The news is entirely organized around making sure you don't have a clear understanding of this process. In fact, the news and shilling machines have been trying very hard to make sure everyone thinks the opposite of what is going on is true.
A good example of a limited hangout is the Panama Papers documentary. It gives a lot of really good information, but leaves out a lot of important specifics. The Guardian reported on the Troika Laundromat giving to Prince Charles, but completely left out the Podestas, despite admissions and paperwork that prove it.
Three Pieces of primary source evidence, good enough for court, that blow apart the news narrative:
The Podesta Group's LD 1 disclosure forms; the one that proves there is a nexus between The Podesta Group, Mueller, Yanukovych and Manafort which totally destroys the narrative in the news. archive.fo/lzowz
The Podesta Group LD 1 disclosure form took money from the Kremlin's Sberbank and other entities that Putin is known to launder money to himself, through. archive.fo/ozkh0
John Podesta's signed document that proves he got 100,000 shares of the Kremlin's faux clean energy company "Joule." i.imgur.com/HT0xO15.jpg
Almost no news outlet incorporates them into their reporting about Uranium One. One of the most extensive articles about Uranium One was done by the New York Times, "Cash Flowed to the Clinton Foundation Amid Uranium Deal." These pieces of evidence are not mentioned, nor did they ever bother to update their reporting. Despite that, their article is pretty damning. The NYT also fails to mention the human trafficking nexus surrounding the mining operations.
pic8.co/sh/nbqWZg.png
All of this has been standard operating procedure within the unelected echelons of government for our entire lives. Obama just allowed it to operate at a greater scale, likely at the behest of forces greater than himself.
pic8.co/sh/rMwZRh.png
Attached: IMG_Tokyo_20190311_002501_processed.jpg (1453x1151, 424K)