Well Jow Forums?

How do you respond to this?

Attached: terrorism.png (626x722, 127K)

Other urls found in this thread:

thereligionofpeace.com/attacks/attacks.aspx?Yr=Last30
thereligionofpeace.com/attacks/attacks.aspx?Yr=Last30
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Now try per capita or compare world extremism.

islam is right wing, get fucked commie.

A lot of studies include Islamic terrorism as right wing terrorism to fluff the numbers up

I don't respond to shitty retarded twitter posts because I'm not a drooling normalfag.

The official hate crime statistics only include 0.3% of reported interracial crimes. In order for a crime to be counted as a hate crime, the criminal must make his motive clear, usually by using racial slurs.

Also 97% of terrorist attacks in Europe and North America were committed by a Muslim terrorist between the years of 2001 and 2011. Not including 9/11, it's 91% committed by Muslim terrorists.

100% of Arabs are terrorists waiting to happen
100% OP is always a faggot

This

The hundreds of dead french people in Paris and Nice alone make up more deaths than any by "right wing terrorism"

This.

Attached: 1552918001289.jpg (582x603, 73K)

bullshit
total death toll + their portion of the population would give you a better idea

This but unironically!
The crime of Turkish nationalists in Germany is accounted under far right extremism.

White men gonna white. Amazing how you "create" civilization and then destroy it because white women stopped fucking you

Attached: pol.png (963x970, 797K)

they also pad with hate crimes that aren't terroristic and regular crimes commit by people with RW affiliations

>its white people destroying civilization and not the hordes of barely sentient shitskins like yourself

>Not adjusted for population share
>Definition or time frame chosen to exclude 9/11

Not 73 percent of killing, 73 percent of ATTACKS. If you add in Orlando shooting, the number of people killed is very similar for right wingers and Muslims over the past decade. If you add 9/11 it's not even close. If you look at per capita, right wingers make up 50 percent of the population, and commit slightly more than half of the attacks. If you look at Muslims, they make up 1 percent of the population and commit ten percent of the attacks.


The only reason it's lower in the US is because they are a fractional percent of the population. If Muslims made up 5 or 6 percent of the population like liberals want, they would commit FAR more attacks than right wingers. And in England, Germany, France, and most of Europe they already do. And worldwide, they commit the vast majority of terror attacks, and right wingers commit less than one percent.

Not in my country, that's US propaganda.

My bad, the percentages are counted by deaths, not attacks.

Islamic terrorism kills 80,000-130,000 every single year.

>domestic
its the sandpeople version of the nigger stat

Attached: 1551136317839.png (720x717, 565K)

You can't trust government stats when it comes to anything "white" or "right wing" related
pic related, imagine how skewed white crime stats are due to the labeling of literal black skinned "hispanics"

Attached: white hispanics.jpg (1580x3431, 1.97M)

>1-2% of the population responsible for 23.4% of terror attacks
wow. racists btfo...

This. That tweet is intentionally misleading. They measure it by attacks and not by deaths. Also they don't say how they define "right-wing".

With facts

Attached: 1552709983395.png (680x420, 187K)

If Muslims make up nearly a quarter of the US population then I guess those numbers aren't so ba-...

People still post shitty Sam Hyde memes in 2019? Wasn't he exposed for diddling some kid?

>the guy selectively uses the word domestic to make his point
>this is because his entire point hinges on exclusively domestic statisics
>is ignoring how these obviously pale in comparison to wider statistics not confined to domestic's bro

and he can't keep getting away with it

Attached: ItchyFaceHonkHonk.png (325x325, 138K)

Propaganda bullshit with skewed numbers. Has been debunked a billion times but brainlets keep going for it.

Ask the descendants of Hiroshima about the proportionality of an American response.

Three methodologies that leftists will always use for the boogeyman of right-wing extremism:
1. They cut off the 9/11 killings
2. They only account for US attacks instead of the world wide total.
3. They count right-wing killings as Islamic terror.
They always do the first one.

He's absolutely right, Islam is a extremist right wing religion

>domestic
>US

>1% of population is muslim
>23.4% of terrorism

PER
FUCKING
CAPITA

It's true.
If they count Islamic terror attacks as "right wing".

The left believes only the right can be fascist. Take Jeremy Joseph Christian as an example. He killed two white men who defended some Muslim girls he was berating on a bus. He has been labeled as a "white supremacist" and "right-wing extremist" by the media even though he was a registered Democrat and staunch Bernie Sanders supporter.

If you just throw everyone who does these things into a single group and call them right-wing extremists, then naturally you're going to come to the conclusion that most terrorists are right-wing extremists. If you look at the person's politics and how they actually vote they are more often than not left-leaning.

Why the fuck should anybody respond to this? Every sane nation has allies and enemies - killing enemies is ok, when your citizens are killed it's a disaster. Any other point of view is counter logical.

Check out
thereligionofpeace.com/attacks/attacks.aspx?Yr=Last30
Average of five islamic terrorist attacks a day

911 is still ahead, Muslims need to die a lot more yet

>decade
At least that can say that now instead of post 9/11 "since 2001"

Number of killings is certainly important.
Number of attempts is also important.
It could be that the intelligence services' primary focus is islamic fundamentalism, and so their numbers are down. They're down due to enforcement, rather than lack of will.

Let me guess...
Because Muslims are more or less conservative and patriarchal by our standards!

it's not true at all, look at the data nigger bitch

thereligionofpeace.com/attacks/attacks.aspx?Yr=Last30

>my peepee bigger than you peepee

can we just all fucking agree that terrorism is bad? not only one type of terrorism needs to go, all of them do.
it’s not a dick measuring contest. let’s compare the fucking k/d while we’re at it.

Attached: B607D854-750E-4A9C-8315-472A4BF185CE.jpg (640x468, 80K)

Based on his stats, Muslims represent 1.1% of the entire US population and are literally responsible for ~1 in 5 incidents of domestic terror.

That's fucking concerning alright.

Muslims are the ultimate (((right wing Extremists)))

White knight syndrome is cure-able my friend.

Apparently this fucking moron doesn't count TENS OF THOUSANDS of dead muslims killed by other muslims every year.

When the killing fields begin...we are coming for (((you)))

muslims are right wing extremists...

But shitskins don’t do anything so that’s impossible :^)

(((studies)))

Attached: 787f86b10170a2d79e80d0a470ad495a0bfb482158982cef2663774b68c5b51f.png (660x660, 159K)

Separate islam from right wing.
Factoring 9/11?
How many black on black crimes in democrat locales before it's considered terrorist?
Fact is in the entire western world very few people die from terrorist action, its probably similar to how many people die from falling off ladders.
More black people killed each other last weekend in the us than died in christchurch.
This is very silly politics. Domestic actions and daily behavior drive your daily life. Not big headlines

It's all about the Birthrates
It's all about the Birthrates
It's all about the Birthrates

Yep baltimore MD is up to 60 murders this year.
That's just one city