Feminist police chief want false rape accusations

If there can't be a fair trial there should be no trial at all. Legalize rape desu.

she's unironically right

>lead Muhammad on with "tehehe im lonely tonight" texting
>really just want his arab money and have no intention of putting out
>get raped
>press charges
>b-but she texted that she likes me so it was consensual
>mohammad acquitted of all charges and elected monarch of Sweden

women always need to get compensated for being fucked otherwise they feel they've been raped

>UK
Those subhumans love living in a dystopian nightmare. Hopefully this speeds up the collapse of that shithole country, if only a tiny bit

Attached: 1423023173261.jpg (229x377, 18K)

The most pragmatic solution is for women to:

Avoid situations where rape could occur.
Fight back violently to provide physical evidence.

and they're right in feeling that way desu

Women are the most unfair and treacherous beings on Earth. They're the worst power trippers as well.
In Spain there's a lot of violence against men being promoted (with slogans like "If you wonder kill your partner" and things like that... And that's not hate speech, no).
But worst part is that female directives in the police dept. recommend women brass knuckles with blades in them, which are illegal, for women to defend theirselves while men can't even keep a screwdriver in their car without justification.

Omg I was totally raped SOMEBODY DO SOMETHING:
i.4cdn.org/gif/1552928933955.webm

is this rape?

Lol look at her face she looks like one of these "brainlet" memes

sack this bitch

that's a social interaction that wasn't meant to be

Who gives a fuck about white women, let them be raped by the people they cheer and call them innocent.

Attached: 5123121.jpg (500x623, 35K)

No. Rape is almost entirely a myth. Some men do get raped, usually in prison, but there's no such thing as raping a woman.

>16 months

from colonizers to cucks

OMG! Yes of course it was rape. He just assaulted me out of nowhere for no reason at all I was just dancing and he did that to me I'm literally shaking how dare you question me

Hot!

Them nasty woman has been benefitting from false rape accusations for years and when it comes to a man it is mostly not heard of or even just neglected.This feminazis support any bitch who comes crying to them and are ready to exploit a man...

>Nobody notices she works for fucking NPCC
Was Camus right?

When will people learn that imitating nigs is a terrible idea?

Rape is bad unless it happens in Rotherham.

>It leaves no real evidence of trauma
Well that's just completely untrue. Bruises, skin under nails, seman, there are plenty of things you can pick up for evidence as long as you don't wait 30 years to report it.

Don't worry guys, I got this covered!

Attached: waifu.jpg (1024x687, 221K)

That Sarah Thornton Cunt was in the news just a couple of weeks ago, don't know for what though.
I do no, that in here previous position, she had the worst crime solving rates in England/Wales. Typical for the public sector, the incompetent get promoted.

I don't get ubderstand their wording. Why dont women want courts showing evidence on their phone, what the fuck is a figital short skirt? Is it texts of them being hoes or pictures? Also why do they begin mentioning that cases have been thrown out because police arent sharing evidence , isnt this what the women want?

99% of girls love to be taken, choked, hair pulled, and abandoned with their clothes torn. It's not rape. It's normal sex.

lol what a retard. Dry humping this hypo for 15 sec sure was worth losing all your friends and dignity.

There was a case about twenty years ago where a sheboon decided it would be smart to walk around nogville in a mini skirt made of nothing but lace while not wearing panties, showing her pussy off. As you'd expect, a pack of spear chuckers raped her. During their trial, the defense attorney used the sheboon's mini skirt as a evidence that she wanted to be fucked. Feminists were outraged and have ever since used that situation in ghetto court as a strawman for all rape defenses.

Public obscenity should be a mitigating factor in rape cases in my opinion.

This is also where the saying "if I was on that jury" and "I'd do X years for her" got popularized. Men were more based back then.

>Saved by a recording on his phone

Does this mean he'd been jailed without evidence solely based on her testimony? WHAT THE FUCK

>unironically defending a woman's right to emotionally exploit men for financial gain.

Kill yourself.

So the woman was messaging the man before they had sex telling him she was going to enjoy getting fucked by him.
And now women say that such messages on their phones would make them fearful of making rape accusations.
So she's advocating that evidence of consent be not admissible because???
Privacy!!!
She really is a misanderist bitch, if a male police chief uttered anything similarly anti female it would be headline news and he would be sacked

Rape cases are always 'the guy better have evidence it wasn't rape/didn't happen'.

Yes lad the authority is fixed an unlawful.
Tis why you should ignore it an help bring revolution in stead of attempting to keep the status racist quo.

fuckers.

Basically if a woman is a whore and has tons of evidence of said woman being a whore on her phone (texts about fucking tons of guys, videos of her sucking dick, etc) the police don't want that to be used against a whore in a bullshit rape case. So in essence even though a roastie has been with countless guys on countless drunk nights, she'll be able to cherry pick any one she chooses and call it rape without worry

You already know the answer.

Cheers, thats retarded

>because of his phone
>no word about what the recording revealed
Sure, its wasn't because he is a sandnigger at all

Yes it is but that's what happens when you have women running things

>will I get paid if I successfully claim I was raped?
Yes,
Leftist governments have brought this in,
The Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority will give you a nice little wad of cash

I've never told someone to kill themselves

you know why? because it's unoriginal as fuck. you're literally no better than a 13 year old nothing watching chinlet !!le leafy mc kys is here!! there are millions like you. fucking millions. your IQ is low, your creativity is low. I've spent my life explaining the obvious to NPCs like you who only think in platitudes. you are fucking worthless.

and she's right. rapists are subhuman and having a le """emotionally manipulated""" sob story doesn't change that. a woman hurt your feelings? so fucking what. maybe if you had a higher IQ you wouldn't have fallen for her tricks.

>"he raped me"
>police look at her texts, find messages where she sent the "rapist" pics of her tits and told him to come over and fuck her because she was "horny"
>"IT'S NOT FAIR THIS IS A DIGITAL SHORT SKIRT YOU'RE NOT ALLOWED TO LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO SHUT UP AND BELIEVE ME REEEEEEEEE!"

But did it actually work? Had they gotten off with this excuse I might be sympathetic but if the judge and jury called bullshit then the turbo-dykes have based their whole argument on a nothing-burger.

>chairwoman of the NPCC

Attached: 1478913966627.jpg (1280x720, 102K)

Aussie honeypot be mad

They are talking about modern "I was drunk" rape, which are probably most rape accusations in the west.

Is your justice system that fucked up? In the United States the defendant has a right to fair trial. A potentially innocent man's liberty is at stake. Our legal philosophy has been, "It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer". That's why any evidence the defense may find useful may be used in court if allowed by the presiding judge.

Fairly simple the prosecution gets to have their inculpatory evidence and the defense gets to have exculpatory evidence. In the end, in most rape cases that go to trial are decided by juries.

The accusers character has every right to be scrutinized. Her liberty is not at stake.

Her feeling shame vs a possible innocent mans liberty. If you were someone who valued liberty you would agree that feeling shame is incomparable to liberty of an innocent. Who cares if her dress attire, sexual history, and character will be scrutinized at trial; liberty is more important than that.

Innocent = Reasonable doubt
Guilty = Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

Good girls wont have a problem entering their phone texts into evidence.
This is already going on in canada where exculpatory evidence on a woman's phone is being excluded from court in order to achieve a conviction.

That's fucked up.

>Text messages are the digital equivalent of a short skirt.
Pretty soon, consenting is going to be the verbal equivalent of a short skirt.

The only way I see to prevent a bullshit claim is to always record the sex/interaction with at least audio.
I'd gladly break some law about recording somebody without their consent if it can disprove a false claim.

never did I say that people shouldn't be innocent until proven guilty.

I merely assert that all the flirty texts in the world don't prove rape didn't happen. nor does a short skirt. they don't prove it did happen either. she should have to substantiate that she was raped. the idea that these texts need to be used to disprove rape is predicated on the assumption that rape needs to be disproved rather than proved

>Our legal philosophy has been, "It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer".
Why 10? Why not 100? 1 million? Why have a system of justice at all if by doing so we virtually guarantee that innocents will be condemned? That’s what the court of appeals is for, but I believe that the jury system should be done away with entirely anyway because it is a bigger source of error than prosecutory misconduct. Do you really want the absolute brainlets of the world determining what happens to you?

You don't have to choose a jury trial.
It is your right to have that option but you don't have to take it.
You can choose a bench trial.

The point of the statement is to say that liberty is very valuable, especially in the context of an innocent with regards to the law.

And that's the best legal system we have. If you can think of a better one then be my guest.

You falsely assuming that all women fight back. There’s a lot of evidence that most women just freeze and try not make the person angry. In a way that really does seem like it would be the best move to make. It’s not like the average female can go hand to hand with even the most beta of men.

I think they are part of context. Trials for the most part aren't that black and white. Every detail counts. Especially in hearsay cases that aren't obvious. She says rape, he says consensual. He says no bruises, she says she was terrified to fight back. That's why every detail matters.

kill yourself

Nigga do you think jury trials are mandatory?

As and pointed out, trial by judge or jury is the accused's choice. What would you substitute the jury system for? Just a judge?

It's actually pretty great. I've been charged with misdemeanors for which I knew they had no evidence worth a damn and got it knocked down to a $400 ticket simply by stating I would need to take it to a jury trial.

>okay state, you can either get $400 profit or piss away a bunch of money and time on a jury trial, up to you
Jury trials can be based as fuck sometimes and are definitely leverage for the defendant.

its the uk, is anyone shocked?

Any evidence that might exonerate the man might discourage women from coming forward. Ergo the police will no longer collect evidence if it could exonerate the man.

Not doubting you but do you have proof in a link or anything?

Based sweden.

FUck women.

Everything they get in involved in starts being tore apart like this.

This is why it's so important to get married and to marry women that are either young or who were raised right. Women will mould their opinions and behaviors to their peers, they are followers and never leaders. If they have a good husband and a good father the person they will follow is their husband and father. If they have neither of these things they will follow the screeching idiots on twitter and the water carriers for ZOG.

>"Like, OMG, let's fuck again!!"

>"I was forced!"

>All that trouble for a free cab ride.

Attached: Screenshot.png (600x1126, 425K)

Attached: 6.jpg (112x198, 16K)

>UK
Part and parcel?

Unless a weapon, violence or surreptitiously-administered drugs are involved, it's virtually impossible for a rape to have occurred

Lol the point of a jury is to give the defendant a chance. If the judge and prosecutor didn’t think you were guilty already you wouldn’t be on trial in the first place.

Also Jury nullification is the ultimate trump card for the people.