job interviews (and hoping they show) for mentally ill drug addicts.

>I gave serious thought
What benefit did that bring you? Enjoy giving more serious thoughts as your town gets more and more of these instances. Don't ever do anything though, that'd be silly.

Also you imply that they'll keep the job. That for some reason this time it'll be different. Get real dude, no one wakes up and finds themselves starving in the streets one day in America. Fuck homeless people, literal plague on society.

>implying that poors surviving is a good thing
We should be feeding them bleach directly, not just putting some on their food. Those cops have the right idea though.

Don't feed the wildlife or they'll stop taking care of themselves and become dependent on handouts. The only thing the homeless should be given is a high-pressure bath from a fire hose.

Honestly if you have every tom dick and harry outfit giving tonnes of dumpster-tier shit to populations ridden with needles and hepatitis, you're going to wind up with some botulism and other food borne illnesses, some FATAL. Who's liable then?

>>>homeless person affords attorney to sue the city but cant afford food

oh wait, let me guess there's "pro bono" lawyers who will take this case on because it's a Slam Dunk to prove the reason some homeless person got sick was because of a specific food item right?

>retard can't understand basic law principles
I'll spell it out for you :
>homeless person eats food given to him without a permit in a public space
>homeless person gets sick from food
>homeless person sues city for damages and injuries
>millions of dollars of taxpayer money spent on legal fees, trial, etc. for no reason
Get the picture dumbass?

Because we pay $38 billion to Israel, and countless trillions on bombing rock farmers in the middle east.
God forbid that money be used to try help some homeless animal and keep him from shanking some neighborhood kid or starting a typhoid epidemic.
We're all in this together, be as libertarian as you want, but remember when you have nowhere else to go, and you're the last white man surrounded by brown people, homeless sociopaths, and LGBTWTFBBQ retards that you still have the "free market."

meanwhile the homeless people eat from dumpsters. truly visionary thinking.

I really hate homeless people. You know how if you have to see one or God forbid walk near them it just makes your day that little bit worse.

Every single one of them is some variety of junkie. Impossible to get that way in a gibs flowing society and not be an addict.

I wish they would just poison them or something.

Don't cut yourself on that edge, champ

>Get real dude, no one wakes up and finds themselves starving in the streets one day in America.

I see you've never divorced a woman before.

Attached: 1550525895209.jpg (590x599, 38K)

Homeless people receiving resources means they live longer.

>Actually feeding homeless "people"
Holy fuck, the absolute state of America.

And we have plenty of nigger. I guess being civilized is not the solution.

we're reaching contrarian levels that shouldnt even be possible

Attached: mental gymnastics.jpg (1366x768, 127K)

That's what they're doing with fentanyl / carfentanil over here in leaf land. I swear the government is letting it get into the drug supply to weed out the junkies. It wasn't even a thing outside of palliative care units until about like 2016ish.

The problem is that if any of them get sick or food poisoning from any of the food, a thousand ambulance chasers will sue the everloving fuck out of whoever was kind and dumb enough to give out free stuff.

>Every single one of them is some variety of junkie. Impossible to get that way in a gibs flowing society and not be an addict.
Unless you are in California, then you could be someone who works, but thanks to it being a Democratic Paradise, you cannot afford to live in a home. Well unless you are an illegal.

*ahem*
FUCK HOMELESS PEOPLE

Attached: 1526157293355.png (1000x1000, 177K)

Do americans not have agency?

>Do americans not have agency?
Not anymore for the most part. The only ones having it are the elite.

I'd love to see someone show up to a police bake sale and pour bleach on their brownies, because it's not an accredited business.

Here's the thing. Put yourself in the shoes of a homeless man. You've just come down with a pretty nasty case of food poisoning, nothing lethal but you're not all sunshine and roses. A noseberg finds you and says that he will argue your case in court for free, and get you a cash settlement from the company. Of course you say yes to free money, but what the kike fails to mention is that he takes 80% of the settlement for himself. That's how this works, and why companies don't give free food to the poor.

>Supreme Poster of Jow Forums
You should unironically consider suicide you enormous faggot.

Grocery store chains like Publix will pour bleach into bags full of stale bread from their bakeries because they're afraid homeless people will get sick from eating it and sue them.
They just don't want to be sued.

Why do your courts allow suits like this to happen?

You can sue for literally anything, but that doesn't mean you're going to win.
Moshe Shekelstein finds a sick bum and blames the grocery store and rather than bother with legal proceedings which would tie up resources, they just settle the case out of court by paying some amount of money.
Alternatively, they could just put some bleach in the bag.
It could also be argued that it prevents bugs and whatnot from feeding on it and spreading.

Attached: Juden.png (446x576, 113K)

go fuck yourself chink

>(((Why do your courts allow suits like this to happen?)))
The thing is that the courts usually don't allow it in the first place, what happens is that the noseberg agrees to take a lump sum settlement from the company and go away instead of actually bothering to drag it out through the courts.