Modern social justice is just hating on straight people, white people, men, Christians, non-fat people, etc. They don't care about equality. It's about hate. Equality is a guise, the excuse they use to justify their racism, sexism, and other discriminatory practices.
MLK said to not judge by the color of skin, but by the content of character. I believe this is what conservatives do when they hire based on merit, not based on race or gender.
Other urls found in this thread:
unqualified-reservations.org
twitter.com
Social justice isn't a real thing.
It’s all cultural Marxism taught by commie professors, why are majority of SJW’s students or women? Easy targets for indoctrination.
That image is retarded by assuming women were an oppressed class to begin with and "only third wave feminism was a problem!"
Thanks for your unique and interesting insight
Don't use grape-kun's tragedy for your political arguments.
It's a mind-virus
unqualified-reservations.org
first wave feminism: tolerable
second wave feminism: radical dyke degeneracy that aimed to dissolve the heterosexual nuclear family
third wave feminism: the logical outcome of the 2nd wave, something to support in fact if you accept accelerationist theory.
>third wave feminism: the logical outcome of the 2nd wave
I believe this as well. 2nd wave feminists try to distance themselves from 3rd wave even though they caused it
Well, not being able to vote is a form of discrimination, right? I'm cool with women's suffrage and equal pay (we have already achieved both) because I like to treat everyone fairly, but I'm opposed to the modern rabid hatred towards men, forcing diversity, public nudity, and other crazy shit that feminism has become.
Selling equality always needs an oppressor.
Even much of the first wave was very socialist, friend. The trick is that even most men shouldn't have been allowed to vote, let alone most women
see
They define the conflict in ways that ensure it will never achieve its aims. Whenever women feel they’re happy, the media will tell them they are only content because they have internalized sexism. This way the puppet masters can constantly pit groups against one another because no one even knows what the goal posts look like let alone where they are
>Well, not being able to vote is a form of discrimination, right?
Everything is discriminatory. Specially from a biological viewpoint.
Still, the "suffragettes" lovers always forget to mention why women couldn't vote. Democracy is a relatively modern thing. Only nobles and aristocrats could vote, because they actually had things at stake as they went to wars. Then this right extended to the commoners under the condition that they could be conscripted and go to war. Women wanted this right without the responsability of conscription. That's what they've always wanted: the same rights without the responsabilities that come along. Like they want quotas for high paying jobs today but not quotas to work on sewers or construction who are the most dominated jobs by men. And since we've yielded all this time that's why you get the purple haired monsters, they want to keep shittesting you.
As a side note, I'm against universal suffrage for both men and women. There's way too many people that shouldn't be allowed to vote and it's a system that's too open to subvertion.
>having cancer wasn't so bad until I started dying
lurk more newfag
I didn't know that, thanks. I know that the average person can be surprisingly stupid but at the same time I wouldn't want a group of people or a single person rule over everyone else including myself.
>I wouldn't want a group of people or a single person rule over everyone
There are plenty of alternatives to that.
Anti-statism, ethno/religious nationalism, libertarianism... Still, if you look up Athens' democratic system it was much different than what we have now. What we have is a perversion of what it used to be. We don't choose policies, we choose politics. So it can't be a direct democracy, specially when betraying your political program after you've been elected have zero consecuences.
> rape culture
What the actual fuck this supposed to mean?
It was all Frankfurt school degeracy, right from the first wave. It wasn’t even supported by most women of the day, because the concept of the social contract still existed. Women naturally didn’t want to be summoned for jury duty or drafted into combat. They prefer their natural duty as home maker. We can see that it only took a decade after suffrage to introduce us to lovely things like the Great Depression, an overhaul on government intervention, and the NFA. Suffrage was a mistake, and, AT THE MOST, only women who are currently serving in the military should be allowed to vote.
world that is not led by insane feminists
rape is bad
all men are rapists
even if they dont rape
therefore all men are bad
therefore women have the moral high ground
therefore the ends justify the means as long as the goal is to empower women (whatever that means)
They think there are men whose hobby it is to have sex with women without their consent. Of course there are some rapists, but this is supposed to be a very common thing according to them. Really, it means sluts can accuse innocent people of raping them and people will believe the women with no evidence.
True, there are other systems, but I'm too much of a realist to believe in big changes.
>Social Justice
it's the attack on white procreation
all male draft
check mate fems
