Uhh, zoomerbros? How do we deal with this?

>This is how

Attached: 856565464.webm (720x404, 2.68M)

it’s just an exponentially increasing curve, so what

Aryan zoomers, assemble!

youtube.com/watch?v=BZovcCxftAY

This graph is meaningless. Note that it's not displaying temperature on the right there, it's displaying "temperature anomaly". What exactly is that?

easy stop going to school and import niggers

I'll act like its a crisis when the people telling me its a crisis act like its a crisis.

Attached: 1545918701877m.jpg (1024x717, 84K)

came on this to post here

Who cares, if you want to complain about this, start screaming at China, and India.

This. If environmentalists actually wanted to make an impact they would be advocating for mass genocide of 3rd world populations.

>nytimes.com/2019/03/04/climate/marine-heat-waves.html
>oceans capture 90% of heat caused by climate change
>when the underwater ecosystem collapses the world's ecosystem will collapse
>air temperature increase being so small is misleading and meaningless
why is this so hard for brainlets to understand

Air conditioning

You can start by not manipulating the data for now on.

I've read an article about how the planet got colder after tons of people died. So if the overpopulation, that is getting worse, is the reason for the climate change what exactly is the left going to do about it?

well dumb fuck look at a graph over the last 10000 years not the last 150

Boomer here, you can't. Best of luck.

deal with it just the way you dealt with it the past 10 years. as in do nothing because a minor increase in temperature is actually beneficial for mankind

Attached: 1529726733385.gif (640x512, 136K)

you don't, the danger to humanity and life is global cooling. Warming means more farmland.

Ask yourself how much energy it takes to heat an entire fucking planet 1.5 degrees C. Now realize all of that energy gets converted into things like storms and even potentially earthquakes. We're talking millions upon millions of nuclear explosions worth. We added 40% more CO2 to our atmosphere that was perfectly in balance with nature and now it's already trying to kill us. It's to the point now where the CO2 alone is causing our IQs to go down and screwing with our temperament, which is awesome because we also created a social climate akin to a powder keg.

>1951-1980 had massive anomalies so we just averaged it out....

So the graph is blatant lies and propaganda.

wear shorts you dick riding cum eater

>CO2 alone is causing our IQs to go down
I can assure you that it isn't the CO2.

wear more sunscreen

Zoom out.

What goes up..

Attached: 1552871355824.png (1370x533, 90K)

>The Neolithic Subpluvial [7000 - 3000 BC] was the most recent of a number of periods of "Wet Sahara" or "Green Sahara", during which the Sahara region was much moister and supported a richer biota and human population than the present-day desert."

>"Doggerland was an area of land, now submerged beneath the southern North Sea, that connected Great Britain to continental Europe. It was flooded by rising sea levels around 6,500–6,200 BC."

>"It is likely that until relatively recent times the islands were much larger and perhaps joined together into one island named Ennor. Rising sea levels flooded the central plain around 400–500 AD, forming the current 55 islands and islets"

>"The Medieval Warm Period (MWP) also known as the Medieval Climate Optimum, or Medieval Climatic Anomaly was a time of warm climate in the North Atlantic region that may have been related to other warming events in other regions during that time, including China and other areas, lasting from c.950 to c.1250."

>"From around 985, Vikings founded the Eastern Settlement and Western Settlement, both near the southern tip of Greenland. In the colony's early stages, they kept cattle, sheep, and goats, with around a quarter of their diet from seafood. After the climate became colder and stormier around 1250, their diet steadily shifted towards ocean sources; by around 1300, seal hunting provided over three quarters of their food."

>"The Little Ice Age is a period between about 1300 and 1870 during which Europe and North America were subjected to much colder winters than during the 20th century. The period can be divided in two phases, the first beginning around 1300 and continuing until the late 1400s."

Attached: 2000-years-of-global-temperature.jpg (528x336, 33K)

>Wolf Minimum (1280-1350)
The Great Mandrake:
marketoracle.co.uk/Article41182.html
Great Famine of 1315-1317:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Famine_of_1315–17
Dobler's Abrupt Earth Changes and the Black Plague
abruptearthchanges.files.wordpress.com/2017/08/8-8-2017-updated-black-death-and-abrupt-earth-changes.pdf

>Spörer Minimum (1450-1550)
researchgate.net/publication/294085842_The_early_Sporer_Minimum_-_a_period_of_extraordinary_climate_and_socio-economic_changes_in_Western_and_Central_Europe

>Maunder Minimum (1645-1715)
climatechangedispatch.com/uk-over-8000-people-killed-in-an-extreme-storm-that-lasted-nine-days-in-1703/amp/
nationalgeographic.com/archaeology-and-history/magazine/2017/01-02/1709-deep-freeze-europe-winter/

>Eddy or Landscheidt Minimum (2020-2055)

Attached: 1536854548384.jpg (485x273, 40K)

Reduce population and industrialization in Asia and Africa.

It will be interesting to see how China uses their billions of new slaves

Attached: 1539473358772.jpg (890x872, 89K)

lol at Jow Forumstards in this thread unironically thinking they're more intelligent than actual scientists

The earth has been warming since the last ice age. The climate changes and no matter how much money and power you give politicians, the climate will keep changing. It always has and it always will, the fucking idiotic narcissists who think they are going to control the climate are fucking frauds.

Attached: Screenshot_2019-01-27 Corporate America Is Getting Ready to Monetize Climate Change.png (1160x450, 50K)

Maybe your scientists are sellouts. There's still true physicists out there like Zharkova making accurate predictions based on math. I'll give you an example of how bullshit the IPCC are, 148 models predicted solar cycle 24 ( the current cycle) would be weaker than cycle 23. They were wrong, the 2 models that were correct were what zharkova chose. Cycle 23 was the weakest in a century too.

Attached: 1546053093966.jpg (767x552, 62K)

>lol at Jow Forumstards in this thread unironically thinking they're more intelligent than actual scientists
Sing their praises! Genius. Where do I go to become as intelligent as you?

Attached: climate.png (907x587, 415K)

>graph starts at 1850 to hide medieval warm period

>force boomers into slave labor
This. Just for the lulz though.

By not living near a coast like a faggot

148 models predicted cycle 24 would be stronger than cycle 23*

Attached: 1552187581980.jpg (760x573, 93K)

The atmosphere is .04% CO2, so 1 part in 2500. The portion of CO2 due to man is 5%. So, 1/20 x 1/2500 = 1/50,000 of the atmosphere is man made CO2. We need to give governments trillions to spend as they please, or we will all surely die of the heat.