Why is the right so in love with hierarchies?

Daddy issues.

Are you getting paid to lie or are you just so kiked up you can't tell Marx from Mises?

>Marx
>Mises
>both materialist Jews

Nice touch on both the purple hairs and rabbis, only thing missing is Democrat and Republican as the front men below the star of david.

This picture is antisemitic. pls delet

Because hierarchies are true.
Simple.

This is why I don't give a flying fuck that capitalism is dying... too bad communism is shit too though.

Hierarchies are lies that we all pretend are true.
Kill yourself for having daddy issues.

Ever considered a third position?

Attached: 20190327_150714.jpg (2576x1932, 1.5M)

motherfucker

Have you tried National Socialism?

Direct democracy is the only system that has a less than even chance of serving the tiny elite at the expense of everyone else.

>existance itself is flawed

I agree

>mob rule totally works guise

Elites are the ones pushing for commie democracy. Its easy to buy retard voters like you, so all the evil shit they want to do will be legal.

Embrace third position

Ever heard of a lobster?

Attached: download (21).jpg (300x223, 13K)

because it keeps useless plebs like you down where you can be exploited for something halfway productive cause you are good for nothing else and we will not allow useless plebs to waste our air.

it's a hierarchy but it just lies about it's existence

>he thinks elites want the people to rule themselves
>rather than have just a few representatives they can buy off
>t.boomer with Alzheimer's

Attached: 1543165615138.jpg (480x480, 15K)

>inequality is a flaw

>he thinks Marxism is a political system rather than an ideology
Take off your memeflag, crippledick jew.

This is why Jussie Smollet was released. Fuck poor people!

Attached: 20190327_231216.jpg (2576x1932, 1.52M)

>my entire life outlook is informed by vidya and other jewish media

Too bad this shit uploads sideways

Maybe when my head is on sideways I will consider it

Fascism will never work in the long run, there will always be rebellion, besides I'm not white so no.

Any fom of democracy always ends up (((corrupted))) over time.

Sorry guys, I'm a existential nihilist for a reason (it's the only fucking thing that makes any sense)

Attached: 1549406176620.gif (400x400, 1.4M)

Wot?

>I'm not white
>flag
Checks out
Go home

The same system exists in communism too. You just replace the aristocrats and capitalists with the party elite, the clergy with the state propagandists and the upper class with those favored by the party.

Lets take Best Korea for example. Kim Jong Un is essentially the monarch, his propaganda department is effectively the state religion, the military and police hold every one in line and if you obey well enough to please the party then you may join the privileged class and be rewarded with an apartment in Pyongyang.

Centralized power will always lead to inequality and exploitation. Only when the people have the power in their own hands can they protect themselves from exploitation.

Attached: Stalin Incredulous.webm (582x600, 1.4M)

We had it once. The middle class was living the good life but someone saw it was just white men, so they took all their money for civil rights programs and dragged the middle class down.

>implying elites who aren't the primary source of gibs will be under threat to those who receive gibs in the first place to be complacent
>gibs monkeys now take a vote to murder you for being a bigoted white male

Hey man, its democracy.

Equality is a false god
I have not seen a leftist defend equality on its own merit other than 'it is equality so it must be good'

>I'm not white
Why the fuck are you in a white country? Go back to your shithole, institute natsoc and make it stop being a shithole. But most of all GO BACK NIGGER.

Go take your retarded jewish religion and shove it up your anus faggot nigger

Attached: 1514962799009.png (892x978, 40K)

>Go home

When you come here and make me, burger.

Attached: 1540232615948.jpg (599x540, 167K)

>Centralized power will always lead to inequality and exploitation. Only when the people have the power in their own hands can they protect themselves from exploitation.
Power centralizes either through markets or through politics. Lets not pretend that a small government will prevent corporations from abusing you

Yea that median is created by free market capitalism

I love working for Uncle Sam.
He let's me know just who I am.

Attached: 1514328882416.png (801x801, 51K)

Heirachies, in my definition are arrangements of people, items, where there is an order from lesser to greater.

There are lesser and greater in nearly anything you care to name; social hierarchies such as apprentice/master tradesman relationships, military commander/subordinate relationships, owner and employee relationships, food chains in biology, levels of human needs, etc.

No, indirect democracy gets (((corrupted))) over time. That's why you can't vote to deport the jews back to the Middle East to live or die by their own hands.
I respect existential nihilism, but it's a shitty basis for collective action.

>implying there would be a ruling class under direct democracy
>needing to make this much drama about jigaboos who just want to do what needs to be done and go home and fuck off, just like you
You should leave the basement, once in a while.

That doesnt create a medium
That user is so caught up in hegelian dialectics that he's literally trying to find an in between or grey zone of inequality and equality.
It's fucking retarded. Inequality will always exist. Heriarchies should be actively utilized for collective betterment.

Why don't you stop worrying about me, and start worrying about the jew behind you, you stupid faggot.

Besides, I do what I want when I want, so make me... bitch.

Attached: 1544001866646.jpg (1024x936, 215K)

It should scare you that democracy is dying. It's not perfect, but it's the only system that has ever brought a majority of the world out of poverty & its the reason you are on this thing called the internet right now.

Who enforces the law in direct Democracy?

Yes, and they're social constructs.
You shouldn't project your one-dimensional reductionism onto the world. It engenders psychosis and it makes you sound like the SJWs who do exactly the same thing.

>someone
>(((someone)))

>heirarchy is a social construct!
>screams the gazelle as it is eaten alive by a lion

fuck you

Either police that the people themselves can hire *AND FIRE* at will, or everyone.
Take special note of that last part in asterisks. This is where EVERY system of leadership goes wrong.

because they're bottoms and they like it that way

Attached: pyramid-miga.jpg (1024x791, 137K)

Because communism was fundamentally opposed to it, so anything associated with left-wing equality is automatically opposed due to the fact that the Soviet Union was attempting to destroy us for 60 years.

This is the answer.
This is the correct answer.
This is the ONLY correct answer.
If any human being alive was subject to being dehumanized by such a system they would not agree with the hierarchy.
If you disagree with this, you're fucking retarded and need to off yourself.

Attached: 1550644408972.jpg (552x692, 52K)

Please spare her.

The rich only have all the power when all you retarded urbanites decide to sit on each others laps like a fucking anthill. If you have to drive for 6 hours to expolits someone its simply not worth it

>implying there would be a ruling class under direct democracy
When has that not been the case?
>jigaboos who just want to do what needs to be done and go home and fuck off, just like you
What exactly do you mean by this?

The Jew behind me brought your shitskin ass here. I'm trying to help you help yourself and your people. Obviously, like the Jew you're not interested in being more than parasitic on the white man. Otherwise you'd fuck off back to your home country and attempt to bring your people up.

I think collusion with the state to regulate the market in ways that empower the most powerful corporations exacerbates the corruption problem.

The Free Market will exploit you if its profitable to do so. In my view the best way to avert this is through tax policy. Corporations that behave as we would wish them to by providing good jobs to many citizens and treating consumers fairly have little need to pay taxes as they are simply through their existence serving the needs of the society. On the other hand a corporation that concentrates all its profits into the hands of a few and makes all its money through automation or employment of Chinese slaves should rightly pay a high corporate tax rate as its existence does little to serve the society.

Attached: 52887097_10156911919192226_8657169126743080960_n.png (800x408, 149K)

>but it's the only system that has ever brought a majority of the world out of poverty
Weird way to spell republic, but okay.

>complains about capitalism
>i do what i want when i want
>doesn't realize this is the exact rationalization of why capitalism exists

Attached: 223454.jpg (638x425, 130K)

Sounds like a chaotic and ineffective system

>No, indirect democracy gets (((corrupted))) over time. That's why you can't vote to deport the jews back to the Middle East to live or die by their own hands.

All forms of democracy get corrupted over time, it's mob rule, control the majority 51% or more (the mob) and you, well (((they))) rule.

>I respect existential nihilism, but it's a shitty basis for collective action.

I'm way past giving a shit about the collective, and can't you recognize a lost cause when you see one?

Attached: 1542045599892.png (420x420, 165K)

Soviet Union was anti-racist and always expressed solidarity with Third World struggles. I doubt Stalin would be appalled by brown people in communist attire.

>Heriarchies should be actively utilized for collective betterment.
Can you be any more cucked than this? Your daddy is dead. Join him.

>you can't kill me! I'm an apex predator!

Attached: 1536583909323.jpg (1000x1502, 283K)

Yeah, its fascism/third position. You realise that you are all part of the same nation so its beneficial to help each other out and work towards the betterment of your society.

Otherwise its dog eat dog. Or we can all be equally poor together under communism

Attached: zdsf782pyaf21.jpg (422x599, 57K)

I'm okay with this. I think to secure more fundamental things, like healthy families, we may need more government involvement and refulation than just taxation though

When you think about it the groups don’t need to be considered in an hierarchical manner, each group has a role to play and is vital. People used to take pride in their work no matter how lowly it might be thought of today

>Soviet Union was anti-racist
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kulak

Attached: 1440773646828.jpg (500x473, 55K)

„We eat for you“? Not in communism my man

>no argument
K then

Trying to find logic in a completely illogical world mfw

Also get fucked, you brought this on yourself invading and subjugating other cultures, what did you think was going to happen? Stupid burger faggot.

Attached: DD.jpg (413x395, 17K)

why is hitler laughing? is it because neo nazis are super epic he-men and commies are literally this?

>illogical world
The world is governed by observable and constant laws
Existential nihilism is unjustifiable
>you brought this on yourself
Your statement is correct. It also demonstrates the veracity of my statement regarding natural law

That's because you have daddy issues.

>muh mob rule!!!1!
Then it can't be any worse, and stands a much better chance of being better than dead oligarchs would admit. Regular order isn't a suicide pact, but someone with daddy issues (like 90% of Jow Forums) wouldn't be able to understand that.

Actually trusting a nobility to act in your interest or the interest of the collective is an argument? K

Tax the idle. It's that simple.
Tax speculators.
Tax the rich who hoard the nation's money.
Tax the unemployed. (Indeed, it is taxation itself that creates unemployment by enlarging the pool of people who want money and need to work.)
Also nationalize all utilities, but that might be a bit contentious around here.

There are many hierarchies within society because people are competent at different things.

I mean with a just distribution of wealth in the society you shouldn't need the state to help anyone except for people who can't work since people should be able to afford all the services they need.

We clearly don't have a just distribution of wealth though which is why many of us believe we need the state to intervene on our behalf since our economy has become an exploitative system where we can't get ahead through work alone and where unskilled labor is damned to perpetual poverty no matter how hard they work.

Attached: Nozick-1.jpg (376x437, 70K)

I love to have that "middleground" via national socialism, but you keep fucking it up and importing millions of ethnocentric rival shitskin tribes.

>invading and subjugating other cultures
Do you actually think your shithole was capable of coming into the West without the West allowing it?

What part of "direct" are you being paid to ignore, here?
>What exactly do you mean by this?
Can't you read? Apparently not since you fail to understand what makes democracy direct, or are too busy sucking up to dead oligarchs and their self-serving statements to show healthy cynicism.
Workers literally want to do the work that needs to be done and go home, rather than generate surplus for some lazy-ass kike who thinks he's special.

>muh daddy issues
>>>Tumblr
>trusting nobility
When did I mention noblity?
>tax everything
>nationalize utilies
I dont really disagree with that desu

>just distribution of wealth
I dont believe in capitalism, but that statement is very fuzzy and potentially dangerous. Just secure a strong industrial base, abolish usury and keep your currency strong, and that should mainly make for a good economy

Hilariously enough these are some of the wealthiest and easiest times in human history and you're acting like it's the end of the world. These has never been a time where the leading cause of death is nation wide gluttony.

Competition is the one thing that got us here. The whole point of evolution is competition for the best mate, most resources, whatever. The second you try to build a communist system which tries to eliminate all competition, people will create competition through corruption. Anything else is pointless, hierarchies work, they have always worked and nothing has changed. We're all rich, fat and educated. Life has never been easier in the west. The fact that most of you spend half the day jerking off and shitposting while still being overweight is proof of how much easier life is now than for all of human history.

>The world is governed by observable and constant laws

Then what is chaos? and apart from the basics, most of these "laws" are subjective, trying to desperately peace things together to find "order" and "meaning" where there is none.

I asked for an example of direct democracy without a ruling class, you rube.

>Can't you read?
WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE, YOU ABSOLUTE FUCKING RETARD?

>Entire website pretends to be woke and hates the left
>Complains about the “unfairness” of capitalism

Idk ask Stalin and his hierarchy of "party members"

>we feed all

concepts that communists doesn't understand

These laws are cause and effect
Insert x get out y
Morality is based around conforming to the best input for output. Thats literally how you justify your worldview at all. That is why you think we should have direct democracy
Problem is, is that this process of input and output is governed by natural law. Doesnt mattet what your opinion is, put shit in, get shit out. And nature will correct all bad inputs

Because most leftists nowadays dont want sozialism or communism because they believe its the best for all, they want it because they see it as an means to protect them from the consequences of their decadent lifestyle, like being a fag and getting pozzed, getting knocked up by random nignogs who wont pay child support or being childless narcissts who wont have anybody to feeed them when their theef start falling out. All this behaviour was quiet contrary to everything Stalin propagated.
While neonazis might havecfallee a long way, they still propagatectheircideascout of idealism, because there is rally no good reason to get yourself on the naughty boys list when public and corporate support is still low

Typical, can't dispute the point so make a strawman... again, you didn't think you could rape, kill, steal and pillage from cultures and peoples for centuries, and have no ramifications of the cause and effect, did you? What you reap, you sow.

You all brought this on yourselves, good day burger.

Attached: 1548033824372.gif (286x204, 844K)