>Slavs are NOT white
Define "white". Albinos, mongrels, asians, arabs can all potentially have "white" skin.
Also, who are the slavs ? Are they only found in parts of Russia ? Do they exist in other countries , ? Are Poles, or Croatians or Serbs, Ukrainians also considered "slavs" ? Is there a difference between South Slavs, East Slavs, West Slavs ? (aside from the geographic region)...
In other words, "white" and "slav" can be very vague depending on who you're asking. Not trying to be anal here but i hope you understand where i'm coming from.
To me (for example, "white" is just a word that jews, antiracists, liberals, Africans, and other non-Europeans use to label people of European origin. But it's a vague concept and tells me little about a person's race or biological heritage.
"white" is the word used to demonize and dehumanize, control and guilt trip certain groups of people. And whenever you're using that word, you're giving your ideological opponents power over you. You allow them to define you.
and that's how they're able to lump you in the same basket as everybody else regardless of your culture, race, history, ast..etc..
That's how (for instance,) the cultural marxists, feminists, jews.. have no issues blaming slavery or white patriarchy" or "white privilege" on the sons and daughters of Polish immigrants for example. (even though slavery only concerned about 3 to 6% of america's slave owners). But "white" that adjective is ideal to guilt trip indigenous europeans, regardless of their differences.
So what does white means to you? To me, Poles are just Polish, Italians are Italian, etc.. People from the Uk are British...and that's that. And the non-europeans who claim to be "british" or "french" citizens are just that..ON PAPER.
Attached: Hasan and Misho the magical tale of a Swede & a fish.jpg (853x1024, 99K)
