NASA Lies

Attached: ! 1524379536521.jpg (750x615, 95K)

Attached: ! 1530607999395.jpg (612x807, 112K)

Attached: ! 1533001666204.jpg (720x548, 78K)

Attached: ! 1544781228714.jpg (1199x550, 477K)

Attached: ! 1544778329305.jpg (960x960, 114K)

Attached: ! 1545224501312 (1).jpg (720x568, 77K)

i love this
i love this so much
really
nothing screams "75 IQ dumb fucking retards with access to the internet" more than flat earthers, anti-nasa shills like op and other assorted subhumans
it makes me smile every single time

Has nothing to do with flat earth it has to do with everything you thought you knew to be true is a lie !

Attached: - 18446551_10155275995443908_370626034734181710_n (1).jpg (960x960, 91K)

Attached: 59u89r349u8uy38748.jpg (768x768, 106K)

lay off the vegemite steve

THE EARTH IS FUCKING FLAT

Attached: 753847589743.jpg (540x540, 42K)

Mainly because those pictures do not present correct perspective, and scales (aka distance of the moon.)

Attached: main-qimg-a83e543c09995927ec4e773b92f95b7b.jpg (602x452, 51K)

Attached: 11702849_850503308336750_7245930964155770806_n.jpg (640x426, 37K)

Attached: - 1509460032684 -.jpg (600x600, 72K)

Attached: - 1509879510251.jpg (960x960, 166K)

fun fact: "makes me smile" is a metric self absorbed morons use.
No one cares what makes you smile, you're not special.

Attached: 938493274723.jpg (500x500, 95K)

Attached: 421948732748.jpg (539x537, 38K)

just watch it.

You can do it yourself.
youtube.com/watch?v=95NDkABAsSk

This is the most Reddit post I've seen in a long time. GTFO newfag.

Attached: kys faggot.jpg (500x341, 42K)

Dust
Wind
Dude

thanks for proving flat earth

...

.

Attached: g.png (635x344, 142K)

Oh really? Tell me what does that video prove... As it doesn't prove flat earth, just the opposite.

(nasa photos/space station is another thing.)

that's a distortion from camera lens.

inside the circle should be the most accurate distortion-less picture (further you go up/down or sides the so called Pincushion distortion takes place.

It shows about ~0.2' curvature inside the circle

Attached: distorion.png (1605x734, 380K)

anyway, in terms of NASA, ISS

youtube.com/watch?v=BJZ9sqvH9dY

anyway, in terms of NASA, ISS

youtube.com/watch?v=BJZ9sqvH9dY

ISS Israil secret service

That perspective, and each corresponding, makes it even worse..
The earth should still look bigger on the moon, than the moon appears from earth.

It does brainlet

I recommend taking a look at the so called "Dolly Zoom" where focal view is being changed on a camera. It should also help to explain why the perspective on the photographs of earth/moon etc doesn't look realistic. (and we need to remember they do use lens with curvature, not a straight one.)

Everyone is full of shit at the cgi astrophysics club level of secular worship of satanic imagery designed to detract and decieve while they profit off new space tech

>Anonymous
Dont wake the sheep

They all using an A.

China an nasa both using discs....
hmm.

Nice string.

Why freeze it at that shot, cuz you knew the lens distorted teh image.
Original image of that vids is clearly curved.

Even slighty...

Explain planets

is anybody here? i have a tinfoil theory about this is you want to hear it.

Kek

And here I thought the brain drain was exaggerated

Have you seen one?

***VIDEO EVIDENCE OF CURVATURE***

Watch this first before replying with "but muh fisheye":
youtu.be/cHhDhYeYf2Q
Then this
youtu.be/dV99TJ9KlJQ

/thread

Attached: lens-distortion-graphic.jpg (650x403, 86K)

fuck yes i do.

gotta admit
only stumbled in this thread because i had the same opinion like you.

whilst the thread still hasnt convinced me, if you look up the apollo missions, you will without a doubt get to a point where you have to question credibility.

Anti-science obscurantists should be culled. I'd have no issue looking them up in databases and raping their entire families.

They're giving the future on a platter to Chinks and Pajeets

t junior researcher

Attached: ecbert6.jpg (1024x683, 56K)

NASA has been going thru some reforms

this, we must cut NASA Funding so we have more Money to give to Israel

>you will without a doubt get to a point where you have to question credibility.

Like, what point, you fucking mongrel ?
What seems IMPOSSIBLE to have happened, technically, physically, computationally ?

Attached: 1528735496420.jpg (1129x1200, 118K)

>heh you think the moon landings happened? My phone can emulate N64 games at 60FPS and it can't go go the moon, checkmate moontards

Attached: 1512701610206.png (403x448, 53K)

op please take your worthless life

great.
first thing to understand is that nasa and cia are both headquartd (and connected by tunnels) in langley.
secondly we know from disclosed documents that cia is in to weird shit like psychic reseach, wormholes time travel etc
thirdly, the sky is a clock and filled with LIGHT and energy
so i propose that the space component in nasa is exoterically about OUTER SPACE, but esoterically about INNER SPACE (think astralprojection) and IMMINENT SPACE (think space-time and the space all around you.

just a tinfoil thesis ive been working on

>working on

Schizophreniac stream of consciousness is not work, user.

flat earth is a psyop jesus christ

you ever heard of the well being poisoned?

>you're drinking the fucking coolaid retard

>gypsy still believes that 50 years ago they went to the moon 6 times in a short period and havent been greater than 400 miles above earth since

yes, buy a fucking telescope, you can literally see the rings around saturn

All of the evidence for a flat earth are coming from memeflags and an austie.
Ok sure.

Attached: f41.gif (250x250, 1.23M)

/Look Into It/ General?

Attached: bravo.jpg (626x602, 58K)

Well, since it obviously happened, why would I reject it ?

I haven't internalized communist propaganda meant to condition you to fall behind Eurasians in technological development.

Attached: 1510200764305.png (211x239, 4K)

Don’t listen to these regressive shills Jow Forums
spinoff.nasa.gov/Spinoff2008/tech_benefits.html

Attached: B82CB785-C2D2-4191-A358-F4EE4B173606.jpg (750x444, 231K)

dude every philosopher in history had (((mental illness))) by todays standards.
gtfo here

or they were particularly well adjusted and clear headed intelligent, observant people - especially like John Stuart Mill, Bertrand Russell or Karl Popper.
Where's your ''philosophy'' ? Nobody engaged in the process of science thinks about ''exoteric and esoteric'' components.
Astral projection...fuck off, Daisy Ridley.

Attached: 1507938380974.jpg (1582x2048, 626K)

>the time a romanian calls you a mongrel - cant make this shit up
btw do you mean the dog or the web server?

anyway..
strange thing: tapes lost, rocks lost,...

it was mankinds most glorious moment, you would think the agency in control of it would take care of everything remotely important for furhter investigation.. but nope. not nasa

i dont think we never went to the moon but idk if a man ever stepped on the moon.

Ever see a man stand in front of a really bright light?

You know piolets and various birds of prey use the sun as cover.

oh yeah... one more quote i read somewhere about this: Space Travel is the only kind of Technology which managed to go backwards. And that is unfortunately true.

that gif holy shit! kek

Remind me again how obvious it was when we misplaced the telemetry data and lost the technology to go back? is that how technological progress works in the gypsy camps?

>Remind me again how obvious it was when we misplaced the telemetry data and lost the technology to go back?

this is a crucial question

what ever dude. your talking about (((philosophy))).
there is an entirely different world out there waiting for you if you just look for it.

Same way we lost the technology to go to the space station for a decade

Not really, just because the current rockets in production today aren't powerful enough to send people to the moon doesn't mean they're not vastly more efficient and have way better on-board technology than the Saturn V

Ok here’s where I’m at. NASA is obviously composed of people who genuinely believe they are working towards a goal, while one section really knows what’s happening, compartmentalizations if you will, they obviously didn’t go to the moon, but I don’t think the earth is flat, maybe they are hiding something on Antarctica but it can’t be flat

>anyway..
strange thing: tapes lost, rocks lost,...

it was mankinds most glorious moment, you would think the agency in control of it would take care of everything remotely important for furhter investigation.. but nope. not nasa

i dont think we never went to the moon but idk if a man ever stepped on the moon.

I asked you what seems far-fetched technologically or physically. What COULD NOT have happened, you mongrel ? Not your opinion on their opsec.

>>the time a romanian calls you a mongrel - cant make this shit up

Meanwhile I do voronoi tesselation simulations of hydrostatic flows in convective shells of main sequence stars. What the fuck do you do ? Does your day-to-day existence involve a lot of differential geometry ?

Attached: minres.jpg (1280x720, 48K)

Fuck the Saturn. That's superfluous.
The F-1 engine was a DEATH TRAP and it's almost statistically unlikely that it worked so many times through the whole cycle.

Please find me engines today capable of 263 m/s specific impulse AND burn time of 3 minutes.
Please find me a management framework in which such an engine would pass safety protocols.

Attached: pau.png (720x812, 691K)

so wait your job is to make fake cgi space (((SIMULATIONS)) and shit?

SO YOUR LIKE A LEGIT SHILL?/?/???????

FAGGOT