Should Chomsky go on the Joe Rogan Experience?

Ryan Dawson should

>we have a president who doesn't want to intervene
>increasing hostility with Russia
>launching missiles at Syria
>wants to tear up nuclear deal with Iran and go to war with them
>wants to invade Venezuela

Attached: drill.jpg (500x363, 34K)

why? he's just another statist bootlicker. get over yourselves - the left is about as anarchist as the fucking queen of england. you lot are perfectly FINE with government as long as it's a governmtn that you all agree with and those that disagree will be cast out.

>claims to be pulling out of Syria
>announces new military base opening in Syria

Attached: I say.jpg (900x726, 94K)

Take someone who's a committed revolutionary, thinks we really have to throw out whatever there is of the capitalist system and market system and so on, take someone like that. They're still reformers. All the people you mention are still in favour of developing a decent health care system through government intervention because that's the only option. None of them say "lets not improve lives of people because we'd like to see a revolutionary change." They'd all be in favour for example.
Take say OSHA, the safety and health goals in the workplace, for years its been declining under Bush probably disappeared. But everyone you mentioned would be in favour of strengthening those regulations, they're government regulations.
Because what you're in favour of if you're serious, and the people you mention are, is pressing the institutions to the limits. Seeing what they can achieve. You're not gonna get mass popular movements trying to overthrow the institutions until people recognize they cannot satisfy our needs. Therefore you try to press reform as far as possible within the structure of existing institutions meanwhile developing alternative institutions from within building the future in the present society.
That goes on simultaneously.

>He's talking about Kurds and explains why to protect them from Turkey
Who the fuck do you think is one of Israel's geopolitical opponents? Who do you think benefits from Syria having to fight an extended COIN war?

>You decide to just lie and say he is talking about Israel
>implicit benefits of actions is lying
>people can't have alternative motives
You wake the fuck up first dipshit. Its shitty to intervene either way, Kurds or no Kurds.

Chomsky is the ultimate Jew who leads the cattle into controlled opposition. Nothing he says is genuine and he even agrees in Syria when it suits Israel's needs. He's not even hiding his Jewness anymore.

Chomsky, babies first communism. Who was a limited hang out during the Vietnam Papers and shifted the blame of the (((mafia))) and their drug trade.

Attached: anger rage choke.jpg (500x333, 141K)

two tards chatting. no thanks.

Kurds are communists and an ethnic minority. Of course now he wants military intervention.

Joe should go on Noam Chomsky Experience

he still believes israel has a right to exist. most people do at the end of the day. you can appose settlements and occupation of palestinian territories and still be a zionist.