>I don't understand why someone would waste their time with someone who they're not really all that attracted to, and basically fake a relationship, especially if the girl in question is very good looking and could probably get any brodude Chad that she wanted.
Okay I'm gonna explain, but disclaimer:
>THIS IS NOT A POLITICS TOPIC PER SAY...
That being said we can swing it in the direction of politics if we discuss how this effects politics.
Here's the answer to your question -- physical resources. I understand this whole theory more than most and I think a lot guys butcher it and leave us confused. So lets start with this, what is being "provided" by the "provider"? That's what she's in the relationship for. He's providing literal cash, a roof over her head, social status, SECURITY, good responsible father material, etc. She doesn't have to earn any of that if she can simply marry it.
She thinks, if this guy isn't the best looking guy, she can simply cheat with a better looking one. That's where the false dichotomy of alpha/love & beta/provider come from. She doesn't allow the beta to be seen as attractive in her mind because she's just using him, barely giving him what he needs to be convinced of her deception while focusing still on attracting other men.
A lot time the Alpha/Lover isn't good father material. Hell half the time he's a fucking criminal. She still PHYSICALLY WANTS THIS GUY but she doesn't think he's gonna provide a good home for her and the kids' shed have. So the schmuck beta guy provides that. She thinks she can go fuck the evil, immoral, asshole, other guy, get his genes and pretend it's the more responsible guys parents to get SOMEONE to take care of the kid.
It's important to understand this dynamic because it does lead to a lot of societal problems, cheating and divorce cause more homicide and suicides than any other motivation for instance, understanding why it happens can prevent it.
Attached: 1509689563283.jpg (1080x1080, 1.35M)