Counter-manifesto

Do I need to go on?
m) Sexual freedom and homosexuality is growing, the same thing you clowns like to attack as degeneracy, was practiced by the Greeks that you refer to when you defend White power (the 300 spartans and their 1500 slaves).
n) Freedom of speech: The thing that is preventing the supposed ((Jew)) from killing you all 1 by 1. No, proxies dont work. They just have to find the proxies and use those to find the next etc. until they find you. It does not cost that much money, they can do it. But they choose not to because they want to allow freedom of speech as it is a CULTURAL thing in Europe to challenge ideas instead of resorting to violence... As Mr. Tarrant would suggest.
o)gun rights. Even crazy people are allowed to defend themselves. to ensure growth opportunities. Maybe the conspiracy theorists are right? European culture is so kind that it allows retards like Alex Jones to spew their crap at the chance that maybe they are a New Copernicus to us one day.
Again, it does not cost much money to kill these individuals. Why dont they do it? (le 4d chess meme, eat my ass).

This is getting tiring.

p) Blue eyes and Blonde hair and Pale skin has ALWAYS been considered beautiful in European culture. and it still is.
q) Heres a controversial one for a change: We are SO SECURE about our culture, that we invite apes from dumb nations to ours to prove that ours is superior. And it is, as they all inevitably adopt our scientific culture, or live in slums as cheap factory workers. Win win.

tldr; get out. People who dont read dont deserve to have a voice.

Attached: 1403878366217.jpg (432x288, 13K)

So culture is going nowhere. ok. Esp considering the fact that a fucking Australian is feeling enough European pride to murder civilians, I'd say our culture is going pretty fucking strong. (Slavery flashback).

what about race? This is the most difficult one, because it is the only premise that has a true root, and that is consequently his biggest issue. But this one is false as well, since the problem is not the yes or no question of race, but rather the extent.

3::
Are white people and black people and brown people and asian people and gingers different? Yes.
Are these differences caused by genetics? Yes.
RACISM IS REAL!!!

Hold that thought...

Look at the races of dogs. What are the differences? Some have really fucking weird shapes, some are really fucking short. Some are really motherfucking big. Some are aggressive. Some are the size of rats. Some are the size of fucking cows. Those are different races.

Look at the races of humans.

One has slightly more skin covering the eyes to minimize water evaporation from the eyes, and lean black hair.
One has less hair, but black skin to replace the hair to prevent skin cancer and skin burns.
One has light skin as there is less sun farther from the equator, so allowing more sunlight to hit the skin (to get vitamin D for bonegrowth/strength) is important.
One has EVEN LIGHTER skin and BLONDE hair to go with it because wearing clothes is a necessity in the cold North, and if you are covering your skin with clothes that means less sunlight hitting your skin, which means you need even lighter skin to absorb more and more vitamin D.
One has blue eyes, because they are pretty, okay?
One is hairy as fuck because they wear clothes but live in sunny areas so they dont really need to change that much, so they remain hairy like apes on the parts of the body covered by clothing.

With a straight face, tell yourself these differences are the same as telling a German shepherd apart from a bloodhound (which is a generous example. What about rottweilers.

So we arent really different enough to tell us apart race-wise. Language wise YES. culture wise YES. but race wise? a little more skin over the eyes but speaks perfect english - is a different TYPE of human???

You are correct in that these people can be thought of as different races, but dear god. If there is a german shepherd with asian eyes, im not gonna rename it asian german shepherd (although that would be hilarious for other reasons). It's a german shepherd with 'smaller' eyes.
If I see a german shepherd that is slightly furrier, it is still a german shepherd, not a.. whatever those dumb hairy dogs are called.

Attached: 1407808379226.jpg (400x538, 42K)

i didn’t realize you were going off on the whole thing. sorry to interrupt, good work user.

Our brains. Burakku peeepul have lower IQ. IQ is a barely standardized test devised to test people's convergence when it comes to problem solving. Is it the shape? no. Is it that shape? maybe. Is it really? no. Is it that? no. is it that? no. Is it that YES. IT IS. Problem solved. High IQ.
Black people might be slightly worse than white people in solving this way, that might be true.

Is this german shepherd suddenly a rottweiler due to this test, that literally nobody takes seriously and uses as a meme ("400 IQ move right there, bud")?
What about those black people that score well. Are they suddenly white? ("But most of black people..") HAVE YOU TESTED MOST OF BLACK PEOPLE THAT HAVE INTEGRATED INTO EUROPEAN SCIENTIFIC CULTURES? Sorry for yelling. But no. no you havent. And even if you are proven right, and call these people other races of human. You may do that, but nobody sane is ever going to. So... Your move... -as long as it doesnt involve killing 50 innocents hanging out in a church.

But what about preserving white people? If we all mix, there will be no more black people and no more white people and no more asian people.

Firstly, that is not really a bad thing as this would result in the more beautiful and now rarer white people being extra pretty due to the rarity. Blonde hair and Blue eyes are beautiful.
While at the same time providing more possible mates for everyone.
And secondly, even if it was a bad thing. It is not going to happen.
People will always have the choice to marry/mate with whomever they wish.
'Diversity' (buzzword alert) simply provides us with more choices.

dial it back
you take some truth then blow it out of proportion as far as possible and it becomes edgy bullshit

So preservation is not a problem, and since there is no hivemind going on (eradicate white people beep boop) white people becoming a minority is not going to be a threat. The same way people who are gingers arent being threatened, or the way people with really fucking bad teeth arent being threatened, white people are not either. Especially, considering your extreme scenarios' major flaw: a lot of these mixed people will have white parents, and therefore will respect whiteness and its beauty.

White people will keep breeding more as things settle down. We are still very new to this new Information era and open sexuality VS. tradition era. Dont worry about it. And dont kill while you worry about it...

4::
Whiteness is going to lose power.

This is the one question that scares me. I wonder. Do other white people see themselves as a hivemind? Are you deeply connected to big oil CEO:s and read their thoughts and agree with them when they start wars to make some extra pocket money etc.?

Joking aside, I know what you mean. White people will become so few that they will be bullied and too weak to stand up to their possible eradication holocaust style.

This sounds like a very very legitimate concern. I am not being sarcastic.

If nonwhites were truly looking at white people and thinking: "Hey, that family out shopping have fair skin. Fuck that shit."
Your worry is very legitimate.

Fucking BASED, sound, and logicpilled! POST MORE user!

But. They don't. There is no other way to put it. IF (big if) whites become a minority, they will not be oppressed. So your concern is very careful, and legitimate, but just strictly not true. Mixed people are not going to think back at their ancestry and only hate the white side. And 'coloured' people are not going to become rich and resourceful WHILE at the same time remaining stupid enough to think white people are not themselves but with whiter skin. It is just so unlikely, BUT POSSIBLE, but so god damn unlikely that it is ridiculuous to cause a revolution over.

I am going to be a little rude here, and assume that whoever is claiming whites are in power and not are probably people who have no idea of what being in power is like. It really, really, is not a competition of race and appearance. You are either better/richer than someone else or you are not. It is not us whites against those asians.
So to conclude all of the presumptions:

(we are getting near the end)

have you read his manifesto?

Attached: 1407867552295.jpg (640x480, 75K)

1. There is no hivemind going on. You are simply projecting your sharp carefulness ('it is POSSIBLE... that my toaster has a microphone in it' level of carefulness).

2. The European culture is safe and secure, to say the absolute least.

3. The 'races' are too similar for anyone but very very sharp and careful people to give a flying shit about. And even then, on further examination, they are too similar to really be different. You find black people ugly? Fine. nobody is asking you to call them beautiful (though u are lying if you see a thicc...ehm.) but are they a very different TYPE of human with different compatibilities and capabilities? no. infact, I believe there are even some black conservatists who act more white than most white people, which is highly amusing. Toms always crack me up...

4. Whiteness is not going to lose power. It is going to gain power. Fair skin is always beautiful. European culture sure as hell beats goatfucking.

Whiteness is safe. The definition might become broader (the same way gingers/blondes with blue eyes' whiteness allowed brownhaired people into their whiteness making up what we call white today - which included Hitler whose hair and headshape does not look very white to me.), and so the widening of the definition is not an issue as extremists who want super super whiteness can still breed with whoever they want, ensuring the future for their white children 1488. (meme.)

Sorry... But you killed 50 people to defend the white race. You ended up showing that 'white people' are willing to go as far as sandniggers/Isis to defend their extremist ideologies.

One believes Mohammad wanted them to kill civilians as a message.
The other that Ebba Åkerlund wanted them to kill civilians as a message.

P.S. "But why is this event so important, hur dur, why do you not care about the terror crimes committed by the towelheads".
Firstly, we do. this is just more shocking.
Secondly.
Because white people born in European cultures are supposed to be better than brown people born in hellish cultures.
Incase you, a white supremacist, did not get the memo.

PPS. "This is about Islam and its..." oh shut the hell up. There are literally billions of muslims in the world. Dont shapiro it and claim that most of them want destruction and domination etc.
There are a lot more muslims in the West even, that are peaceful than violent. As a thought experiment, guess the ratio. I dont think even a super nazi would go lower than 100-1. So clearly the muslimness is not causing these pathetic psychopaths from joining terrorist organizations. Move on, you retard.

Attached: 14037493552272.jpg (782x566, 123K)

Bump even though zoomers dont read

thank you. I just had to get this out of my head. Whatever bullshit happens next, I did my part.

I did not like Mr. Tarrant's false dichotomy either, where the muslims were all one side of terrorists, and the Europeans one side of powerless victims.

Im just trying to extinguish any other clever, but very radical flames that are undoubtedly growing for no reason in people's hearts.

Attached: 1409313108660.jpg (600x600, 53K)

final bump.

Muslim isn't a race.
And Jew is a loaded term cause it could be either.

>m) Sexual freedom and homosexuality is growing, the same thing you clowns like to attack as degeneracy, was practiced by the Greeks that you refer to when you defend White power (the 300 spartans and their 1500 slaves).

Greeks died cause of that decadence. Have you seen that place? Haven't done anything since Saint Nicholas. The Romans liked their early stuff, sure, reading it was a sign of "worldliness" likely, but I think even they were embarrassed by how useless Greece had become.

This is fantastic work user, great way of defusing radical terrorist stormfags at Jow Forums. But what is your argument against all these stats americans keep throwing about how jews hold disproportionate power in their societies relative to their population. Such as, having more power in the media, academia, etc. Being only 2% of the population and being 30% of students in Harvard. That sort of thing. Is it just propaganda and false data?

Attached: harvard.jpg (480x507, 58K)

>challenge ideas instead of resorting to violence...
Except that's a false narrative. Civilization is built on violence against the barbarian. We start with violence against ourselves, in Christiandom we kill the old man with Christ on the Cross.
In Rome they literally destroy the Barbarian homelands, rebuild them in Alexandrian streets, make them slaves and teach them how to do the work to make their own Alexandrian style cities.
In either event, the pretense of Peace in our time takes lots of violence to create.
And it is, paradoxically perhaps, an act of Peace to violently stop a person wrongly doing bodily harm to someone else.
And, again, you're conflating religion with race, and as part of that conflation, placing a non-existent connection between people existing near you "at peace" and their intent being peaceful. The Trojan Horse would work on you 100% of the time.

What is with swedes that they keep writing a 6 trillion word ramble that nobody's gonna read about shit most of us already have known about at what is for them 4 am.

is this a Swedish thing or is it a German autist who thinks he is Swedish did some drunk Jews steal a German baby and lose it in Sweden like 20 years ago

They are a cream of the crop people, my guess would be. Their worst ones were killed as they traversed "hostnations" perhaps, and only their cleverest survived. And clever people make it to the top very easily, but they dont seem very creative or amazing. Just effective. "Slow and steady no matter what" as opposed to the more natural "stupid rabbit or smart rabbit".

Until this is proven to be a bad thing, I will turn a blind side. I sincerely cannot see a reason Jews would want to hurt their neighbours. Many of them are 'halfblood' anyway.

>uses as a meme
This is what is known, by recent culture, as "taking it back." It's a coping mechanism that actually suggests the value of the test, not defies it.
The absurdly high reading suggested actually implies that you would have a low number, thus validating the idea inherent in the scoring.
Not necessarily enough to be a racialist over, but not a very strong point from you.

No, they are a medically clean nation, they have strict punishment for virus carriers in mating, and since virus in utero contribute to permanent DNA weakness, this distinction creates people with a higher IQ. They are also a people who learned to read as a culture before others, and not only did they learn to read, but they required memorization which offered on demand recall.

>I sincerely cannot see a reason Jews would want to hurt their neighbours.
Because you have yet to delve into anything of intents, ideas, schools of thought, or group self identification, at least when it comes to Muslims or Jews.
You've done a nice bit of Critique over 'europeans' and some guy in New Zealand.

said again
Muslim isn't a race.
And Jew is a loaded term cause it could be either race or religion.
And Anti-Semite is being against a language group.

But the main complaint they seem to have is justice, especially considering the average jews (according to more of their data) votes and defends ideas that weaken the majority group in favour of minorities such as quotas, but this doesn't seem to affect them, since they have dominated these institutions to the point where they favour their own ingroup when chosing applicants. It is hard to deny that this is unfair to a group that is legally penalized, no?

The worst of us see Islam as a race. I dont think Mr. Tarrant questioned those he killed if they were just visiting or actual muslims.
Hitler's rule even included tracing people's lineages back to see if they were Jewish, so again, I do believe it is very important for me to conflate race and religion in this topic.

Greeks died for many reasons. Lack of expansion, and internal conflict.

Civilization is built on many things. We do what is necessary.

Up to today, slavery, murder, and rape has been necessary since people can forget and overlook. we will not be able to use violent means in modern times however.

It is though, as it is not an intelligence quotient. But rather a convergence ability quotient.

There are probably some really damn low IQ JAzz artists out there that the Einstein of Einsteins finds amazing.

Yea, I forgot that too. Good point, their religion has a lot of reading and repeating which enhances thinking.

You are just spitting out words here.

Jews and Muslims are the two prongs of a Semite invasion - The Muslims outbreed us while the Jews outmaneuver us.

Whites will have to expel the whole Semite scourge in order to save our people.

wtf do we or dont we randomly kill the brown people? someone explain

Attached: 0a1.jpg (643x820, 80K)

fucking based

Attached: 1549510198285.gif (640x480, 1.26M)

hey op i didn't read your gay posts either but i just wanna say that non-whites don't belong in white countries, mudslime or otherwise and that no amount of paragraph posting will change my or anyone else's mind

oh and one more thing, don't respond either cause i'm leaving the thread and i'm not gonna read it

>But the main complaint they seem to have is justice, especially considering the average jews (according to more of their data) votes and defends ideas that weaken the majority group in favour of minorities such as quotas
That would be a problem if there were malicious intent behind it. But it is difficult to cross those two lines.
>They hire other Jews BECAUSE they want to hurt whites.
vs
>They hire other Jews because they trust other Jews more, since they are more like themselves.

And they probably vote in favour of quotas etc because they identify and at the least sympathize with minorities.

But yea, your suggestion would be an unfair thing indeed, if I understood it correctly.

I see, so you can see that maybe it could be percieved as unfair if you're racist enough. But nazis never stop there when it comes to their hatred for jews. Their data also implies that jews had an absurd representation of the media as WELL as finance. This very convenient for them, because small minorities that hold a lot of power are usually good targets for irrational hatred. Think S. Africa now with blacks against minority rich whites.

Attached: journalism-2.jpg (678x596, 87K)

1. no one here seriously think there's a "hivemind" going on, individuals act freely and independently; however, the freedom any individual has is clearly limited by his environment - that is to say, no matter how free individuals are, a palestinian kid raised in gaza will never act out the lifestyle of a scythian horselord; the conspiratorial folks here think a number of powerful individuals (radical imams, postmodern jews, etc.) with great mal-intent to the West have managed to muster enough influence over society to shape the "parameters" of individual freedom that would ultimately lead to the demise of white people; I disagree completely with that notion, since it's nothing but conspiracy theory; I, however, hold the hypothesis that by being the people to have given birth to capitalism and industrialization, white people are also the first to feel and so far most affect by its effects: capital does not care about race or color, capital will chase profit, no matter tradition, no matter the birth rates (the fall of both being direct results of urbanization which is a direct result of industrialization which is a direct result of capitalist accumulation and innovation cycles); so basically whites created the system that's driving their own "genocide" (I disagree with the term)

You werent bad until this part. Then you started sounding like yet another reddit fuck, who cant stay at least somewhat neutral for 5 minutes.

I like Nazis. They think! but I dont like it when they become irrational and surrender their greatest virtues (human kindness, and thoroughness - white superman meme).

Regarding the Jews, this is profiling which I dont really like doing as it objectifies people into things. But it is necessary here for their own good...

Jews have had to be clever due to their history. They speak like gypsies, and dont look very attractive. They also spend time only with themselves, and cut their foreskin. So only the clever ones could have survived, doing clever things.

What professions are good for clever people? Media (CLICK BAIT TITLES).
Economics (Trading!!).
Banking (Interest and gambling calculations to determine good investements!!).

You are not wrong.
But people tell themselves lazy versions of this piece over and over again. And if you tell a lie enough times... Muslim individuals become muslims.
And muslims become shooting targets.

Well. Im being as objective as I can. And Ithink I did a pretty good job. I am cutting things short, as you can surely understand.

2. the definition of "european" has varied a lot throughout history; after the fall of the roman empire Europa eventually became associated with christendom: territories conquered in Palestine would've been considered european, while the far reaches of the baltic and scandinavian states, still pagan, wouldn't; anyway, eventually "european" became tightly associated with the age of revolutions, with the enlightenment, with the modern nation-state, with constitutionalism, with human rights (private property), etc.; the spread of "europeaneity" reached it's highest point in the immediate aftermatch of ww2, with the defeat of fascisms and the establishment of global institutions of governance along the lines of western liberal democratic values; however, that specific type of "europeaneity" was challenged all throughout the 20th century by communist regimes and third world non-aligned movements alike, and despite what the end of the cold war might've made everyone think at the time, the heat is still on, especially with the chinese catching up to the U.S. and proclaiming to the entire world their system is a legitimate and frankly better alternative; european culture is the most threatened it has ever been at least since fascism

3. Race (genetic variability between human groups) is a spectrum, just like color is. Nobody denies red is a completely different color from yellow. The problem is at some point on the spectrum people decide "here red stops and orange begins". That is the whole problem with the race debate. Sure blacks are ugly af and have lower average IQs. They are absolutely, fundamentally different from me, including because your own race influences a lot how you perceive the world and how the world perceives you. But to me the problem is deeper : I hold the notion that, as individuals, we're are all so different from one another, in our backgrounds and stories, bonding along the lines of race, as arbitrary and meaningless as that is, is futile. Bonding over your country, your tradition, blood and soil, etc. is much less arbitrary, but still not enough.

That's cool and all, but here is the graph that actually got to me. It turns out that when asked about which group they percieve as the worst in their societies, jews decided that it was evangelical christians. Even more so than muslims! And this considering that evangelical christians are the group that most strongly support them, especially when it comes to Israel.

This actually got me thinking. Maybe (and this is just a theory), just maybe there is a possibility that jews have this tendency of actually not liking the people in their host nation, to the point of even misjudging or despising the people who support them the most. This causes them to actively work against this majority group of people (sometimes in sneaky ways XD), who in turn starts to hate them as well. And because they are in positions of power often associated with greed or fraud, unlike, say, gypsies, they end up being very easy to hate back and that's why they end up being expelled by so many countries.

It's just a theory I'm working on bro, do you like it?

Attached: PF_14.07.16_interreligiousRelations_ALL.png (640x512, 27K)

You seem to be a lot more knowledgeable than me, so I cannot really do anything but nod as it does make sense.

The part about china matching Europes influence however caught my attention a little though. China is, as far as I can tell, an extremely wellmoderated capitalsm-communism fusion of governance, where they are cutting every corner to become as economically successful as possible.

Their treatment of their own people, and their individuals' lack of freedom is a bubble close to bursting I believe. Macroscopically, it would be in our best interest if this bubble were to burst peacefully.

Europe is under threat perhaps, but not by anything even close to its level.

I, as an European, believe very firmly and close to my heart that kindness and justice. Happiness and cooperation is the correct path towards the future.
China does not seem to embrace these things, so I inherently believe their ideology will change.
But I might be wrong.

Thank you for entertaining me my friend.
Stay strong!

Attached: 1468270493182.png (319x310, 136K)

This graph is showing exactly the opposite of what you are saying.

Ratings given by Jews seem to rate Evangelical christians highly...

Maybe im too tired.

You're not very good at reading graphs, crossboarding friend. Read it more carefully.

100 is good 0 is bad jews rated evangelicals a 34. thats low not high.

4. Here you're just wrong. White traits are recessive. This means even if white people were 75% of the world population and they got to mingle with the rest 25% non-recessive people's, in the long term, white traits would largely disappear from the population. Maybe every once in a blue moon a kid would be born with yellow hair and be treated like a freak. But the situation is much graver: whites are projected to be 5% of the world population by 2100. It'll all be niggers and chinks, all dominant genes. I still don't think white people are going to disappear, because like I said, individuals are free and independent, and there'll always be white people only breeding with other white people. But the demographics effects will have a devastating effect in power and politics. Whites have had it too easy: we're few but hold a tight grip on the world's power structures. The entire first world is a white haven, has been for the past 70 years at least. The entire third world is black, brown and yellow. That is not a coincidence. That grip you hold on power is the extraordinary profit of the capitalist venture, you beat the competition, now you rake in the spoils. Like Apple. But that will change due to the sheer pressure of demographics and genetics. Politicians govern for their constituents, and whites will be a minority. Minorities get, at most, tolerated. Wealth will be spread more equally among the rest of the brown society and be progressively diverted away from the hands of whites. This will only drive birth rates even further down. This is what people here call "white genocide". "White replacement" seems more appropriate to me. I also think it's the result of the system they created and exported to the rest of the world. Capital doesn't care about race or tradition. Fascism was trying exactly to subvert that, to put capitalism to work for race and tradition. This is why fascism spreads like wildfire here, despite most being completely unaware of why.

have you never learned how to summarize in school?

Attached: giphy.gif (280x280, 2.39M)

Attached: stuffers.png (640x512, 70K)

If you were not an srs fag I would think you were merely pretending to be retarded and would abandon the thread. But I am kind to the mentally handicapped.

Attached: PF_14.07.16_interreligiousRelations_ALL.png (640x512, 70K)

s4s*. I guess retardation is contagious

At least the other guy had the decency to publish his manifest in PDF format instead of half-assing it like you are.

I suggest you do the same. This is beginning to be tl:dr material.

Attached: Main_PDF.jpg (844x500, 107K)

My friend. Are you trolling me next level right now?

Ratings given by Jews:
White evangelical 69, Jewish 89. (Makes sense).

Ratings given by Catholics: catholic 80 (makes sense).

Ratings by evangelical christians: Jewish 34.

>Jews are better than you Goy! They're not cheating nepotistic con-men at all!

Attached: 1530047174490.jpg (471x462, 64K)

wew
Friend, try reading it this way;
Blue numbers BAD
Orange numbers GOOD

Jews rate evangelicals at 34. White evangelicals rate jews at 69. Read carefully little buddy. Focus!

ok you're trolling. goodnight haha

Attached: 1481687980549.jpg (717x800, 80K)

you're wrong

jews don't like christians because to them it's all made up bullshit, they are a people so old and firmed in tradition that a lot of rabbis decend from lineages of jews that pass down the stories of how their ancestors got to see christ going around judea with his weird hippy movement, how they all had a good laugh at him being crucified, how they made fun of his followers when nothing miraculous happened later and how they got to witness the absolute fringe cult-like shishow that was the 200 first years of christianity

to jews catholics are bad, but evangelical christians are an even worse breed of heretical professional bullshitters spreading throughout the world like the plague

Jesus Christ, you are actually retarded. Notice how the Y and X axis on the graph aren't equal. The relevant one is the horizontal.

can you please just publish your manifesto in PDF format?

im lazy

>let me explain this they breed because they are cave people
>they act like cave people because they are cave people
>we can teach them how not to be cave people

No we cant you stupid cunt. Funny because the rest of the posts were so solid.

That wasn't my point. The point is how jews tend to hate even the people who will support them the most. It's their eternal mistake.

you are reading the graph wrong, on the left are the groups that give the rates, the top line is the groups that are being rated

I have never seen a person have so much trouble with a graph.

sigh you fucking lost me again, now you just sound like another jew =/ unfortunate.

Remember the 6 gorrilian mein neger

Attached: 1552790841017.jpg (904x711, 70K)

Not all muslims. Not all Muslims. Allow me to rebut.

It's not at all surprising this happened. It was going to happen eventually. The only reason you guys are acting surprised is because you prefer the illusion of moral superiority right now. Ok that's fine, I'm not a radical either, I choose to work within the process as well. The question does become though, do you have a breaking point where you recognize the process does not or cannot work? I surely hear many of you making that accusation daily. Then what? Perhaps "at least we weren't violent" will be your last words. How christlike.

These people individually? Innocent perhaps, although allegedly the mosque had some history of extremism which I was unable to verify personally. Regardless, lets call them innocent, they are still part of the greater whole of Islam. The same way we might be categorized by Muslims as part of the greater whole of Christendom. I can't remember a time in my life when Muslims havent been hijacking airplanes, blowing up buildings, taking hostages, massacring innocents, raping young girls, stoning women for being raped, murdering faggots and engaging in general barbarian fuckery that by comparison makes chicago gangbagers look like a bunch of church boys. Before 2001 it was condemned by the west to a degree. Now we get "Not all Muslims." Children run over with a truck and dismembered. Not all muslims. Nearly 100 slaughtered in Paris. Not all muslims. 1500 girls systematically raped for years. Not all muslims. Not all muslims. Authorities refuse to take action and worse, they blame those of exposing it! Racists, bigots, intolerant!

Whether you like it or not, two sides exist and one of them is inordinately prone to violence. This was going to happen eventually. You may say "but hes no better than a muslim now" and you may be right, but when the authorities fail to act and allow the enemy to continue onward, there are two outcomes. Accept subjugation and eventual extinction, or adopt tactics that worked against you so effectively. War is not about moral superiority, its about brutality and exerting force upon the other. If a knife is pulled on you, you pull a gun. If they kill ten of yours, 100 of theirs pay the price. Waging war against you must be too expensive to continue and the enemy forced to submit to your overwhelming nature.

That is what happened here and while I take no joy in the slaughter of innocents, this is just the beginning. I've seen plenty of Jew removal this, Jew removal that. Fuck the spics, kill them at the boarder, drive them out! Intern the shitlibs, destroy liberalism etc. How do you think that all works? You think all of those people go peacefully? Violence is the final arbiter in all matters of man. Brenton will not be alone in his ferocity, he is merely the first to be driven to his brink. Do you think he is the only accelerationist that exists? Muslims have already vowed to take revenge. They will undoubtedly kill innocents as they have been for the last 50 years. Will you rationalist it for them as well?

Frankly I'm surprised that whites have been as restrained as they have. All of you are flipping your fucking lid over 40-50 muslims dead (vs the 1000's killed on the opposing side) while 3 times that died in Africa just recently. Seems to me this number is actually more of a testament to the restraint whites have as a whole than anything.

I would say jews don't care (not exactly hate) about anyone that's not a jew, especially if you know a little about their religious tenets (e.g. there's no such thing as "spreading the gospel" in judaism) and after so many diasporas and persecutions throughout the world

the jew is like that excluded kid in class that people try to approach time and time again only to be rebutted, as a result the kid is excluded even further and starts being hated as he clearly disrupts the atmosphere in making a point to be around but not be a part of the group either

seen this happen in workplace environments

ohh yea i see that now... curious study. I wonder why the Jews rated the evangelicals so lowly.

im really tired... ive been awake for 30 h now. good night

> thinks we will read his commiecuck wall of text
Just wanted to say DEUS VULT and may /ourlad/ have a /comfy/ prison cell full of vidya and tendies

Yeah, but what if that kid held a monopoly on the other kids parents media and could tell them how awful the kids were to him all the time so they should all be morally obligated to give him money for the protection of his holy treefort (israel) and ignore the fact that he is trying to genocide palestineans?

stop being a meme spouter cringe lord

1. jews are disproportionately represented in a few key fields of the modern economy (result of both in-group mentality = nepotism + higher average IQs) but they are far from holding a monopoly on anything;

2. jews played masterfully the holocaust to legitimize their zionist ambitions, but don't forget that's only part of the equation; a) the creation of the state of israel is mostly the result of brits having shit the bed MASSIVELY on the middle-east post-ww2; b) hitler played a direct role in the rise of zionism by luring the mufti of jerusalem to the axis sphere of influence, which in turn led the british to look for a strong ally in the region, during the interwar period having promised an israeli state in palestine; c) jews conquered that land fair and square, with blood and sweat, against all arabs gangin up on them

3. after the seven day war, the lebanon raids, the labanon war, the suppression of the intifadas, the gaza raids, the exclusion of the people in the west bank, the staunch conservatism of the orthodox jews, nobody thinks they are saints anymore; the holocaust will live on in memory just as the first industrialized genocide and that's about it (just the germans proving once again that if they have a knack for something it's for autistic efficiency), not the first genocide, not the first one of the jewish people, not the first one of the 21st century

4. the nature of current us-israel relationship has much more to do with appeasing republican evangelical bases, the geopolitics of having an ally in the middle-east and tech/military industry contracts than any possible conspiratorial theory

>but they are far from holding a monopoly on anything
Media. Not a monopoly on it in general, but in what's considered "new establishment" media, and hollywood. I'm not a nazi and Hitler obviously helped the jews with the holocaust. Their colonizing of palestine is immoral to most people and they often kill civilians to advance their agenda.

Also, the current us-israel relationship goes further than that. We're talking about billions of dollars worth of contracts. Obviously american big arm companies profit from all of this, but implying that Israel as a state would survive without that money is zionist propaganda, essentially. They are not as strong as they like to portray themselves to be and rely on funding other groups to do their fighting for them, like ISIS, with the help of the CIA and US money.