Yangfags, how do u not realize you're all just as bad as niggers? literally gibs me dat, the president

yangfags, how do u not realize you're all just as bad as niggers? literally gibs me dat, the president.

you're all either shills, or NEET retards that shouldn't be allowed to vote in the first place.

prove me wrong.

Attached: whystayaliveeven.jpg (600x600, 86K)

whatever dude go eat shit retard
yang gang

Attached: Untitled.png (1281x678, 1.55M)

t. literal welfare nigger
get a job nigger you're no better than a kike

A nigger with a nazi flag. That's neat.

Attached: 1536108396638.png (1180x314, 819K)

To all the rest of you dumb niggers, including op.

>yang support is artificial
>you shouldn't have to be told this
>its a dozen or so people on a "social media team"

>watch for when the funding stops

Its obnoxious but not real. At all

under socialism everyone would just work fewer hours to account for automation, but in capitalism jobs are lost
what is your solution to lost jobs?

they dont understand things like this. youre talking to people with the time horizon of apes. this is Jow Forums after all
yang gang

So under socialism you monkeys would show up to work at a job that has become automated? Like just bring a lunch and watch the robot work? And that's mandatory you say? Fun times.

Capitalism is more competition = more jobs
Socialism is work until the food runs out and starve. So you are also right as less people = more jobs

what the fuck does "until the food runs out" even mean? labor is the only thing that produces value. if robots can work jobs there will be no shortage of food?

based and yangpilled
ideology never got me $1000 a month but voting for yang might

Why would hours from a propane service technician be cut if a candy makers job gets automated? Do you expect the candy maker to go from making candies to servicing equipment that uses highly flammable gas? And when their shotty work kills people? Degrade the whole instead of cutting the loses. That's what you're saying.

no, you would show up and do robot maintenance for a couple hours a day, three days a week

That would still be needed regardless. Capitalist robots aren't maintenance free. Then again I can see how socialist robots would break down more frequently seeing as how they'll be manufactured by honest to god retards.

The YANG GANG BOTTOM TEXT phenomenon will pass as all bad forced meme do. Remember that antifa mascot thing? Ya, neither do i.

Attached: 1552145974768.png (1024x576, 709K)

Our society has not come close to reaching that point yet.
Why am I responding to the dumbest post I've ever read?

Gritty did nothing wrong.

Attached: 1542772544611.jpg (810x455, 91K)

It's not a forced meme though. I voted for Trump and now I'm going to vote for Yang because one of three things will happen:
>A: I'll get $1k/mo
>B: Everything will fuck up and be hilarious
>C: Business as usual
There's literally no downside. I couldn't give less of a shit if he disavows me. I'm voting for him whether he likes it or not.

this is all theoretical. right now none of these hypotheticals apply.

Checked for you having a moment of clarity.

Lets hope you starve, and are forced to experience true suffering during the collapse.

No, I'm going to work and get gibs.

Why do the lazy and disabled get rewarded while the rest of us who weren't born rich are stuck being paycheck to paycheck wage slaves?

Attached: 1533606080375.jpg (713x918, 127K)

Gibs are already being handed out by the bucketload, and niggers get a vastly disproportionate amount of them. Yang's plan would put them into the hands of people who will actually better themselves with it.
We should replace all social welfare programs with a system like this desu.

under socialism work will be distributed to try and make working conditions as nice for everyone as possible.
The total labor requirement of society is the total labor requirement of society, socialist systems try to balance it as best as possible.

competition does not create jobs, it loses them. Under capitalism profit needs to be reinvested into competition, which means things like advertising and wasteful secretive proprietary r&d. Thanks to this the company that pays its workers less has more to reinvest into competition. This is why automation and efficiency will always just result in job loss instead of lower working hours, under the system of wage labor you will never see reduction in working hours, only loss in job, because worker compensation is not tied to what they actually produce, the labor is just bought as another resource.

>Why would hours from a propane service technician be cut if a candy makers job gets automated?
It would happen over time, if something that made candy making much more automated occurred fewer people would be trained as candy makers going forward, and more trained for propain.

You can only do the best you can do in this regard, but over time it creates better working conditions for everybody

Who pays for the gibs? Do you think they will materialize like a venezuelan buffet? The workers will be paying. You and I. You think getting a thousand a month won't be coming out of your check but if you make anywhere close to decent money, you'll be taxed 3k to be given 1k.
The only people who will benefit are those who have nothing to steal. That's nogs, the lazy and the mentally infirm.

Make sure you spell his name correctly on the write-in line.

they are shills, any neets that havent gotten a job already have either been recommissioned, quit or sold. I only feel bad for newfag neets that dont have a base to work with and are fed yang shit all day

I work paycheck to paycheck. I only have 1k in my bank right now. I'd actually benefit from the gibs.

You didn't answer a thing. If a job is automated then it is automated. So as best I can tell is that you're saying everyone who isn't a burger flipper should have their livelihoods reduced to make way for people who can't perform the same function.
A total labor requirement is not an indescribable factor but a series of requirements that each have their own subset of requirements. Farming and waiting tables are not the same function for example.
You can't equally distribute the labor without consequence. That consequence would be low or no output in areas that require training and skill.
I still take your original comment to mean that under socialism the workers are forced to watch robots work. At least that sounds somewhat reasonable.

Then you're assuming I would be ok with giving them. Should such a policy be implemented I certainly wouldn't open up my dealings or finances to the government and would secret away what I have. You're asking to benefit by taking from others so in such a system what would stop me from becoming entirely predatory? Or just leaving?

>You're asking to benefit by taking from others so in such a system what would stop me from becoming entirely predatory? Or just leaving?
The government.

Its about accelerationism you greedy retard nogaf about $1000 per month, its about destroying the economy so USHitler can seize power

The government doesn't stop predatory business now. You think they would try once they have the excuse by saying everyone gets the same base pay?
Plus I'd probably just leave. I have no interest in sharing even more of my assets than I already do with a nation full of people who will not take it upon themselves to improve their position while insisting everyone who makes something of themselves be stripped of what they've accomplished.

Free money does not equal productive goods like food. Everyone getting access quickly results in too many monies and too few sandwiches

>If a job is automated then it is automated
'candy maker' consists of multiple tasks. If one part of candy making is automated, then there is less need for candy makers.
Its hard to imagine any entire sector getting fully automated instantly. It is possible i suppose but in the end it doesn't matter, you can still just do the best you can do at balancing out labor needs, the point is no matter how things were it would be better than it currently is because everyone would already be working fewer hours.

Completely subjective you psycho

Also

You are low IQ, there I said it

>prove me wrong
$1000.

Attached: 1552264887686.jpg (1000x704, 970K)

The good book foresaw all of this.


>>Romans 8:5 For those who live according to the flesh set their minds on the things of the flesh, but those who live according to the Spirit, the things of the Spirit.

Attached: Jesus.png (721x543, 751K)

>under socialism everyone would just work fewer hours to account for automation
Ok lets use your candy maker notion. Mass produced candy is already largely automated. You of course have your mixers and kitchen staff on the kitchen end. Then you have your line attendants and machine operators on the production end. If line attendants positions are automated then those positions don't require a person. So you'd suggest that the attendant should be trained to partially displace the operator. Or should they displace the schmuck flushing lines? Or should they be displacing the guys mixing the candy?
Everyone works less and thus gets less while simultaneously putting someone who wasn't skilled enough in the first place to rise above being a line attendant into a position that can decrease quality and or quantity of the production line. All of a sudden mixing errors go up, shipments get held and profits go down.
Your solution is to kill the company which is privately owned mind you.
So not only is this socialist concept not a solution to the problem but is in fact the best way to add a myriad of more problems. When you see your neighbors house burning the answer is not to set the block on fire.

>HEY white man
>GIBS ARE ONLY FOR NIGGERS!!!!!!

Fuck you, give me my Yangbux faggot