Is globalism really all that bad?

>Is globalism really all that bad?

Attached: replacement3.png (2000x1557, 1.08M)

technically the white population has not gone down in any countries. Just their proportion to other groups. If globalism reaches its end then all people will be free to move where they want which will bring about mixing. But as long as each individuals will is to impeded as to whether they want to mix or not then nothing is wrong in my opinion.

>Globalism is an inevitability due to technology.
No, that's war

>Governments have only ever gotten bigger with time rather than smaller.
Rome would like a word

>In order to achieve things that are greater than just our nations we have to work together.
Incorrect, the US got to the moon by itself just fine, and most of the countries of the world are a drag on achievement rather than a beneficial potential cooperator

>Globalism stops wars. We understand that because we have nuclear bombs war would mean mutual self destruction for most countries.
The exact opposite is true. People thought this same way a hundred years ago. Norman Angell even wrote a book about how it was mathematically impossible for the developed world to ever have a war again because of how interconnected their economies had become. He published this book in 1911. He was a smart man, but he was dead wrong. ONLY interconnected countries go to war. Brazil will never declare war on Madagascar. They have no connections, and no conflicting interests. But if you don't think the EU is precipitating another european war, you're kidding yourself. It is not globalism that has kept Europe peaceful for 70 years, it's outright military occupation by an overwhelming force.

Because some people don't think liberty and freedom are part of their identity or self worth. You are an imperialist attempting to foist your values on others. No matter how hard you try, Afghanistan will never become Minnesota.

youtu.be/DQM0i0fGovY

Zero-Sum

to add, you must subtract.

So I lose my job, so a person in 3rd world country can have it?...what identity and self worth do I have when I cant support my family?

Fucking kike

Attached: Cointelpro_Techniques_for_dilution_misdirection_control.png (1169x6371, 868K)

>No, thats war
I would say its technology because technology is the ultimate agent for creating human freedom. Once people are free, all people, then we are all equal and on the same terms. Which allows for globalism.

>Rome would like a word
Rome grew and fell, but now we have an even bigger government, it may fall but why should it not follow the progression.

>Incorrect, the U.S got to the moon
They needed the german scientists though.

>The exact opposite is true.
but that doesn't deal with the understanding of mutual destruction from atomic weapons.

All great societies are imperialist, this is the empire of technology, capitalism, and liberalism. It has created this world that we know and could continue until we are all free and equal to buy mcdonalds. Can't be that bad.

Are you brown and/or a mutt. Is India being overrun with outsiders? No? Then yeah, you would think as much. You're a statistic, not a human.

Attached: mutt.png (1117x402, 1.01M)

>the white population has not gone down

>The average total fertility rate in the European Union (EU-28) is calculated at 1.58 children per woman in 2015
>REPLACEMENT MIGRATION

It's hard to accept I know, but there are the facts.

Attached: europe-fertility-2015.png (585x486, 112K)

Alex Jones is a perfect example, no matter how hard he tries we move towards globalism, he will go to any lengths to say whats causing it but we all know its just natural progression of freedom and technology.

Why would you lose you job? I doubt you would be fired if you are qualified. I have stated i am against affirmitive action as it still believes in nationalities.

I have been actually wondering this, I went from libertarian -> national socialist -> strasserist and now I am exploring these thoughts.

Im white, english heritage. We are all human. I want the best for all people.

fertility means growth. The population growth has stopped being a large growth, that doesn't mean they are not growing a little bit. The "replacement" is simply a replacement of growth. The growth from Canada comes from immigrants and immigrant births. It doesn't mean white people are dieing or not having children.

>technology is the ultimate agent for creating human freedom
Or if you're the chinese, the ultimate agent for creating a paramilitary security state

>it may fall but why should it not follow the progression.
The "progression" is rise and fall. No one rules forever, and "common sense" is the worst guide to the future one can have.

>They needed the german scientists though.
Need is far too strong a word. They used german scientists. They didn't need them. And regardless, they were americans by that point anyway, they were not members of a foreign nation cooperating with the United States, they were naturalized citizens of the US, working for the US.

>but that doesn't deal with the understanding of mutual destruction from atomic weapons.
There's no threat of MAD from anyone but Russia. War with the US just means destruction of whoever decided it was a good idea to hit the US. Regardless you could make the argument that nuclear deterrence stops wars, but nukes are not a feature of globalism, they are a feature of military technology.

Nothing lasts forever. US culture and liberalism are not universal values. You can impose them on others, but you cannot force others to identify with them. And as long as you can't, your system will fall eventually, same as rome. You could create a global culture only if there was a global people. There isn't, and won't be.

I guess we'll just have to wait and see then.

>Why would you lose you job? I doubt you would be fired if you are qualified.

Wouldn't matter if I'm qualified or not.

If a corporation sees some kid in a grasshut is willing to get paid for pennies compared to the dollars I make, if/when globalization becomes more prevalent "competitive wages" will become an idea that send everyone to the poor house.

> I have stated i am against affirmitive action as it still believes in nationalities.

Nope, that's the whole point of globalism, to bypass the rights of established people. You can be against it, sure, but the reality opens it up to abuse of power.

eventually wages and benefits will go up in those countries as well as they develop and then there will be a global standard working condition and the worker and labor movement will be unnecessary.

Globalism may bypass national sovereignty but theres no such thing as group rights. There are only individual rights.

Fuck off and kill yourself, jew. And take your retarded ideas with you.

Not really, anyone who's paying attention has known the fate of globalism since 2008. The world is not growing more interconnected. It certainly was, for a time. And now it is being blasted apart.

I want you to think about the summer of 1900. Europe dominates the world, the European imperial system is overwhelmingly powerful. Europe is amazingly wealthy, and it is at peace. And the common sense of the time that everyone shares is "this is the natural order of our time." And it will continue. As previously mentioned, a man named Norman Angell even writes a book called The Great Illusion, in which he proves mathematically that the great powers of Europe are so economically interdependent that war is totally impossible.

Twenty years later, Europe has ripped itself to pieces, a generation has been slaughtered, its empires have fallen, and it's been saved by a strange third world country called the United States, who then leaves the continent to wallow in its newfound misery. No one really knew what was going to happen, but everyone knew one thing in 1920: Germany is finished. After the great war, Germany will never be able to recover.

Twenty years later, Germany has conquered France, it is astride Europe as no one, including Napoleon, has ever managed to be. It is dueling with the British over the fate of their empire. And the one thing that all common sense will tell you: this war is over. With the fall of France, Germany is ultimately invincible, and they've imposed a new order.

Twenty years later, Germany is occupied by the United States and the Soviet Union, divided in half. The Soviet Union is allied with China, and everyone knows that war in Europe is almost inevitable. It will be a nuclear war, and the pivotal point is China, which we all know is completely insane. Once they get nuclear weapons, it's all over.

Twenty years later, China is allied with the United States against the Soviet Union, who appears to be emerging as a great power to truly rival the US. The occupation of Europe continues, and the United States has fought a war. Not in Europe, but in Vietnam. In 1980, one thing was certain: The USSR is a permanent feature, and we must be prepared to make an accommodation with them. This is no longer the US's world.

Twenty years later, the Soviet Union has collapsed. It no longer is, and now the common sense is that the real issues of our time are economic. Davos man has arrived, and with him a rejection of Machiavellian power politics. The European Union brings wealth and prosperity to all who join it, and China has joined the World Trade Organization as a market economy. We humans are now able to lift our eyes from warfare and division. And then 9/11 happens.

Twenty years later, the US has been engaged in constant warfare throughout the islamic world for two decades. A financial crisis which started in New York eviscerated the European banking system and caused the Chinese economy to falter, leading to the eventual installation of a permanent dictator whose power overshadows even Mao. Russia has seized territory in Eastern Europe, and the EU does little but squabble amongst themselves while member states divorce themselves from the union, whether officially or unofficially. And in the United States, an ex-reality TV star has claimed the presidency on an explicit policy of "Every country for themselves!"

There are two lessons you can learn from this. The first is that common sense is the most misleading tool you can use to forecast events. The second is that what is now is almost inevitably not going to be soon. Nothing is inevitable, least of all peace.

thanks for the response

Good work.
Call out the leafs where ever they are, give them no chance to spread their lies.

Attached: 1539213187720.jpg (627x784, 112K)

Jews control America therefore they control the world because of globalization.

Doing God's work user. May the wind blow in favor of your gas.

Attached: 1552166232504.jpg (567x460, 38K)

Lmao you pathetic leafs never fail to make me laugh with your "is globalism a good thing" threads

Face it, most nationalists will be infinitely more successful than any of you sad virgins ever will be. You are on the wrong side of history, get over it newfie niggers

Useless.

Sounds nice in theory until you realise that free movement is only desirable to third worlders. Do you want to go live in bumfuck Uganda? No you fucking don't because it's full of niggers.

globalism only works if everyone is intelligent. We need to start an incentive based sperm donation eugenics program to cure stupidity and make everyone smart.

>incentive based sperm donation eugenics

no, just incentive based...

youtube.com/watch?v=ILXlKshp-kI

that’s libertarianism not globalism. globalism is the equal abuse of all local communities and local environments by a panel of bureaucrats who are controlled by money and who don’t actually live in any of the local communities or environments they abuse. libertarianism doesn’t work either, btw.

If you truly believe this is even a possibility, you are in fact mentally retarded. Kill yourself.

Global Aryan Imperium is the future. After the eugenics wars, when all non-whites have been wiped out by race-targeting bioweapons, this galactic reich will be established.