I defend free speech! But only for MY side!

>I defend free speech! But only for MY side!

Why does the right do this? The left does the same but they don't have so many "free speech advocates" who only advocate for their side.

Attached: brainlet.jpg (800x450, 45K)

Because most people here are hypocritical retards that scream "communists aren't people!", yet get their balls in a twist the moment someone says the same about Nazis.

>What is steven crowder
Literally making a strawman to get angry at. God you guys are faggots.

but as a right winger i advocate for free speech for all even censorist leftwingers.
How else are people going to know you are a dumbfuck op?

It's because they are selfish and have no base nor stable platform for discussion.

They own guns because the negotiating table to the. Doesn't exist.

Pretty much this. The left's worse enemy is an open field for debate. Why the fuck do you think reddit is censored as shit?

Funnily enough it does nothing to help them. Makes them look authoritatian and turn leftists away towards centrism or even right wing.

That's not hypocrisy. Marxism is literally a brainlets attempt at creating a philosophical framework by which theft is somehow justified and then attempting to build an entire system on said theft. Nazism at least functions and isn't just built on "hey, let's steal shit from the productive members of society because I'm an edgy faggot"

>steven crowder
Why are you cherrypicking one example? Did he come out to support BDS supporters who were censored on US campuses? Has he openly advocated against the anti-First Amendment laws all over the US mandating pro-Israel oaths? Did he call out Facebook for deleting anti-war and anti-police brutality groups?

>Behold! The eternal leaf posts about right wingers censoring free speech
>On a right wing (it's ours now) internet forum dedicated to protecting free speech

Go on Jow Forums the donald if you want to complain about censorship cunt.

You're a retard if you think absence means support. But that's literally in leftist dialectic thinking so I'm not surprised.

Sure thing, mate, the billionaire shareholders that differentiate their enormous capital among hundreds of companies without even taking part in running them are totally more productive and hardworking than an average employee. Same goes for bankers. And that wasn't even my point. The idea is - you either give everyone a platform, no matter how retarded you are, or you don't claim you support free speech and such. Cherry picking who can and who can not express his views isn't exactly what freedom of speech stands for.

So you admit he doesn't give a shit. If I stand up for religious freedom for all, but only advocate for Muslims, then it's obvious whose religious freedom I really care about.

>internet forum dedicated to protecting free speech
For one side.

>people who invest loads of money or manage millions of dollars worth of assets in order to provide value in the market are more valuable than some dude flipping a burger
>this is a surprise
Wew. No one said commies shouldn't have a platform to speak their mind, you can just as well have a platform to post gore and yell nigger over and over again, but the idea that thieves who glorify themselves while destroying their nations are comparable to patriots who try to build and uplift their country is funny to me.

>Incoherent rant about bullshit completely unrelated to the point you're trying to make

At least you admitted it.

>Why does the right do this?
Because they got used to being culturally dominant over several generations, and now that the shoe's on the other foot, they're crying foul.

>The left does the same but they don't have so many "free speech advocates" who only advocate for their side.
When your opinion is widely accepted you don't feel the need to defend your right to say it.

By posting, you’re literally proving yourself wrong. Post away faggot

Attached: BB87AC8D-F755-4C68-9FD0-25590A6AADB5.gif (368x288, 1.66M)

>Jow Forums = "the right"

Stop.

You did it again here’s a you

>why does a group of people care more about censorship that is affecting their group than censorship that is affecting another group
Do you have autism or just not understand how being human works? We have bias towards our own. Left wing groups would also care more about censorship that happens towards their own. If you're being censored, go out and do something about it instead of complaining about the other side not fighting for your rights.

Attached: 1552640318235.jpg (641x530, 25K)

AHAHAHA IMAGINE BEING THIS RETARDED!!!
WE WANT LEFTIES TO COME HERE, WE WANT THEM TO ARGUE WITH US BUT THEY NEVER OBLIGE!
THEY'RE SCARE OF OUR LOGIC.

Start a thread, start any thread (other than BBC cuckporn), make any comment - you won't get banned, your thread won't get deleted, you'll just get told how much of a retard you are (and evidently you are quite retarded).

I agree. That being said, remove flag and stop being a socialist like.

The reason the right is so marginalised is because they advocate for free speech of everyone. Nobody wants to shut down discussion. Leftists are free to talk about whatever fucking stupid shit they want to, it's just the right that isn't allowed to express their opinion. The right gets censored and screamed down.

This is the reason why Trump won. Sensible people react strongly against grown adults screaming and carrying on like children. It's why he'll win again. There will be countless upsets on topics the lefties assume will be an open and shut case, because they can't fathom other people having different opinions.

Attached: sips.jpg (631x757, 37K)

if you had something valuable to say we'd defend it and your right to say it. but you don't, it's just stale pseudopasta points

>Left wing groups would also care more about censorship that happens towards their own.
Yes, but as I mentioned, it's the right which has a lot of "free speech advocates". These are people who take a principled stance on freedom of speech and actively fight any threat to it... but only on their side. I can think of one guy on the left (Kyle Kulinski) who also calls himself a "free speech absolutist" and has been on record defending conservatives against deplatforming on social media. He's even openly supported the ACLU's defence of actual neo-Nazis on free speech grounds. This is virtually unheard of on the left. However, you don't see it on the right, either, even with all these "free speech advocates", which is the point of the thread.

I'm not talking about fucking posting on Jow Forums, you dumb brainlet. I know you're very new to Jow Forums, so you might not get it.

Left-wingers here can post as freely as right-wingers without getting banned. Your argument is literally invalid

>if you had something valuable to say we'd defend it and your right to say it

Attached: american states that force pro-israel pledges.jpg (1024x762, 82K)

I'm not talking about posting on Jow Forums. See

There is no free speech

I wonder how many companies wouldn't even exist without said investors

Attached: nasim.jpg (960x543, 53K)

becuase the reality is, is that to attain and hold power you must silence your political enemys, the left do it the right do it and the centrist just suck eachothers dicks in confusion
its been the way of the world since long before clown world