Hello Jow Forums. I think it is a good time to make this thread, given that the UBI Yang Gang is popular now. Today I want to make another argument in favor of UBI. UBI could save traditional femininity.
>But most UBI supporters are feminists!
Irrelevant. Oftentimes, government policies lead to consequences not intended by the people who support said policies. For example, most commies are pro-LGBT even though almost every communist country has an abysmal LGBT rights record. Another Example: Prohibition was supposed to reduce the crime rate, but the crime rate actually increased. We all know that feminists aren't political experts. Therefore, it's entirely possible that they are supporting their own doom without realizing it.
FACT: A big part of femininity is a woman's desire to become pregnant, give birth and spend time with her children. Right-wing economics often conflicts with this. Oftentimes, women are forced into the workplace because they cannot feed their children any other way. Also, a woman cannot spend as much time with her children if she has to work. FACT: A woman who has less money is more likely to send her children to daycare out of necessity. FACT: When parents can spend more time with their kids, they have an easier time monitoring what their children are exposed to. FACT: All men are attracted to women who have a bouncy, pleasant, cutesy personality. A woman is less likely to have this disposition if the stress of hard work has eroded her maternal softness. FACT: Women often become strippers and prostitutes due to economic stress. Not all women that get sucked up into depravity choose this lifestyle. FACT: Women love to dress prettily and men love women who dress prettily. Fashion isn't free though.
>UBI will promote feminism and degrade femininity by making women less dependent on men!
No it will not. If you think this way, you are assuming that the women of the past were only feminine because men forced them to be feminine. In reality, most women have a natural desire to be feminine. This desire erodes when women are forced to work outside the home. Also, when a man cannot support his wife financially, she is forced to either surrender her femininity to the workplace or become a hypergamous gold digger.
It's also worth noting that workers had more free time during the Middle Ages. Also, women with wealthy husbands generally display more feminine behavioral characteristics than women with poor husbands.
Right-wing economics has destroyed femininity more than UBI ever could.
Jeremiah Allen
Do ctrl-f and search for "Jow Forums", they advertise the threads they make to eachother so they can comment and make it look like Yang has a lot of supporters.
Archive can be found here: anonfile.com/gchfM0waba/YangDiscordArchives_7z
Are you saying that all women are whores? Are you implying that traditional feminine grace never existed?
Jeremiah Carter
>right-wing economics ?
Luke Bennett
>Do ctrl-f and search for "Jow Forums", they advertise the threads they make to eachother so they can comment and make it look like Yang has a lot of supporters. Pure conspiracy nuttery.
>UBI for neets The U in UBI stands for "universal". It's for everyone, not just NEETS. It's also worth nothing that most conservatives consider NEET women to be preferable to women with careers.
The rest of that pic is just pure assumptions with insufficient evidence.
Lincoln Reyes
>right-wing economics The belief that workers who are underpaid just need to work harder because all employers can be trusted to pay their employees an appropriate wage.
Jaxson Reyes
nobody gives a fuckj about saving women
this is accelerationism to the max burning the usa in a blaze of glory
Charles Wood
the welfare state promotes dysgenics, if the government has free money to give out the government is taxing the general working male populus too much, welfare state promotes single mothers jews niggers and moslems and non-whites in general and satan. sage
Samuel Foster
>nobody gives a fuckj about saving women Only women can have babies though.
Ayden Nelson
>the welfare state promotes dysgenics So ... you want a system in which the Jews will have the highest birth rate?
>if the government has free money to give out the government is taxing the general working male populus too much You are making the assumption that shifting the tax burden to the billionaires is not possible.
>welfare state promotes single mothers ... who tend to pump out kids. Isn't Jow Forums supposed to want a higher birth rate?
>jews Since when do Jews need welfare? They already control the economy.
>niggers and moslems and non-whites in general So? Nowadays, the non-white women often display more behavioral femininity than the white women. This is especially true of Arabs.
>and satan. Most Satanists are right-libertarians though.
Julian Torres
Another Thing: The problem with modern welfare is that it is not given to workers. Thus, many men on welfare are scared to get jobs and lose their welfare. UBI doesn't come with this defect, as it is universal.
Brody Ross
>woman's desire to become pregnant, give birth and spend time with her children
Except women don't want your children you stupid cuck. Welfare for all isn't going to change that.
Owen Sullivan
>Except women don't want your children you stupid cuck. Come on dude. Lots of women want kids. Are you implying that women only have kids because men pressure them into it? A lot of women are so obsessed with pregnancy that it comes across as fetishistic.
Tyler Adams
Take your neet bux and jack off in the corner because nothing is going to change for you.
Ethan Nguyen
No it wouldn’t it would just be an additional wealfare program and instead of the default being 0$ in your pocket it would be 1000$
Whithin a year prices will adjust for the new minimum and that will be that.
the modern American welfare state is already perfectly dysgenic. there are literally zero economic factors that currently prevent the dregs of society or their children from surviving until reproduction. UBI only extends some of that safety net upwards to make the lower and lower middle class more secure.
Alexander Smith
I thought Jow Forums wanted to increase the birthrate. I'm so confused.
Dylan Murphy
No, it brings the bonobo mentality and mating pattern, the contrast to every civilization
Listen, Canuck. UBI is a certifiably untenable position from eith the political or the financial angle. Any nation that tried it had to abandon it swiftly or face total ruination.
So why would that work now?
Alexander Rivera
It amazes how yang shill posters ruined this board in less than a month. Contgratulations missing accomplished. You cant have a discussion on any topic without some fucking yang tard coming and just uttering the word "ubi" and the entire fucking thread is derailed.
Hey you fucking retards even if yang somehoe got nominated (despite a literal 0% chance) UBI will never work. It wont even get passed theres no fucking way to fund it. If youre falling for this shit your just like a gibs me dat nigger taking handouts from a democratic.
Jaxon Cruz
Wait a minute. Hold the phone.
So ... you are saying that feminine grace is not biologically pre-programmed? You are starting to sound like a radfem.
Watch this video and you will see what society will become ya fucking nonce
Brandon Perez
It's a flare-up, when the Dems dump Yang for his lunatic proposals in favor of the literally hundreds of other candidates remaining, they'll switch to another.
When confronted for their past Yangbanger activity they'll either deny it or claim they got 'caught up' before becoming 'a moderate'.
Don;t believe their lies.
Eli Hughes
ye it was programmed for males woman find good enough to have kids with. If you think women are "feminine" and nice to everyone just because its part of their nature you are delusional
Carson Brown
Does Jow Forums seriously believe in a gender-flipped version of the SCUM Manifesto or is this just a joke?
I still can't tell if this site is satirical or serious.
This doesn't make much sense, given that Bonobos don't use a system comparable to the modern Western economy. In a Bonobo troop, everyone hunts and gathers. There are rarely any slackers.
Brody Garcia
>Any nation that tried it had to abandon it swiftly or face total ruination. You haven't provided a single example.
Jason Thomas
>It amazes how yang shill posters ruined this board in less than a month. Are you implying that only leftists can have paid shills? It's possible for politicians of any stripe to hire shills.
>Contgratulations missing accomplished. You cant have a discussion on any topic without some fucking yang tard coming and just uttering the word "ubi" and the entire fucking thread is derailed. Go use Conservapedia if you don't want to see alternate viewpoints.
>Hey you fucking retards even if yang somehoe got nominated (despite a literal 0% chance) UBI will never work. It wont even get passed theres no fucking way to fund it. You have provided no proof. You're just spewing common right-wing mantras.
>Implying that only non-whites are underpaid because of the current system LOL No.
Lucas Carter
The most horrifying notion is that you might be serious about your stance.
You're ignoring the fact that humans are different from mice. You're also ignoring the fact that human civilization contains far more space per individual compared the the space per mouse in the mouse utopia experiment. Also, human civilization tends to expand as the population grows.
>ye it was programmed for males woman find good enough to have kids with. I think I get what you are saying even though this post is a grammatical train wreck.
You, however, fail to realize that feminine grace makes a woman a good mother. How is a mother supposed to respect her child's emotional needs if she lacks feminine grace?
>If you think women are "feminine" and nice to everyone just because its part of their nature you are delusional It's not natural for women to be nice to everyone, but is natural for a woman to love her children as well as the father of her children.
Maternal instincts must have existed during prehistory or else the human species would have gone extinct.
Julian Torres
What is wrong with my stance? Are you an an-cap?
Hunter Carter
I'm not too mad at Sanders though. Both Sanders and Yang would benefit the working class. Either of them would be a good president.
