Should the West abolish voting rights for women?

Should the West abolish voting rights for women?

Attached: 1534424625485.jpg (600x600, 39K)

Attached: theend.jpg (646x692, 98K)

Yes but good luck enacting it without civil war.

> booze good
Honestly preety based.

Attached: 1552446699375.png (664x812, 562K)

In America, female suffrage grew out of the temperance movement. Protestant ministers would give their suffragette wives platforms before their congregations to speak about temperance, and in time the temperance movement became inseparable from the suffragette movement for this very reason. Women's suffrage, at least in the American context, is a story about women being invited into a male space and then using it as leverage to advance their own interests, a story as old as time.

"We're living now in a time where - it's literally the first generation in history where people consider themselves educated, and yet are biblically (and historically) illiterate."

We must redefine literacy as competency, subvert media, education, social media accordingly to provide this education and indoctrination. Voting rights will be scaled according to each individual's demonstrated competency.

Attached: americawhenfeminized.jpg (1617x1024, 1.05M)

Women are no match for the strength of men, there will be no civil war.

common misconception
women voted more conservatively, with the party that was leading where they lived - so for example if republicans led in a county women voted more republican than men did and they voted less for third parties, which coincided with actually less support for temperance movement

america and the west not feminised, it lacks femininity - women are brought to act masculine and that feminine is shameful and it lacks feminine virtues like caring about children (abortions), compassion (leaving sick people to die cause they cant pay treatment)

That would involve men having a spine, which they haven't had ever since they gave control over their money supply to Central Bankers. Doing that is the equivalent of demoting yourself from Father to Child and giving control over your family's money to your neighbor.

stop being an incel

My friend, at the time of the suffragette movement, "Republican" was not in any way synonymous with conservatism.

yes but it's far too late to do so now

it doesnt matter as it was not the point of what i said

btw. in time of the suffragette movement over 90% of women didnt support women voting and decades later over 10% of women refused to vote out of conviction

But it does matter because you mentioned these cunts voting for Republicans, which during the progressive era was not conservative. So what are you judging their conservative credentials by specifically? Name some of these conservative candidates that they voted for, and we will examine them individually.
Okay. Good. Nobody should support women voting, including women. And yet here we are.

>But it does matter because you mentioned these cunts voting for Republicans
i didnt, i said they voted for whatever party was in power
at that time republicans were largely in new england
if they were in the south they voted for democrats in the same fashion

read better next time

ofcourse

So why say they voted more conservatively if the only evidence you have for that is that they voted for whoever was in power, which is not at all the same thing as voting more conservatively, especially at the height of the progressive era where conservative politics were just hard to come by at the time.

Answer my question: What specific candidates are you referring to? Pick one so we can examine his platform. My guess is they aren't nearly as conservative as you're implying, so let's solve the mystery with a concrete historical example.