Is there an alternative to communism that isn't just reactionary 'grug no like change'...

> this is what brainlets actually believe

Attached: sayaka_laugh.jpg (1920x1080, 849K)

It's obvious to me that the course of civilization is leading to the literal unity of every entity on earth, lead by a centralized will. I think this is what Marx was trying to get at, but his idea of it turned out retarded.
I don't think there's any political ideology that I respect less.
kek

>Communists comes to wealthy person and says "We no money now, all possession gon be seized by the state"

What do you think will happen next?

Attached: Goshira.jpg (763x559, 55K)

>Liberalism does not thrive on imperialism.
>Drone strikes are like only done by bad republicans, only drumpf does those.

>Is there an alternative to communism that isn't just reactionary 'grug no like change'?
Capitalism, the most liberal system of all.

If the capitalists would concede their private property this wouldn't have to happen but instead they have to use private militias and propaganda to undermine the revolution.
What choice does the good communist have?

Bumping because I would also like to hear some.

What's Marxism?

>the literal unity of every entity on earth, lead by a centralized will.
That's the plot of Neon Genesis Evangeleon.

I hate people who even jokingly use pornography memes. There is nothing worse than this. Nothing. This rots the very mind to the core.

But will it still be capitalism when we are part of a hivemind?

Tell me about it

Attached: 40264243_1819939121435646_1717104232518038958_n.jpg (960x960, 80K)

You can have Socialism without Marxism - it doesn't have to end up stateless and there are much milder property relations that aren't Capitalism

>we

Are you truly free from its grasp when you're that sensitive to it?

No one wants their shit taken away

I'm not capitalist or Marxist. I don't even know what these terms mean. I'm just genuinely shocked and saddened if Marxism really condones the murder of it's ideological opponents as a precursor to it's official seizing of power. I know capitalists and Marxists hate eachother, and are at eachother's throats every day, but if they would genuinely kill eachother, then our world can only be said to be run by psychopaths, and I'm not supportive of either party. Be kind, people. Don't lose yourself to the degradation of the Kali Yuga.

been fucking my wife

Eudaimonia offers more promise.

Once all production is solar panels and 3D printers, owning them becomes trivial.

Attached: cliffside_monestary.jpg (850x2021, 339K)

instead of looking at them as opposing tribes, why not define what their principles are and how the ideas are in opposition

Marx doesn't explicitly call to kill, but the Soviet runs (Stalin, say) went ahead and seized and the opponents where executed.
Capitalists don't have to kill their opponents as they already are in power and can buy people.
Marxism is a plan to get to an authority-less situation, Communism, where (usually) you have arbitrary scale communes. It's all utopian and since you still need policia to enforce any contract, it's very theoretical and there are a billion of different plans for this stateless society.
A currencyless depiction that's a mix is the Star Trek universe, which has (within the federation) no money, but they do have an benevolent authoritarian stratification where status comes with virtue (also seen in parts in StarShip troopers and many sci-fi).

moved from /lit/ to Jow Forums, this is surely staying relevant after this post....

Unironically, National Socialism. Not so much white prison gangs but more the actual Nazi German state as it existed. They did a lot of incredible things. First national 5 day workweek (inspired by Ford), first jetplanes, rockets into space, highways/autobahns, you name it

Very successful companies/industry but also a good welfare system

They've obviously been seriously threatened by Marxism/Islam but modern Germany, Scandinavia, Netherlands, and to some degree even Switzerland and other countries are based off of them

Of course, they were all based off Bismarck's Prussia too (great innovation, but also first worker's accident/health/old age insurance--not at all friendly to Marxism)

Fucking m*ds, it was a philosophical question.

Yes, common sense and electronic democracy without retards and criminals voting.

Hmm, maybe electronic national socialist democracy

Dark hair on left is a dude isn't it?

What the hell? Of course not.

Seems to be true? What do you think those words mean?

I don't know who he/she/xir is.
So I have to ask.

>Is there an alternative to communism that isn't just reactionary 'grug no like change'? I hate communism but marxism seems to be true, albeit in a different way from how he predicted.
The only one who can be relied on to rule yourself is yourself and your property is yourself, other than that everything in marxism is flawed, attempting to get equality through the most unequal power balance of individual vs rulers, no marxists ever work to actually increase the standard of living of people or their rights only work to establish their ruling positions.

Attached: 1551891811932.png (888x894, 520K)

Evidently I'm incapable of describing it, since everyone thinks I'm discussing politics.

marxism isnt true at all lol
historical materialism has some value, but everything else is trash
capitalism (free markets) is the most efficient system of allocating scarce resources
it is backed up by studies in the lab and by just looking at the world/history

This thread is a sperg thread

>but marxism seems to be true

Attached: 1526489457337.jpg (205x249, 16K)

>but marxism seems to be true
It's called dialectics, many things jews say "seem to be true".

Attached: 1552701981508.png (1366x763, 1.54M)