you don't get it, man. Kellyanne is pretty good no matter what her physical form. Her character and grace is pretty impressive. And even though she is beyond prime physical form beauty, she still is very good looking and pretty for her age. There are lots of women half her age that look rekt. But her inner self is so...classy and fierce and witty, that the aged nature of this physical form is but a small blemish.
By the way: You might find this useful if you're too autistic to not respond to the yangbang spammers and blatant shills. It's the image MD5 filter. I updated it hours ago and caught most of the leaf spam. I've been too busy shoveling my truck out, then getting a helping hand from a random stranger to pull me out with a ratchet strap to update it since then. I will update it soon™. Until then, just lrn2filter yourself. pastebin.com/stDmuicf
The neetsoc Quebecois hasn't been seen in a while since all the new stuff has come out. He's probably confused on how to call us jews for pointing out the facts.
Cooper Bailey
>Anyone else finds that the gook shilling is weaker at night? Their vision is based on movement.
Dems said they'll keep searching until they find something.
Jonathan Wright
you should. Trump falsely thinks that "economic nationalism" is a thing that will save America (ie: if everyone is making money, everyone will be happy). I personally believe Trump's heart is in the right place but he's been brainwashed like the majority of boomers.
Reminder Yang fears robots because he knows they will come after him like they do to his brethren in china.
Henry Gray
>if everyone is making money, everyone will be happy He's not wrong. It's just that having a large inferior minority population is a massive money sink.
Samuel Campbell
I wonder if the dems realise the danger they're in. They're running 3 big establishment candidates who will split that vote while Bernie is onmly competing with Warren who will probably drop out after new Hampshire. Bernie is actually going to win purely off those retards splitting the vote.
there's way too many details missing to make a determination
Asher Barnes
>Oh okay, on a purely physical basis I would go with her younger form, but I'm aware that she might not be as wise, experienced, poised as she is now. Yeah if only you could put an older woman's spirit in a young woman's body you know.
they have sufficient resources to overthrow the government.
Thomas Ward
No, I’m saying whites shouldn’t trust a non-white to ensure their race’s survival, especially not Chinese shills who want to destroy the white race so the Chinese are supreme
Blake Hill
Well I was speaking in terms of her attributes isolated in the first place.
Anthony Diaz
Can you imagine shiling for Kikelumpf when he believes in all of that as well except he will give your tax money to Israel instead of giving you free $1000 a month?
well then, after checking out the leadership and ideology. If it was all in the up and up, hell yeah I would
Isaac Adams
It's still very early and there's plenty of time for the socialist vote to split further as Booker/Harris/etc start trying to compete for who can support the dumbest leftist shit.
then why should I trust some guy who doesn't have a scientific understanding of racialism or wants to help his ethnic people?
I hope trump is just a stepping stone for something greater, because hes kinda just bush tier in my opinion due to his boomerism.
Cooper Morris
seething MIGAboomer
Oliver Hill
You mean Beto, savior of the white race? He's going to skateboard on the jews!
Carson Jenkins
>especially not Chinese shills who want to destroy the white race so the Chinese are supreme Why do people keep forgetting about this part.
Elijah Long
>Ideological War: A Short Essay on The Weaknesses of Socialist Governments and other Large Bureaucratic Institutions
The main weaknesses of large institutions are inflexibility, poor hiring practices, lack of (or ineffective) oversight, wasted resources, and weakness in top leadership. Inflexibility and slowness to action (or complete inaction) are evident in many aspects of these organizations. Bureaucracies are by definition run according to a set of rules which are often difficult or impossible to change- except by group consensus. This means that as times change and the world evolves around it- a bureaucracy will become less efficient as its methods become outdated if it is incapable of change.
Poor hiring practices are another well-known problem in large bureaucracies with strict job heirarchies and many employees. In a small or private business- the owner or person acting in a managerial capacity has a lot of influence over who gets hired and often has the abillity to fire employees who aren't carrying their weight. In contrast- a large bureaucracy is often run by rules and procedures and commitees - and the power to hire and fire is often far removed from the actual work being performed at the lowest level. This often translates to poor decisions and lost productivity.
No socialist is gonna vote for Booker or Harris over Bernie or Warren. Bernie will get about 26-28% of the primary vote while Warren will start at around 6 or 7 and quickly evaporate.
I would disagree. Jews on the whole make plenty of money in America and those same people always see the white majority as "other." The majority of wealthy blacks in America see whites as "other" even though their wealth would never be equal to what they have here if they were in a majority black country.
Race and religion historically have been proven to be much more important than personal wealth.
