The goal of feminism

Western feminists would probably call those broads islamophobic or some shit

I hope each and every single one of them gets raped by the economic migrants they brought in to ethnically cleanse the people they are meant to be representing and working for.

Attached: CQEnhuEWIAANEyY.jpg (480x553, 60K)

Yet you retards, including OP, can't show a single evidence of feminists Muslims who are anti Hijab, advocate for compulsary hijab in the West.

The feminists in Iran are advocate for choice, not compulsion. There are ex Muslims in the West who claim hijab is a symbol of oppression.
You fools are making advancement more difficult, just like SJW leftists.
You're a retard, those women are not the same women who protest compulsory hijab.

English motherfucker do you speak it?

Brainlet leaf
I wonder how much of it is just female nature and how much of it is due to their reaction to modern technology. Would they be doing the same things if they didn't have the internet or any similar way of connecting to a global liberal community (and their standards).

for women it all seesm to boil down to shit tests, i can bet you 100% that they all secretly want some perisan chad to run up to them put the hijab back on and fuck the shit out of them, its all shit tests for women constant non stop shit tests

I speak it, better than you ever could.
This is what the OP states:
>. Literally if you put this bitch in New Zealand, she would be wearing a hijab right now.
He's stating this anti-compulsory hijab woman would be wearing a hijab in NZ. That's retarded.
You have no cognition besides repeating what other idiots say.
>I wonder how much of it is just female nature and how much of it is due to their reaction to modern technology. Would they be doing the same things if they didn't have the internet or any similar way of connecting to a global liberal community (and their standards).
It's in your nature to do false generalizations boosted by your incelness.

therationalmale.com/2011/10/03/war-brides/
Women do not understand the concept of loyalty or brotherhood. They are natural born traitors and need to be dealt with a firm hand. See link above.

women are illogical and retarded, is anybody shocked by this?

How come vast majority of female lead empires led in expansion of said empire? Catherine of Russia, Victoria of Britain, Isabella of Spain, etc...
The dumbest people are men, and your post is evidence.

Brainlet leaf, once again.

>No argument and projecting: The post.

Those were all figureheads. Russia was essentially run by Catherine's advisors under her reign. Victoria was too busy sleeping with her servants to do much running of Britain as well. Those first two examples literally prove the red-pill right. Women care more about cock than duty and need to be "advised" (led) by competent men to achieve anything of note.

Assblasted leaf

You're just repeating incel damage control. Virtually all empires are run by advisors and bureaucrats. Yet the female lead ones did a lot more in expansion.
If they were really so untrustworthy, the empire wouldn't be doing better.
Brainlet incel detected.

Feminism is a category of leftism. Hatred of ones self, people, country, history and traditions is central to all forms of leftism.

I've had a girlfriend for 3 years and she's unironically a 9/10. She also hates niggers, Jews and globalists. Take your cuck'd buzzfeed/vice talking points elsewhere.

Persia was a shit tier empire. They got btfo by greeks

It’s a Jewish lie, created to divide men, and women, and turn them against each other, Jews can only truly function in a divided nation, and they do everything in their power to create that division, feminism is one of those tactics.

Persian here and yes. Ive noticed this as well.

American right wingers are unironically supporting leftists in Iran, this is why i personally support leftism in America right back as they are at least non-warmongering and less interventionist towards Iran.

Attached: 1551059470921m.jpg (832x1024, 106K)

Leftists are the only ones opposing Saudi Arabia and Israel in not only the UK, but pretty much the entire West. They're the most based and pro white (and pro POC) people there are.
>girlfriend for 3 years and she's unironically a 9/10
Everytime an incel is challenged, they repeat with this overused trope.
And notice how you dropped your argument and now just focusing on defending your person.

I think Jow Forums leafs are actually just kike trolls behind a vpn. Surely one country cannot have such a high density of abject faggots.

Leftists are unlikely to intervene economically and militarily against Iran mullahs but thanks to global culture.
Instead they help set a precedence to next generation by being "woke", a better way at changing cultures. One day, Iranians will act like their ancestors and drop the veil, a Semitic invention.

Two can play this game, look. I speak english better than you ever could. I suspect that the reason why logical points are beyond your comprehension and you keep acting like a cunt is because you are a thot yourself. What he meant to say was "the same type of a woman would act on the same exact subversive way given the circumstances" they don't know what the fuck they want, western femenism scum want
islam, Arab whores want democracy. To be perfectly honest women are degenerates anywhere and should be kept in cages, they vote for open borders and bring hordes of Arabs to our countries, they vote for wars they don't fight and they have 0 empathy for men hence male genital mutilation aka circumcision on the west. Same western women who care so much about foreign women from Islamic countries frankly don't give a fuck about boys next door being mutilated for life. I suggest you read books nigger, your cognitive abilities are that of a woman.

Persia wasnt one singular empire but multitudes of empires and dynasties spanning thousands of years, and the Achaemenid Persian empire actually rekt the greeks and destroyed the lydian greek empire in anatolia entirely.

Attached: c2hdmoz573621.jpg (740x956, 87K)

You're right that all empires are run by advisors/bureaucrats. So why the fuck does it matter if the regent of England or the "leader" of Russia has a cock or balls between their legs?

I think UK posters have low IQ. The posts from UK posters are proving this hypothesis correct. Hopefully, the UK porn ban will result in less UK posters in Jow Forums.
You can't even read a simple sentence of the OP. So no, you can't speak English. And that's OK. You don't have to pretend to have knowledge or intelligence. You can instead accept your inferiority without rambling like an incel with fragile masculinity.

The fact that I can tell Leaf is a women just off the stupidity in her posts and the lack of logic behind her thoughts is a true testament to how men and women will never be equal, hahaha.

That wasn't me brainlet leaf. You played yourself once again.

The veil has existed in Iran literally since the time of Zoroastrianism you fucking retard.

Burka itself comes from the Persian word Pardeh and was adopted by muslims from Zoroastrians.

This is how Zoroastrian women dressed and dress to this day.

Attached: download (1).jpg (161x313, 7K)

The ones with female leaders were more expansionary. Perhaps, that's due to input from female leaders or its male advisors trying to impress their female leader. Regardless, if female were not loyal, the effects would be dire.
Not a woman. But assuming that I am, it must be quite painful for an incel like you to be completely dominated by a woman.

And making another post just to vent is typical femoid behavior during her menses day. Hows your bleeding Stacy?

its almost like a (((third party))) is in charge

i hope they get arrested because i know they're only doing it for cunt sjw reasons.

Nobody cares Juden Peterstein. Fence sitting and saying everyone is stupid makes you look like an even bigger retard.

>The veil has existed in Iran literally since the time of Zoroastrianism .
That's Islamic revionism of history, you absolute Arab rape baby.
Zoroastrians were so autistics they didn't shut up about how great fucking cousins and siblings was. Yet there wasn't any pre-Islamic Zoroastrian writing about the veil.

>it must be quite painful for an incel like you to be completely dominated by a woman.
Actually that's my deepest darkest fantasy

The official data suggests that the UK has a higher average IQ than Canada. The behaviour of Canadians suggests that Canadians are faggots.

>Zoroastrians were so autistics they didn't shut up about how great fucking cousins and siblings was
Sounds like Muslims.

except these protesters have a legitimate grievance, if I was FORCED under penalty of law to comply with some fucking national dress code I would protest too. Fuck that

No it isnt retard. This is why even traditional Zoroastrian women in India wear the veil.

Jordan Peterson is the incels hero. Interestingly enough he also claims there's no such thing as European culture and claims anything relevant in it is Middle Easterner.
Of course. Incels tilt toward femdom more than being a dom to women. The latter is something that's done by their highschool Jock bully.
>London full of nonwhites
>UK higher IQ
Muslims were pro cousin fucking at worst, not pro sibling fucking.

Virgin leaf

UK is whiter than Canada despite London.

That's could very well be due to Muslim influence, retard. Muslims were present in India for over thousands of years.
Even if one can accept the position that women in Zoroastrianism wear veil, it doesn't mean that piece of clothing was for common women or mandatory. It very well could be just for elite women.

Still, there's no evidence in Zoroastrian text that women wear the veil.
There's an anti-Islam Iranian from the US who regularly posts about Zoroastrianism. He also agrees on that issue.

Will you dominate me?

I'd take Chinks over Pakis though

Hey Leaf, what are your thoughts on this red pill? Have you ever seen it before? Can you explain it if race doesn't exist?

Attached: RedPillonBlacks.jpg (1319x1174, 299K)

UK has pedophiles as political leaders, has grooming gangs, is losing its biggest cities to nonwhites.

In Canada, people have to worry about high IQ chinese taking over. Big difference.
Maybe if you take hormone pills and do the transgender surgery. You should go to Iran, they'd do it to you.

bioewabioweaoiwebgioaabgewiogawbegioewaeawbgieowgbaoweriebgaweioawebgioewa, faggot.

If these quotes are true, then more influence needs to be spread to the Middle East to combat racism. Open borders for all Middle Eastern countries. No sanctions, just love and humanity.
t. retard

I had various women, Japanese, western and I'll tell you one thing, the ones that act strong, femenist types always have daddy issues. Before a man they act like a retarded child asking me to fake rape, tie them up. I suppose if I dated a more femenist one they would ask me to fucking put them in diapers. Who the fuck do you think you women are? You only lie to yourself but we see you through. And I am true misogynist, the one you fear. I see how useless women are, truly incapable of writing, making, building and now nurturing. You've had your chances to fuck things up the way you did. Now people like me will come: young, attractive. And we'll make everything in our power to bring you down.

Ew no I don't like lesbians they're disgusting

>at worst

Attached: 2zqacuv.jpg (1156x869, 110K)

Ancient Persian clothing for women showed that they covered. It wasnt mandatory but was something high class women would do.

Them not covering is literally liberal Persian revisionism.

Attached: Ancient_Persian_Clothing_Parthian_Era_200_BC.jpg (200x420, 28K)

>I'm going to lie about dating rape victims just to show how dominant and mysognistic I am on an imageboard from a site that started off Japanese culture. I'm also not going to talk about how I can't read a simple sentence.
Ok incel.

By the way, if you make it a little more cringier and longer, then it can be a good copypasta.
t. faggot

>incapable of writing
*Blocks your path*

Attached: Flannery-O'Connor_1947.jpg (313x389, 16K)

I didn't deny they were into cousin fucking.
That clothing is from the Islamic era, it's not "Ancient Persian". Having the filename claim it's pre Islamic doesn't make it so, especially when the picture is modern.
>It wasnt mandatory but was something high class women would do.
And the hijab in Iran is mandatory.

Iran RESTART

Attached: 1EB5EADD-D953-41A0-96F2-A832CB9BCAE5.jpg (1200x1200, 271K)

All gays and feminists should push for Islam. Islam will save us all and anyone that disagrees is a racist, bigot, homophone and anti semite.

Attached: otr.jpg (634x354, 48K)

You only prove general rule with exceptions like this. Most women can't, most women don't even have hobbies and that comes from our fundamental neurobiological differences that shouldn't be underestimated. But once women decided they want to compete we should show them how miserable they look at an attempt to do anything a man can. In other words women are useless.

"Veiling did not originate with the advent of Islam. Statuettes depicting veiled priestesses precede all major Abrahamic religions (Christianity, Judaism, and Islam), dating back as far as 2500 BCE.[75] Elite women in ancient Mesopotamia and in the Byzantine, Greek, and Persian empires wore the veil as a sign of respectability and high status.[76] "

Stop denying the truth.

It’s about defying their men in both cases.

I give zero fuck and it's not my place to give a fuck.

I hope they will kill them fuck those whores.

No veil in Achaemenian era among Zoroastrians.
>There does not seem to be any evidence of veils, either covering the body or just the mouth or head from the Achaemenian period. Instead covering the mouth with the fingers, apparently as a gesture of deference to avoid offending the monarch with the smell of one’s breath, is seen for example in a relief from Persepolis where a Median official, separated from Darius by two beehive-shaped incense-burners on chest-high stands, holds the tips of the fingers of his right hand over his lips (Hinz, pl. 19 opposite p. 64).

Veil in Parthian (cucks btw) and Sasanian era were of servants:
>In Iranian painting of the Parthian and Sasanian periods, however, especially from Sīstān and Sogdia, servants are shown wearing the mouth-veil, Pahlavi padān or padām (Av. paiti.dāna-, borrowed in Armenian as pʿandam; see Russell, pp. 482, 486), which Zoroastrian priests still employ ritually to prevent the breath from polluting the sacred fire (see Kawami, p. 48).
In Sasanian era, veil wore by dancers (not so modest):
> Women in Sasanian art, other than royal figures, appear most often in cheerful settings as musicians or dancers. In the latter case they often twirl long scarves or veils of a diaphanous material (see, e.g., Harper, pp. 77-78, and cf. clothing), but their heads are rarely covered. Silk was also sometimes used for the ritual mouth veils (Persian Rivayats, p. 296), but Dhabhar points out that this usage should properly be condemned as the silk worm was traditionally regarded as an Ahrimanic creature (ibid., n. 1).

Any instance found of veil in Sasanian or even achemeanid eras is due to influence from foreigners, Assyrian culture (Semitic) in the case of latter, and it wasn't seen as a way to preserve (((modesty)))

No one said Muslims were the first to wore veils, but the common woman of Iran wearing a veil is due to Islam and its enforcement is also due to Islam in Iran. That's a fact.

Forgot to add source: iranicaonline.org/articles/cador-a-loose-female-garment-covering-the-body-sometimes-also-the-face

Don't forget, I give my speaches in an anime antagonist voice.

I like you

Attached: 1547267786204.jpg (996x682, 64K)

You are literally retarded and didnt even read your own post that you linked:

"In Early Literary Sources

At least as early as Achaemenid times Persian queens were hidden from the people. Plutarch, discussing the reign of Artaxerxes (r. 404-359), writes that Queen Stateira was beloved by the common folk because the curtains of her carriage were always up, and thus the women of the people were permitted to see and greet her (“Artaxerxes,” 5; cf. Xenophon, Cyropaedia 6.4.11). The fact that women of royalty were carried in curtained carriages gave rise to a motif in Persian narrative literature, the most celebrated example of which we find in the epic of Vīs o Rāmīn, with material dating from the Parthian era. There (p. 93), Vīs is not only sitting behind curtains (parda) but also wearing a veil (neqāb) on her face (cf. Baḵtīār-nāma, ed. Ṣafā, pp. 5-6).

In the Pahlavi texts čādor is mentioned in at least two cases: in the Rivāyat ī Hēmīd i Ašawahištān, a 4th/10th-century Zoroastrian legal text (ed. Safa-Isfehani, p. 33.9), čādor is mentioned, together with the sarband and wāšmag, as a female head dress worn by Zoroastrian women; in the Mādayān ī Yōišt ī Friyān, a Pahlavi text (6th century?) based on (lost) Avestan texts (cf. Yt. 5.81-83), we read (3.56) that Hufriyā, the sister of Yōišt, a Turanian Zoroastrian, and the wife of Axt, an opponent of the new, Zoroastrian, faith, put on a veil (čādur) when she was requested to answer the question whether the pleasure of women is from dress and housewifery rather than being with their husbands."

Pic related, its a chador.

Attached: head-coverings1.jpg (1000x750, 85K)

Attached: mff.jpg (632x496, 128K)

>Persian Queens are women
>Zoroastrianism says to wear veil, despite no evidence in Zoroastrian text
You're absolutely retarded beyond help. That's why you can't follow a string of posts.

Also what was thought of "cador" before is different than Islamic era, which is described by hadiths and opinions of clerics.

>and the wife of Axt, an opponent of the new, Zoroastrian, faith, put on a veil (čādur) when she was requested to answer the question whether the pleasure of women is from dress and housewifery rather than being with their husbands."
>an opponent of

Americans should be castrated, changed my mind.

>>Persian Queens are common women
Fixed before the retard goes full autism mode.

Mandatory Veiling women is a SEMITIC, not just Islamic, product.
>The earliest attested reference to veiling is found a Middle Assyrian law code dating from between 1400 and 1100 BC.[2] Assyria had explicit sumptuary laws detailing which women must veil and which women must not, depending upon the woman's class, rank, and occupation in society.[1] Female slaves and prostitutes were forbidden to veil and faced harsh penalties if they did so.[3] The Middle Assyrian law code states:
>§40. A wife-of-a-man, or [widows], or [Assyrian] women who go out into the main thoroughfare [shall not have] their heads [bare]. [...] A prostitute shall not veil herself, her head shall be bare. Whoever sees a veiled prostitute shall seize her, secure witnesses, and bring her to the palace entrance. They shall not take her jewelry; he who has seized her shall take her clothing; they shall strike her 50 blows with rods; they shall pour hot pitch over her head. And if a man should see a veiled prostitute and release her and not bring her to the palace entrance: they shall strike that man 50 blows with rods; the one who informs against him shall take his clothing; they shall pierce his ears, thread (them) on a cord, tie (it) at his back; he shall perform the king’s service for one full month. Slave-women shall not veil themselves, and he who should see a veiled slave-woman shall seize her and bring her to the palace entrance: they shall cut off her ears; he who seizes her shall take her clothing.[4]

Attached: Veil them all Modechai.jpg (248x258, 8K)

I dont care if its mentioned in Zoroastrian texts or not, fact is that its been a part of our culture since the beginning, before, during and after Zoroastrianism and islam.

Nothing wrong with modesty.

Their lives are so comfortable that their only problem is that they have to dress modestly.

Let that sink in.

>Iran
>comfortable
Jow Forums really is tsundere for islam

Today Iranian men are mutilated at birth (thanks to Semites) and their women are oppressed with veil (thanks to Semites).

When will Iranians rise and free themselves from Semitic brainwashing?
Interesting. I'm talking to two supposedly Iranians living outside of Iran, justifying a barbaric practice and notions of false (((modesty))), instead of where you should be, in Iran.
But let's analyze the notion of modesty: There was no veil enforcement toward common women in Iran. At worst, Iranian elite women woer some form of veil, like European elite women did not long ago. If the same women in Iran wore that similar veil, they'd be considered either Wahhabi (if it's the supposed Achemaenid veil) or whores (if it's later Parthian type of veil). Both of those veils are the product of Semitic influence.

Why do you defend being slave of Semites? Literally the most defended parts of Iranian culture by Iranians these days are all Semitic.

>They are fed
>They have internet
>They complain about stupid feminist shit

They're comfortable.

>Iran
>not comfortable

Most of these women are from high income families btw.

Attached: 57122829-winter-tehran-view-with-a-snow-covered-alborz-mountains-on-background.jpg (1300x866, 315K)

Lots of sites are censored in Iran, including Jow Forums.

Fuck off you silly cunt

Oh the horror

t. Muslim living in France

>The goal of feminism
You mean communism?

Attached: 2F62CF53-5881-4D43-9212-7D055EA08538.jpg (1111x622, 296K)

>Cutting hair off to have aans cut and colouring it green to not look like hair
>Pretend to be brave by showing non hair.

Senseless projecting

I plan on banning yoga pants

No, and these feminists are parasites on the Iranian société. Instead of enhancing it, they wish to destroy it with feminism.

I dont care who came up with it. Women not dressing like whores is always a good idea.

Having said that, i dont like mandatory hijab laws.

All our problems could be solved in one generation by simply removing the womans right to vote