Why do places that don’t restrict speech always end up being right wing?

Agreed. Those /leftypol/ fanatics ruined everything. And don't get me started on radicalized origami

*and

Attached: 2FCA1CD0-1E1B-4879-80A5-882A2BAE4F1F.jpg (750x508, 189K)

The left isn’t liberal. American conservatives are the real liberals

>no actual consequences
Except losing your job and thus your livelihood. The Western Establishment is very careful to not TECHNICALLY take away your rights, while de facto doing so through indirectly by making wrongthink grounds for employment termination. Shaping public opinion through corporate media and coopted academia gives the elite plausible deniability that it's not THEM boxing you into a narrow range of acceptable behavior, it's just "common sense"

There is little difference between American “conservatives” and liberals

Attached: efa9676026cb975090db2193a4d4f347.jpg (240x240, 13K)

I misspoke. I meant people who are for limiting government in their lives. Neocucks need not apply

>Except losing your job and thus your livelihood.
Aw, dang, it's a shame there isn't protection for peoples' jobs being terminated for no valid reason or something.

>Why do places that don’t restrict speech always end up being right wing?
like communist country's?
there not right wing

Attached: Let+him+know+that+a+stranger+has+a+picture+of+_a97e30627f416c0858f5525791272630.png (283x164, 73K)

Your boss is going to find a way to get rid of you if they want to. Political opinion isn't a protected class in anti-discrimination law. Besides, most people don't have tens of thousands of dollars to blow on litigating a wrongful termination lawsuit for months while foregoing income

>Your boss is going to find a way to get rid of you if they want to. Political opinion isn't a protected class in anti-discrimination law.
No shit, that's why you don't spout your nutty bullshit at work or with your name attached. We used to have something in this country called a fucking union that would provide the lawyer to fight this bullshit. The pigs still do, which is why they can kill a guy on accident and get a paid vacation.

>nutty bullshit
i.e. corporate media has shaped your opinion to have defined as "common sense" a narrow range of acceptably progressive thought
>unions
Too bad the useful idiot left allowed themselves to be baited into idpol hysteria at the expense of actual socialism. Oligarchy is fine as long as half the billionaires are black women

They end up being counterculture and anti norms.

Valuing free speech requires valuing the individual. And Individualism is what makes something "Right Wing".

In order to maintain things like free speech. The more liberals and communists try to destroy that which grants people rights, the more “right wing” rational, normal people become.

By the way, I’ve learned to write at a 4th grade reading level to ensure liberals and communists are properly insulted.

>Go look at universities 50 years ago. They were all for free speech
Yeah I'm sure the Ivy Leagues were fine with people talking about the Jewish question and Race realism in the 70s. They liked the idea of free speech but they never supported it

I think it's because progressivism is essentially the religion of the west...along with this religion come the "priests" ie blue-checkmarks who preach the gospel, their loyal virtue-signaling followers, and their sjw inquisitorial squads who aim to root out and abolish all heresies. Once the heretics have been chased off the main platforms, they'll congregate wherever the inquisitors don't have as much control. Which means forums that at least somewhat support free speech especially in an anonymous format, web sites run by fellow heretics, small comments sections on blogs that are generally outside the notice of the inquisitors, etc.
As to what this user said, nature abhors a vacuum...if there is no explicitly endorsed ideology on a platform, usually the one dominant in the culture at large will take over given enough time, pressure, and motivation. This is why the shills post their threads here every day, and why NGOs and even some official government agencies are applying pressure to reveal the identities of anonymous posters...the first, to astroturf the preferred ideals, the second, to shame or otherwise disincentivize the wrong-think posters from countering the new material with their own.

We both know why, user

Because libtards move goalposts and ban logic they don't like

>right wing
What if I simply enjoy watching others get riled up by poking them with ideas contrary to the ones they demand I adopt

Attached: tmp_6327-14586793336361229187966.gif (320x240, 1.9M)

About 50% of the population have greater in-group preference versus out-group preference.
So any place that doesn't prevent in-group preferences will become right-wing as the left will flee any place that tolerates any other opinions.

>Social
>Not the law
The law is social. It's not some magical force field that just permeates all of space. Laws are enforced because people with the power to do so can be influenced to do so. If what is being enforced does not agree with what is written in the books, then it is what is in the books is no longer the law in any capacity beyond larp, even if it is intended to be law. What is intended cannot excuse what is, otherwise we just end up with
>Not real socialism
with a gavel and wig.

reals > feels
if logic is banned there is nothing to btfo mental gymnastics, but as soon as you allow logical arguments leftist idiocy gets rekt

>Soviet Union
>Venezula
>North Korea
>China
>Right Wing

Attached: 1551474305028.gif (445x250, 1.17M)

Because there are so few places that doesn't restrict it people with such opinions have to actively seek them out and gather there.
Others can flaunt their opinions anywhere.

Can you read?

Attached: E134E987-DF17-45F5-85C3-2BD7BF5D6A76.png (543x443, 24K)

What do you mean by 'places', do you mean platforms or physical locations ?

Get a load of this guy.

Where? You certainly can't be thinking of your own country. Yours is a leftist country founded in leftism and which spreads leftism everywhere.

But as for countries ending up right-wing in structure despite their ideological commitments, well, that's just a reflection of nature. There is no possible left-wing structure. Hierarchy is natural and all things will tend to it.

You’re posting here

I am aware of it. Is it relevant to my point?

Lmao so commies don't restrict free speech sweetie?

Both of these are true.
barrypopik.com/index.php/new_york_city/entry/all_organizations_that_are_not_actually_right_wing
Any real-life organization won't have true unrestricted speech (you couldn't walk into a right wing organization and scream gas the jews without getting kicked out) so over time they're able to trend liberal because of O'Sullivan's law. In a place with truely 100% free speech it's able to be fought against.

Like this very site, idiot.