I don't get the holohoax denial thing

Fuck off JIDF

>why do you murder your slave labor as you are losing a war?
Several reasons, they become insubordinate, too weak to work, it deters mutiny.

>why use gas used to fumigate factories that would linger for hours and is obviously less efficient than a bullet, bayonet, or knife?
They've tried this. Initially, Jews were just killed indiscrimantly in their hometowns. This method is too in efficient because it encourages mutiny from other Jews or good samaritans

Again, 20%. Common sense.

I will if you answer a question. How about that?

the JQ pill comes last, take the other first

But it's the easiest thing ever to make up casualties during a war.
Especially for states like the Soviets and UK experienced in dealing with deception

>1 post by this ID
How about responding to your own thread faggot

Not amout of common sense can stop gas passing through wooden doors.
Try harder.

Which points are false and why?

>A council of centralized Jewish leadership that has no documentation or evidence to ever existing decides to fake "the holocaust" as part of a plot to take over the world and enslave the Master Race
Why does it have to be a centralized Jewish leadership? Why can't it be jews looking out for jewish interests? Don't rabbis talk to each other? Do jews not do "what's good for jews"?
>Plant the seeds for decades (centuries?) in advance long before WW1 even happened (Jow Forums often uses the old "six million" references as evidence of a conspiracy)
six million seems to be a religiously important number. The number six certainly is (6 pointed star, 666, etc.)
>None of this is ever discovered or found out
It clearly is. As evidenced many times on this board and other places. What are you even talking about?
>Somehow orchestrate in the middle of WW2 the mass disappearance of 11 million people including 6 million jews and 5 million non-jews
How do you know 11 million people were missing?
>covertly relocate these people secretly to ??? (Israel I guess?)
Yea, look up the transfer agreement between Hitler and the Jews. It wasn't covert. They had an open agreement.
>build all these complex facilities and phony camps that were actually resorts with theaters and swimming pools and etc
They were clearly concentration camps. Do you know what the word "concentrate" means?
>falsify thousands of documents, photographs, etc
Like what?

Attached: 1512340147740.png (1645x2520, 3.63M)

The entire thing is utterly riddled with logical fallacies, it's not about being wrong it's the fact that it asks the wrong questions. I suspect this was written by somebody who believes that they should question the holocaust but has no idea why.

Ok.

>create thousands of fake mass graves and fill them with fake bodies in the middle of nazi-controlled territory
For example? Also, I thought they burned the bodies. Why would you have mass graves for burned bodies?
>pay off millions of witnesses of dozens of nationalities, none of whom EVER break the silence that they were in fact in on a gargantuan conspiracy
Millions of witnesses say they saw Nazis systematically exterminating jews? I don't think that's true. I think you think that's true based on propaganda.
>Pay off every single historian to have existed at the time or has existed since, they're all in on it too and none of them ever blab
Check out David Irving on YouTube. They ruined his life for legitimately questioning the holocaust. You don't have to pay people off if you can just scare them away.
>All the nazi's are in on it too as not one of them denied the holocaust took place at their trials, just their individual responsibility.
Haha, at the show trials? You've got to be kidding? They were trying to stay alive after being captured by enemies of war.
>The leaders of every country in the world is in on that, including both sides of the Cold War
The communists were heavily controlled by Jews and Germany was an enemy of Russia. Do you know any history?
>Jews coordinate all this despite no real method of communication at the time. Moreover not a single document exists of them communicating so it was all psychic I guess
They're constantly worried about and coming up with stories about being shoad. Why was the term "holocaust" pushed so heavily before the war?
>No paper trail of this MASSIVE unprecedented operation that has spanned now many years exists.
Paper trail of what exactly?
>Somehow THIS is more believable than the nazi's killing the people they said they always wanted to
I don't think anyone denies that Jews were killed in Nazi Germany...
Seems like you don't have any idea what you're talking about, user.

Attached: 1502211661133.jpg (900x1046, 189K)

>Several reasons, they become insubordinate, too weak to work, it deters mutiny.
so like every other POW camp in history until "muh holohoax never again" now we treat our enemies like our friends and haven't won a war since

>Not amout of common sense can stop gas passing through wooden doors.
This is literally not true. Which camp and room are you referring to which had the wooden doors? Cite your sources

If the Holocaust is indeed a hoax, then why don't deniers post evidence of conspiracy or collusion instead of holocoasters and soaps from obviously deluded witnesses?

>now we treat our enemies like our friends and haven't won a war since
Lol wut?

You sound like a faggot

name one war we've come out the conclusive victor in since WW2

Desert storm.

I still don't know what you're talking about or what this has to do with the Holocaust.

Failed to take out sadam, back 10 years later NEXT

6,000,000 Jews killed via poisonous gas
>No autopsy report confirming death from poison gas
>No official documentation ordering extermination of Jews
>J..just take our word for it, goy.

Attached: 1538181139038.png (127x204, 42K)

>Failed to take out sadam
Not the point of the war. The main purpose was to defend the nation of Kuwait from Iraq.

Starving emaciated and brutalized prisoners of war was SOP until after the holocaust. They treat the images of those skeleton people in pajamas like it was the worst thing, never before seen tragedy. It wasnt, thats just what happens when you have POW camps and all your supply lines get cut by the enemy. If the germans had magically invaded mainland US our jap prisoners would have looked exactly the same

Attached: 351px-Andersonvillesurvivor.jpg (351x598, 42K)

and leaving the guy that ordered the invasion in power whyyyyyyy?

>Prove a negative goy
>Pipul
Watcha doing Rabbi?

ALLIED WARCRIMES

another moron who gets his infro from (((Television)))

REMEMBER DRESDEN!!!

It wasn't just depletion of supplies that killed the Jews. The nazis explained to us, several times in and out of court, that they also deliberately killed Jews because of operation reinhard.

You're simply conflating half truths

you mean the Nuremberg trial where evidence was ruled out as a factor. Not to mention they brought out lampshades as proof

Attached: Over6gorillionhoursinmspaint.jpg (475x507, 140K)

lack of supplies, typhuls, and brutalization for sure. Pointless murders, sure. Gas chambers and "muh 6million" no

>The nazis explained to us, several times in and out of court, that they also deliberately killed Jews because of operation reinhard.
Order #?

Leave him defeated with a crippled army. I don't why we didn't try to take out saddam then. All I know is that our intention was to expel Iraqi soldiers from Kuwait. We did that, and so we won the war. The question you're asking is why haven't we won an unconventional war after ww2, is just because of that, because they're unconventional the and the belligerents don't play by the rules. That and several other factors that are not relevant to the topic at hand and so I won't go over.

tortured and coerced confessions dont count in courts of law for good reason

Attached: 1486177527220.jpg (400x400, 99K)

It’s the big lie.

I read a book about Lawrence of Arabia and in it they mentioned that some Jew scientist was hired by the Ottoman governor of the Palestine region to help with the food growing issues they were having. By the Jew’s own hand he and his people were treated well by the governor and given whatever they needed. Yet by the time the Brits were sniffing around he wrote a letter saying the governor was committing a pogrom against his people, they were being victimized, etc. This evidence was added to the pile and eventually that governor was executed for war crimes.

There didn’t need to be any explicit cooperation or investigation or any of that shit. It is called in group cooperation. The Jew was helping out fellow Jews by lying and deceiving and they all got what they want. Nobody ever sat there and investigated it because they found people who wanted to hear it. That’s the point.

THIS SAME THREAD AGAIN

this retarded copypasta again???

The 'holocaust' storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. What sort of truth is it that denies free speech and the freedom to seek the truth? Truth needs no protection from scrutiny.

New Holohoax flyer -- print and disseminate

PDF: drive.google.com/open?id=1ipWainshExGJPUfTmBwjLy9WVCWyZfAq

PDF (Grayscale): drive.google.com/open?id=1DyijBzaw9Tf9QXbyDFFvQX5c7HmUhXi_

Large, text-heavy front-back flyer: holocausthandbooks.com/dl/FlyerLetterSize.pdf

IMPORTANT LINKS

Documentaries
codoh.com/library/categories/1167/
(note: also search for Eric Hunt's documentaries on the Holocaust)

Intro to Holocaust revisionism:
vho.org/Intro/GB/index.html

Dissecting the Holocaust
vho.org/GB/Books/dth/

Holocaust Handbook series
holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?st=40&sort=voa&main_page=1#entries

Holocaust debate forum
forum.codoh.com/

>"Ninety-nine per cent of what we know [about the Holocaust in Auschwitz-Birkenau] we do not actually have the physical evidence to prove... it has become part of our inherited knowledge." (A Case for Letting Nature Take Back Auschwitz, The Toronto Star, December 27, 2009)

>"The consequence of the absence of any overt documentary evidence of gas chambers at these camps, coupled with the lack of archaeological evidence, means that reliance has to be placed on eye witness and circumstantial evidence." (Judge Gray, Irving-Lipstadt trial, 2000)

Attached: flyer-updated-map-questioning (1).png (1626x2129, 453K)

- Dr. Horst Pelckmann, defense counsel for the SS at Nuremberg, exposed the fact that over 97% of the SS men who mentioned "The Jewish Problem" denied that it was to be solved by extermination. On 21 August 1946: "1,593 out of 1,637 affidavits which mention this problem state that the Jewish problem was not to be solved by killing" (IMT Proceedings, vol. 21, p. 368)

- On July 1945, the Jewish Telegraphic Agency reported that: "A report from the place where major German war criminals are now confined discloses that all of them have denied that the Nazis had any plans to exterminate the Jews of Europe."

- According to archives director Shmuel Krakowski: "Over half of the 20,000 testimonies from Holocaust survivors on record at Yad Vashem are “unreliable” and have never been used as evidence in Nazi war crimes trials" (B. Amouyal, "Doubts over evidence of camp survivors," Jerusalem Post (Israel), August 17, 1986)

- “Survivor accounts of critical events are typical of all testimony, that is, they are full of discrepancies. About all matters both trivial and significant, the evidence is nearly always in dispute. In part the unreliability of these accounts derives from imperfect observation and flawed memory, but in larger part from the circumstance that they are not constructed exclusively on the basis of firsthand experience. In order to present a coherent narrative, the author has likely included a large measure of hearsay, gossip, rumor, assumption, speculation, and hypothesis.” (Jewish holocaust historian Lucy Dawidowicz, A Holocaust Reader, 1976)

- "The consequence of the absence of any overt documentary evidence of gas chambers at these camps, coupled with the lack of archaeological evidence, means that reliance has to be placed on eye witness and circumstantial evidence." (Judge Gray, Irving-Lipstadt trial, 2000)

Attached: Holocaust_The_Greenville_News_April_1945_T.jpg (846x406, 138K)

generally those who dont play by the rules and win are the ones writing the rules for the next generation of warfare. Our enemies are more invested and dedicated. we dont have the stomach for total war anymore

>you mean the Nuremberg trial where evidence was ruled out as a factor.
You didn't have to present evidence, but that doesn't mean that prosecutors didn't regularly show evidence to prove their arguments. We have more evidence than the ones produced at the nuremberg trials.

Your ignorance is not an argument.

youtube.com/watch?v=VnqgCQ7Uk8g

The "Holocaust" is a racist, anti-White conspiracy theory

Indeed, it's interesting to see that those who accuse Revisionists of promoting a 'conspiracy theory' often promote truly bizarre conspiracy theories themselves, such as:

>"The Germans executed a secret plan to exterminate every Jew they could get their hands on, the results were such that 6M Jews and huge numbers of gypsies and homosexuals were murdered by gassing and by being shot into enormous pits."

Yet in short, there are no orders from Hitler, no authentic German documents, no records of funding, no massive graves of human remains as alleged which would necessarily be available, and a gassing method which defies science.

At the Nuremberg Military Tribunals (NMT) it was alleged that the Holocaust had been perpetrated with the greatest level of secrecy, and very few know it was even happening. According to US Judge Leon Powers "not over 100 people in all were informed" about the attempted extermination. As with many other conspiracy theories, the lack of physical evidence and the scarcity of alleged eyewitness testimonies were seen as convincing proof that the Nazis had something to hide and that they had successfully managed to do it.

Pennsylvania judge Edward L. Van Roden:
>"This solitary confinement proved sufficient in itself in some cases to persuade the Germans to sign prepared statements. These statements not only involved the signer, but often would involve other defendants. Our investigators would put a black hood over the accused’s head and then punch him in the face with rubber hose. Many of the German defendants had teeth knocked out. Some had their jaws broken. All but two of the Germans, in the 139 cases we investigated, had been kicked in the testicles beyond repair. This was Standard Operating Procedure with American investigators."

Attached: Holocaust-Nuremberg-trials-April-1949-Judge-Leon-W-Powers.jpg (1374x1110, 762K)

While researching history, our highest goal must be at all times to discover how it actually was. Historians should not place research in the service of making criminal accusations against, for example, Genghis Khan & the Mongol hordes, nor to whitewash any of their wrong-doings. Anybody insisting that research be barred from exonerating Genghis Khan of criminal accusations would be the object of ridicule and would be subject to the suspicion that he was, in fact, acting out of political motives. If this were not so, why would anyone insist that our historical view of Genghis Khan forever be defined solely by Khan's victims and enemies?

The same reasoning applies to Hitler and Nazis. Both revisionists and their adversaries are entitled to their political views. The accusation that revisionists are only interested in exonerating Nazis and that such an effort is reprehensible or even criminal, is a boomerang: This accusation has as a prerequisite that it is deemed unacceptable to partially exonerate Nazis historically, and by so doing, always also morally.

But by declaring any hypothetical exoneration based on possible facts as unacceptable, one admits openly not to be interested in the quest for the truth, but in incriminating Nazis historically and morally under any circumstances and at all costs. And the motivation behind this can only be political. Hence, those accusing revisionists to misuse their research for political ends have themselves been proven guilty of exactly this offense. It is therefore not necessarily the revisionists who are guided by political motives--though quite a few of them certainly are--but with absolute certainty all those who accuse others of attempting to somehow historically exonerate a political system which has long since disappeared.

Attached: gas-chamber-traffic-jam (1).jpg (1000x483, 191K)

>Gas chambers and "muh 6million" no
Why? Why is it so hard to believe? Genocide is unfortunately not a historical anomoly, and given Hitler's megalomania and Germany's long antisemetic history. It's completely possible.

Attached: 1551463420084.jpg (1014x840, 248K)

The typical canard used by Jews is to claim that Revisionists "deny" the existence of everything about the Jews' experience in WWII, the camps etc. But no one says what the Jews claim, it's a classic false, strawman argument.

Revisionists do not "deny" that Jews were deported to labor camps and encouraged to leave Europe. There is no question that the National Socialists wanted the Jews out of Europe. The Zionists also wanted the Jews out of Europe.

What Revisionists do deny is:

- the unfounded and frankly, laughable '6,000,000'
- the ridiculous & irrational allegations of homicidal 'gas chambers'
- the unsubstantiated claim of a state planned genocide of Jews

The response to anyone who asks if you "deny" the so-called holocaust is to ask them to define what they mean by the 'holocaust'. If any of those 3 items are part of that definition, then say: 'yes, then I am a denier and you can't prove that any of those points are fact...next'.

Attached: holocaust-debate-points.jpg (576x720, 299K)

imgur.com/a/725A7

>You didn't have to present evidence
Then it's not an actual trial.

Attached: 1551400700143.jpg (718x1024, 158K)

>Order #?
Look up the the hofle telegram and the posen speech. Come back to me when you've educated yourself.

Attached: 1550664500214m.jpg (969x1024, 159K)

Attached: 1552311476109.jpg (970x710, 243K)

Attached: 1550765415042.gif (2056x2736, 2.33M)

>A council of centralized Jewish leadership that has no documentation or evidence to ever existing decides to fake "the holocaust" as part of a plot to take over the world and enslave the Master Race
nobody claimed this ever. mostly it was russia

Holocaust: Made in Russia
jrbooksonline.com/cwporter/two2.htm

It was collectively done by the allied governments, especially Russia.

Autopsies were done at the camps liberated by USA and UK, so the people who cliamed gas chambers existed there were disproven
forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=6513

that is why ALL of the "death camps" were liberated by soviets

>None of this is ever discovered or found out
Lolwut? The first "Holocaust deniers" were a jew (Josef G Burg) and French Communist (Paul Rassinier) who were imprisoned in the camps

>Somehow orchestrate in the middle of WW2 the mass disappearance of 11 million people including 6 million jews and 5 million non-jews
There is actually no proof of a "mass disappearance" of people

MILLIONS of jews resettled according to jew sources: forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=8921#p91371

Self-reported jewish ancestry was greatly reduced. That doesn't mean they died

More:

Jewish population losses in the German sphere of influence during the World War II
historiography-project.com/misc/graf_jewishlosses.php

Holocaust Victims: A Statistical Analysis
vho.org/GB/Books/dth/fndstats.html

>covertly relocate these people secretly to ??? (Israel I guess?)
and USA, USSR, Britain, israel (haavara agreement), etc

eventually many did make it to Israel. Israel has over 6.5 million jews today, how many were there pre-ww2?

>build all these complex facilities and phony camps that were actually resorts with theaters and swimming pools and etc
No, the camps weren't phony at all! Over 300,000 people died in the camps, but none from poison gas. Nobody denies the existence of camps, just that people were exterminated in gas chambers at them . pic related:

>Then it's not an actual trial
No, some good came out of it. We sentenced nazis to death.

>falsify thousands of documents, photographs, etc
No wartime document on the final solution. They all define the final solution as resettlement.

proof: forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12296

Show me ONE (01) document from Nazis defining the final solution as extermination.

Jew Raul Hilberg, orthodox historian Number One, author of "The Destruction of the European Jews"
>There was no pre-established guiding plan. As for the question of the decision, it is in part unsolvable: no order signed by Hitler has ever been found, doubtless because no such document ever existed. I am persuaded that the bureaucracies moved through a sort of latent structure: each decision brings on another, then another, and so forth, even if it isn’t possible to foresee exactly the next step
(Le Monde des livres, October 20, 2006, p. 12)

>create thousands of fake mass graves and fill them with fake bodies in the middle of nazi-controlled territory
Show me ONE (01) mass grave consistent with the alleged remains.

Note, even "deniers" claim 66-70 thousand died at Auschwitz

>pay off millions of witnesses of dozens of nationalities, none of whom EVER break the silence that they were in fact in on a gargantuan conspiracy
Lolwut? Pic related (), apparently less than 100 nazis even knew about it. Get your own fucking story straight. This is called a strawman, you're being dishonest here: All the nazi's are in on it too as not one of them denied the holocaust took place at their trials, just their individual responsibility.
Not true at all, many of them did in fact deny it

See:
forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12287

the six million number is a talmund prophecy right?? is that why it was being pushed so much in newspapers?

>Pay off every single historian to have existed at the time or has existed since, they're all in on it too and none of them ever blab
You don't have to pay them. They'll get arrested if they tell the truth! en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_against_Holocaust_denial

If they are in a country where it's legal to deny... you just get your life ruined by racist jews. Yeah, no fun

>pay off millions of witnesses of dozens of nationalities, none of whom EVER break the silence that they were in fact in on a gargantuan conspiracy
According to jews, most of them simply lied. It's not even a conspiracy, they just lied

Over half of the 20,000 testimonies from Holocaust survivors on record at Yad Vashem are “unreliable” and have never been used as evidence in Nazi war crimes trials [according to archives director Shmuel Krakowski], Krakowski says that many survivors, wanting “to be part of history,” may have let their imaginations run away with them.
“Many were never in the place where they claim to have witnessed atrocities, while others relied on second-hand information given them by friends or passing strangers according to Krakowski. A large number of testimonies on file were later proved inaccurate when locations and dates could not pass an expert historian’s appraisal.
SOURCE: B. Amouyal, "Doubts over evidence of camp survivors," Jerusalem Post (Israel), August 17, 1986, p. 1

>The leaders of every country in the world is in on that, including both sides of the Cold War
Didn't the president of Iran deny the holohoax?

>Jews coordinate all this despite no real method of communication at the time. Moreover not a single document exists of them communicating so it was all psychic I guess
there's also no document of nazis communicating it. so they did that psychic? fail

>No paper trail of this MASSIVE unprecedented operation that has spanned now many years exists.
EXACTLY! There is no paper trail substantiating the holohoax story.

Because the only "death camps" were the ones liberated by the soviets. The rest were correctly labeled as prison and work camps by the Allies. It just sounds like one of the many propogandistic lies Trotsky made up to encourage continued fighting against the germans. You can find plenty of Russian-doctored photos that make it look like german soldiers are comitting horrible war crimes. Why should I believe the soviet claims of what went on in those camps?

All you niggers are posting in a slide thread.

>pay off millions of witnesses of dozens of nationalities, none of whom EVER break the silence that they were in fact in on a gargantuan conspiracy

ever heard of holocaust reparations?

read on:

The Value of Testimony and Confessions Concerning the Holocaust
vho.org/GB/Books/dth/fndvalue.html

>create thousands of fake mass graves and fill them with fake bodies in the middle of nazi-controlled territory
show me these alleged mass graves

according to "deniers" over 300,000 died in the camps

according to holocaust hoaxters, 3,000,000 died in the camps, most of the rest being shot on the eastern front by einsatzgruppen

so, show me the graves, and explain why you think 3,000,000 rather than 300,000 died in the camps, based on the volume

It has been asserted that over 1 million people were murdered by Nazis at Auschwitz in homicidal gas chambers, then cremated. If the average weight was 130 lbs (59kg) this would result in 75,231 cubic feet (2,130 cubic meters) for the burnt remains of 1 million people.

According to this calculator: mainelyurns.com/urn-size-chart.html

For every pound a person is, that is 1 cubic inch of ashes. Therefore, a 130 lb (59kg) person would be cremated into 130 cubic inches (2,130 cubic cm) of ashes.

2,000 cubic meters (this is rounding down) = 1 US football field covered from corner-to-corner in burnt remains, slightly over 1 foot high of remains.

this is assuming that all of the dead were cremated.

show me the football-field worth of human remains, 1 foot high that is alleged to exist at auschwitz

PROTIP: burnt remains (bone ash) IS NOT SOLUBLE IN WATER. so if it was dumped en masse into a pond or river, it would necessarily still be there.

NOTE: holocaust "deniers" claim 66-70,000 people died at auschwitz. the standard narrative is 1.1 million did. show me that the massive quantities of human remains supports the 1.1 number

Auschwitz 'gas chambers' debunked here: vho.org/GB/Books/trr/

Attached: cubic-metre-diagram.png (464x398, 48K)

No, I'll take the actual legislation that was passed, that ordered German soldiers to exterminate the Jews.That is what you claimed, after all. So, what was the order #?

>Why is it so hard to believe?
there is 0 physical evidence

why do the hoaxters LIE so much?

check out:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Holocaust_denial

they fraudulently cite Goering as saying "I saw the gas chambers"

he did not say this

it's a fake quote. see: forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=7622

even some holohoax believers admit it's a fake quote

only liars need fakes

>Look up the the hofle telegram
Nowhere does it say anything about killing anyone.

>posen speech
probably a fake, and certainly does not support the standard "holocaust" story

en.metapedia.org/wiki/Posen_speeches

>Because the only "death camps" were the ones liberated by the soviets. The rest were correctly labeled as prison and work camps by the Allies
No, they were labeled as "death camps" because there were dead people in them and gas.

But, yes, all the death camps were liberated by soviets. Every western general understood that the soviets were going to be the main ones to liberate Poland and the first to reach Berlin. This isn't proof against the Holocaust or extraordinary news to anybody.

That doesn't legitimize it as a trial, it makes it a witch hunt, especially when you consider the torture used to gain confessions.

>No, I'll take the actual legislation that was passed, that ordered German soldiers to exterminate the Jews.
I literally just gave you an audio recording of Himmler explaining the Holocaust and an enigma decrypted report of operation reinhard.

Whats wrong with them?

>there is 0 physical evidence
You probably heard by some random retard on here, and believed it ever since with no evidence or further context.

How far off am I?

they found no "gas" they found the de-loucing agent they were using to try and fight the epidemic of typhus, hence why they shaved everyones head

Muh wooden doors. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow_theater_hostage_crisis this motherfucker had open doors and windows. Explain that cuck.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow_theater_hostage_crisis open doors and open windows. You lose cuck boy

post it

read: post the millions of lbs of evidence that must be there in exactly known locations

a fucking theatre is significantly larger than a gas chamber, retard.

You know that the National Socialist party was in govt, correct? You know govts. pass laws and lower downs execute these laws, correct? You know laws are then archived, for later reference, correct?.. So where is that law? I am asking for something incredibly simple; the legislation that was passed that ordered Germans to exterminate the Jewish people. That's it. I don't need speeches or telegrams or any other circumstantial evidence if I can just see the official order demanding the extermination of Jews. So what was the order #? Or will you now finally admit there isn't one?

Don't forget Churchill, FDR, and the Allies were in big shit for turning Poland over to the Soviets as all of the Soviet atrocities came out. Churchill and the Allies had a very big reason to keep propaganda against the Germans going as well.

>Nowhere does it say anything about killing anyone
It does. It mentions operation reinhard, and it lists 4 of the 6 alleged death camps along with some figures with it.

>probably a fake, and certainly does not support the standard "holocaust" story
A retard observation. The "standard Holocaust story", whatever the fuck that means, says that the Holocaust happened and it was perpetrated by nazis. How does the speeches not support the "standard story"?

>they found no "gas" they found the de-loucing agent they were using to try and fight the epidemic of typhus, hence why they shaved everyones head
The delousing agent was the gas that people refer to. And yes, they have found traces of it. Lots of it

>How far off am I?
extremely far off. i was a "holocaust denier" since before Jow Forums ever existed!

>You probably heard by some random retard on here, and believed it ever since with no evidence or further context.
evidence of a lack of evidence?

please read: >It has been asserted that over 1 million people were murdered by Nazis at Auschwitz in homicidal gas chambers, then cremated. If the average weight was 130 lbs (59kg) this would result in 75,231 cubic feet (2,130 cubic meters) for the burnt remains of 1 million people.
>2,000 cubic meters (this is rounding down) = 1 US football field covered from corner-to-corner in burnt remains, slightly over 1 foot high of remains.
>show me the football-field worth of human remains, 1 foot high that is alleged to exist at auschwitz

Are you arguing that there was another holocaust ever 10 years for the past 70 years, because the Jew population doesn't grow?

Attached: 14.4 million jews today.png (707x807, 533K)

im interested to see where this thread ends, let's hear it.

Sooo it should take more gas and be less efficient. Got it. You're a retard.

Damn, Moishe is fired up.

>It does. It mentions operation reinhard, and it lists 4 of the 6 alleged death camps along with some figures with it.
you're wrong. nowhere in the document is there any mention of murder, killing, gas chambers, or anything. please review the actual document

NOWHERE in that document does it mention killing of anyone

>A retard observation
nonsense, it was an observation by an actual SS general, Gottlob Berger. he said he didn't recognize himmler's voice, and that there was no talk of extermination at that instance

>The "standard Holocaust story", whatever the fuck that means, says that the Holocaust happened and it was perpetrated by nazis.
yes but "The holocaust" is a collection of events. the standard story is: 6 million + gas chambers + planned extermination

>How does the speeches not support the "standard story"?
the handwritten notes only mention Judenevakuierung, or evacuation of jews (collaborated by ALL documents on the "Final Solution) -- further, in 1993, Holocaust believer Robert Wolfe, supervisory archivist for captured German records at the National Archives admitted that a more precise translation of Ausrottung would be extirpation or tearing up by the roots

another document in which himmler uses that same term in a non-exterminatory sense: fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/docs/Ausrottung/Himmler210244.html

>Or will you now finally admit there isn't one?
Why does it have to specifically be legislature? There are literally hundreds of other ways to prove genocide, a few of which I have already posted on here, you just want only specific versions of proof because youre in denial, and were never interested in a rational discussion.

You do know that there are more than one way to prove historical events, right?

GAS CHAMBERS DON'T HAVE WOODEN DOORS

yes

>The delousing agent was the gas that people refer to. And yes, they have found traces of it. Lots of it
correct. they found lots of traces... in the delousing chambers!

they found iron-cyanide traces also in the alleged "Homicidal gas chambers" as well as random bricks in the camp

there were thousands of times higher traces in the delousing chambers

Check it out:
vho.org/GB/Books/trr/
alleged 'homicidal gas chamber' walls 4.8 ± 3 ppm (n=3)
Others: 0.7± 0.9 ppm (n=6)

De-lousing room, inside: 5670 ± 3900 ppm (n=9)
outside: 3750 ± 3600 ppm (n=4)

PLEASE cite the fraudulent polish report made by Markiewicz et al, so i can utterly tear it to shreds

You could gas people in a cardboard box if you really felt like it and had a nice enough uniform.

Not if the gas used in Russia was more potent, or absorbable through the skin. Not all gasses are equal. Chaim really isn't sending his best.

PLEASE SEE PIC RELATED: The two main 'gas chambers at Auschwitz / Birkenau were exactly the same, supposedly in Kremas II & III. So let's play along with the storyline. Up to 2000 Jews were supposedly gassed until dead, then they were supposedly taken via an elevator to the crematorium directly above.

Fact: as seen in the plans, this elevator is hand drawn, and is only 4 ft X 9 ft. How in the world could 2000 Jews have been loaded onto a 4 ft x 9 ft. hand drawn elevator in just a few minutes? Remember, the storyline says that the gassings and resultant cremations were non-stop for much of the period in question.

We supposedly have another batch of 2000 Jews waiting outside, supposedly being tricked into thinking they were about to receive showers. It would have been impossible to disentangle all the supposedly dead Jews and load 2000 of them onto to this postage stamp of an elevator, hoist them by hand up to the crematory 'ovens' in just minutes.
And this repeated process meant that the crematory ovens above would not have been capable of cremating them in the time alleged, which meant a build-up, a backlog occurred.
The storyline even states that the backlog of the to-be-cremated-gassed-Jews required stacking them outside. Once again, the alleged 2000 Jews were outside in full view of this laughable backlog claim, but supposedly they still thought they were getting 'showers'. Of course, timely aerial reconnaissance photos show nothing of the kind.

GAS CHAMBERS DON'T HAVE WOODEN DOORS.

Give it up you shill. The holocaust has been debunked.