Youtube autist makes fun imaginary scenario about EU vs UK war

you need to go back george

brits are a lot like americans in that they believe they’re the greatest thing on the planet

Not really no. First of all it was Germany, which had already exhausted itself partially against France (losing about a quarter of its airforce), with France more or less "self-sabotaging" (Vichy refused to join the Axis wars formally and was technically neutral, the French navy was either sunk by the British or destroyed by the French themselves) and even then there was immense American Lend-Lease. What also didn't help is that the Germans had to dedicate manpower to maintaining order in its occupied territories. Because they were fucking occupied territories. And then there's the whole Two Front War thing. It's entirely incomparable to EU vs Britain sans outside involvement.

...

...

The video was retarded. both France and the UK has shown the inability to pursue warfare without the aid of American aircraft and navy, like in Lybia where they couldn't even ferry aid a hundred miles so they had to start bitching up a storm to the US to get involved aswell.

It's laughable to believe that the EU will have the moral and drive to ferry millions to take the UK, it's impossible, without overwhelming numbers you can never hope to take a landing.

And like the other user said, the US will join the defender side and fuck up the other, unlike the Europoors, we still maintain enough equipment on standby to do a naval invasion with up to 500,000 troops

Even without nukes, Britain and France could defeat the rest of Europe combined.

Don't (You) me.

Attached: 81277d649f7df4a74b1ec81499121c86.jpg (599x540, 33K)

>It's retarded to believe the EU will have the morale to do something in a video that deliberately states it isn't calculating for morale
>Anyway the US would join the defending side in a thought experiment where one of the rules is no outside intervention
I bet you watch Rick and Morty

Binkov is fucking retarded as are the ,people who take him seriously

>Netherlands only lasted 4 days in WWII
Leave it to the Dutch to know warfare

Not an argument

both sides would get it if you didn't stop

try it you little poofs youd get smashed no bother

why would you think those development wouldn't occur in this scenario? it is instead plausible that in a war like only a few nation are actually willing to go to war and the remaining have to be occupied by force, and why do you thing USA wouldn't help the UK in this time? plus right now the British military is way in better shape than most European armies

It is, it shows that Western Europe is filled with limpwristed fags who will throw their arms and get on both knees to suck Sgt. Cletus and Prvt. Lopez as soon as they land

>why would you think those development wouldn't occur in this scenario?
Because it presumes a united EU and no outside involvement.

Still not an argument.

>Because it presumes a united EU and no outside involvement.
which is an extremely improbable assumption. Even during Napoleon all europe was united and there weren't any external influences and still britain managed to win.

Hey! Binkov is cool, ut some respect on his name!

Neither during Napoleon's time nor during WW2 was all of Europe united against Britain.

you comparing napoleonic era majestical britain with modern feminist britain tho

Which will be versus feminist Europe. Both will never move troops, Europeans will start reeing before allowing millions to be drafted for an invasion

it was, at least most of it even if by force.

*laughs at you*

Attached: Edward Bernays.png (396x297, 49K)

We're allied with china now,we can best the rest of rope together

No it wasn't. Under Napoleon it was France, in WW2 it was Germany. The rest of Europe was more of a hindrance for France/Germany that required resources for occupation. And except for short periods Britain didn't fight alone. Without Russia, Austria and Prussia it would've never defeated Napoleon, without the US and the USSR it would've never defeated Nazi Germany.

>which is an extremely improbable assumption
NO. FUCKING. SHIT. The entire idea of the EU and the UK ever going to war is so laughably improbably that it's not even worth discussing. Almost as if the entire video is a thought experiment or something.

France had their turn against europe after the revolution and so did Germany after ww1. Both times both countries at their lowest with nothing to lose. Barring nukes I think we could do well

seething

Attached: eee.jpg (647x740, 54K)

austria and prussia got rekt early on by napoleon. He lost against russia wich was neutral. if you check the nationality of napoleonic army and navy they were from all around europe. in ww2 it was more germany centered but there were other assis nation such finland, italy, romania , hungary and i don't know the degree of how many nation cooperated but for sure it wasn't a completely desertion neither in ww2.

>winning a war against a nuclear power

What?

The jannys really are pussies. What do you Jow Forumslacks take of this? I'm under the assumption that the EU manlets will never have the balls and equipment to pull a successful invasion in the 21st century

kek

Attached: 382ecb5dc69bf89bc1c15707c22cc19f.png (465x79, 7K)

NOT ONE LINK after 40 posts
WHY?

>austria and prussia got rekt early on by napoleon.
and they fought against France again in 1813-1814 and 1815 which brought about his defeat. Austria was the most consistent opponent of Napoleon and rose up against him again and again.
>He lost against russia wich was neutral.
His invasion of Russia failed, which enabled Russia, Austria and Prussia to defeat France. Without Prussia and Austria Russia wouldn't have been able to defeat France and drive them back all the way to Paris.
Russia was only neutral from 1809-1812. Before and after they were enemies of Napoleon. He had to invade Russia because they refused to obey his continental system against Britain.
>if you check the nationality of napoleonic army and navy they were from all around europe
Yes but these people didn't want to fight for him and deserted by the first chance. Also he couldn't make use of all the resources of Europe because he didn't control all of it. Neither did Germany in WW2.
>other assis nation such finland, italy, romania , hungary
virtually no manpower, industry or resources to speak of. They contributed jack shit to the German war effort, even less than Italy.

kek

Attached: proxy.duckduckgo.com.jpg (584x374, 96K)

yeah boy and that's the most united europe scenario we had.
thinking this time we would be more united is ridiculous

kek

Attached: white_british.gif (389x320, 24K)

how is it ridiculous? In the two scenarios you mentioned (Napoleon, WW2), Europe was "united" by military force. Today we have a common administration that all member states voluntarily joined.

France alone has a better military than the UK. Who the fuck is surprised by this video

until everything is ok and no shit happens why not, but when time are harsh all this cooperation will tear down and force is needed. Nationalism can rise again very easily and right now a lot nationalist movement are already rising up

aren't Canadian and Austrialian military available for Her Majesty?

>Join to fight the UK and be sanctioned to hell and back

>Sit back and enjoy prosperity while selling arms and food to the autist who chose to fight

Pick one user

because retards blame the EU for everything that goes wrong, which is why stupid impulsive decisions like Brexit were made. Being patriotic and being pro-EU doesn't exclude itself. Member states profit from the EU.

No. There are more or less 0 actual obligations to Britain required to be in the Commonwealth. The UK could be invaded at random and the Commonwealth nations are under no obligation whatsoever to actually help.
Being in the "Commonwealth" basically means fat fuck all, there are agreements and treaties between those involved but they're more about trade and grander-scale NATO-esque stuff than some memey British Empire thing.

>her majesty
The Monarchy are just celebrities here now, there's zero authority or presitge to them anymore.

What a retarded idea. First off, you didn't link a video, not that I would watch it. Secondly, it's either going to have to be a naval invasion, or nuclear war.
>winning either one
When is the last time a major nation successfully conducted an amphibious assault on another major nation. Modern technology has only made it a more unfeasible feat. It would require overwhelming air sea and land superiority to win.

you know, it's easy to blame an institution which stays far away from home, is not ruled by people from your country and may go against the intrests of your people. It happened with the church for protestantism ya know

They are animals

B-Britannia r-r-rules t-the waves...

Attached: proud.png (375x360, 142K)

We have always been underestimated, and we have always won. Ask the flower of the French nobility under the muck in Agincourt.
Disclaimer: By always I mean usually, and most of those rare defeats were cheating by the enemy.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Macau

The EU is trying to wipe nationalism out you dumb kraut.
You'd think that even if you don't listen to their words and read the documents, you'd have at least seen Merkel very visibly disrespect the German flag.

Where the fuck is link!!!!!

youtu.be/hWhFZJmm0_Q

unironically this

1147 2019

We have nukes, they have no realistic defence.

We could nuke every European nation except France, and I bet the French wouldn't use their own nukes unless we hit them first. They talk a big game when it comes to European unity, but when push comes to shove the French care about the French first and everyone else not at all.

It's not hard to realize that 5 pikeys with hunting shotguns could conquer all of Europe besides Poland, because continentals are the biggest manlet crybaby noguns lanklet basedboys to have ever graced the planet. Hell if I brought my SKS and a zodiac boat I could probably conquer France myself right now

bongs are amongst the most deluded self important arrogant pricks out there. right after mutts ofc

>a literal who country

>B-Britannia r-r-rules t-the waves...
it's "Britannia rule the waves", it's a command

it's never rules and never has been

alright then
B-Britannia r-r-rule t-the waves...

UK is alone against all the continent every century.
So far, they won every round.

With what navy would the Euros cross over with? You lazy fucks can't even reach NATO's pathetic military spending targets. You expect me to believe that your navies are worth anything?

pretty much this

>With what navy would the Euros cross over with?
They wouldnt they'd go by train

Attached: asdasd.jpg (590x350, 46K)

EU navy is much larger than UK + the air power difference is a game changer

>Europe needs to team up 27-1 to stand a chance against us
>They think this is something to boast about

Attached: 14c2af8efbbd446efbb3b10cce595b43.jpg (640x633, 42K)

spain allied with England, Prussians eventually allied with England, Russia allied with England

the Austrians fought napoleon initially, territories of modern northern Italy as well

yeah, they fought a united Europe alright /s

Because the Rothschilds live in the City of London and are members of the royal family.
Stay mad goyim.

Important to note that Binkov doesn't model nukes in his scenarios. A landing force would get literally nuked while crossing the channel.

Attached: vlcsnap-2019-03-15-02h17m06s086.png (960x720, 439K)

...

Its ok fren , when trump wins again and buys England (UK) it will be all good !

This

I honestly think our cuck politicians would surrender the Isles to an invading Euro force before using nukes in self defence. Labour would 100%.

based toothpaste

The Royal Navy has lost some of its luster since then. The frogs could probably take them alone.

Thx, I watched it in whole. The assumptions are mostly wrong. The idea that such a conflict would take a year in today’s world, is absolutely laughable. Air superiority is a matter of a few days given the very small numbers of planes and weapon systems on both sides. And if a single beachhead is successfully established, it won’t take more than 2-3 weeks for the UK to surrender. Overall, max time for this war is 4-6 weeks, Gulf War I style.

Also, tactically, it makes most sense for the UK to abandon Northern Ireland instead of trying to comquer Ireland.

...

Based. Fuck Brexit.

We are propaganda'd in school and via TV that our army and other things are the best. Just the best.

What's funny is that Britain was in the unique position to be able to seriously fuck with the EU and possibly even come out on top. The EU is facing more internal struggle than ever and several other members have considered their own leave campaign to some extent. Britain could have started a domino effect of causing others to leave if it showed how ridiculously unfairly it was being treated, and it would have been able to weather the storm by relying on trade with the remnants of its international empire. This includes the largest and most economically powerful country in the fucking world, the president of which being one of the only world leaders to announce support for the brexit movement before the election was even held. Trump would love to make a very good trade deal with Britain if it meant the EU suffered from it. Farrage could have even played a role in that part with his relationship with Trump as a sort of unofficial ambassador.

But none of that is going to happen because the UK has the densest concentration of faggots out of any population in the world. Theresa May is either the most incompetent or malovolent person possible for PM who did everything possible to put Britain in a bad position with both the EU and US and even Trump on a personal level. The British people deserve her and the hell they face with their eventual half-assed brexit.

Attached: 1357010949059.gif (295x221, 554K)

...

They would win, no one can beat brits in a fair fight.

What could anyone except France do in Europe?

Nah most Europeans are pro-EU on some level even though many complain about it. That's why you get so many Germans, French, Poles etc here who are right-wing but want Britain punished for Brexit. The EU props up the German economy through allowing them to sell all their products to the EU market barrier-free, props up France through farming subsidies and Poland through gibs. Deep down every one of the citizens of those countries knows that they personally benefit from the EU even though they don't want to admit it.

Why go to war? Within a few generations there's gonna be nothing but niggers and pakis on that island anyway.

Attached: 1553370226733.jpg (1024x554, 124K)

Can't fucking wait, justice at last.
after the uk, the mutts are next

Attached: 1545577313089.png (382x414, 12K)

Why is Ireland on fire in that image?

...

Because UK invades them