Muh russia

Attached: image.jpg (620x470, 76K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=9Rha6Wamfp0
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

bump for lib tears

NOT EXONERATED. Do you conservashits now what that means? He can still be charged with circumstancial evidence. We will get the full report and then all you little fan boys can fuck off.

Fake news, faggot. All of your hopes and dreams are dead. Your life was worth nothing before and now it's worth less than nothing.

Attached: image.jpg (640x501, 75K)

There's no way that he will walk away from this without charges. His financial dealings, the obstruction, etc. You are delusional if you think he is above the law

>EXONERATE
There was no crime idiot. What's to exonerate?

There was no crine because he obstructed justice and destroyed evidence. I swear you guys will deny science that has facts, ie climate change, but support this because it fits your narrative.

>There was no crine because he obstructed justice and destroyed evidence.
Like with a cloth or something?

What are you even talking about?

AAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Attached: 546345345.gif (240x158, 531K)

Do you know you have very little time to live? Yeah turns out all the politicians are friends and don't hate each other also they rape and eat kids... so anyways this was all a distraction while they are getting ready to kill most of the earths peoples... Hope you don't spend your last hours (laugh) hating old white dudes n what not lol...

youtube.com/watch?v=9Rha6Wamfp0

Proof?

Shame he wasn't found guilty just for getting rid of /ptg/ and the boomers

muh cloths, muh hammers, muh emails, muh servers. She was cleared

>charged with circumstancial evidence
lol Not when it's the President of the United States. Also, HAHAHAHAHAHAHA, fuck, no one here would be charged with purely circumstantial evidence. Not unless we invented a car that runs on water we won't.

>here's no way that he will walk away from this without charges
:D

>You are delusional
Ummmm..

bssed Beria poster

>he is above the law
The only true part of your sentence, muh Russia collusion or no. [sic] Obama was above the law too. They all are. Wake up. Life is a dream and we got to pick our roles. They chose villain.

How sad that he had to spend the last couple of years fending off unfounded, conspiracy-theory charges on the legitimacy of his presidency.
How sad indeed.

Attached: 75645318241.jpg (480x360, 26K)

In other words she was exonerated for crimes that happened. In Trumps case there was no crime. There was no Russian collusion. What's to exonerate?

Obama was born abroad, though. Answer me this: Why did he get a "Foreign Student" visa?

*crickets*

>The Special Counsel's decision to describe the facts of his obstruction investigation without reaching any legal conclusions leaves it to the Attorney General to determine whether the conduct described in the report constitutes a crime. Over the course of the investigation, the Special Counsel's office engaged in discussions with certain Department officials regarding many of the legal and factual matters at issue in the Special Counsel's obstruction investigation. After reviewing the Special Counsel's final report on these issues; consulting with Department officials, including the Office of Legal Counsel; and applying the principles of federal prosecution that guide our charging decisions, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense. Our determination was made without regard to, and is not based on, the constitutional considerations that surround the indictment and criminal prosecution of a sitting president.

>In making this determination, we noted that the Special Counsel recognized that "the evidence does not establish that the President was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference," and that, while not determinative, the absence of such evidence bears upon the President's intent with respect to obstruction. Generally speaking, to obtain and sustain an obstruction conviction, the government would need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a person, acting with corrupt intent, engaged in obstructive conduct with a sufficient nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding. In cataloguing the President's actions, many of which took place in public view, the report identifies no actions that, in our judgment, constitute obstructive conduct, had a nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding, and were done with corrupt intent, each of which, under the Department's principles of federal prosecution guiding charging decisions, would need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to establish an obstruction-of-justice offense.

Suck it. Nigger.