Attached: 13456.png (1357x628, 42K)
Is this accurate?
Jacob Adams
Levi Foster
>USA
>Mongoloid race
kek
Caleb Cox
It's natives obviously. Are you 13?
Charles Green
it's supposed to be pre-colonial, but honestly it's a stupid distinction considering that migration has been occuring forever anyway
Blake Ramirez
The map is showing the original population distribution.
Btw, I don't think you ever had caucasoids in north africa.
Jacob Thomas
Is Bangladesh Mongoloid?
Isaac Cox
Does this look like a Caucasian?
Nathaniel Adams
migration != invasion/colonization
Ryder Walker
Whiter than you, Jamal.
Jacob Baker
Alexander White
Somalia
>caucasoid race
Bentley Howard
>Btw, I don't think you ever had caucasoids in north africa
what is that supposed to mean. Modern and ancient north africans were caucasoid.
Thomas Thomas
>implying race isn't a social construct
Jonathan Miller
That's the pleistocene era
It's reasonably accurate.
Brody Thompson
It's the pleistocene era.
Connor Moore
Colonization, in the context of groups of people moving from one area into another (ie Europeans moving from Europe to the modern US) is certainly a form of migration. The fact that it was done with force and displacement does not change that. The involuntary movement of Africans to the modern US through the trans-Atlantic slave trade was also a form of migration; it doesn't have to be willing.
Liam Fisher
Okay, that's fair. Good to know that it wasn't based on an arbitrary distinction between 'native' and 'non-native' peoples.
Aaron Hernandez
It's the pleistocene era.
It's one distinct time period of history.
Liam Lopez
what's that got to do with my post
Robert Parker
Modern north African causasoids aren't pure blooded, they have admixture from a previous more pure stock of caucasoid hominid from the pleistocene era.
Josiah Murphy
yeah I know that. They're still cluster with caucasoids minus the ethiopians and somalis which are somewhat intermediate. Still don't see what your comment had to do with my original post though.
Luke Rivera
they*
Angel Clark
I would definitely hybridize eastern africa and central asia.
Carson Ross
Adjusted for accuracy.
Gavin Cruz
A lot of people from south eastern asia and the pacific islands have abo ancestry
Ethan Reyes
Five races isn't enough to capture the diversity of humanity.
Andrew Russell
no
Adam Jenkins
I do think it's worth having americoid separate from mongoloids. American indians have ancestors that they do not share with asians
Sebastian Miller
First Post Best Post does not apply in this situation.
Isaac Hall
Did you know it was a map of continental distributions of the races during the pleistocene era, or not?
Hunter Baker
I don't know about that. The races as we know them did not exist back then.
Jace Fisher
no, Caucasoids and australoids are mixed in india, as they were back then and the himalayas prevented mongoloids from entering India.
Kevin Cooper
no. I simply knew it was before the bantu migrations and obviously europeans ones. I also thought It was after the indo european migrations but i'm not certain about that. Either way it has no relevancy to my original post.
Benjamin Kelly
What's going on on Madagascar?
Wyatt Richardson
The lines represent hybrids. And i kept canada and alaska as mongoloid because the eskimos are directly descended from asians. They are from a migration separate than the ones that the ancestors of american indians took.
Colton Johnson
They are actually a mix of abo, mongoloid and african i think
Jordan Flores
Yes. He sure doesn't have West African skull structure.
Also Indians aren't Asians. Phenotype drift.
Hunter Russell
Austriod and Africans mixed, they have a unique genetic history