What are they?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
reuters.com
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
nature.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
people.fas.harvard.edu
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
youtu.be
telegraph.co.uk
theatlantic.com
twitter.com
I want to say noongar tribe because they have those roundish sorta heads
But are they niggers or a totally different thing?
on second thought that's pretty red dirt. they're probably up north with the camels
>are they niggers
nah kid they're space patrollers
they are a million things but human ain't one of them
I wanted to know how they got to there and everything. They're were from Africa?
Typical Australian that isn't a gook.
Basically wildlife that found alcohol.
Indigenous means that they are from where they currently reside. an entirely separate species of human.
Niggers
clearly indians who get too much sun, not native americans but apu from simpsons
According to Google they're out of Africa like everyone else
or kangaroo niggers
Inbreds.
>according to (((google)))
ok lad
They're the missing link between modern man and ancient hominids. Quite literally a prehistoric stone age people who, due to location and isolation, managed to survive until the present day. It's hard to for me to even describe them and do it any justice. Unless you've been way out in the bush and interacted with them for real, it's hard to know what I'm talking about.
It's easy to fling shit at them. The behavior can be quite terrible, especially among the ones who are shunned from their people and end up living rough in the cities. But I do feel bad for them in a way, because they are entirely unequipped to live in the modern world. They're time travelers, and castaways.
Funny considering the apparent split between hominids and chimps is only recorded in fossils so far on the north side of the Mediterranean. Out of Greece Theory is more like it.
>imagine the worldwide asspain when graecopithecus proves Athens as the seat of both our species and Western culture.
>What are they?
they are us.. ahahahahahahahaha
they're homo erectus, unchanged for 60k years.
What the hell did their buildings look like?
That's poetic.
They are australian aboriginals. Just to be fair, I am attaching the best this race has to show.
they look like some of my countrymen
IIRC they are more closely related to Dravidian Indians.
White women like travelling back in time for some reason.
still looks ugly to me.
Mandatory viewing
People just like you and me user
Your family
They have resided in Australia for 40,000 years and are just a step above chimps.
>literally lie on roads at night because its warm then get run over
>huff enough petrol to fuel an aircraft carrier's service life
>cant integrate into modern society because they stopped evolving 20,000 years ago
I’m not sure, but I can tell you what they aren’t
Aboriginals? read an article that the aboriginal man:
These guys could run at 40 km/h sustained speed, throw spears twice the distance and force of modern athletes.
Good God. Somehow I missed this. Thank you user.
Beautifully written
Slightly dumber pajeets.
they walked to Australia during the last iceage when sea levels were lower.
Africa is huge be more specific (you cant because it's a lie)
Homo erectus.
We should humanely reduce their population but keep some in a zoo.
not humans for sure
That thing is disgusting!
there are no camels in australia
Australoids (Australo-Melanesian) and no they are not related to the Dravidian or south Indian population. It's a broad range of people.
South Asian Indian populations have different cranial characteristics from Australoid groups. This difference got possibly strengthened in recent times due to the miscegenation with peoples of different origins. recent study sustains that the Southern Indian populations are not closely related to the classic Australo-Melanesian groups.
Theyre closest to dravidian indians but even less evolved
Basically prototype poo-in-loos
Please user may I have a source?
No, they are not. Genetics suggests otherwise.
> A research involving cranial morphology, made by Indian anthropologists
Kek, in other words poo smeared on a paper
It's almost as if he wants people to buy his book.
>Petroleum connoisseurs
They are survivors from a place where literally everything is trying to kill you.
they are poojeets that didnt get raped by arabs, mongolds, and poles
pic rel is a patel abo from brahmin caste
They actually look like extras in Michael Jackson's Thriller.
She looks like Selena Gomez
>lie on roads
What? Is this real or a joke?
I know they're basically old model humans but are they really that close to being more like non-humans?
Here another study.
nature.com
"Lanka Ranaweera, Supannee Kaewsutthi, Aung Win Tun, Hathaichanoke Boonyarit, Samerchai Poolsuwan & Patcharee Lertrit"
Don't seem to be Indian.
Their conclusion: Southern Indian populations are not closely related to the Australo-Melanesian groups.
Anyways I don't care, I'm north Indian.
Proto-dravidian and Korean share basic vocabulary. you can't explain that
barely human, btw everything i ever said on the internet was ironic and a joke
Mitochondrial DNA evidence supports northeast Indian origin of the aboriginal Andamanese in the Late Palaeolithic
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
the Indian population is attributed to incessant, historical waves of migrations into India, the earliest, by the Australoid speakers around 70,000 years ago
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Microsatellite diversity reveals the interplay of language and geography in shaping genetic differentiation of diverse Proto-Australoid populations of west-central India.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
A common genetic substratum (Proto-Australoid stock) of the Oraon and Munda was evident
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Microsatellite diversity reveals the interplay of language and geography in shaping genetic differentiation of diverse Proto-Australoid populations of west-central India.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Peter Underhill, in a more recent study, showed genetic connections between the Andamanese and people from the Kusunda area of Nepal.
people.fas.harvard.edu
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
Between 70,000 and 100,000 years ago, Homo sapiens began migrating from the African continent and populating parts of Europe and Asia. They reached the Australian continent in canoes sometime between 35,000 and 65,000 years ago.
I like the don't sleep in the road one better.
Does not look Brahmin at all. And every population got raped by some.
Also cherry picking. I will show you his white-skinned brother.
Your link doesnt say they arent descended from dravidians but that they should be considered separate groups due to the length of separation and that aboriginal groups are more homogenous due to inbreeding
>The pattern of genetic differentiation observed in the Vedda is a characteristic also observed in various other aboriginal populations of the world with their relatively small subgroups experiencing a long history of separation.34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 Such population history was also proposed for the Vedda based on the anatomical analysis.10 Much greater genetic similarities with Sinhalese, and to a lesser degree with Sri Lankan Tamils, observed in some Vedda subgroups (VA-Dam, VA-Hen and VA-Pol) in comparison with other subgroups of the same ethnic category (VA-Rat and VA-Dal) suggests that the pattern of genetic admixture between older inhabitants (Vedda) and more recent newcomers (Sinhalese and Tamils) on the island was truly heterogeneous. Advance admixture of VA-Dam, VA-Hen and VA-Pol with other ethnic populations on the island is confirmed by the presence of several shared sub-haplogroups (M33a1, D, R5a and U7a) among them that are not found in VA-Rat and Va-Dal. The reduced intrapopulation genetic diversity observed among subgroups of the Vedda is most likely a result of severe genetic drift associated with the practice of endogamy among small-sized villages during the long distant past, a phenomenon with firm historical evidence.4, 5
All evidence still points to abos coming from india
Human is not a scientific term. Humans are many species. Abos are a less evolved version.
KWeens
I like the one better.
youtube.com
look like abominations...I mean aboriginals
pure aussies, aren't they?
Oh my god.
Oh my god.
I understand there are significant biological differences, including re the brain, but I didnt know it was like this. They should not be forced to live among modern humans like this, we have a responsibility to them just like we have to chimpanzees, gorillas, rhinos, other endangered species etc. They should have a nature preserve somewhere they can all live completely freely like nature intended. The only time they should be interfered with is well-regulated studies etc. I know what I'm saying sounds like a joke but seriously. Forcing those to live in our modern world is fucked up. There is no fucking way it can turn out to their benefit.
subhuman untermentch
Diffrent
Cavemen.
>implying the northern poos arent gypsie abos larping as non-abos
gypos are upper caste brahmin
The populations showing closest relatedness to Roma/Gypsies were Brahmins.[26]
~50k yrs ago veddoids from india followed coastal route to australia to become aussie abs
~5k yrs ago veddoids from india returned and reinforced themselves in australia
veddoids form the bedrock race and have spawned the mongoloids/caucasoids
in india there still exists veddoids who speak the original australoid language related to austro-aboriginal lang
Haplogroup M2 [2] - found in South Asia
Haplogroup M3 [3] - found mainly in South Asia
Haplogroup M29'Q found among Papuans, Australian Aborigines
Haplogroup M31 [24] - found among the Onge, in the Andaman Islands[15]
Haplogroup M32 [25] - found in Andaman Islands
Haplogroup M33 [26] - found in South Asia
Haplogroup M33a - found in India
Haplogroup M34 [27] - found in South Asia
Haplogroup M40 [30] - found in South Asia[15]
Haplogroup M41 - found in South Asia
Haplogroup M42 [31] - found among Australian Aborigines
Haplogroup M5 [5] - found in South Asia
Haplogroup M6 [6] - found mainly in South Asia
also prevelant in east asians and native americans with australoid origins
I think the genetic distance is large enough. and abo came directly from Africa.
Sure they do bongo
youtu.be
you laugh, but in about 200 years the entire human race will look like that
They..aren't human. So yes, nigger
anything but indians, i don't see streets full of shit, so maybe these australoid guys are a more evolved version of pajeets...
do you like living in india the toilet of south asia?
a subspecies of gorilla
>gypos are upper caste brahmin
NO
Rom means man or husband in the Romani language. It has the variants dom and lom, related with the Sanskrit words dam-pati (lord of the house, husband), dama (to subdue), lom (hair), lomaka (hairy), loman, roman (hairy), romaça (man with beard and long hair). Another possible origin is from Sanskrit डोम doma (member of a low caste of travelling musicians and dancers).
Roma gypsies in Britain and Europe are descended from "dalits" or low caste "untouchables" who migrated from the Indian sub-continent 1,400 years ago, a genetic study has suggested.
They were spacegooks that crash landed and accidentally set themselves on fire. 40,000 years later they are still here. Just minding their own business in the dirt and napping on the main roads.
I love it desu. At least we got hope for future, unlike your dying race.
> and abo came directly from Africa.
Not even your links written by other poo-in-loos claim this
also this Doubt it, abos are even more primitive than modern Africans and are basically just a freak sideshow like pygmies or other isolated tribes.
Cheeky buggers.
Australia is so fucked up, literally everything there is monstrous
Calling them "sub"human is too generous imo.
Prepare to have those hopes crushed by a Pakistani nuclear bomb.
The first genome analysis of an Aborigine reveals that these early Australians took part in the first human migration out of Africa. They were the first to arrive in Asia some 70,000 years ago, roaming the area at least 24,000 years before the ancestors of present-day Europeans and Asians.
cope shitskin
Pakstan has mostly tactical nuclear bombs which are very small and they will only use it to stop an Indian agression (Cold start). India on the other hand has bigger nukes and much bigger delivery system.
Pakis can never win a war against us.
Poor.
Here's genetic difference.
ok winnie the poo, atleast i got toilet paper and a functioning toilet. China and pakis will crush you in the coming war
Ah Turkmenistan. Western Europe's long lost brother.
>They were the first to arrive in Asia some 70,000 years ago, roaming the area at least 24,000 years before the ancestors of present-day Europeans and Asians.
And guess where they mainly stopped and settled first before spreading out? India
Nothing about what you posted refutes that they are related or settled in India, its just butthurt pajeets trying to claim they are should be considered separate groups since dravidians have more arab and european rape baby dna.
> t. brainlet
