Why do people hate 'victim blaming' so much and use it as a buzzword criticism? Victim blaming is not even inherently wrong. If the victim is not at fault then yes it's wrong, but sometimes the victim is at fault. If someone drives without a seatbelt and crashes and dies, they are the victim and they are at fault. Saying it's their fault they died is victim blaming and it is true and reasonable and there is literally nothing wrong with saying it. Why do people, especially SJWs and leftists, hate victim blaming so much?
Why do people hate 'victim blaming' so much and use it as a buzzword criticism...
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
and before anyone replies to bait pic, its 17.
Because a victim is a symptom of a problem with that person, not with the offender.
Why are you an easy target?
What?
An abuser is just a person, same as a victim. The victim was clearly chosen for a good reason, let's discuss that.
Give me a victim example and we can work through it together.
reddit is down the hall to the left, morla fag
5
>Give me a victim example
A nigger breaks into your house and steals your TV.
What the fuck are you talking about, dumbfuck? How the fuck does calling out dumbcunts for being obsessed with 'victim blaming' make me a moralfag? Fuck off.
no its not, its five
5
1 + (6 - 8)2 /16
1 - 2 * 2 / 16
1 - 4 / 16
1- 0,25
0.75
Most people cant solve this problem which is crazy
That should be -6 not 6 m8
PEMDAS NIGGA
>homeowner is victim
My home security is worse than my neighbours. My vitcimhood comes from my ignorance of home security. I can fix this problem
>thief is victim
Raised in a single-parent home, this man is likely to be a victim of his narcissistic mother. There's no quick solution but a vasectomy can help prevent the spread of poverty.
5
What if your neighbor is rich and spend 1 million dollars per month on home security? Assuming you cannot afford that, your security will inevitably be worse than his.
agreed my bad
result is -0.75
5. Now then...
81
Das 81 rite
16÷2[8-3(4-2)]+1
16÷2[8-12-6]+1
16÷[16-24-12]+1
16÷4+1
4+1
5
>muh relativity
there is a minimum cost for a safe security system. after that minimum is reached, there's no need to spend millions.
if you're living in an area where the thieves are quite well-equipped and wealthy themselves, it may be worth your time to set traps in order to differ your victimhood onto somebody else.
o well if its wrong
16/2[8-3(4-2)]+1
16/2[8-3(2)]+1
16/2[8-6]+1
16/2[2]+1
8[2]+1
16+1
17
8?
What if aliens invade and abduct you and experiment on you?
I think it is just a tactic they use. They couldn't care less for any victim of anything, anywhere in the world. They just like getting mad in the hopes that someone will get it on video and everyone will see how great they are. Its a very shallow and underdeveloped way of functioning in the world.
SJWs hate taking responsibility for their dumb actions.
16/2[8-3(4-2)]+1
16/2[8-3*2]+1
16/2[8-6]+1
16/2*2+1
8*2+1
16+1
17
They don't, they'd blame you if you got beaten up for saying nigger.
It's just something they use for an excuse to start demonising opposition and virtue signalling, show everyone how morally outraged they are over your transgression.
Yes and no. Isn't that making the assumption the seat belt would have saved their life in general. Were they speeding? Was there a drunk driver? on meds?
I get what you mean. it's really starting to loose it's meaning at this point or just changing the definition
Multiplication and Division have the same precedence so they're evaluated left to right. RPN never has this problem:
It's 16 8 4 2 - 3 * - 2 * / 1 +
or 17
that's not a realistic situation. aliens are unlike to ever approach earth.
that's not a realistic situation. aliens are unlikely to ever approach earth.
no its 25
5
I thought sin can't go to infinity but not sure
>that's not a realistic situation. aliens are unlikely to ever approach earth.
[citation needed[
5
start here
en.wikipedia.org
PEMDAS is retarded. It should be called PEMA where division is multiplication by the reciprocal and and subtraction is negative addition
16/2(8-3(4-2))+1
16/2(8-3(2))+1
16/2(8-6)+1
16/2(2)+1
8(2)+1
16+1
17
It's 17, this really isn't hard
that has nothing to do with ayylmaos
I got 38 fuck why am I like this.
Hol up dipshits, I change my answer to -10.
True facts