Is libertarianism connected with the jews? or a jew invention?

Is libertarianism connected with the jews? or a jew invention?

Attached: libertarian jew.png (298x169, 6K)

Other urls found in this thread:

biblebelievers.org.au/word.htm
youtu.be/JZTJOc87pLc
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

yes

Same with Christianity. They are two sides of the same coin.

You have some books or links explaining that? i'm looking for information but i didn't find much about that

Murray Rothbard and Mises were both Jews so yeah I would say it is as connected as Marxism and Jews

Rothbard denied the holocaust though, so he's based

>Jews want you to think for yourself and only care about your life, your family, and your property

Jews are ten times more based than Nazis then I guess

Everything is connected with the jews you retarded nigger

I disagree with that.
Here some info:
biblebelievers.org.au/word.htm
and i reccomend the book:
Christ Ain't a Jew - Houston Stewart Chamberlain

(((Ayn Rand)))

Attached: 3A9ED599-2A13-4499-8E09-900B489AB34D.jpg (1334x750, 471K)

Nice job trying to hide your flag, Shlomo. You’re biological need to jew still ruins your plans everytime.

Attached: 8499AC19-567A-4E81-A002-FCDEBCA05C22.jpg (829x600, 88K)

Libertarianism is just classical liberalism with anti-statism. While I welcome Jewish supporters, I'm pretty sure classical liberalism came out of England and France, not Israel.

True
But i´m searching for information that supports it

>Muh (((Individualism)))
Sure thing, kike fuck.

Attached: 2803B8EF-882B-41E7-9FB9-FB1C4C4A2681.png (1397x760, 727K)

Not my problem if you want to be part of a Jewish based religion. Keep worshipping browns, cuck

Attached: _87264971_jesus_bbc.jpg (624x463, 28K)

Attached: (((Libertarianism))).jpg (1280x727, 156K)

I wonder why we aren’t able to see your flag. Is it because of some Talmudic trickery? I wonder...

Attached: D3B9C06E-CBCE-4867-AB03-751B5A3F02A7.jpg (267x189, 7K)

Attached: 3EEDD041-B9C5-4692-85A6-E24E230E4DAC.jpg (300x221, 13K)

Attached: 94B9E419-0B4A-46BC-8A6C-A62CBFBB1888.jpg (194x259, 10K)

>physical and mental well being of society

>Implying that this term is well-defined or even makes sense.

Individualism is not an ideology, it's a tradition of thought.

>Ayn Rand
>Milton Friedman
>Rothbard
All libertarian philosophy is rooted in Jews.

Attached: ancap libertarian on children.jpg (1024x930, 242K)

Wtf I love Jews now.

its jewish, friedman, van mises, ayn rand etc were all jews. Its atomized individualism for the goy and hyperfocus on materialism just like marxism.

source?

If you don't value individuality and like being told what to do, the Jews have already defeated you

>Jews dont want you to care for your own race of people

Humans are tribal, and we unironically live in a society. There are standards and customs by which we operate on an interpersonal level. When those standards and customs become depraved and glorify degeneracy, all statistics indicate unhappiness, suicide, poverty, broken families, etc, it can be said that collective health is lacking.

Attached: decay of civilization through atomized individualism.jpg (1774x1602, 524K)

Everything has jews behind it so stop caring too much about it and listen to your own thoughts. Theres jews on the left and on the right. Stop being retarded about it.

FPBP

Attached: Ahem Ahem.webm (1280x720, 2.04M)

>pilpul
Your nose is poking me through my screen.

Attached: 4ED103DF-DB6B-4359-A15E-9C30D35AD158.jpg (850x446, 306K)

take your meds schizo

Collectives can be defined by more than just ant like conformity and authoritarianism. Societies and cultures depend on the involvement of its people to preserve it and keep it strong. Collective identity is essential to the mental and physical well being of the individual.

Attached: self sacrafice fascism.png (790x894, 380K)

I'm not gonna put that above my family and my property just because they look like me

That is literally one of the reasons US broke off from the UK, because Brits believed they had the right to be quartered in American homes just because they were subjects of the crown

Fuck that shit

Attached: SmartSelect_20190317-150249_Chrome.jpg (1042x958, 570K)

He’s not a schizo. He’s a Jew. Look at the pilpul he performs here: Jews have a biological need to jew.

Our founding fathers were racial collectivists

Attached: immigration act 1789.jpg (1024x586, 108K)

no

>they collectively said from their mothers basement eating junk food with their semen stained hands stretching over their engorged guts.

It was the Jews that made my race weak and decadent
These individualists are part of their scheme to keep me a slave to their tricks

Attached: FB_IMG_1550024811115.jpg (625x720, 75K)

Jews exploit the weaknesses of every ideology.

Mises endorsed Benito Mussolini and rothbard also worked on David dukes campaign
youtu.be/JZTJOc87pLc

Do you think a Jew cares?

Attached: 365C98E6-7561-4281-A05F-88D5F97FA04B.png (1240x1870, 3.48M)

Interesting, he was still a proponent of a subversive abominable ideology that go against natural order though. Maybe he just used "anti semitism" to have plausible cover and thus influence white nationalists with his corrosive ideas? Karl Marx did the same thing, he made "anti semitic" pieces for the news papers so that people wouldn't question him on the basis of being a jew, which he was.

Attached: 3B72CF9B-0BD6-4D5D-9131-4CB5D9D6F73A.png (645x360, 420K)

I know but part of the jidf script is to say "take your meds schizo" whenever we question them, so why not do the same?

It's more about getting this info to the lurkers rather than convincing him. But if I can convince him, all the better.

Attached: rockwell cult of depravity.jpg (850x400, 85K)

Collective identity only works for small communities like rural farms, which are far more incorruptible and close-knit

You expand it to a nation-state and it collapses, because farmers thousands of miles away have nothing in common with rich city-dwellers other than they look alike assuming it's an ethnostate

Good luck convincing a rural man he needs to pay for the upkeep and welfare of citydwellers so far away

Mussolini started of as an installled puppet, david duke is very likely controlled opposition having been a leader of the (((KKK)))

True
Based and redpilled GLR.

Attached: 4492AAD0-B141-4BCA-8203-197B5398822E.jpg (1024x576, 114K)

They weren't collectivists, hence "landowning"

They were individualists and they ascribed personal liberty to all Americans, hence the development of the electoral college and gun rights

They came here to escape the totalitarian collectivism of European monarchies where every and all citizen were subjects to a crown

"collective" is a misused word by subversives to indoctinate whites to not protect their own group.

based jews

Attached: 1543744083542.jpg (710x888, 162K)

Whatever is the best economic system, it is secondary to the survival of our race. We cannot get hooked up on materialistic doctrines if we wish to turn the tide

>You expand it to a nation-state and it collapses, because farmers thousands of miles away have nothing in common with rich city-dwellers other than they look alike assuming it's an ethnostate
The Nation States of Europe have existed for a thousand years along racial lines.
The way we look is genetically determined, and our genetic predispositions are what produce culture and an ability to coexist. The city-country divide in America was not a political problem until after the 1965 immigration act and a massive concentration of non whites in urban areas. Rural areas occupied by whites, despite being separated by the whole continent, maintain cultural and political homogeneity. If what you said was true, then there would never have been a successful nation state, ever.Which is demonstrably incorrect.

Attached: libertarianism truth.png (1231x441, 25K)

Only whites can be Americans as he has shown you, kike fuck. Jews are not white and therefore you aren’t an American.

Attached: 044E0E29-C351-4C05-90A2-8EDD28CB8825.jpg (442x558, 33K)

I think you misunderstand collectivism. You are using it a materialistic sense, economic collectivism. I am use it culturally. The Founding Fathers were RACIAL collectivists.

Attached: cs lewis depravity.jpg (599x477, 112K)

Throw in one last bump I guess
Off to celebrate the holiday

Attached: left right center and truth.jpg (900x1024, 245K)

Attached: truth on freedom.jpg (1000x1500, 262K)

The snake position is basically pic related.

Attached: ray_smbl.png (123x342, 61K)

>They weren't collectivists, hence "landowning
What does landowning have to do with collectivism?

Sort of. Same with Islam. Ostensibly these could be seen as 'anti-semitic' religions, but in reality only in the sense that either if successful would simply force all Jews into crypsis and their exoteric anti-semitic messaging is designed by one faction of Jews as a weapon and safeguard against another. The thing that confuses gentiles about Jewish subversion is the disputatious nature of Jews and the natural divisions within Jewish society is a part of their evolutionary fitness. Their natural divisions cause them to be acutely aware of the fracture points among other groups, but also occasionally goes sideways on them when they produce a renegade Jew, or a spurned convert.

Mohamed wanted to be a Rabbi but was rejected. Like Sunni Islam Judaism is a proprietary religion. As in the religion is the personal patrimony of certain Jewish families. One can convert but only the correct bloodlines can be priests. You will be shunted into an 'order' to be used as a resource by an actual racially Jewish 'priest'. Hence the Jewish derivation of a hyper-focus on property, in particular trademarks, intellectual property, et cetera which becomes increasingly more abstract (rounded digital buttons) as their obsession with materialism wends its' way through the psyche of the world over generations. A conception of attenuated "property" one may never personally behold, or cannot personally defend that initially only exists in the mind of the owner, but the sense of such "ownership" having been inculcated in society to protect said "ownership" allows the utilizing of free 3rd party labor in the form of violence against transgressors of the communal religious belief in said form of property.

Christian ritual practice comes from the Essenes after a multi-century dispute with the Pharisees over the converting of gentiles (the Essenes being the strict racialists). The central dispute between these poles in Jewish society was over who "owned" Judaism.

That's interesting, I noticed and found it really weird in the beginning that jews here had such an intricate understanding of so many different groups and their internal conflicts and roles, but it makes sense in that they want to subvert them.

Todays liberterianism as Mises and now HHH understands it can be traced back to Thomas Aquinas.

You aren't supposed to care about any of those things unless they are directly financially beneficial. Libertarians have simply added baggage on top of Liberalism and Capitalism after having been forced to back off of their insane stances, but haven't addressed any of the critiques. The idea that Libertarianism is an ideology which allows for rustic and folksy family values is nothing but PR to sell their ideas.

It's a moral philosophy without any room for subjective valuation. It answers the question of what the value of the love you have for your family should be. That answer is: The market will decide. So moral considerations are determined by their ability to produce profit. Valuations which impinge on the quality of price signals are immoral, and of course moral Libertarian actors will be more wealthy which in itself means more moral. Inculcating some kind of immoral belief system in one's children like that one should have exclusive sexual couplings out of non-pricable factors like "love" is interfering with price signals.

Thomas Hobbes had similar conceptions of "honor" as it was a kind of 'currency' which was in competition with loyalty towards the sovereign, which was the only vector of morality. Some Puritan dispensations believed the same about love for God, hence it being immoral to love one's children. The more love of family (et al) the less love of God. Adam Smith had a similar complaint about "honor" as being detrimental to his 'Shopkeeper's Morality' which would be necessary for the manifestation of Economic Liberalism into reality. The goal of Capitalist reformers was the moral reconfiguration of society in order to disprivilege things like loving one's family, and replacing those concerns with economic ones, which should be the only vector for any kind of concern. A single psychological dimension to all human action, controlled by a supposed collective invisible hand which in reality is of course more like a hidden hand.

Many neocons were literally (((Trotskyists))) who escaped Stalin's purges. One of the main ones was (((Irving Kristol))). His son, (((Bill Kristol))), owns the neocon news magazine National Review, which basically shills for globalist capitalism, anti-nationalism, yet is also strongly Zionist.

Basically, libertarianism is just a way for Jews to infiltrate white capitalist groups.

That said, there are some strains like Hoppean Libertarianism, that are more pro-white and nationalist.

Attached: Hans-Hermann Hoppe.jpg (406x270, 47K)

To be fair, many libertarians have to make nihilistic and materialist rationales for their philosophy, because it's a response to the same standards used by (((Marxism))).

yes

The idea of racial loyalty is no more or no less natural than your conception of "property" which promotes your self-interest as being morally correct and sanctioned by society. Libertarianism and it's antecedents are a religion, whose power like all religions is based on the power of collective belief to alter the behavior of the masses.

All Libertarians argue based on some belief that their axioms are true, and must be taken for granted as the cost of discourse with them, and hence their beliefs which flow from these axioms are a natural or cosmic "default". Libertarianism isn't tapping into the Rta or Dharma, and even if they were you would have to make the argument for the existence of this spiritual True Order to the universe. Marxists have the other side of the religion coin in that it's essentially Wikipedia as a religion. Their ingroups are based upon knowledge of canonical texts and seeded with memeplexes and thought terminating cliches which disprivilege "original research" (and original thought). Marxism and its' descendants are hence essentially controlled by book publishers and corporate journalism.

Libertarianism is Low Church personal spirituality mumbo jumbo and Marxism is High Church magisterialism, and the kinds of people who follow either religion are exactly who you would expect.

Good post
Hard to find good Jow Forums threads anymore
This one has exceeded by expectations