Can Libertarians also be white nationalists?

No, the free market is inherently anti-nationalist

what kind of 4 IQ brainlet posts with literally nothing to say?

I am a libertarian nationalist, fuck open borders
I want free market for my people. Some restrictions on the global trade must be made.

What little tasks the government should have, enforcing the white identity could be one. This could simply be done by you needing to proof that you're white for citizenship and/or entry into the state.

Can Liberty exist without White nations? No one else votes libertarian.

no its not profitable

Yes. I am.

Well a libertarian usually rejects all kind of economics borders, all of his virtue is based solely for monetary reasons.

This leads to what we have today, the entire manual labour sector being relocated to China and hence corrupting the own economy, while the owners of the companies are all Jews.

So to answer your question: No.

Yes, we can.

Attached: 15528571561743.jpg (918x593, 440K)

ancaps are retarded
how can you have a white-controlled state if there is no state

Well, you can't fully be a libertarian and a white nationalist at the same time. If you value the free market above all else, free trade and the circulation of currency in a world market where you can utilize the economic opportunity presented by foreign countries for your own benefit, you can't be economically isolationist and you can't be closed borders.

White nationalists know that they need to prioritize the needs of their own race before every other race and so that means no migration and no economic dependence on anti-white or non-white foreign entities. Not to mention, many white nationalists are concerned with the fundamental building blocks of our society being broken down through the modern metropolitan nihilistic creep. White nationalists want to bring back the atomic family and come back to a time where tradition and community come before progress and consumerism.

yes but you shouldn't use a modified version of an anarcho-capitalist flag with an adopted symbol of authoritarianism on it. that's just stupid.

If you want to live in all white communities, why should the government be able to force “diversity” on you? They should not. That’s why civil rights era integration was done literally at gun point.

No, because part of moving on past the libertarian phase is realizing that shitskins, Jews, queers, and leftists in general will never abide by the NAP and are harmful even if they're not violating the NAP overtly.

Libertarian principles are nice in theory, but in practice they'll never work. It takes the iron fist of a strong government to keep subversives and outsiders from infiltrating and destroying society.

I need context of that pic, is that Russia?

>Libertarian principles are nice in theory

Attached: 1123235466333.jpg (500x457, 49K)

The problem I see is that people don't believe that there are collective groups of people inside the U.S or any western country for that matter working as a collective to break it down and weaken it so that their home countries eventually have the upper hand. It seems to me that many people just never consider this as a possibility but enemy nations have every reason possible to attempt something like that. That is one of their only ways of winning. You would think that they would put the most effort there.

Sure, libertarianism is simply a form of governance. You could have an ethnostate which ran on a libertarian ruleset, which is pretty much what the US was for the first ~100 years of its existence.

Yes. I want a small non intrusive government that protects the border and removes nonwhites. So a small government with strong border protection and strong white enforcement.

It is.
This but after the xenos are purged I would rather have a less authoritarian government for whites.

America 1776-1865 was white ancapistan

Attached: anfash2.png (1920x1080, 368K)

Libertarians are subversive and by definition hostile to their host country. They cannot be nationalist.

yes

Attached: 1_EStatH5PPl-cqNLEB7FCXQ.png (1080x720, 134K)

White nationalist libertarian here. Yes. Technically, libertarianism is white nationalism so only white nationalists can be libertarians, because you can only have a libertarian society if that society is 100% white. Libertarianism doesn't work in non-white or multi-ethnic societies as individualism is uniquely a white man trait.

Attached: 1523568197815.png (1290x1290, 307K)

Actual libertarians want the whole world to be a libertarian one with nationalism everywhere, only being free-trade really free. The others are just rich people/cuckolds who are too deep into virtue signalling they will never turn fully right-wing.

The concept wouldn't even exist if not for whites, no other continent has people as individualistic as Western and Northern Europeans. Look how much trouble nonwhites STILL have comprehending even the most basic concept of individual liberty

Attached: 1534740953036.png (750x420, 1.2M)

Free market capitalism can only work with a homogenous white state. Race before economics.

t. A libertarian

No it wasnt, it had the constitution as the rule of law. It was much closer to true libertarianism in a nearly pure european society with little government intervention...and it was beautiful.

Thats the only way to be libertarian you big dumb dumb.

Well, you can't fully be a libertarian and a white nationalist at the same time. If you value the free market above all else, free trade and the circulation of currency in a world market where you can utilize the economic opportunity presented by foreign countries for your own benefit, you can't be economically isolationist and you can't be closed borders.

White nationalists know that they need to prioritize the needs of their own race before every other race and so that means no migration and no economic dependence on anti-white or non-white foreign entities. Not to mention, many white nationalists are concerned with the fundamental building blocks of our society being broken down through the modern metropolitan nihilistic creep. White nationalists want to bring back the atomic family and come back to a time where tradition and community come before progress and consumerism.

Attached: d32e16b8b25e8fb0b49a21b0e4c3d64f2941d74459c91d63a7353d58d1668fb5.jpg (762x530, 96K)

it's the only redpilled view to have

True Nat Soc does not rely on Whiteness.

Unless the country is "white".

Nat Soc can be implimented in any country.

Attached: 1553305124420.jpg (680x919, 105K)

>Libertarians are subversive and by definition hostile to their host country.

We were literally a white nation with libertarians until 1965

>They cannot be nationalist.

Yes they can, but easy to subvert since they're no anchor

Huh okay but I tried reverse img searching but no result, you'd expect some media coverage of that type of thing right? Do you have a link of what was happening there?

wrong ctrl +c
a small state that only protects the frontiers and shoots communists and wild immigrants, protecting the future of white people and their culture, with a free market

Yes, to the extent that white nationalism does not involve aggression. So it could be conceived as the project of creating white communities within a a libertarian framework, without aggressing against non white communities.

The short answer is yes, but you asked the wrong question. The real question is "can libertarians exist without white nationalism?"
The answer is no. The only way for the libertarian ideology to exist in practice is for a government to protect their rights by not seeking to infringe upon them. The only race that has ever adhered to libertarian values and codified a system of governance that allows it is Europeans. Anglo/Dutch(German) to be exact. That is what the United States as designed to be.
If you allow niggers, spice, and Asians to vote, the result is a push for collectivist ideology.
If you want to be a libertarian, you had best support the only people who would understand, protect, and even fight for your right to do so.

The federal government was still quite weak compared to individual states, the Civil War turned the United States of America from plural to singular. Plus there were states that were effectively private property like Pennsylvania at their foundation, and others that were ruled by a small group of independent landowners

Attached: 1511842988536.png (5000x7500, 1.81M)

I don't see why not, it's a broad camp that encompasses a large number of economic and social beliefs. It conflicts with the views of the party as a whole, but pretty much everyone disagrees with their party in some way

No a libertarian cannot be natsocial. Open boarders? Free market? These concepts are not compatible with natsocial.

What is the problem of a small state that protects borders and prevents diversity? all white people would benefit from a free market and white culture

Attached: 1553453715710.png (944x1224, 187K)

Attached: 2458A2F5-2F92-4C0A-A352-72BDFB61DD49.png (1065x699, 508K)

Open borders are not part of liberterianism as Hoppe understand it. You still have to be invite by the landowner to be allowed entry in a libertarian society.

Correction: ONLY white nationalists can be Libertarians. That doesn't work any other way. You CAN'T have a Libertarian society with niggers in it.
Also, Libertarianism means Patriarchy. That also doesn't work any other way. You can't have a Libertarian society with women having political rights.

Attached: mysoul.png (582x481, 28K)

But maybe the libertarians could work side by side with natsocial. Whites only though

Open borders and free markets are not compatible with each other because open borders imports the most anti-market groups on Earth. People who vote for Socialism already.

2011/2012 protests
most of those people are now in jail

>having a nation being libertarian

exact. a small state to protect us from Muslims and immigrants.

Attached: mqdefault.jpg (320x180, 14K)

Probably

nation is a common feeling of people sharing a geographical location

Attached: 1553456231235.png (691x666, 459K)

well, you can outlaw communism, because communists break the NAP by existing, and then everything becomes fine again.

Attached: communists.png (1440x2388, 640K)

Attached: 1536339149521.jpg (555x555, 95K)

>(((plebbit ptsd whitespace)))
>Libertarians are for open borders.
lol nice bait, retard

Attached: 1553454096392.jpg (900x600, 102K)

Well said

I was gonna post that jerk

Attached: 1535166124092.jpg (720x348, 37K)

Libertarianism operates under the idea of free association so its completely possible to freely associate into restricted access, ethnic enclaves.

Thanks, thought no less that they'd be in gulags for doing that in Russia but pretty brave

Deal.

Attached: EB99B6CC-2127-49F3-B5A1-E8C400F7B018.jpg (570x487, 48K)

Yes, White Nationalism is a political position held by many ideologies. One can be gay and be pro white, a feminist or misogynist, a Christian or pagan, pro weed or anti weed.

Of fucking course they can.

USA was built as a white nationalist free market country.

Attached: 1553327235560.png (1240x1870, 3.48M)

>Libertarians are for open borders.
WRONG

Why do you keep lying?

Daily reminder that voluntary association is collectivism if everyone is white.

Buy all the land, lease it under contract to only let white people inside.

pinochet proves that libertarianism is totally compatible with fascism,

Attached: 27655370_530601863982072_2092112280311317728_n.png (634x634, 21K)

Meanwhile, Russia's golden years were under a household matriarchy. Now look at you... A bunch of drunk slavs with cold women. Quit being a virgin non.
Also, libertarianism is impossible.
Venerate your women, destroy the saracen, remove the jew.

>Also, libertarianism is impossible.
Then why did it exist in USA for over 100 years and created a massive increase in living standards for whites? you lying kike

fascism has
>white people protecting their culture
libertarianism has
>white people
>free market
we just need to put free market in fascism

>remove the jew
Thats exactly what are we going to do with you, roastie kike.

Attached: femijew.jpg (881x848, 80K)

A meme flag apparently

Attached: 3E09745C-8B10-4996-A711-B9CC5CC5EC64.jpg (635x542, 15K)

The "US", get rid of that corporate 'A' which is subverting you. Im not sure why you think libertarianism = massive increase in living standards. That would have been the result of state influences. Unless you think libertarianism is a form of collectivism??
Everyone who disagrees with me is a jew.jpg What's the average IQ where you're from?

Do you want a free helicopter ride, discord trannie? The state will cover all the expenses, just the way you like it.

Attached: 1553358278379.png (480x480, 94K)

he doesn't know liberals are different from libertarians. AS most of pol goes.

Really? Could you explain?
Not baiting. I really want to know.

To be fair a lot of self-styled libertarians are massive faggots who are autistically individualistic

Attached: bfaf.jpg (1751x1022, 451K)