Nazism = LEFTISM

Reminder that Nazism is another form of Socialism and therefore is a form of Leftism.

Like most ideologies, it founds itself on some truth (in this case, that Jews are the ruling class of the world and are the cause of many of the problems we see today). Consider it in just name alone: "National Socialism".

Hitler, like many socialists today, advocated for state controlled education, health care, media, etc. Religion was denounced and replaced in favor of worship of the State. It's also during this time that degenerate behaviors, such as Homosexuality was allowed (some high ranking nazi soldiers were in fact, gay. Hitler said something along the lines of "I really don't care what they do")

In truth, Nazism exists to subvert actual right wing values. Nazism at its core is collectivist (in favor of state control) and authoritarian. It's also imperialist, in the sense that it seeks to conquer other territories and unite it under its one, central government. This is just like communism, but with a farce of nationalist identity. This is uniquely on the left, and does not identify with the right hand path.

Assume Nazism gets fully realized and all non-Anglos are purged or turned into 2nd class citizens. Instead of having a class-less and race-less society governed by a ruling class, you'll have a central race governed by a ruling class (and guess what, you won't be in that fucking ruling class, buddy).

For this vision to be realized, mass genocide must occur. Anyone deemed any enemy must be eliminated at all costs.

For any authoritarian rule to exist, mass genocide is inevitable. Does this make you better than the kikes who want to eliminate the whites? Assuming this gets fully realized, you'll simply replace the Jews as a ruling class. You become the very people you despise.

Is that what God and Jesus would want from you?

> National Socialism
> Socialism

How do people on Jow Forums justify that?

Attached: hitler.jpg (1000x1500, 241K)

Other urls found in this thread:

mega.nz/#!Y3wWBIgI!-KwOf1mFjrqZChX_PkkJyRC8oBGpM07hXMvGB53XRJo
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master–slave_dialectic
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Another retard who doesn't know the difference between Strasser and Hitler. Look up night of the long knives...

I am not familiar with the night of long knives. Is there a reliable place for me to read up on it? Any vids or books perhaps?

>state controlled education, health care, media, etc
There's literally nothing wrong with that. Even communism isn't wrong in that aspect, the problem is the SJW shit they bundle in. Capitalism by the way promotes the fuck out of degeneracy. What system do you want OP?

Read about it quite a while ago but it is pretty much Hitler ordering the purging of any actual leftists/socialists from the nsdap. Particularly Gregor Strasser and anyone asociated with his beliefs as Hitler deemed them to be marxists and just as bad as actual socialists.

>There's literally nothing wrong with that

really means "nothing wrong in indoctrinating in what I want them to be indoctrinated. Capitalism doesn't promote anything. Capitalism is merely the social relations established in an exchange of goods with different perspectives of value (the buyer and the seller), a.k.a a market-based society. what promotes degeneracy is the forcefully produced culture by the ruling class that uses corporatist strategies invented by fascists and late soviet politicians.

So you advocate for Hitler not being a socialist because he killed socialists? Stalin did the same in the great purge 1937-1938.

Brought to you by the Daily Boomer.

I will read up on it then. I am determined to find an effective solution to the cultural marxism impressed upon us, and it seems subversion is abound everywhere you look. I've heard / red in a few places that Nazism is leftist, yet I also see Jow Forums strongly pushing in favor of it. And from what I know, when Jow Forums is behind something, there's some truth to it. It's important that I learn more about it. Thanks

I want a return to a true constitutional republic, in which megalomaniacs and narcissists are kept in check and people achieve and gain position through their merit. A system that closely models the path of God (strong faith in Christianity, emphasis on the family, personal responsibility and pride in one's heritage and nation).

From what I know, America's original republic is the closest we've gotten to true personal freedom that keeps (((evil))) at bay.

I am not a boomer, I am Gen Z.

I didn't say it was the goal of capitalism. My point is that capitalism will necessarily expand into degenerate circles to market to them (because companies need to constantly grow).
The capitalist sees a working white man and a trust fund feminist the same: as potential customers.

Tldr
Happy Hanukkah faggot

All of your news sources are capitalist endeavors! What reality do they portray? Look around you. You really want media oligarchs and intelligence agencies dictating your reality and the reality of those around you, because.... principality?

There primary motivation is profit. How do you illicit an emotional response in sales? Prey on fundemental instincts, including fear and rage and to do that efficiently... you must alter reality.

Say what you want about the fascists of the golden age, but they reestablished societal tenants that restructured their countries and stripped degeneracy of all of it’s power. And that did include limiting capitalism both morally and ethically. Purging the creators of degenerates from their borders and sometimes from their own existence.

Say what you want, but they were not wrong.

>A system that closely models the path of God (strong faith in Christianity, emphasis on the family, personal responsibility and pride in one's heritage and nation).

Clerical Fascism is a thing, I highly recommend looking into Corneliu Codreanu.

Attached: 0EC4E410-240E-41AC-A448-00A528774C20.jpg (620x620, 98K)

Nazi's desire a daddy government who parents every citizen just like most idiots in the world.
They're pretty good at shooting bolsheviks and globalists though so they're pretty useful.

Kill yourself BOOMER

So why is it that every neo nazi and "hitler dindu nuffin" crowd are all extremely conservative and anti freedom?

>nazism is collectivism
The entire right wing is literally a bunch of npc clones. They have the same talking points, they believe the same shit, they vote the same way, they're aligned behind the same one issue, left bad. There is absolutely no individuality or nuance on the right, everything they don't like can be categorized as "The left", "SJWs", "Communism", even if said topic has nothing to do with any of those things.

Lol claiming today's world operates through pure capitalism. Read some John Locke, you'll learn that society and capitalism require a rule of common law applied to all individuals. The reason because you're mad is because your ruling class has grown so much that now they put themselves above law. Degeneracy and corruption do not come from capitalism, they are its destroyers. The last thing the ruling class wants is a capitalist system that'll allow any scrub on society to grow, they want a cast society where they are untouchable, above the law, and that's the dystopia you're living rn. Create a fascist superstate (because muh morals) and you'll see the ruling class taking the position of saviors and pretty much guaranteeing their power. Hitler was a Zion servant, he was not breaking any trends or any power structure. He was guaranteeing it.

say what? So you saying the beautiful works of art and engineering of Renaissance Italy was degenerate? It was all funded by capitalism. You're living a fantasy you created where you live in a capitalist society today and its all bad. No, today's society is a corporatist, socialistic society, full of corruption and deception. Today the ruling class uses methods of propaganda and dissuasion that were invented by fascists and late soviet politicians.

Nazism holds a different definition of "socialism" which does not mean Marxism. There is no wealth redistribution in Nazism. All welfare is meant to be funded by the state's few nationalized, profit-making businesses. Welfare and public programs are not meant to be funded through taxes. One hope of Nazism is that taxation itself can be done away with (if you listen to Gottfried Feder). Nazism also holds gun ownership as a fundamental human right, to be infringed only in absolute emergencies. The German Weapons Act of 1938 eliminated restrictions on rifles and shotguns, for example. Imperialism is also not a central component of Nazism. That's just what Hitler did. Nazism would not have a state consisting of multiple different races, whether it recognizes different white ethnicities as being so different or not. Different races should remain separate.

Read Mein Kampf before you try to take sides.

Attached: 293856934966.jpg (900x563, 111K)

If you want a system that follows the path of God, keep in mind that Christianity forbids usury. Say "We should abolish usury!" and see which faction doesn't treat you like a vampire.

Spoiler: It's us.

The art of the renaissance era wasn’t funded by capitalism, it was the guild system that allowed art to flourish during that era. The guilds resemble trade unions, or syndicalism more than free market capitalism.

First day, bud?

Don't be like that. It takes people a long time to come to any understanding of National Socialism that goes beyond "Put Jews in ovens and hail the Fuhrer."

>I am not familiar with the night of long knives
this is shit you learn in public high school

Attached: (You).jpg (651x610, 49K)

the guilds merely organized labor division and taught newcomers to the profession. They had no ideological "muh labor, muh property" or "the means of production belongs to the proletariat reeeee" narrative. All the resources that funded artists came from the rich Italian families that made money through free Mediterranean trade.

Fine.
OP, compare the tenants of natsoc vs the ideology behind marxism.
Global socialism vs national socialism
Forced conquering of lands not your own vs isolationist policy in benefit of your people
Shit man, rules for radicals vs the 14 words

This is true for both sides, 95% of opinions are parroted, left, right, up, down, it doesn't matter, people are merely products of their indoctrination for the most part.

We have a natural inclination against free thought and for conformity

Yeah, besides that it's just trash socialism. But if you say that in retarded Jow Forums one of two things will happen:

1) Jow Forums will inform you are a jew
2) Jow Forums will ask where you got your information, you'll mention the books you read, and they will say the writers were leftists or jews

>you'll mention the books you read, and they will say the writers were leftists or jews
Is this because the book you read is The Vampire Economy, written by an angry antifascist in the 1930's?

true. Jow Forums is complete garbage lately, just a bunch of fags shilling for their political bias. I don't think this board had a good political discussion in a long time.

Sooo... a power struggle? You do realize that 2 sets of the ruling class cannot coexist right? At least not for long.

No, it wasn't. I base my arguments on more than one source.

You might want to give one at this point.

>it's socialism because it's in the name!
Socialism is such a vague term that at this point it just means "the government does things". Hitler's socialism is different from marxist socialism.
>state controlled education
This is a good thing if your country isn't burdened by public debt and you can largely afford an education system. It's also good when your government is dedicated to support the existance of your people instead of actively trying to undermine it.
>Religion was replaced...
False, just outright false.
>in favor of worship of the state
That's a lie. Fascism is based on the supremacy of the state. National Socialism is based on the supremacy of the people; the state is just an instrument to further its existance.
>Homosexuality was allowed
Wrong. The traditional family and high fertility were greatly promoted. Also, among many things, the first tranny clinic (Institute of Sex Research) was burned to the ground by the Hitler Youth. The homosexual elements allowed in important positions were there only because they were National Socialists before faggots.
>Nazism is collectivist...
It's collectivist in the measure that allows it to recognize the importance of individual achievement and give it a greater purpose so that the whole people can benefit from it. Again, Hitler's socialism is different form Marxist socialism
>and authoritarian
Enjoy getting flooded by niggers because lemmings are bleeding hearts and vite for open borders you kike. Hitler had the maximum responsibility togheter with maximum powers and if he ever acted against the interest of the people in a significant way he would be faced with death as every german performed military service and had a gun.
>central race governed by a ruling class
>implying racial homogeneity is a bad thing
>implying democracy is a good thing
>implying social mobility isn't a thing
Get out of your suburb sometimes fag.
(1/2)

Attached: FBB6B0FA-CAF3-4532-B1E7-808EA18FDF19.jpg (306x423, 58K)

(You)

Attached: download_20190312_143029.jpg (750x561, 91K)

>mass genocide must occur
Deportation is sufficient.
>MUH KIKE PROPHET FROM THE DESERT SAID YOU SHOULD SUCK NIGGER DICK REEEEEEE
Stop listening to the rabbi and read what the actual Bible says.
If you think National Socialism is leftist you are mistaken. National Socialism surpasses the traditional left-right paradigm: it takes something from the left and something from the right, and only the elements which help further the existance of the people. This is because its objective, as opposed to traditional parties', is not to hold and accumulate power but to further and improve the existance of the people and its quality.
Sage goes in every field.

Attached: 1523132772691.gif (260x242, 625K)

Yeah it sucks but we are responsible, we're the ones getting baited so easily and too lazy to make real threads unfortunately, myself included

Si, you don't know the rudiments of the history of the movement you are speaking about, but decided to make that fucking tl;dr post?

I read "Wages of Destruction", several articles on the Liberal and Mises Institutes (economy articles). I also built some of my ideas on criticisms of economic policies on the book Economy in one Lesson, by Henry Hazlitt. And then some extra local books of general history I own, and articles produced by Olavo de Carvalho, one of our philosophers/political scientist, greatly responsible for the recent uprising of the right against the socialist government in Brazil. These are a significant part, but there are other ones. I'm still getting more depth, got a pdf of mein kampf here to read about nazi propaganda. If you have further suggestions that I can find at least a pdf with not so much difficulty I'm interested.

>nazis are socialist because they have socialist in the name
You’re not even trying anymore.

We got to teach him, or else he'll just keep being blue pilled

Read this
>mega.nz/#!Y3wWBIgI!-KwOf1mFjrqZChX_PkkJyRC8oBGpM07hXMvGB53XRJo

Attached: 41QZoxrplHL.jpg (313x500, 31K)

I actually frequently make threads with hopes of actually having a discussion. It works rarely. Sometimes it gets raided by shills or trolls. Most times it just dies out to archive, nobody is interested in reasonable discussion.

REPORT ALL RULEBREAKING, COPY-PASTED TROLL THREADS

STOP REPLYING TO BULLSHIT!

Attached: What is Fascism.png (886x1322, 125K)

I'll look for the book myself, I ain't clicking links in Jow Forums lol

So, out of all of those books, what facts have you learned?

wow what a basic bitch opinion, thanks for the Facebook status update, Lauren

back to r*ddit

Nazism practices corporatism, which in reality is just an ideological background to support an alternative to socialist planned economy. Socialists themselves of the Frankfurt school realized that the socialist economy instantiated by Marx doesn't work. That was around the early 1920s. The Austrian school of economics nailed the coffin by demonstrating that socialism doesn't work through the economic calculation problem. Since then, socialists attempted several new models, abandoning the classic Marxist fundamentals. Even a hardcore Marxist like Noam Chomsky recognizes the shift in socialist ideology at that period. Mussolini broke from the communist party with the goal to create a new model for a centralized national economy, and that was based on a system that preserved the principle of private property, but utilized heavy lobbying and mafia-like tactics (that is my own comparison) to control the economic output. As any centralized economy, fascism, and therefore nazism (it received great inspiration from fascist ideas), it counts with the same problems: the slow death of economic output through bureaucratic economic planning and central taxation to support national industries that are doomed to become inefficient. Eventually, the soviet socialists themselves attempted to use fascist central planning, which they perfected to create the most monstrous big daddy controlling and corrupt State possibly in the entire human history. That is a basic outlook on my own conclusions based on my readings.

Don't be so dismissive. People who make posts like this are usually just interested but cautious.

>fascism and therefore nazism
I've been yelled at one too many times for likening the two to let you get away with that. You're calling Nazism both corporatist and centralized? Don't you know that Nazism doesn't do bureaucratic economic planning and central taxation? The corporations are privatized and the taxation is meant to be as low as possible. That's what happened in the real Nazi Germany, you know.

>When not a single post in the thread is even moderately close to being right.

Capitalism is a Mode of Production based on PRIVATE OWNERSHIP OF THE MEANS OF PRODUCTION, wage labor, profit motive and markets. Capitalism is intrinsically related with the modern era, industrialization and the expansionist/growth mindset.
Even if the term capitalism was coined by leftists all classical economists were aware of the shift in how society operated during the industrial revolution.
The presence of a state or how much control the state exerts over an economy is not a factor in categorizing capitalism, as long as the means of production are owned in their majority by individuals it is still capitalism.
>but muh gubbirmint intervention not freedum and capitilism is freedum
capitalism historically is not free, the bourgeoisie has been involved in and manipulating politics even before democratic republics were the norm. Unless you want to go the "not real capitalism" route, you gotta accept that state intervention means shit.
Simple trade does not constitute capitalism, trade happened all over history and it was not done in the same manner as capitalism. Ask any historian, of any school, the only ones who disagree are unfunded lolberts revising history to push their shit ideology as human nature.

Socialism on the other hand Mode of Production based on PUBLIC OWNERSHIP OF THE MEANS OF PRODUCTION, socialized production and (atempt to) increase overall living standards.
If the means of productio are owned localy or via a state, if production is centralized or not, are all variables in a socialist system.

So using the prior (corect) definition Nazi germany and other fascist states are unarguably capitalist societies. As a matter of fact all fascist regimes sprouted as a reaction to heavy communist organization and were supported by capitalists. And all those that were not destroyed by force were eventually removed when the dust settled and commies were not a threat.

Attached: images.jpg (187x270, 16K)

The modern democrats and others who call themselves leftists are in fact pawns of the wealthiest international capitalists to ever exist

Natsocs aren't left wing, they're just retarded, literally a shit ideology only idiots can get indoctrinated to

you're surprised Jow Forums can't get the most simplest things right?

Fuck off, Dinesh.

>Nazism is "blank", therefore "blank"
>Is that what God and Jesus would want from you?
Fuck god and nigglet Jesus, christianity is for slaves.
Paganism will triumph.

Low taxation was targeted to productive members of the nazi party, meaning they were submissive to the party's central economic planning. Don't pretend like they were some sort of Laissez Faire madness.

>I am not a boomer, I am Gen Z.
Fucking hell go die you're an embarassment to all Gen Z.

>Is that what God and Jesus would want from you?

Imagine praying to a Jew God...


You are fucking blind.

>bourgeoisie
>memeflag

Fuck off. Capitalism is not a system, it's a social fact by sociological definition. You had capitalism long before "muh bourgeoise" was even seen as a class. It's the system of exchange between humans with different perspective of value, a.k.a market society.

If you were to read that book that was linked earlier, you'd realize that's not the case. Gottfried Feder wanted to abolish taxation in general, and he was Adolf Hitler's economic mentor. The top tax rate in Nazi Germany in 1941 was 13.7%.

dios mio.... la ignorancia...

Oswald Spengler - Prussianism and socialism

define socialism you retarded gypsy faggot.

You are claiming trade is capitalism (como esperado de um macaco da nossa lixeira ancap).
Capitalism as the word is used today refers specifically to the mode of production you can whine as much as you want but that's it. you can say trading is human nature and it might as well be i don't give a fuck. Trading can and will happen under socialism.
Markets on the other hand do not constitute capitalism either (google market socialism). For markets to exist there needs to be a competition among multiple sources of production and this was not the norm for most of human society as we were hunter gatherers that shared resources within the tribe for mutual survival. Ancient agrarian societies developed markets but those were mostly composed of family businesses so they also dont calssify as capitalism because work relations were completelly different and capital was not viewed, used or traded in the same manner as today.

Attached: 246edcd9b50002a239fd8f417ef69abf2d6f047d9e1369781cc3c8b2efabe6ef.jpg (1000x710, 145K)

>Nazis were socialists because they called themselves national socialists
>Just because you call yourself a woman doesn't mean your not still BIOLOJICULLY MALE

Pick one. By no means did workers in Germany control the means of production. In fact they used a lot of slave labor.

>Bump
>Seconded

"For any authoritarian rule to exist, mass genocide is inevitable. Does this make you better than the kikes who want to eliminate the whites? Assuming this gets fully realized, you'll simply replace the Jews as a ruling class. You become the very people you despise."

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master–slave_dialectic

" I'm not familiar with the Night of the Long Knives"

Good lord you don't read much and it shows. You'll fit right in the with jew blaming morons around here.

Medbro.... don't be retarded... it was in no way socialism come the fuck on, use your head.

Wrong. Read up on the third position. But I can totally understand why you can only see the left/right black/white limited spectrum, being demoralized and all.

The KPD(communist party) was funded by jews and they're biggest enemies of the NSDAP. Any government that prints interest free money, like the National Socialists did, is inherently anti-jewish and anti-leftist.

Okay.
List some major differences.

>leftism
>americanised politics
don't fall for this meme eurobros, youre not as braindead as the civic nationalist mutts

The socialists were killed BECAUSE they were socialists. Stalin killed communists and socialists because they threatened his power, not because they had the wrong ideology.

Means of Production, the fact they had currency, the fact they had private property, the fact there was no intent to become communism, the fact they were nationalist, the fact they were more preoccupied on race than they were on class, the fact they themselves admitted to believe in "class collaboration" as opposed to "class warfare/revolution/liberation"

Btw the literal ONLY difference you need to differentiate between a capitalist and socialist economy is who the fuck controls the MOP,

you're not my bro, mick. Also Europeans are just as braindead as Americans, the only difference is that we're America's bitch.

+
Was it the gulag and kulaks?
Maybe how production was ultimately achieved?
There's nothing else big enough do distinguish.
As Hitler said, they are similar, but not the same, but even that meant mostly different laws in production.

Yes indeed, as I was going to say.
That's, that's not enough.
You see centralized authoritarian regime on both sides. There's a reason he called his movement Nazi.

>That's, that's not enough.

WHAT!?

>Centralised Authoritarian Regimes

are you autistic? That's Marxist-Leninist and Maoist Socialism you utter retard, you can have socialism without being authoritarian or centralised, what the fuck is Mutualism? The difference is private property and means of production, you don't get to decide what differentiates what, Marx does. And Marx says this is what differentiates Socialism from Capitalism you retard. It would be like calling yourself a Fascist but wanting Anarchism. Anarcho-Fascism isn't a thing, National-Anarchism is.

>Nazism = LEFT

Its not leftism, you utter retard.

Illiterate, self-agrandizing drooling thundercunt.

"The 3rd alternative" was chosen because capitalism and communism are both cancer.
At the very least google up a wikipedia article before putting your fat american cheeto-dusted fingers into the heavy work of typing your braindead autofellatio resonnement.
Nazism also contain ultra-conservative, ethno-nationalism with multiple traits also linked fascist ideologies.
You are so desperate to affiliate Nazism with your personal opposition, you ignore this. Cannot tell if its blind party loyalty or literal retardation that motivate you into doing so, but you are equivalent to a downs-syndrome mulatto with severe autism either way.

Go cuck yourself for Israel. Ultrafaggot.

Attached: OP again.gif (200x200, 843K)

You are completely appreciated for the kind gift of intergalactic travel for my sides but you're totally brainwashed and ultimately useless.
>200m.
Stay silent or you'll be thrown in the gulags.

I was a natsoc you fucking retard.... the actual irony in what you said is palpable...

>Was
Kulaks like you are being hunted as ghouls.

as i said before centralization is a bullshit word so is economic planing when defining what is capitalism or communism.

if all the companies are owned by individuals who contract workers and profit over them it does not matter if there is a dictator telling them how they should do it it's still capitalism. Besides you also have to take in to consideration the fact that the capitalist had great influence over the fascist states, and their profits increased. They might no have been governing themselves but the government was definitely governing for them.

Attached: gee-i-sure-hope-i-dont-have-to-send-anyone-3201902.png (500x639, 127K)

Hopefully you'll outgrow your phase when you get through puberty and your balls start dropping, faggot.

If there's someone controlling corporations, it's not capitalism, user.
I should also say, we haven't seen pure capitalism anywhere in history but I'm not as hateful or crazy low-IQ as commies to support such a test, many times, in failure.

>I am not familiar with the night of long knives.
Don't start retarded threads when you don't know shit next time pls

>If there's someone controlling corporations, it's not capitalism, user.


AAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

>we haven't seen pure capitalism anywhere in history but I'm not as hateful or crazy low-IQ as commies to support such a test, many times, in failure.

BAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAPPPWWWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

At least I'm not butthurt.
Let thy bottom hair grow even more I guess.

Or just take the Islampill.

Not a Nazi ideologically, but
>State control
Everything is "controlled" by some organization. Why does calling it a "state" changing anything? What is it that actually changes when a state owns or provides something compared with a business? If a single business owned and provided everything, would it be any different from a state? Is it authoritarian for a business owner to exclude others from their business?

I simply see states as providing a kind of service, and think that the optimal means of meeting peoples demand for these services is through a decentralized "market of states". I view globalism, as a form of central planning, even if the global system attempts to implement capitalism.

In that sense, I would view a world consisting of 200 independent Fascist states to be preferable to a world consisting of a single capitalist state, even though I would rather live under capitalism than Fascism. I guess it results from not viewing all resources and services equally. The services provided by a state are more fundamental than most resources and services provided by "businesses", hence I view keeping the implementation of the state decentralized to be of higher priority than keeping most other industries (barring necessities such as food) decentralized, and see most of today's problems arising from the "political representation industry" being effectively centralized.

Someone, controlling the means of production like let's say, Stalin, is capitalistic?
Well, what a productive discussion that it.
Beddit was never good at stuff like this, or other stuff in general. Anyhow.

Attached: Tanya011.jpg (1920x1080, 231K)

Who has time to argue with low level jews every fucking day or read all their bullshit.
This is now a Hitler appreciation thread.

>Literally has never heard of the Vanguard Party
>Doesn't know what Marxist--LENINISM is

LOLOLOLOLOLOL nigga... keep talking please.. you're making me laugh my ass off, really

Copy-pasting this from another thread, since it's relevant here too.

Global capitalism contradicts itself.
This can be seen by considering the state itself as a product.
There are many possibilities for how to implement a state, and there is no reason to assume that they are equal.
The question then becomes
>What is the optimal method for designing and maintaining states?
Globalism is literally the application of central planning to this problem, and it fails for exactly the same reason central planning fails anywhere else.
The most fundamental market is the market of states, since all other economic activity takes place downstream from rules defined by a state.

Globalism is to society what communism is to economics. If your society is everyone's society, then any investment in maintaining your society becomes a dysgenic act, as others who don't make this sacrifice can instead invest their resources into outcompeting you within the society you maintain for them.

We can also consider political representation as a resource. The suppliers are states, the consumers are people. As a single entity can only faithfully represent a single position, supply is limited by the number of independent states. As similar people can more easily compromise on issues, demand is limited by the homogeneity of the people. Globalism moves the market of states toward a monopoly, reducing the supply of political representation. This causes increased competition on the demand side for the benefit of the supply side, which is why the establishment is always in favour of globalism. However as the demand side is the people, increased demand side competition undermines homogeneity, which further drives up demand, creating a positive feedback loop and a race to the bottom.

Among their most destructive memes is the conflation between
>Unity -> unifying people -> reducing demand
and
>(((Unity))) -> unifying states -> reducing supply

United we stand
(((United))) we fall

Attached: gap.jpg (715x1000, 719K)

Reminder that no one gives a shit what political system we have if there's no niggers, spics or jews in the country.

No Jews implies no usury.

No idea about the vanguard party.
I do know Marx was the economist who had the theory but Stalin was the failure (as all the later testers) who committed the most brutal Mass killings in history.
Why would you think I don't know about Marx or Lenin, is there something I typed not a fact?
Focus on the matter in hands, we're not in the gulags.

>Reminder that Nazism is another form of Socialism and therefore is a form of Leftism.
Your conclusion does not follow. Many things have gone under the name of socialism, some of them right-wing (albeit in degraded and far-from-ideal form). The right-wing entered into "socialism" with men like Henri de Saint-Simon and Auguste Comte, that is to say, they "overlooked" equal liberty in favour of hierarchy and authority. Theirs was certainly a degraded and decadent form of right-wing thought, but right-wing it certainly was. The Nazis stand in this tradition.

What certainly is leftism is liberalism, i.e., what your country is founded on and what you continue to defend with all the usual dumb slogans about liberty and equality.

Achtung! Achtung! Boomer alert! OP is a faggot.

Attached: OP.gif (150x148, 930K)