not sure if trying to subvert yang gang or actually woke to the fact of yangs prediction about whites shooting up places because of disenfranchisement. Oh I see now kike.
>Yang supporter poorly edits image to imply the bulk of Yang supporters are significantly more criminally violent than Hispanic and White US citizens That's an impressively racist self-own. Let's disarm all Yang voters.
>Implying he's not right You guys are the ones constantly calling for right wing death squads and a race war. The worse things get for white people in white countries the more violent they will get. AS IS NORMAL.
>meme flag No, you like to latch onto the few nuts who like to yell about it online. If there was a serious push in real life you would see it unmistakably. The US public owns over 46% of the world's firearms and trillions of rounds of ammunition. If even a fraction of it was suddenly possessed by the ideas of a violent movement, they would metaphorically flip the sociopolitical table in only a couple of days.
Evan Flores
So you are agreeing with me and him. Good to know.
Ayden Reyes
>So you are agreeing with me and him. Not even remotely. If the problem existed or was imminent, public rhetoric would be very different. Most people in the US who are students of the Civil War and the periods before and after it recognize that certain circumstances like the state of the nation in the pre-war period aren't anywhere near happening. US gun owners, unlike the paranoid Mr. Yang fears, are not remotely likely to break the law or rise up in violence with the particular exception being to hide their arms in the event of unconstitutional attempts at confiscation.
Thomas Reyes
that is a fuckin good meme
Jacob Brooks
Yeah, right now. But in the near future when automation displaces more and more people and puts them out of jobs permanently, social unrest will rise. Racial tension will rice, and violence will escalate. A country as well armed as the US will probably have armed gangs killing people.
He's not even remotely saying all gun owners are killers in the waiting, you are just too low IQ to see what the future holds. NZ was just the beginning, as things get worse and worse in western countries (More immigration, more welfare for immigrants, lower salaries, lower employment, larger wealth inequality, more crime from immigrants, muslims, etc) the violence will escalate, as it's only normal for white people to defend themselves (and isn't that exactly what you've been warning everyone you would do?).
Basically, you're dumb. Yang won't take your weapons, he has said he will have a buyback program. You can't forcibly disarm a country with 300 million firerams, and he knows it and doesn't hide it.
Nathan Hill
Then he has already lost the war. Virtually no one will turn in their arms; entire counties are declaring that they will not follow state laws on firearms. Even if Yang became President, he cannot use the military to enforce law. The field staff of federal law enforcement is too small to bring a nation into compliance; they were created as specialist agencies to deal with crime across multiple states and even international boundaries, not to really supplement local law enforcement. You're already beaten, you just don't know it yet.
His objective is not to disarm whites, but to avoid things getting so bad so as that whites would take up arms and start retaliating. Jesus you paranoid THEYS GON TAKE MUH GUNS idiots are endless. Even Drumpft sold you out.
Sebastian Hernandez
If you're so serious, show your real flag. I've already displayed mine. Do you fear the inevitable disengagement that much?
A bold one. You should know that things really are pretty fucking tame in the US, but certain governmental moves are not tolerated on a deep cultural level.
The purpose of counties, towns, and some cities declaring themselves Gun Law Sanctuaries is to invite a legal challenge from a State government. They understand that under current US national law, the State will lose any challenge; this is a game, a dare from the right to the left using a mechanism that galls the left in a special way because they tried to invent it for matters of immigration. The problem being is that immigration is much fuzzier in US law than the right to bear arms, and immigration-related sanctuary laws have failed repeatedly when pressed on a national level.
Yeah, but again Yang's point is not that white people are racist killers in waiting. His point is that as whites are displaced, marginalized and embittered they will grow more and more angry, and eventually they will retaliate. Not just in the US, but in Europe as well. Which is already crystalizing in the form of right wing surge in politics, gun ownership, etc. The point is that there must be a set of policies enacted to ensure that white people won't have to lash out and defend themselves in their own countries.
You don't want a hundred thousand truckers with shotguns blocking your highways because they lost their jobs to robot trucks, while they see sanctuary cities and immigrants getting tons of welfare gibs. That is the point.
Hunter Jenkins
that only matters for people stuck here, I plan to exchange my ubi for a different currency and horde that till mexica's economy busts. then i'll laugh at the riots from a safe distance.
any scam where the perpetrator is promising to provide payments to all or most of the population for nothing is what im talking about.
also, most older people understand that when the government provides some service like this, they'll provide $500 in services at a cost of $2500, and that will only be the cost that they can quantify today.
also ubi would be implementing a mass scale experiment based purely on speculation. pretending you know exactly what happens once robots take today's jobs is speculation, betting on it is unwise.
>"Western World will be burned down but at least Yang gave me 1000$" - Yang Voter >"Western World will be burned down but at least I bought this stupid hat from blumpf." - Blumpf Voter
