Invaders are not innocent

lol it says CUK in your ID

I recognize that maid

Then why you faggots come to our countries and destroyed it you white devils have a double standard

theyre ok as long as they don't fuck whites

BASED

military units gain all the glory, but the real work is carried out by the settler units. they lay the economic/social/logistical groundwork for the takeover. you see this happening today all across the west- spics taking over large portions of the US, no-go zones of mudslimes popping up all over europe

if you have the logistics in place, you can take over with minimal loss of life. "amateurs talk tactics, professionals talk logistsics" etc etc

Attached: 1522783379990.jpg (1080x1350, 124K)

Attached: 1489696891086.jpg (320x292, 27K)

Stand up, firestarter.
1-2-3-4, break and enter the mudslime mosque door.

youtube.com/watch?v=EiqFcc_l_Kk

war was made upon your people. your comment is like a soldier saying "im not gonna shoot at the enemy cuz hes shooting at us, im not gonna stoop to his level that would be hypocritical"

dont be a retard

Attached: dumbdumb.png (226x240, 6K)

100% wrong
The vast majority of people were against the immigration increases in 1950, 1965, and even today immigration is the number one issue for voters.
There were no referendums because the result would have been ruinous to the banking kikes plans and they never would have been able to sell it

yes, just like their was no Bolshevik revolution, after all it was just Russians do it to themselves.

Destroyed what? Name one country that was not developed far beyond it's beginnings by colonialism.
Then we gave them independence and they went to shit.
Anyway the conquistadors and invading armies were fought against and rightly so

no, jews let them in.

Love this place after all

Attached: s1200.jpg (900x900, 135K)

So if traitors open the gates for the invaders, that somehow doesn't make them invaders?

(((countrymen)))

Policy is decided by the governing class, even in a total democracy. We didn't let in the invaders, our governors did.

There are no invaders, there are people who want a better life, and there are losers who have nothing going on for them and are butthurt at brown people for existing, like everyone here.
The future is multiracial. Like Christianity, Islam will fade away once its adherents are no longer victimized.

I'm a Moroccan guy in NL and I just gave my ginger dutch baby a good dicking. Shit was so cash. Fuck you losers lol.

>pedophile
>implying there is anything wrong with being a lolicon
butmad roastie detected.
>also muslems worshipping the profet
pure retardation
Quran, 18:110
>Say to them (O Muhammad): “I am only a human being like you. It is revealed to me that your God is One God. So let him who hopes to meet his Lord do good deeds and let him associate no one else in the worship of his Lord.”
quran 3:144
>Muhammad is not but a messenger. [Other] messengers have passed on before him. So if he was to die or be killed, would you turn back on your heels [to unbelief]? And he who turns back on his heels will never harm Allah at all; but Allah will reward the grateful.
quran.com/3/144
more over you know why muslems are prohibeted from making images of the profet and any of the other profets? in order to prevent Muhammad from being “idolized” as Jesus and maria (pbut) was by Christians.

no genuine messenger of god would ever ask his people to idolise him besides God.
quran 3:79
>It is not for a human [prophet] that Allah should give him the Scripture and authority and prophethood and then he would say to the people, "Be servants to me rather than Allah," but [instead, he would say], "Be pious scholars of the Lord because of what you have taught of the Scripture and because of what you have studied."
quran 5:99
>Not upon the Messenger is [responsibility] except [for] notification. And Allah knows whatever you reveal and whatever you conceal.

Attached: pure discust.png (376x415, 215K)

>open the gates for the invaders,
invaders implies there an organized army which there not stop diluting the fucking term refrugees=/=invaders

>be peasant
>local Earl decides he wants cheap steppe nigger labor
>let's them in
>not just lets them in but incentivizes them with welfare
>displaces the native workforce
>native workforce deals with it for years
>can't deal with it.jpg
>organizes pogrom
Yeah but they totally did it to themselves.

>the future is multiracial
>but only in western countries

Attached: 1443794017167.png (539x612, 175K)

perks of living in a neo-democracy

>live in a shithole
>decide you want free shit
>step in a magic time machine
>boat on over
>suddenly 200 years in the future
>still have the same regressive and evil beliefs that condemn your home country to shithole status
>begin dragging down the mean in your host country
The elites don't mind turning you into Brazil because they'll live in their little walled off enclaves. From their they will rule you all while the rich get richer, the poor get poorer.

I have no problem with white people living in Morocco or anywhere else, in fact they're most welcome. In fact I'm thinking of taking my girl with me to Morocco once I make the big bucks here.
I fuckin hate places where everyone looks the same, like China and Japan.

That's why once we get over hatred of people based on their skin color, we must guillotine the billionaires and confiscate their wealth.

The politicians you voted in who represent you did

True. Thanks for listening.

Follow me on Twitter for more.

>traitors open the gates to invaders so they can rape and pillage
>haha they're not invaders loooool

Never going to happen. They'll sell you socialism that will only stratify things even more all while telling you they're making things better and the stupid brown people will gobble it right up just like they do back home.
If the jew cries out as he strikes you the commie bleets about wealth inequality while building his fourth summer villa.

So what are the Europeans doing in New Zealand then

>invaders implies there an organized army

Wrong.
For the bulk of human history organized armies were the exception and not the rule. What "organized armies" did the Vikings, have? What "organized armies" did the Huns have? What "organized armies" did the Commanche have?

Organized armies are an aspect of sophisticated civilized warfare, but not all warfare is civilized let alone sophisticated.

Your ancient unknown ancestor that died when a band of friends from a neighboring tribe decided to get together and burn down his settlement, would laugh in your face if you told him that "invasion implies an organized army". That is if he wasn't dead for over two thousand years with his skull bashed in, anyway.

>I have no problem with white people living in Morocco or anywhere else,
You also have no problem when white people living in Algeria it anywhere else are genocides in the name of decolonization, so no one here really cares what you have no problem with about white people.

>What "organized armies" did the Vikings, have?
viking raiders where warbands again with the express intent of raiding aka invasion and then agian did you not hear about the fact that they took over france? and england why do you think the anglos are now called anglo saxons? .

>What "organized armies" did the Huns have?
what are you talking about the huns where well organized and they where an empire at that.

Tarrant-chan did nothing wrong.

Attached: 1548616826252.jpg (1152x2048, 199K)

Attached: BRAAAAP.png (568x552, 109K)

>scat fetishism
>kraut flag
it's like pottery

Attached: smug.jpg (223x226, 5K)

Loss of human life is still unfortunate.

Attached: 1552628350597.jpg (184x184, 13K)

are you quoting skyrim user?

>human life

WHAT?
where? what has happend???

Attached: 1509553144831.jpg (641x530, 136K)

Not really. The only lives that could be said to be worth distressing over are those that are properly constructive.
Most people, including myself, are worthless for the species as a whole.