WE DID IT, REDDIT!

Huh. This nigger's shtick is rgb(50, 0, 255)pilled. Anyway, watch The Jordan Peterson and the JQ video. The original got censored right after it got uploaded: youtube.com/watch?v=xRfV6qsvlUA

In a zero sum game, that is how it is mate

He's a conman e-celeb,I'm surprised people still try and push him.
I guess I should wash my dick and slay dragons, unfortunately,skyrim got old

Whatever floats your boat mate, he has some good points. If that means moving the Overton window, so be it

Good

Good point's? Name one good point he makes, and go into detail why the point is good.

he has schizophrenia

Peterson is a milquetoast vanilla Liberal (as in Classical Liberal) who dabbles in self-help psychobabble. He is deliberately and vocally anti-racist. He is completely harmless. Just how far left wing do you have to be to view Peterson as a threat who should be deplatformed and banned? Just how much koolaid have the students and faculty in the UK drunk?

what a dumb ass move, Cambridge is clearly on its last legs

One good point is that he doesn’t apostrophize a pluralized word you fucking mouth breather

I liked him before when Jow Forums liked him but now I don't because Jow Forums doesn't like him.

Free speech should not be infringed upon by governments besides those defamation, libel, etc and no speech must be required by the rule of law.

Why?

Anything else would be autocratic and arbitrary. Who decides what can be said and what not? Open to abuse and literal censorship.

2 Equality of outcome is thinly veiled anti-meritocratic and extremely left.

Why?

Nobody should get an outcome guaranteed if the opportunity is meritocratic in nature.

Dude, he makes typos like that on twitter all the fucking time

Jow Forums thinks he's Juden, Cambridge thinks he's a Nazi, methinks he's doing something right.

Attached: ascension.jpg (514x296, 15K)

No one cares.

Does anyone have a link to the NZ shooter manifesto and video?

That's a point the founding father of the US made, not JP

They just proved his point

dazed and dreadpilled

I was asking for points, not observations of points made by people hundreds of years prior to JP discussing it

SO BANE - AND THAT'S THE BLOODY THING ABOUT BANE - HE REPRESENTS CHAOS, IN FACT, HE'S AN AGENT OF CHAOS, AND IN CONTRAST, WE HAVE CIA, WHO REPRESENTS ORDER, ROUGHLY SPEAKING. BUT CIA, IN HIS BITTER RESENTMENT, IN HIS-HIS POSTMODERN CULTURAL MARXIST IDEOLOGY, HE TRIES TO TAME THE CHAOS - AND THAT'S A BAD IDEA MAN, IT'S LIKE-IT'S LIKE IF YOU TRIED TAMING FIRE, IT'S JUST GOING TO LEAVE YOU BURNT. BUT CIA, HE TRIES ANYWAY, MOTIVATED BY A LUST FOR POWER - AND IT'S LIKE - GOD ITS SO SAD - ITS LIKE YOU'RE NOT A BIG GUY! YOU'RE NOT A BIG GUY, AND NO POSTMODERN RATIONALIZATION WILL CHANGE THAT. THE EVIDENCE IS CLEAR. THE SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE IS EXPLICIT ON THIS MATTER. AND SPEAKING OF TAMING FIRE - WHAT HAPPENS BY THE END OF CIA'S 'EXPERIMENT'? THE FIRE IS NOT TAMED, QUITE THE OPPOSITE, IT'S ACTUALLY RISING. AND THIS DEMONSTRATES EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED IN THE 20TH CENTURY. AND IT'S LIKE SOLZHENITSYN WRITES IN THE GULAG ARCHIPELAGO - THE BLOODY MARXISTS ATTEMPTED TO QUELL FIRE, BUT IN DOING SO THEY MERELY FUELED IT. AND WELL ACTUALLY, THEY DID QUITE A BIT MORE. YOU CAN'T PRETEND TO BE A BIG GUY IF YOU'RE NOT. WE TRIED THAT EXPERIMENT IN THE 20TH CENTURY, AND IT WAS A BAD IDEA MAN! AND IT. IS. NOT. A. ROUTE. YOU. WANT. TO. GO. DOWN.

Attached: 1527501707635.png (716x768, 462K)

There is no way that you don't already have multiple links to download the video by now. Stop trying to entrap kiwis, glownigger.

But how will their students know whether to wash their balls or not? They will pay with a plague of disorganized dirty rooms.

>Moving the goal post fallacy

We were talking about points he made, does not matter when or where someone said it before or formulated it differently.

it makes a martyr out of a guy that's pure establishment, and some people will fall for it.

whats with these triggered americanfags? lmao

why don't you name one bad point he makes? Here's a good point for you, I don't really want to waste too much time on this since you clearly don't have a clue.

A Good Point
1. The value of a classical architecture
revival.

Why?
Long term it is of incredible economic benefit as well as psychological uplifting to those who work and view those buildings on a regular basis.

Attached: 1551803813448.png (754x1393, 1.55M)

Why should people defend him? Why is he angry? Clearly he makes people angry just like kavanaugh did. He should step down out of the spotlight and reflect.

Literal shills.

Haha, why are you leftists so fucking nervous lately??

Is that bottom picture real or an artistic rendition?

FOR YOU.

Most ideas anyone has have already been discussed at one point or another in history. A thought doesn’t have to be original to be good. Jbp takes those points and expands on them in detail with incredible articulation. He is worth listening to.

>Jewdan jewterson
Good, fuck this kike

This is brilliant user. If its not copy pasta good job.

No, I directly asked for points he made
He didn't make those points, he plagiarized them from US history .
You are moving the goal post by acting as if his observation and plagiarism are original points he made

I believe it is a computer generated model of what is to be built. The caption reads:

"The Hungarians are rebuilding their beautiful traditional architecture which was torn down by the Communists"

I don’t think you know what plagiarism means.

the thing is, he should stuck with psychology, while his promotion of individiualism is admirable, it's sadly quite flawed(not the thinking by itself, but rather applying in real life)

So you are giving excuses for is lake of originality, and I'm moving goal posts
I ask for points he made, not for shit he observed

>Circular reasoning

How long are you going to keep this charade?

You asked for points he made. Not original thoughts. He made those points in multiple speeches at University, like the one at Oxford you can watch on YouTube.

You are now grasping. Addres the points I gave you, coward.

>hee hee, I probably shouldn't say this but I figured out how to monetize SJWs hee hee
t. Jordan Peterson "intellectual" "spiritual" leader

youtube.com/watch?v=Eg4VmU8ejvA
He is just another money grabbing whore, with failed daughter

It's taking the work of others and acting as if it's your own, it's pretty spot on in describing JP

Jordan "Everyone can have a group identity except for whites, support Isreal Goyim" Peterson. Fuck him.

Alright smartass let’s hear one (1) original thought you’ve had

>Elite university rescinds invitation of snake oil salesman whose target audience is midwits and beta males

Jbp sources literally everything he talks about in real time, whether it’s from books he’s read or people he’s listened to.

He's the opposite, it's "tribalism for thee, not for me." He only cares about keeping whites as individuals instead of a united front

Attached: 1524630625683.jpg (1220x636, 141K)

There's nothing "Elite" about American universities user. They're daycare centers for thots and non-whites.

I think he perfectly sums up why identity politics is so dangerous. How anyone could be seen as an oppressor along some line if you look hard enough. Therefore, identity politics just ends in everyone getting killed. That's a good point.
It's not like his ideas are new, they are just common sense things that we've known for ages. People like him because he is a voice of reason. I can understand people not being interested, but this weird hatred of him is completely nonsensical. That's like hating Bob Ross.

He's an honorary Jew now like Trump, backstabbing bastards

I don't think you know what point means in the context I am using it as
Hint, it's a verb
>Circular reasoning
Unironically,that is the exact definition of what you tried to do there

>things he never said

This is so fucking dishonest, you know full well that the major disagreements here with Peterson are concerning racial interests and what he said about Kavanaugh

Attached: 1517612777499.jpg (2096x9768, 3.56M)

Attached: 1531094642225.jpg (640x360, 113K)

People that come from single parent households often latch on to JP

>Cambridge thinks he's a Nazi,
No one thinks he's a Nazi. He's some odd judeo-christian civic nationalist.
The issue is he's a motivational speaker and not a real academic; he hasn't published anything meaningful in decades. I'm honestly embarrassed that they even considered hiring him.
Also, the dude thinks women don't belong in workplaces with men. It's downright disrespectful to our many distinguished female fellows to promote that sort of rhetoric.

AHAHAAHHAA

They see the fraud for what he is!!

AHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA only virgin angsty manchildren takes this goofball seriously.

Attached: 30yrboomdanceparty.png (1416x788, 1.06M)

H O T P R O P E R T Y

Wrong wrong wrong wrong. When every other group is practicing own group preference except for the group you're a part of you are left vulnerable to attack. They don't see you as an individual, they see you as part of a monolithic entity that's "oppressing" them. When the rubber hits the road it's you or them and there's no second prize when you lose the civilization game, you get annihilated. Ask the Indians, or the Aborigines or any other group throughout history that was on the losing side.

Not original, jbp talks about this himself

Cambridge thinks he's a retard. Do you think an ivy league school actually can't see that. dude is full of shit.

>Cambridge University
>American

I know us yank graduate students like to joke about colonizing, but this is a bit of a reach.

Nope, you have only been using fallacious reasoning constantly. Refusing to address something you asked for.

Now run along, shill.

Could the Yang shills actually be Peterstein golems?

They seem to have a curious level of interest in what white people do on the internet, given the criticism they like to levy against those who are concerned about what others are doing. They seem to like using the actions of leftists to attack nationalist whites, rather than the leftists performing these actions, given how they stress that actions should only be attributed to those responsible. They seem to get really buttflustered over the success of shit like ((())), given their tendency to use "envy of success" as a means to deflect criticism.

Attached: yang-tweets.png (1437x805, 64K)

Good point.

>he makes you butt mad and stomp your fat little feet.

The reason this is good is because you’re a total faggot.

Not all retards are Nazis. Also, "ivy league" refers to an American sports conference.

Yeah, I made that point years ago, and he plagiarized it .

All of it.

lol Yes I'm aware that Peterson is labelled a shill by the alt right and a nazi by the alt left.

For those of us who are centralist, we don't actually see what your issue is, other than your both obsessed with a narrative that places you as the victim.

That's we love Peterson, he reminds us that our success and failures are our own.

I guess Cambridge University will remain dirty.

He's said it plenty of times. He clearly states that white identity is dangerous, but not Jews identity, or African identity or any other identity.

So you don't like him because he isn't a white nationalist, just say that then. You guys don't need to make up all these other reasons. Why do we have to beat around the bush you are on Jow Forums

He doesn't make me mad,he lost the majority of his fan base and it's fun to fuck with the die hard fanboys

Attached: F0929763-3C33-4F8D-B72B-0EE84E56CC03.jpg (904x1024, 452K)

Missed that but the point still stands.

please link me to where he says "white identity is dangerous"

I'm pretty sure he say "group identity is dangerous", which are not actually the same thing.

>So you don't like him because he isn't a white nationalist

No, Jow Forums doesn't like him because he bashes white people for wanting to do what Jews have been doing for their entire history.

Essentially yes. He's just another useful idiot that supports the current system that will see Europeans disenfranchised world wide.

See, that's why plagiarists are so dangerous, I didn't get the credit for my work .
He acts as if he organically came to that conclusion himself, when in fact he stole the idea from me

>whose views on gender and race have been condemned by critics
>and race
???

Earning those shekels ain't ya laf?

shouldn't that make you like him? Why do you want to do what Jews do? Why don't you become Jewish or Muslim if that's what you want so bad?

You're arguing semantics, he only calls out white group identity. I've yet to see him chastise blacks for ghetto culture or Jews for the Israeli apartheid state.

>Also, the dude thinks women don't belong in workplaces with men
That's a lie. He never said that

wash your benis

Attached: 1540817538238.jpg (728x704, 62K)

It's fine to be a white nationalist, just don't make something taboo and claim to be a free thinker, the smarter ones catch on.

It depends what you mean by European

*fine to not be a WN

>semantics
no your twisting his words to create a straw man argument. Your trying to make Peterson against white identity when in reality he is against group identity. The two are completely different.

Anyone from the European continent except for Anglos since they continually align themselves against "white" identity. That means you.