What's Cultural Marxism?

What's Cultural Marxism?

Attached: 1552985531817.jpg (600x1052, 146K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.metapedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Marxism
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>Marxism, the Doctrine of Decay by Francis Mcevoy

MARXISM is the doctrine of universal destruction propounded by the German Jew, Karl Marx, which has found political expression in Russia under the label of “Communism.” This latter imposture, stripped of its pseudo-scientific jargon about dialectical materialism, and its mumbo-jumbo for dupes—dictatorship of the proletariat, brotherhood of man, and the rest—reveals itself as nothing else but a regime of despotic state-capitalism, maintained by assassination and terror. In its system of collectivisation, collective vampirism is the dominant factor. Needless to say, the utopian equalitarianism of the denationalised intellectual has never existed anywhere, but it is not political so-called communism which threatens immediate danger to this country. That would be the final consummation, but before the oriental commissars can come into their own, the minds of the prospective victims must be prepared for the event, that is to say, perverted and poisoned to the necessary degree of receptivity. Herein lies the task of cultural Marxism, the preliminary bolshevisation of the mind, facilitated by the indiscriminate toleration-psychosis of liberalism, inherent in Social-Democracy, and leading to its final inevitable collapse.

1

Marxism that's applied to culture

Thus, in Russia Marxism has, for the present, political ascendancy, and thereby controls every sphere of activity, whereas here, and in the other, democracies, its corruptive influence is, as yet, chiefly apparent in social and cultural life. This is far more insidious and fundamentally destructive than any mere doctrinaire political activity, for the creed of subversive materialism, subtly introduced into the life of a people, is the annihilator of all spirituality, moral values, and national culture. It is, to quote the words of Mommsen, “an active ferment of cosmopolitanism and national decomposition.” Many people, both opponents and dupes of political communism, as well as large elements of the superficial masses, drift unwittingly into the Saragossa Sea of cultural bolshevism upon the many unhealthy currents which infect contemporary life. Numerous are the flowers of evil which allure the seekers-of-sensation, and the hedonists of the modern cities, with the iridescence of their putrefaction! Compare what goes by the name of art today with the entrancing achievements of the Elizabethan era, or with those of other and lesser epochs, even down to the beginning of the present century. The stultification of the folk-mind set in seriously with the advent of the industrial revolution, and the concomitant destruction of the peasantry. Having now become amorphous, it is incapable of reaction against spiritual infection. In spite of everything however, the 19th century could still show in its decline some great writers and poets, good painters, and capable composers.

2

What is the intellectual food of the people today, the ambrosia of our blessed democracy? Surrealistic painting and sculpture, an orgy of morbid and distorted imaginings, which finds its cacophonic counterpart in crooning and hot-rhythm—jungle music tainted with the neurosis of the night club. Films charged with titillation, cosmopolitanism and propaganda. Books and magazines either sensational or sexual, or both. Papers replete with mendacity, trivialities, and photographs more calculated to attract attention to the bodies of females than to their faces. It is peculiar that so many “beautiful and glamorous Miss so-and-so’s” should pull their skirts up to be photographed. In the economic sphere liberalism, which is the philosophical leit-motiv of all the democratic parties, gives unhindered play to predatory instincts, and the domination or extinction of the weak and less cunning by the strong. The apocryphal humanitarians who indignantly decry any resort to physical force, call for no restraint upon the exercise of massed money power, or the economic tyranny of unscrupulous “business ability.” And yet there can be other and more despicable forms of bullying than crude physical violence.

3

mendacity, trivialities, and photographs more calculated to attract attention to the bodies of females than to their faces. It is peculiar that so many “beautiful and glamorous Miss so-and-so’s” should pull their skirts up to be photographed. In the economic sphere liberalism, which is the philosophical leit-motiv of all the democratic parties, gives unhindered play to predatory instincts, and the domination or extinction of the weak and less cunning by the strong. The apocryphal humanitarians who indignantly decry any resort to physical force, call for no restraint upon the exercise of massed money power, or the economic tyranny of unscrupulous “business ability.” And yet there can be other and more despicable forms of bullying than crude physical violence. Slavery and subjection are not always only physical. Individuals who have not one saving grace, and no talent beyond mere mercantile cunning, can, and do, force other infinitely more worthy and gifted people into a state of abject economic dependency. They have brought the fight on to the terrain where they know they are sure of winning, where the code of Mammon is all prevailing. Under the money dictatorship profit is necessarily the first and final aim, and mass standardisation in every phase of life offers the most rationalised and therefore lucrative method of draining the public milch-cow. The nation finds itself increasingly dominated by the financial and commercial chain-system from the cradle to the grave. Moral, spiritual, and cultural ideals are not “paying propositions.” They cannot be “bulled” or “beared” on the stock exchanges. Also people who possess them lack the necessary docility and apathy to become the go-alongs of standardised exploitation and dupery.

4

en.metapedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Marxism

An outdated class fight belief were da rich is the only evil without exception, and everyone else are the friendly oppressed good guys.

In short, its the doctrine of the butthurt loser.

I can explain this pretty simply and clearly so you don't have to read walls of text.

If you are a white man, you cannot go to university advocate for your country to act in the interest of European people. Therefore, all people with positions obtained through university qualifications end up being at best egalitarian, at worst anti-white.

If you have an iota of intelligence you can understand why this results in the present anti-European social situation. Peel back the veil, and you see all those at the heart of the university anti-white culture were jews in the 20th century.

Thus Marxist spiritual subversion marches hand in hand with commercial materialism, ‘‘cashing in” on folly and decadence. One precedent broadening down into another (a phrase which crystallizes the breakdown of the modern democratic mind) license begetting still further license, and culminating in uncontrolled abuse. The classical thin end of the wedge thrust in here, there, and everywhere, and the breach widened, until the “real” nation totters to its downfall. The apostles of decay term this “progress.” It is, but progress on their own appointed road to Gehenna. The rake’s progress of spiritual bolshevism, the rot-gut of Marxism corroding the vital organs of the nation—a sinister aphrodisiac administered by the witch doctors of decadence under the various labels of democratic liberty, self-expression, and advanced thought. ‘‘One must move with the times” is the futile catchword, as though the present social anarchy were the result of “force majeure,” and it had become the irremediable fate of the British people to succumb in a welter of cosmopolitan degeneracy.

5