>sweet Staffordshire mix >loyal, intelligent, housetrained >beautiful, dedicated dog >not a great fit for homes with other dogs, cats, children, or men >a bit territorial, but a loyal FRIEND to the END!
Why are minorities and white trash so fixated on this shut breed?
I’m part of an upper middle class white family, and we own two female pit bulls mixed with some other breeds. They’re great with people but will attack other smaller animals because they will naturally want to protect their home. They’re super friendly even with strangers (I question their ability to actually protect the house from strangers entering) and they typically do as they’re told. I’ve never heard a complaint from any houseguests.
Josiah Robinson
You must have very polite houseguests. Literally anyone with a brain and a wallet hates these nasty bastards.
Samuel Howard
My point being is that proper white families can own pit bulls without issue, but if subhuman apes or inbred white trash have them they will be raised to be violent toward strangers and possibly they are abused to the point where they cannot tell what is and what is not a threat (dogs expect their masters to be good to them so abuse will affect them psychologically in a huge way)
Luis White
Because you can get Pitbulls for dirt cheap (if not free most of the time) and nignogs want to protect their gibs
Ryan Smith
You had one job and you blew it.
Nathaniel Hughes
Big powerful animal that is not as dangerous to play with as a puma. Don't mind the fact that they kill stuff from time to time. Humans do that too so clearly that means humans need killer animals as pets. Take your pit on a hunt with you. That's what these guys were bred for.
Christian Cook
>>>sweet Staffordshire mix >>sweet THEY WHERE BRED TO BAIT MOTHERFUCKING BULLS
LITERALLY THE WHOLE FUNCTION OF THE BREED WAS TO BE AS IRRITATING AND AGGRESSIVE AS POSSIBLE TO AN ANIMAL LARGER THAN IT
If this happened to one my pets, I'd be so furious it'd cause a rip in the space-time continuum.
Jeremiah Smith
Also this
the foundation myth How does one recognize a foundation myth? It fulfills three functions.
1) It explains the origin and structure of the world (and society). 2) It defines ultimate good and evil (and from those definitions are derived the values that are used to justify the holding of power). 3) It determines what is held sacred in that society.
For modern Westerners the story of the "Holocaust" and WW2 has become their foundation myth. It fulfills all three functions.
1) We live in the ‘Post-War World’. The lines on the map, the institutions, the sense of what era we live in, all arise from the starting point of WWII.
2) Ultimate evil is Nazis. Ultimate good is opposing Nazis. The values derived from these definitions are anti-racism, equality, diversity, anti-nationalism and so on.
3) The only thing that is held sacred, that cannot be denied or mocked in the contemporary West, is the Holocaust. And by law throughout most of Europe.
The problem is that all three functions are backwards or negative.
Instead of the origin event being one of fertility and new life, it was a conflagration of death and destruction.
Instead of ultimate good taking the central position in the story that slot is occupied by ultimate evil. Everyone knows that Adolf Hitler, the personification of evil, holds the centre point of the WWII story.
Instead of that which is held sacred being something mysterious and sublime it (the Holocaust) is an obscenity.
Having a negative foundation myth means the tree of life for Westerners is poisoned.
This is by design.
Wyatt Gonzalez
In the event of a pitbull attack push things in their eyes and up their butt.
Elijah Cox
>literally every 'cyclists need to assume some kind of responsibility' threads get pruned. >actual politics
>every fucking 'gas the pitts now' thread survives. >hysterical rage