It’s that simple

The less corrupted a country’ politicians are, the more prosperous the average people of said country are. It’s time to rise up third world.

Attached: 3546FC46-C2D9-4677-8A6F-44E99EABA4D6.png (1280x656, 207K)

The media of wealth in Greece, Italy and France is greater than in Germany.

The joys of living in a corruption-free country cannot be understated

Attached: jussie-smollett-696.jpg (618x410, 49K)

Average citizen in those country suffer more than average citizen in Germany.

Just imagine how corrupted countries below the US score are...

corruption = more freedom

in corrupt countries you can criticize multiculturalism and immigration

You also live a shitty life.

This is partially true.

You can do such because law and authority are incompetent

>leaf
>gov't too incompetent to be corrupt

>US
>70-79

Yeah, because lobbyists, foreign donors and super PACs totally doesn't stink of corruption.

Nope, the highest correlation ever in economics is overall interpersonal trust and GDP.

Even Denmark has corruption. The point is that countries with less corrupt politicians correlate with general well-being of the average person there.

>canada
>that blue

our pm literally broke the law and forcibly shut down any investigations into it

>Corruption Perceptions Index
It's perception. By next year US ought to be in pink-red range.

Well even if you are 100% zogged there are still places that are lot worse.
At least right now they have to operate somewhat undercover vs in lot of other places where it's fully expected to bribe and buy people off as every day happening in a working system

your image is incorrect

let me fix it for you

US/Alaska - pink/ pink-red
Canada - yellow
Antarctica - dark blue.

The U.S.A. is pink red orange now.

Attached: Jared+Kushner+Trump+Holds+Roundtable+Prison+tOZXBU-j8Q1l.jpg (600x463, 42K)

>US/Alaska
??? Why did you have to include Alaska like it's a separate being, why not add Hawaii to

Attached: 1553433632368.jpg (670x671, 59K)

It's bullshit because corruption is measured in terms of "perception", there's no actual objective way of measuring it. If nobody reports it, then there's "no corruption".

Well we can measure how much GDP per capita a state/city makes. Then how much the Goverment takes in, then after that what ever is not Spent on infrastructure or better programs (Or state savings.) We can assume goes into politicians bank accounts

There's probably much better ways of measuring it. But saying we can't because we never seen that money in the first place isn't true

>thinks third world savages can do anything but eat and poop out babies.
kek, why are they so easily controlled by dictators in the first place? It might have something to do with IQ...

See here's the difference between Maryland and Madagascar. Your method works in the actual corrupt places because there folks literally just pocket money
In "corrupt" places the money just drains away in "justifiable" expenses and, bonuses, wages and what not all perfectly "legal"