Why are serial killers not prevalent anymore?

>No idea why
The answer is DNA evidence. It is easier than ever before to track, capture and convict a potential serial killer. Now, in order to satisfy their blood lust, they just go for a mass shooting. They are the modern day serial killers. Also any currently active serial killers are likely targeting low value members of society that they know won't be missed. In Canada there was a serial killer in BC who picked up hookers and fed them to his pigs relatively recently.

Did you watch the Bundy movie on Netflix? It was easy as fuck to kill people before security cameras/the internet/cell phones. People get caught now.

That being said, there are at prob hundreds of active serial killers in the US. You'll hear about them when/if they are caught.

>Why are serial killers not prevalent anymore?

It's much much harder to pull off a string of methodical serial killings with all the technology these days.

Killers know they are under a much tighter time constraint now, so their strategy has moved away from serial killing and into high speed mass killings instead.

There is one in New York, but he hasn’t killed anybody in close to a decade.

>cell phones
>no more craigslist hookers
>advancements in DNA
>computer databases on fingerprints
>crime databases in general showing other homicides in different states
>GPS

Serial killlers in the 1970's-1990's used to regularly rack up bodycounts in the 15-30+ range and become national spectacles when finally caught that made your one off mass murderers look like weak queers.

youtu.be/_pJg4RmoIGs

youtube.com/watch?v=MC5huwZoPZA

Attached: ramirez night stalker.jpg (500x400, 50K)

glowies replaced serial killers w/terrorism and school shooters

>they just go for a mass shooting
I doubt it. It's a different type of people who do that. Serial killers are mostly rapists too, for instance.

The MO changed too. Nobody is doing the ostentatious shit like murdering middle class white girls and writing letters to the police to taunt them because they'd be traced real easy. I'm sure there's plenty of serial killers operating who target street bums and whores that have no loved ones to worry about them.

13% do 60% serial murders

read dave mcgowan dingus. the popular idea of the serial killer is a myth.

how'd they catch him? dont pigs eat everything but teeth

1. People can live out their fantasies online.

2. The world is way more politicized, meaning that psychopaths tend to concentrate more on politics now rather than sex/murder.

3. The world is way more surveilled, and the forensic methods are much more developed than just 20 years ago.

4. More people get prescribed psychotropic drugs, which increases the risk of them becoming mass shooters, but often decreases the risk of becoming serial killers.

>serial killers are real
fucking bluepilled normie, serial killers take the blame for the disgusting degenerate murders of the elites. They create a serial killer and convict some patsy whenever an elite is being just a little too greedy that they need misdirection to prevent the people from finding the truth.

Yeah, I think they highlighted serial killers to scare people into being surveilled and giving up rights.

Pretty much this. Seamus is dead on.

Yeah Programmed to Kill was a good book that raised a lot of valid criticisms. I mean the most prolific serial killers are men like Bugsy Siegel, yet nobody ever labels him that.

Can't remember how exactly. Just go on YouTube and look up Robert Pickton documentaries. Its an interesting case.

Because they all work at planned parenthood

Tampa had a dude who killed three ppl spread over several months. May have been captured

I've read dozens of books on serial murder and studied criminal justice, even read Practical Homicide Investigation. I wouldn't reccomend McGowan or most criminal profilers, as guys like John Douglas are full of shit. Douglas even framed Guy Paul Morin, only for Morin to be freed when his DNA was tested against the sperm inside the little girl he was falsely convicted of killing.

OH GAWD i wonder why

Reminds me of the dude who abducted girls to hunt them in the Alaskan wilderness, Dr. Moreau style.

That is more of a spree killer desu.

Because when people speak of serial murder they're not talking about organized crime. They're talking about for most part, lone wolf individuals.

>i have the documents
cmon, bud. its common knowledge that pd's attribute unsolved murders to "serial killers" and mkultra literally produced serial killers, proven by declassified cia docs.
but you read that in your research, right?

Is it though? If it is then how come we don't hear about them like in the past? I get the entire rape angle though, as that was usually an accompanying feature of serial killers. I don't necessarily believe that was a pre requisite. My line of thinking is that people who would have potentially become serial killers realise there is a much greater chance of being caught on modern times, so they opt for a large kill count.

Most mass shooters end up getting killed or killing themselves. If they survived would it surprise you if they fapped to their memories of the shooting?

More importantly why are serial killers disproportionately homosexual?

Because most were likely just mass hysteria cases, with multiple unrelated murders linked together. (see the bizarre explanations of how Ted Bundy could kill so many with basically zero evidence and nobody noticing anything, as well as the police talking seriously about his magical abilities) DNA makes it impossible to happen today.

ffs bro, surely in your extensive research you learned that theres no such thing as a lone wolf, right? its a myth. but im sure you knew that.

The media can't use them as propaganda

>its common knowledge

Maybe if you're getting false information by fucktards like Dolores Kennedy, or other known retards who write about crime.

Attached: dude trust me.png (500x300, 93K)

Because why would leftist media report on any sort of violence from minorities? Tell me, do you ever hear about gang shootings in the radio or TV? And if no, can you guess why?

Attached: 1505698379690.png (668x621, 79K)

Fuckin checked
We know who they are

Who was that? Sounds like the plot of a movie.

Cameras everywhere literally only reason. Dad was LE and he would tell me stories and how easy you could get away with shit. They caught some guy using cash to take a bus, committ a crime, then bus back before supper. Caught him for burglary at first then he graduated to raping. Dad said they were lucky to nab him before he escalated.

Because any person dumb enough to get caught won't have the chance to kill multiple people because they will be in prison shortly after their first kill.
This. A lot of countries, especially in Europe, are catching high profile criminals using massive databases of DNA that is typically voluntarily provided. To not be caught you can't leave the following at any scene (incomplete list):
- DNA
- Fingerprints
- Video or audio (security camera or otherwise)
- Proof of contact with target (texts, calls, being an acquaintance, online contact, etc)
- Witnesses
So I'm sure there are still serial killers, it's just the ones dumb enough to get caught never have the chance to become serial killers.

or, you know, the documents you claim to have researched

mkultra

Because killers usually just jerk off by being weirdos and hacking people up in their basements during great times of peace. The dogs don't know what to do you see.
But there's far more shit to worry about now.

Attached: wolf.png (315x332, 68K)

It requires a way different mindset. A lot of serial killers liked to stalk, torture and rape victims and eventually even taunt the police. That's very different than going on a killing spree.

Maybe Americans just got bored, or something ?
Just a wild guess.

Checkd

Attached: tikthonk.jpg (128x125, 5K)

because they never existed, just like terorists. do people die? fk yes but by whole other reasons than terrorism/serial murder/oopsiedoopsietheregoesanother50
child abduction never stopped though

the new bogeyman is the le spree "shooter"

Attached: shoota.jpg (184x184, 10K)

You don't have to get caught to be labeled a serial killer.

They actually made two movies based off the guy.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Hansen

I think they caught him after he started taking the bodies to the meat processing plant

>that we know of

All those old school psychopaths had to gain some social skills in order to lure their victims in and kill them. Now you can just just be some prick that lives his mom's basement that can kill the same number of people or more in a single day.

If you're never caught you can't be labelled a serial killer because no one else knows about it. Are you fucking stupid?

WEW LAD
That’s hate speech. You and your children will be scheduled for (((therapy)))

>no such thing as a lone wolf
So people don't rape people, then kill them so they don't tell nobody?

youtu.be/XYLkeRaMrKg

Attached: Dean corll victims.jpg (570x513, 100K)

Yes, this is the answer

No more leaded gas being spewed into the atmosphere

It was easier back then. Now it's nightmare, European Extreme mode. Forensics and surveillance are only getting more sophisticated every decade. There's cameras everywhere.

BECAUSE ALL SERIAL KILLERS WERE CIA MKULTRA TOOLS

CIA MOVED FROM SERIAL KILLERS TO SCHOOL SHOOTERS IN THE 90S

no stupid. the idea that someone like ted bundy or jeffrey dahmer acted alone is grug tier.

The news reports on garbage instead.
There are more killers than others.
Most are Blacks killing White pussy

Do any documents state that the CIA framed Jeffrey Dahmer? Richard Ramirez? Tommy Lynn Sells? Gary Ridgway? Wayne Williams? Robin Gecht? Richard Chase? John Norman Collins? Ted Bundy? Dennis Rader? No?

They'd just caught one with like 90 bodies to his name not too long ago

Porn and vidya makes white incels complacent, onlly occasional elliot will lash out.

And probably for the better. Niggers are too nig to succumb for bread and circus, which is why they prefer to constantly nog instead. If incels would be chimping out, they'd be simply subdued like nogs were.

There is this one town I know of that has one camera up on a large hill. At that elevation and angle it can see the entire town, and it has high enough quality that you can zoom in anywhere in town and see people's faces.

Serial killers are only known if their crimes share a pattern...

>BLOCKS YOUR PATH

Attached: ted.jpg (680x513, 29K)

That is fair enough but if that was the case why doesn't it still happen as much as it used to? I'm not saying all serial killers are now mass shooters, merely that there is likely a cross over.

Jeffrey Dahmer documented his crimes with photos, many of which are published. Pic related is a censored pic showing his stash of photos he had in his dresser drawer, showing him dismembering and having sex with the corpses of his victims.

Attached: jeffrey-dahmer-polaroids-crime-scene.png (750x375, 353K)

>hookers

Attached: cdc.jpg (577x537, 33K)

>no one else knows about it
The police often does, you fucking idiot.

This. Lead in petroleum made people crazy

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead–crime_hypothesis

Not a killer but where I live there was a serial offender dubbed the Naked Tickler. He would break into people's houses naked, go into their room and tickle their feet. whie they skept. It took years to catch him, he got 25 years. I wish I was making this shit up. I bet you can guess what state I live in.

Which is most of the time...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_Island_serial_killer
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Unidentified_serial_killers

That's not even one tenth the level of surveillance in the UK. Look at the effort they went through during that poisoning incident.

mossad, CIA, FBI hired ‘em all

It's really not that hard.

The real problem is everyone has a cell phone, you need a cell phone jammer as priority number one.

Disposing of the bodies is relatively simple, 55 gallon drums of acid do the trick filled a quarter of the way.

Power tools make processing the bodies easy, you just need a good dry room that you can wash out easily. Closing the housings on everything so no blood leaks anywhere is critical too, just in case.

After all that you can pretty much pour their dissolved corpse out anywhere.

Some more of these photos. I guess they made this all up and there weren't systematic photos that Dahmer took of himself dismembering victims and peeling their flesh off while he had sex with their body parts.

Attached: dahmer victim 2.jpg (600x409, 37K)

>kill random targets on the fringes of society , properly dispose body.

Pigs will not even be aware of what your doing let alone catch you

Florida?

Another one of the photos Jeff took of him raping and killing a victim.

Attached: dahmer victim.png (600x458, 128K)

Of course.

foxnews.com/story/beware-the-naked-toe-tickler
metro.co.uk/2007/10/16/naked-tickler-believed-captured-after-three-year-hunt-302690/
nwitimes.com/news/weird-news/naked-tickler-loose-in-florida/article_27d5f82b-98a0-56aa-bc9d-5d0a1ca15259.html

Yet another photo from his collection. Blood splatter is on the wall from slitting the throat of one victim who was starting to wake up after being drugged.

Attached: dahmer victim3.png (650x481, 133K)

The same victim. Jeff would pose the bodies and flex their chests like this, because he liked to watch the muscles flexing.

Attached: dahmer victim4.jpg (1920x1080, 133K)

> Everyone prone to become one is now a mass shooter. No idea why
Nah, mass shooters are different breed.
Though cause usually is quite similar, mass shooter has almost no self-control, while serial killer excels at it. I would never beileve that soi bitch that fires 50 shotgun shells and kills two people in the shop could under slightly different circumstance become a man who stay calm and cheerful while having trunk full of body parts and talking to a cop.
> No idea why
Because surveillance and medical tech became so much better. They caught "golden state killer" a year ago based on dna evidence.
On top of that, everybody have tracking device on them 24/7 and willingly write their own dossiers online.

There was a serial killer in Toronto recently. Went in noticed for a long time because he only killed foreign gays, and only got noticed because he killed a white gay activists

Is that a huge BBC I'm looking at?

>Which is most of the time...
Yeah, no.
Even if investigators weren't idiots (newsflash, they are), it's still a lot of work and thinking.

Security cameras are everywhere nowadays and are always recording. Before the late 90s security cameras were a lot less useful than they are now, you had to either hire someone to watch the camera feed live or record the footage to VHS tapes, and the tapes only lasted 2 or so hours at a normal framerate before you had to change it, a lot of people used low framerates like 5 frames a second to stretch recording length but then you could barely even see anything and you needed a different VHS recorder for each camera, it was a lot of work and money. Now you just hook a bunch of camera up and send have it all record to a hard drive somewhere, it's easy and cheap so they're everywhere and much more effective then the old shit was.

>where it hurts the most
>NB4 Mr FBI Guy
It just struck me as odd

It’s no longer trendy. Mass shootings are in now.

Obsessed.
When are (you) gonna start your killing-spree, fat pig ?