MONOGAMY IS FOR BETA MALES

> This sexual marketplace bullshit that you talk about, coupled with gene pools and racial ideas is laughable will get you nowhere.
Well that's funny, because those exact same principles built the capitalist systems of unprecedented prosperity we enjoy today.
You're welcome
I'm just suggesting we apply these ingenious ideas to the sexual market place for identical results.

pro coper? i have a girlfriend. you, however, have never been near a woman outside of your own bloodline. im surprised you have not mentioned the positives of becoming a pagan. im roman catholic, and when i look at people who follow other religions, or people that are atheists, i laugh

only 10-20% of men will get laid then

And how exactly will you stop people being violent?
Perhaps some form of social control, ie. Governance. Oh, so you do believe in government after all. Otherwise who's gonna protect your precious delicate free market???

Unironically based and redpilled.

T. Known Boss

Attached: Beautiful Native American Women.jpg (476x720, 36K)

> "if I assume the worst of you I win the argument!"
Lol nice cope mate
> b-but I haz a gf!!!
How does it feel competing against that paki chad cock she used to enjoy so much more than your noodle?

In a truly free sex market, women are property.
Men buy, sell, and steal them.
The women still have SOME sex leverage (they're not TPE fuck dolls) but it's all sublimated beneath a more robust masculinity.
But there is still the issue of only the strongest breeding because only the strongest are able to KEEP their property.
The sperm/egg bottleneck problem still applies.

Attached: sperm egg bottleneck.png (1479x2300, 438K)

>because those exact same principles built the capitalist systems of unprecedented prosperity
no, they didn't
cheap attempt to link your terrible idea to something else unrelated that is successful

Exactly.
Private vices lead to public benefits.
We will have a much better race with only alphas doing the breeding.

> imagine coping this hard.

The government will be small and only concerned with national defence.

To prove your assertion you would have to post information of the top contributors towards society and whether these men slayed or not. For example, would you consider men such as Laplace, Tesla and Descartes as beta males? Consider that they were virgins (or near virgins can't remember if Laplace would bang his servants)

And how exactly are you gonna convince all those angry incels you disenfranchised and cuckolded to die for your right to continue doing so???

>MONOGAMY IS FOR BETA MALES
>t. Beta male

Ask the Muslim elites of old and their harem of hot bitches and hordes of jihadists ready to conquer for them.
It can work.

> genetic fallacy
le burger education.

>Open Banking app on puter
>Check amount of zeros

mo money mo sexy

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 198K)

That's actually another great argument you brought up. Why is it that nation's that did not practice strict monogamy get outdone by Christendom when it did?
And if your opinion is that it's due to race, back when monogamy was not common practice in all of Europe, shouldn't by natural selection, the polygamous European kingdoms or tribes defeat the monogamist ones?
Explain your reasoning

I'm pretty sure Islam is quite monogamous. It does permit polygamy, but it's certainly not a norm to the extent that it deprives the average Muslim of a wife. Go figure retard.
I have a hard time imagining your system being sustainable.

Go see a map of the Ottoman Empire.
Bigger than virgin monogamous Roman Empire

But the otts got roasted by the West and even when they were really large they couldn't completely take ahold of Europe
Or do you have evidence that their falling may have coincided with their adoption of monogamous practices? If so, you might be on to something

I will tell you what will happen in your idealistic orgy society of "free choice".
You will alienate 90% of your men.
If that mass does not overthrow and murder you for your depraved practices, a foreign horde of monogamous men will and slit your throat and redistribute your whores amongst each other. The end lmfao!

What fallacy? You make a retarded point by applying retarded lolbertarian ideas on human nature. There is no fallacy if there is no argument.

They conquered Iberia, the Balkans, and twice almost took Vienna. But hey, no Empire has a perfect war record.
What has this got to do with my point?

Ok, go read up on what a genetic fallacy is.

The order is first polygamy giving rise to monogamy giving rise to cuckoldry (feminism).
Where men are impulsively violent there is polygamy. The strongest, most powerful control all the ass.
As men become softer and less willing to fight, they turn to monogamy. Because monogamy appeals to everyone's basic sense of fairness, it is much easier to defend than polygamy.
But as the men grow weaker they reach a point where their females take over.
And that's bonobos.

So now, in the west, we have all these bonobo males too weak to protect their borders from the normal (strong) chimps moving in from 3rd world.
They're stronger because poor living conditions have kept them stronger. And now that easy living has made western men into bonobos, it's happening.

The fact that the great Ottoman empire at its peak was halted by monogamist Europe (and eventually pushed out) must mean that there was something within the European system that gave them the upper hand against the otts

Yeah but the Ottomans beat plenty of monogamous cultures. I guess polygamy wins after all! But what an arbitrary argument you're making.

Not state-enforced - socially enforced
And here is why it needs to be socially enforced:
Men build society, period. In fact women adds inefficiency to a society, but are necessary to ensure its perpetuation across time. In the time before agriculture only 1/17 men reproduced, the Chad'est of Chads - But a society of our complexity cannot be build/maintained/protected by Chads alone... And women won't help on those points. Civilization requires that the betas pitch in, but breaking your back to provide power, heating and running water to Chads babymommies is a level of cuck very few would stoop to.
What makes men live on oil rigs in the middle of the ocean for months on end is not the paycheck, but rather to provide for a wife - with children he can be fairly sure is his.

Most likely some technological advantage.
Technology is how the weaker men win against the more barbarian kind.

Well. My guess? Example: I’d die for my one, loyal faithful wife.
I wouldn’t die for the twelve missus I’m banging on the side

>women adds inefficiency to a society

If it weren't so early in the year I'd go ahead and nominate this Understatement of the Year.

>implying Europeans of the time were weaker than Otto mutts

Good plan, until you realize 90% of men would remain virgins, and just like the arab spring destroyed the middle east (tons of young men with nothing to do, no work and no women) the beta males will destroy that society . It's all ready starting with the mass shootings really.

Societies with internally cooperative structures (eg monogamy) consistently produce superior men than internally competitive societies (eg polygamous).
Look at Chechens; it seems every Chechen guy can do infinite pull ups and push ups, are experts in grappling, know how to strike, and can handle weapons well. Could you possibly imagine a soft-handed virgin John Galt or a presumptuously arrogant Henry Rearden winning against a typical Chechen?

I wish i could say ardent idiots like OP were becoming less common.

Your argument from the thread and using the otts as an example for my question, as i understood, is as follows:
1. Polygamy leads to only alphas breeding the women
2. A divine, mysterious guiding force will ensure that this mating strategy in the aggregate will create a more efficient and innovative race
3. The ottoman empire is such an example of said polygamous civilization (according to you)
Taking this into account, if i understood you correctly, the Ottoman Empire should have been then capable of conquering the whole of monogamist Europe when it tried, rather than fail (and later on even be dismantled by these same monogamous forces)
What then, lead to the defeat of the superior practitioners of polygamy from the Ottomans at the hands of the European people's?

We need genetic engineering you stupid caveman.

Monogamy is human nature. Yes, you can have different partners in life who you love, but you can only feel romantic love for one person at a time. Love usually lasts for about 15 years, because it took this long for your child to grow up. The purpose of love for the father is to protect and supply his family, and for the mother it's the protection and caretaking of the newborn. Also you feel different kind of love for your kid because you shouldn't want to fuck them. There, I proved you wrong. I learned this last year in biology class.

This.
The only difference between a school shooter and a ka-boomer is whether or not a cult got to them before their collateral suicide

Attached: qwXZCFU78B8ucBFW85.jpg (755x754, 162K)

Holy shit is that Paris Jackson? She looks fine af

Look at it this way; pygamy turned a bunch of barefoot illiterate Bedouins to the heights of a powerful and feared superpower. Breeding only the best women with the most alpha men they created a great and powerful Empire. So what it didn't beat Europe? Does the Persians losing to Sparta, or Hitler to the RAF suddenly negate the glory of their empires???

Jokes on you, no woman dead or alive would be interested any ways

Ha ha

You should be a muzzie and kill yourself for 72 virgins when you can't find a woman irl

*polygamy

>Pygamy

Polygamy can’t fix your spelling at least.

>Everyone will be much happier.
That's where you're wrong, kiddo.

Brigitta Bulgari

>Turkroaches
>feared
What is with Jow Forums lately? This board is fucking shit. Roaches aren't polygamous you dumb faggot kangaroo, that was reserved for only rich people. Ordinary roaches still had a single wife and family it wasn't as if no one fucked except the rich you dumb homo

But in the case of National Socialist Germany it was a great gang up by the sane monogamous forces. I'm completely ignorant of the mating practices between Sparta and Persia so I can't comment on that. But the entire premise of your thread is that polygamy leads to success at a greater scale than monogamy does. If that's the case, then why didn't a polygamous European force servive against their monogamous opponents and why did monogamous Europe eventually blow the whole world out of the water at such a degree that everyone else may as well be ants?

> spelling error

Attached: images-7.jpg (328x448, 27K)

Are you just going to ignore the poo?

>you can’t reply to me unless it’s to debate me

I’m good. That other guy is wrecking you enough as it is, I’m just spectating.

Words are our servants not our masters.
Intelligence and tech can be seen either as compensating for weakness or as extended phenotype making one strong.

Easiest way to understand this is the Martians in "War of the Worlds"
Physically weaker than humans but clearly way smarter and more tech advanced.
So how you judge Martian strength is a matter of frame.
(In fact Wells' fictional narrator compares what the Martians did to white imperialism)

Imagine not wanting one faithful woman who you can be completely open and honest with. Imagine not wanting kids with that woman and coming home every day to them and having dinner and sharing how each of your days were. You’re fucking gay OP

Monogamy has been a staple of civilization before marriage was even a thing. You fags are all talking about the rich and noble classes, not the ordinary people

not really.
It pretty much leads to war, as in killing, raping, and plundering.
Numerous examples from history not worth bringing up in this post.

I'm humoring the Aussie

>What is with Jow Forums lately? This board is fucking shit
>Implying Jow Forums was ever good
But memes aside, the shills have really ramped up destabilisation efforts and jannies are purposefully not doing their jobs. If they continue this way, Jow Forums is going to be unusable (and that's what they want).

Remember to stay clear of slide threads.

>The invisible hand of sexual selection
Will Lead to a bunch of single moms sucking money from daddy government. Absolutely degenerate!

Attached: IMG_0167.jpg (1024x807, 84K)

Agreed.
Anonymous internet alpha bros are a dime a dozen.
But they do, at least, start threads where important things can be discussed.
There is lemonade to be made from such lemons.

Women are sexual selectors only if men can defend it. Naturally, men can fuck any woman they can beat the shit out of.

Lolbertarians are so fucking retarded.

Attached: images-8.jpg (437x336, 32K)

Attached: somalia.png (900x600, 518K)

No.
Monogamy is the only way to ensure your focus is purely on raising your children. If a man divides his attention to go chasing pussy and being a disloyal asshat he cannot be a good solid father. He is not there to educate and protect when he's off wetting his sausage like a teenager. There is no trust or respect for a man who is ruled by his dick.
Has very little to do with the wife, a man should easily tolerate and control anything his wench can throw at him, if she is a failure, remove her, don't run off like a coward and leave your offspring.

>The invisible hand of sexual selection will lead to a fitter gene pool and a more efficient and innovative race.

I know your post is bait, but you're actually right for the most part. Where you're wrong is what I quoted above. This isn't actually true because there are things like Fisherian runaway selection. Evolution doesn't always lead to the most efficient results. The solution is eugenics. Beta males and low IQ subhumans should be sterilized. The answer is a Nat Soc approach to sexual selection, not a (((capitalistic))) approach.

lol die alone loser with no kids and no one who loves him xD

Monogamy is the big-dick enforced state of alpha power over faggot poofter cuck cunts like OP. The indivisible union between OP and sucking cock is only further sexual faggotry that will lead to a gay gene becoming more effeminate and inbreed race.
Everyone will be much gayer.
Get rid of this AIDS-riddled faggot cuck central menstrual-swallowing queer known as OP.
Only bravo males get in the deep end of fucking up the state of OPs face.
Real men just fuck OP right up.
Proverbs remind us of the truth
>Protip: OP is a fag

Attached: 1542972098644.png (588x556, 285K)

Raising kids is much more than just fucking, my little friend.

Attached: 1551996067397.jpg (720x958, 51K)

Those are niggers. Real libertarianism has never been tried.

Why are you telling this to a bunch of incels?

>OP
Well gays keep on shitting out aids-cum infested turds every day so there is a constant fresh supply of OPs being created all across the country every day. Only way to stop it is to plant bombs in the toilets of gaybars

Really? You mean libertarianism is linked to impulsive dysfunctional niggers?
Imagine my shock.

>Remember to stay clear of slide threads

Cuz we got some big master plan for the preservation of the white race that's being de railed by them.

> alpha polygamist
> has pic of pornstars in his archives
Imagine my shock.

this, this, this
Imagine peddling an ideology where people die of thirst and you control all the water
Of course the unfuckable incels of Jow Forums (read, all Jow Forumsacks) would disagree
just bang their wives behind their backs lol

Actually it’s not state enforced it’s a contract between two consenting adults and it forms the backbone of a thriving civilization and raises decent well adjusted children rather than children raised by single moms, the state, daycare. It’s why we didn’t have massive autism, school shooters, kids with adhd and kids loaded up on depression pills back in the day. You want to live in a nigger based muh dick society move to a tribal/polygamist society and see how that works for you.
If a woman married a beta that’s her own damn fault.

>he doesnt know about the consanguinity in the middle east
Wew lad...

>Alphas take what they want and never compromise on them, beta's make up rules for civilization.
Honestly, this.

In a Nazi world the entire board of directors (past and present) of companies like Nesquik would be brutally tortured to death for the selfishly motivated crimes they have committed against desperate and poor people.

>Big master plan
Do you find not being a homo or a pawn of wenches so difficult ? It's really a very simple thing, if you have the inclination.

>Monogamy is the state-enforced distribution of pussy. That’s socialism

OK, so where has anyone ever cevieved a state-distributed pussy.

your premise is already wrong, ergo so is the rest. OP is obviously honestly low iq retarded, you're an idiot, the /thread post trash.

Attached: op 96rtfg.jpg (497x427, 44K)

If civilization is so beta, then why do civilizations conquer and out populate meagre "alpha" tribes of primitives???

>a man should easily tolerate and control anything his wench can throw at him

Knows about immigrant threat to jobs/security.
Check
Knows blacks are dumber than a box of rocks.
Check
Knows Jews aim is to marginalize him.
Check
Knows about family court judge.
???

Ah, yes.
Keep taking your daily dose of 2/3 of a red pill.

You summed up my argument against the OP

I don't play your beta VS alpha games kangaroo kike. If you would step outside your filthy anime squalor den you'd see that the people practicing polamory and polygamy are typically hippy faggots or mentally ill.

>Evolution doesn't always lead to the most efficient results
Nope, evolution can weed out errors only when they first appear.
But (not being a force of intelligence) is unable to undo any established errors and so produces 'ad hoc' solutions that generate circularity in a system.
See this a lot in sexual selection. Birds in particular. (e.g. male widow bird's tail feathers, peacock feathers, etc.)

>women instinctually seek out desirable traits

No. They do not. We are still cavemen and our instincts lead roasties to fuck mcthundercock in his mcmansion. These are not traits of a powerful man. These are the traits of a man whom fucks as many women as he can in a day.

>Technology
>implying

Attached: uncle.jpg (1200x1200, 214K)