Leaf/pol/ CANADA BLACKED Edition: The Trudeau White Genocide Soros-funded Blackpill

Prepare for the Canadian White Genocide Blackpill. Here's a quick rundown with much more factual information to come.

Grab a drink, get comfy, and whatever you do, do not resort to psychotic denial, however tempting that may be.

Attached: 1491187426725.png (2400x1976, 1.91M)

Other urls found in this thread:

swc-cfc.gc.ca/gba-acs/index-en.html
swc-cfc.gc.ca/gba-acs/overview-apercu-en.html
vancouversun.com/opinion/columnists/douglas-todd-the-narrow-view-from-the-migration-sector-bubble
community.smu.ca/atlantic/
mbc.metropolis.net/
ceris.metropolis.net/
pmc.metropolis.net/
im.metropolis.net/
international.metropolis.net/
cic.gc.ca/english/resources/publications/annual-report-2016/index.asp
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

First for Umaru

Attached: e378b427baece3cb4a351ea496f2fbbd.jpg (511x720, 49K)

Late 1990s:

>White European Canadians were a 90%+ majority until the 2000s and Canada was conservative, no LGBTQ+ bullshit
>All of a sudden, start seeing Africans, Muslims, Pakis, Chinks, etc everywhere
>Multiculturalism expands to hyper levels, every school/university/work place/government agency starts ramming diversity down our throats
>House prices start accelerating
>Wages start decreasing

Fast Forward 2017

>Toronto 30% white
>Vancouver Syrian Refugees 24/7 on TV/news
>White people can't find work, it's all non-whites getting jobs
>Average house price is $1M+ while salaries are 50K-60K max
>Refugees driving BMW and Mercedes
>Most Universities have non-white majorities
>White Europeans down to 65-68%
>Whites will be Nobody really knows why this is happening so fast, government always touts (((250-300k))) "reasonable" immigration a year
>But nobody has ever heard of a white person immigrating in the last 20 years

Now

>Turns out Canada is letting in 750K on permanent residency a year via various immigration schemes not publicized
>Canada lets in 1.2M a year on "temporary immigration" that's 10 year work/live visas that lead to citizenship that aren't even counted in public statistics
>Turns out secret GBA+ (Gender Based Analysis Plus) program is forced down every government decision maker including immigration officers to discriminate against straight whites
>Turns out 97% of immigrants are poor non-whites
>Turns out there is a secret organization called the Metropolis Project that holds an annual conference of 1,000+ government bureaucrats with the sole objective of letting in as many poor non-white migrants a year
>Turns out this organization started in 1998, around the time of the change
>Turns out George Soros started and funded the Metropolis Project through his Open Societies Foundation
>Government passed M-103 anti-Islamophobia motion, setting road to criminalize any criticism of migration policy

You are here.

Attached: Canada1.jpg (620x416, 215K)

How did this radical demographic shift occur right under our noses? Let's start off with Gender Based Analysis Plus, or GBA+ for short.

GBA+ is a program designed to address "inequalities" in various government programs and decision making processes.

Let's take a look at how the government describes it.

>What is GBA+?
GBA+ is an analytical tool used to assess the potential impacts of policies, programs, services, and other initiatives on diverse groups of women and men, taking into account gender and other identity factors. The "plus" in the name highlights that GBA+ goes beyond gender, and includes the examination of a range of other intersecting identity factors (such as age, education, language, geography, culture and income).

>GBA+ and Gender Equality
In 1995, the federal government committed to using GBA+ as a means of advancing gender equality in Canada, as part of the ratification of the United Nations’ Beijing Platform for Action.

Gender equality is a core Canadian value and is enshrined in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which is part of the Constitution of Canada. Gender equality means that women and men, in all their diversity, are able to participate fully in all spheres of Canadian life, contributing to an inclusive and democratic society.

The Government recently renewed its commitment to GBA+ and is working to strengthen its implementation across all federal departments.

>1995

What a (((coincidence))).

Attached: 1489698184028.png (1536x2048, 383K)

Fuck you kike, Canada is white.

swc-cfc.gc.ca/gba-acs/index-en.html

>Mythbusters
>1. Myth: Women and men are already equal in Canada, so GBA+ is not needed.

While many advances have been made, equality gaps remain. Women in Canada today earn, on average, only 73.5 cents for every dollar that men earn. Women are also more often the victims of domestic and sexual violence and continue to be under-represented in leadership and executive positions, occupying only 10.3% of positions on corporate boards.

This is especially evident for certain groups of women. For example, women from northern and rural communities are more likely to experience poverty; Aboriginal women are far more likely to experience sexual and intimate partner violence; and immigrant women experience higher rates of unemployment.

>2. Myth: GBA+ only applies to women’s issues – it is advocacy for women.

GBA+ is not advocacy for anyone. It is an analytical tool designed to help us ask questions, challenge assumptions, and to identify potential impacts, taking into account the diversity of Canadians. Once an issue has been analyzed using the GBA+ process, gender may emerge as the most important factor, while in other cases it might be culture, geography, or a combination of factors that may put a particular group at greater risk.

>3. Myth: GBA+ only applies to the “social” sectors.

All government policies affect people. While gender and diversity issues may be more obvious in some areas (e.g. education and health) and less obvious in others (e.g. natural resources and defence) this does not necessarily mean that gender is not relevant. GBA+ can and has been used across social, economic, public safety and scientific sectors.

>Notice how the government emphasizes factors other than gender.

What are these other (((factors)))? Well, that's what the + stands for in Gender Based Analysis Plus.

>What about the “plus”?

We can use sex and gender as an entry point for analyzing an issue, but women, men, boys and girls are not homogeneous groups. A variety of factors, sometimes referred to as identities, such as age, culture, language, sexual orientation, education, ability, geographic location, migration status, faith, ethnicity, and socio-economic status, intersect with sex and gender to create someone’s experiences.

>culture
>language
>sexual orientation
>education
>ability
>geographic location
>migration status
>faith
>ethnicity
>socioeconomic status

Literally every possible way to claim a white person is privileged and thus forcing every government bureaucrat to discriminate against them, for example, in an immigration decision or in hiring for a job.

Attached: Plus.png (1536x2048, 474K)

jokes on you, diversity is in fact a strength.

The federal government forces every decision to be based on this Gender Based Analysis Plus.

>GBA+ is everyone's responsibility:

All public servants should incorporate gender and other aspects of diversity into their work process by asking questions about how diverse groups of women and men may be impacted, and by ensuring that measures are put in place to address any inequalities.

>ensuring that measures are put in place to address any inequalities
>aka always refuse heterosexual whites

Through systematic use of GBA+, policy analysts, researchers, program officers, evaluators and other public servants are able to improve their work by being more responsive to specific needs and circumstances and therefore attaining better results for all Canadians.

>Systematic use of GBA+

Managers contribute to the success of GBA+ by making it a priority. This can entail supporting their teams by allocating time and resources for GBA+ training and GBA+ related activities. They can also integrate GBA+ as a performance expectation.

>Making GBA+ a priority

Executives must ensure gender considerations are part of the decision-making process and, where identified, equality gaps are being addressed. The Central Agencies (the Privy Council Office, Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, Department of Finance Canada) consider GBA+ a component of due diligence and may request evidence of it for any Cabinet document.

>Executives must ensure gender considerations are part of the decision-making process and, where identified, equality gaps are being addressed. Documentation must be kept that GBA+ was used.

>Immigration Canada officers must exclude straight Whites because equality gaps must be addressed.

Immigration Canada officers must exclude straight Whites because equality gaps must be addressed.

>Immigration Canada officers must exclude straight Whites because equality gaps must be addressed.

swc-cfc.gc.ca/gba-acs/overview-apercu-en.html

Attached: GBA.png (1812x772, 283K)

So now that you are aware of the Gender Based Analysis Plus program mandated by the federal government program and used to ensure discrimination against straight whites, that started in 1995, let's take a look at the Metropolis Project.

vancouversun.com/opinion/columnists/douglas-todd-the-narrow-view-from-the-migration-sector-bubble

The almost 1,000 people at the 2017 Metropolis Conference in Montreal are on the front lines of an effort central to a country with arguably the world’s highest per capita in-migration.

Each year, Canada spends roughly $1.2 billion on the so-called “settlement sector.” Its mission is to assist more than 300,000 new immigrants and refugees a year while supporting 325,000 foreign students and more than 300,000 temporary foreign workers.

Migration is a mass phenomenon in Canada, unlike in most nations. Many settlement workers live in the cities that draw most migrants: Foreign-born people make up 45 per cent of Metro Vancouver’s and half of Greater Toronto.

>Workers in the settlement-sector form an influential Canadian subculture. One person at Metropolis affectionately referred to them as “activists with pensions.” Immigration Minister Ahmed Hussen spoke twice and told them they greatly influence public policy.

I began wondering, however, how much these upstanding people represent the Canadian population. Do their values correspond at all to opinion poll results or with the issues Canadians follow through the media?

>The vast majority at the taxpayer-funded Metropolis conferences live on government paycheques or grants. They are in the Immigration Department, the Heritage Department, public research universities and taxpayer-financed non-profit organizations.

Their theme is humanitarianism. Metropolis participants repeatedly said Canada should bring in more immigrants, refugees and foreign students, migrants are a “vulnerable population” and taxpayers should spend more on them.

Attached: Trudeau1.jpg (1040x585, 318K)