Logic triggers poltards

And you will have no rebuttals to this, only hypocrisy and circle jerk.

Attached: tmp_11930-Screenshot_20190317-123837_Firefox6083997411179691235.jpg (719x878, 362K)

>Moral consistency

Nice, Western Civilization WONT EVEN EXIST soon because of the brown flood, but atleast they were "morally consistent" to their graves :)

...

Judging women for being sluts and being okay with butchering unarmed people doesn't have to be conflicting. In fact, judging your own people to uphold moral standards while advocating for physical removal of foreign people who are a threat to your people is healthy tribalism and has worked for centuries

how do those two things have anything to do with each other
this guy is calling people immoral assuming they follow the same moral code as him

This. OP and pseudointellectual faggots get btfo

Sargon tier argument at best.

This. Not following the moral inconsistency here.

nothing to discuss in this post. is there something you wanted to talk about?

Help friends, harm enemies. The only moral consistency that has ever existed. Fuck muslims, fuck kikes, fuck niggers, fuck passivist racetraitor cuckolds.

Morals are defined by the society

You are not witnessing hypocrisy, you are witnessing the birth of a new society, with new morals to go alongside

You're not wrong, but you're allowing their more fundamental (and highly mistaken) premises that

> men and women are the same psychologically
> the NZ shooting wasn't a disarmament and accelerationist psy-op / false flag
> aesthetics are unimportant as a value to live life by

Once you realize the above points are very mistaken, OP's pic related is word soup.

you're retarded, butchering invaders is fun and wholesome

The moral framework is completely different here. Lurk forever and never post again.

Pol is not 1 person you idiot

When they kill US, we WIN.

>anti female sexual promiscuity and the murder of foreign invaders are conflicting ideas.
I fucking hate how the word hypocrite gets tossed around by buzzword spewing mouth breathers when they can't even point out HOW what they're pointing at is hypocritical.

But his logic is invalid.
>you dislike x groups
>you are okay with this murder
>therefor you are hypocritical and morally inconsistent
The conclusion doesn't logically follow his premises. Now even if he formed his argument as
>you hate x groups because they murder people
>you support this murder
>therefor you are hypocrites and morally inconsistent
the argument still hasn't taken into account the reason why Jow Forums believes this instance of murder is justified. His argument is pure sophistry and emotion. That isn't to say he is wrong, but he argues his point poorly and anyone could easily pick it apart.

Tsk tsk tsk, such double think and circle jerk in this thread.

That specific mosque produced multiple ISIS fighters. The media/jewoogle is trying to memory hole those stories now.

Attached: 1551479911581.jpg (540x720, 34K)

But they're not unarmed. Im pretty sure they all had two...

Absolute mental retardation. You don't know what a false equivalency is, do you retard? A moral code can condemn the prostitulization of it's women and support the genocide of it's filthy enemies' children. It's that simple. Saged and reported.

Justified killing and condemning promiscuity are certainly compatible. What an incoherent diatribe.

>tfw you try to hang Jow Forums on its "principals"

Attached: 1550695396600.jpg (600x600, 35K)

>apples and oranges
>"wow, that's so powerful. truly epic."
>1 post by this ID
nice try, shill

kys