politico.com
archive.fo
ITS AFRAID
Wyatt Price
Aiden White
bump
Christian Walker
Why not? Youtube went to shit after its acquisition and a lot of mergers created huge godzillas that could make a jew orgasm with its unlimited powers.
Samuel Young
>Why not?
Jews
Samuel Gray
Let me guess, his argument is that it will reduce innovation and make us less competitive with China if we hamstring these companies from engaging in their current practice of pooling multiple huge datasets and cross-pollination between the dev teams of the diverse range of products that e.g. Google develops
Xavier Lopez
It's refreshing to see OP include the link and the archive. This board is filled with so many shills and newfags who don't bother
Jackson Scott
This. Bump.
Colton Johnson
Break up tech monopolies now!
Ayden Evans
bump
Ethan Adams
The only thing these tech company heads deserve is a bullet.
Daniel Watson
This
Parker Smith
Neocons are a bigger menace to American society than the far left. It’s easier to fight the far left because they don’t obscure their aims. Neocons are practiced kikes who want to fuck you and your children sideways all to make an extra few bucks on the bottom line.
Ryder Miller
Unless they stop censoring shit, I fully support breaking up big tech. Everyone on the right should
Aiden Wood
Fucking kek
Jose Davis
KEK
Hunter Lewis
Every huge behemoth like Apple, Microsoft, Oracle, IBM, SAP, Google, ... stagnates completely after a while. And they predate rising rivals too.
Luis Myers
This. Breaking up is the only option. Trying to pass some kind of regulation to force these companies to stop censoring (like the article suggests) would never work
Easton Allen
They have merged
Noah Foster
Break it up and set it on fire it’s pure cancer
Carter Watson
Cooper Mitchell
Politicians could also start using different sites than popular ones, that would convince people to use other sites.
Elijah Lopez
Don't break it up.
Destroy it.
David Clark
author of article
Parker Parker
Fuck breaking them apart, just declare them platforms and ban them from censoring content or users for anything not criminal in nature under US law. Problem solved. It isn't like the advertisers will magically abandon their own existence because of le edgy may mays if those posts are protected web-wide.
Levi Hughes
You all run to popular platforms for quick money, basically doomed yourself. Being in unknown territory is hard. It's easy to do what everybody does. If you want to control Facebook you first have to nationalize, but who says American politicians will be on your side in future. Maybe if it was really a government company, then free speech would apply to it and they couldn't remove stuff they think is hateful, but they can invent spamming or racist excuses to ban stuff. So really the best scenario is having different social media sites in each town and force people to use different sites.
Ryan Jenkins