youtube.com
>Third greatest general in history is a muslim
What are Jow Forums's thought on this?
100 greatest generals
Jayden Campbell
Other urls found in this thread:
Adrian Lee
it looks like the ranking is based on who won the most battles. i wouldnt oppose it if a muslim was third or first for that matter for any reason. it's survival of the fittest.
Jason Cruz
>implying David Petraeus was a greater General than Saladin simply cause he won one more """battle"""
Gabriel Turner
Genghis Khan is the greatest
Joseph Richardson
Battles won does not determine the greatness of a general; however, it is a factor in that determination. Out of the four men in the picture, I would say that Julius Caesar was the greatest leader.
Anthony Perry
Ahem.
Napoleon was a fucking hack.
youtu.be
Matthew Bennett
Muslims are horrendous at war just look at history m8
Dominic Nguyen
Hilarious lie, if you knew anything about history you would know thats incorrect m8
Dylan Jones
>who would win
>a couple drunk Slavs and a bit of snow or the “worlds greatest general”
Napoleon was a meme, he only prevailed for so long because everyone else was far too incompetent. The best military strategist of that time was the British admiral who shut down napoleons navy the second they set sail.
Dominic Green
That would be Subutai, who was main strategist for Genghis and conquered more territory than anyone else in the world.
Lucas Sullivan
yes, which is why the only muslim empire to make it to predominance to the likes of Western and far eastern empires were the Ottomans...Turks.
Before that, it was the Sassanids/persians.
Arabs are the nigger tribes of the mediterranean/middle east.
Bentley Flores
Aiden Reed
>Subutai
>Only 12 won battles
Who made this shit video?
>Subutai (Classical Mongolian: Sübügätäi or Sübü'ätäi; Tuvan: Cүбэдэй; Modern Mongolian: Cүбээдэй, Sübedei; Chinese: 速不台 1175–1248) was an Uriankhai general, and the primary military strategist of Genghis Khan and Ögedei Khan. He directed more than 20 campaigns in which he conquered 32 nations and won 65 pitched battles, during which he conquered or overran more territory than any other commander in history.[1] He gained victory by means of imaginative and sophisticated strategies and routinely coordinated movements of armies that were hundreds of kilometers away from each other. He is also remembered for devising the campaign that destroyed the armies of Hungary and Poland within two days of each other, by forces over 500 kilometers apart. By any metric, he is one of the most successful commanders in history.
Carter Garcia
Arabs are awful at war, only notable conquests by Muslims was due to Turks and Berbers. Even then they eventually got their shit kicked in. Even modern day you can see just how awful they are, they rely on old hand-me-down tech from European powers.
Matthew Carter
A L E X A N D E R
Jackson Torres
generals are individuals if one muslim was exceptional at beating his opponents being muslim wouldnt disqualify him
Mason Green
>numbers of battles won
>best general
What brainlet made this list. Is Alexander supposed to be a worse general than a fucking frog or bong despite conquering all of Greece and the entire Persian empire in their heyday from a primitive backwater like Macedon and literally never losing a single battle? I think not.
Jaxson Williams
The best should the one that overcame the greatest odds in battle and come out victorious
Like skanderbeg
Anthony Anderson
>falls for the niggerloving kikeloving robespierre "liberty freedom equality" meme
>emancipates the jews from the ghettos and allows them to start infesting western europe all over again
Jonathan Foster
Exactly this
Arabs are fucking trash at war, however east asians are known too be great wariors, on top of that they took balkanfags to fight for them.
Owen Allen
Numerical number of battles is a poor metric imo.
Jose Brown
Yep, Marlborough(Mambrú in Spain) >>>>>>>>> Every other britbong commander, but just 10 victories.