Fuck boomers

fuck boomers

Attached: Screenshot from 2019-03-23 23-30-13.png (689x160, 26K)

Other urls found in this thread:

westegg.com/inflation/infl.cgi
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

get a a job

imagine being able to afford a really nice house for 100k, goddamn

millennials are the anal leakage of the boomers.
and boomers are giant sphincters. sad.

Attached: lovetap.gif (436x328, 487K)

>58,000

Move to the fly over states and houses there are actually 60k.

>get a a a a a job
Seething boomer can’t even type hes so angry

>the average price of a house was
>the median price of a house was
this triggers me like you wouldnt believe

there are no jobs there though, or if there are the commute is unreasonable (since those houses probably aren't close to civilization).

Boomers weren't buying houses in 1960. They were buying them in the 80s and the 90s.

You can get a decent house in Green Bay or Appleton for around 150k. There are jobs out there, especially in manufacturing. Wisconsin is swell.

Median house size 1960 = 1250 square feet
Median house size today = 2600 square feet
Median cost per square foot today = $123
Median house price today = $226,000

$226,000 - $123 * (2600 - 1250) = $59,000

Well, what do you know. Exact same price adjusted for size.

We make houses too big these days. The greatest generation shat out like 6 kids in tiny cucksheds. Now every little shit and the dog gets their own bedroom.

>Prices then and now
Hail progress!

Attached: 82487v26v2.jpg (471x354, 92K)

My friend just bought a house for 32k

Average home size was also like 1000 sq ft in 1950, now it's 2500.

Humans ruin everything.png

>1960
The oldest Boomer was 15 in 1960. How exactly is it our fault that prices were so low?

Boomers would have been 10 -12 back then so their allowances wouldn't have covered a house

You did that wrong. At $123 per ft the median house would be $320k, but you quote $226k. Idk where these numbers come from, but they're fucky. 59 to 153.

They’re also almost dead soon.

Grave rave when

gggg et aaa aa aa aa a a a a *turds in pants at convalescent home*

millennial salt thread

i know that feel, fellow statistically literate poster.

Telecommute
And be ashamed a boomer gave you good advice

this is actually so true

Sorry kid. I'm only 54

Imagine if Trump tweeted this

Attached: trump 1.jpg (1024x705, 86K)

give me 1000 dollars

Attached: EDBA0A72-B422-43BF-BF6F-7C1C4D0B969E.jpg (750x802, 618K)

Yes there are, you're just unemployable

Quiet, no actual thoughts allowed on Jow Forums, this is another 'it's everyone's fault but mine' agitation thread

source retard?

Here’s how much the median home value in the U.S. has changed between 1940 and 2000:

1940: $2,938
1950: $7,354
1960: $11,900
1970: $17,000
1980: $47,200
1990: $79,100
2000: $119,600

Here are those values again, adjusted for 2000 dollars:

1940: $30,600
1950: $44,600
1960: $58,600
1970: $65,600
1980: $93,400
1990: $101,100
2000: $119,600
see what happened from 1970 to 1980?

So many triggered boombooms in here you’re all pathetic. Face it your going down in the history books as the worst in 150-250 years or so. Take the L and move on chiefs.

T. Millennial employed in white collar for 7 years and owns waterfront property

Attached: 3DBC4841-9430-481E-BFE3-99D6965C13A1.jpg (469x653, 221K)

Boomers shall forever be known as the worst generation.

I'm a millennial you dumb fuck

>To break it down, in 1973, median house prices across Australia’s capital cities looked something like this:

>Sydney – $27,400
>Melbourne – $19,800
>Brisbane – $17,500
>Adelaide – $16,250
>Perth – $18,850
>Canberra – $26,850
>Hobart – $15,200
>Darwin – $87,500 (information unavailable until 1986; this value reflects 1986 housing costs)

>Nowadays, we’re looking at much higher digits and another set of zeroes added to the price, according to September 2014 numbers from Domain Group’s House Price Report:

>Sydney – $843,994
>Melbourne – $615,068
>Brisbane – $473,924
>Adelaide – $459,258
>Perth – $604,822
>Canberra – $573,326
>Hobart – $322,274
>Darwin – $667,115

westegg.com/inflation/infl.cgi
What cost $10000in 1960 would cost $58071.13in 2000.

People also made much less money back then though. I made £1 an hour at my first job during the 1970s. Young people now are making £9 an hour just to flip burgers. You spend all your money on iphones, trainers, fortnight and so on but then say you have it hard. Piss off.

Manufacturing? Hmmm, I'm interested.

Fucking Kek!

Accounting. For. Inflation.
Im sorry boomers cant do math.

Attached: image0-7.jpg (750x734, 162K)

>mutts too stupid to understand their entire system is failing due to jew bleedout and sabotage.
mkay

but keep bashing yourselves morons, don't ever realize it's the kikes who ruined america. kek.

>build a lot of great new houses
>buy and live in those great new houses
>implement anti-development and zoning laws to prevent the next generations from doing this

"government regulation is evil, free market for life!"
"redistribution of wealth? fuck that commie shit!"
"millenials just aren't working hard enough!"

See what happens when you don't race war with the chinks and poos?

some one with half a brain. homes costed a lot in the 80's and 90's. boomers where just hard working and smart. people now a days are just lazy and dumb as fuck.

I'm sat in a barn conversion with half a hillside that cost £600 when it was bought 57 years ago.Comfy af

Boomers ruined everything and still won’t fucking retire.

Attached: B9E849E2-FA33-4823-A722-63C6DEF58A7D.jpg (607x720, 55K)

yeah in a shitty city bet that was Michigan. you fucking zoomers are a sad lot.

Brain cancer will kill you before you reach 60.

boomers are a perfect example of why "lol I don't care about future generations I'll be dead anyway" doesn't work

lol fuck off no on has ever cared about anyone else but them self. ever. and if they did it was just immediate family members.

Depending on the distribution it literally doesn't matter as they will be superclose anyways

>home price doubled from 1940 to 1970 ... again from 1970 to 2000
Seems right. The problem is mostly the supply of homes is incredibly lacking, especially in the 'low end' of things.

As someone pointed out – at some point smaller starter homes (1 or 2 bedrooms, truly small) went away, at least in America. There are a lot of factors but really one big one: Houses started becoming more investment vehicles than anything else.

Investments want bigger returns: so size increased, the old starter homes were demolished or expanded upon. Those who had equity bought more houses to rent out, etc -- speculation that drove up prices. . At the same time a growing population needed those smaller homes, but they were unattractive for builders to build (less profit), for cities to zone (less property tax), and overall for cities to budget lands for (NIMBYism, existing residents against overcrowding etc).