Reminder: you cant call yourself 'redpilled' if you aren't an atheist

Reminder: you cant call yourself 'redpilled' if you aren't an atheist.

Attached: christopher-hitchenss-quotes-6.jpg (750x459, 95K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=bgwq09sIpLQ
imgur.com/a/BgAXeWC
pastebin.com/HPVPTX4u
youtube.com/watch?v=GnD5RqgVtw0
youtube.com/watch?v=wtTrxWK521k
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Actually just the opposite is true

I don't actually think religious belief is the primary factor in being red-pilled.

It's about being wise to globalism and Jewish tricks.

if you aren't pagan you are not redpilled.

Nigga, ten to one you don't know Whitsun from Vinterblot.

Wrong. I'm a gnostic pagan.

Gaytheists are bluepilled NPC's.

Hitchens was a vacuous pseud.

Baptized Roman Catholic and proud.

The boys and girls being raped is not our way.

Elaborate please.

The most enlightenting recognition I've made in the last eighteen months has been the value that religion has (Christianity especially) as a governor of societies. The stories and lessons of the Bible aren't histories or doctrines...they're straight-forward allegories for avoiding the behaviours which destory societies. For example: there is no "God" who hates gays and punishes them. But homosexuality and sodomy does NOTHING to contribute to the growth and prosperity of society, so it is discouraged.

Jimmy Carr has a joke that said (paraphrased): "I think if God would have truly hated gays, he would have sent a plague to wipe them out." There is not God. There is no divinely-inspired plague. But there are STDs which spread epidemically because males are less sexually-selective/discriminatory. Only natural that such behaviour should be discouraged by a hypothetical "God."

Tell me more about how your Christian family "hurt" you frend.

Attached: 1553645253202s.jpg (125x102, 2K)

>Gnostic
You don't "gno" toffee mate.
All that indicates is that you have an unwarranted sense of certainty.

You probably skim-read Havamal once and decided you were the high-Gothi of Portland.

Atheism is part of globalism

Reminder you're a gatekeeper when you post dumb shit like this.

Attached: IMG_1137.jpg (508x720, 58K)

FPBP

Attached: Christian vs Atheist parents.jpg (1000x903, 116K)

redpills are red
bluepills are blue
OP is a faggot
and so are you

I know it's true. Simple as that.

According to OP these christcucks are red pilled. Remember to give your hard earned money to God's chosen people, goy

Attached: christcuck.webm (574x382, 1.24M)

Ah yes. Endless tedious religious arguments that amount to wank. This is what will defeat the enemies of the West.

>I can't read

Incorrect; atheism is the lack of belief in the divine.

There are many reasons to be an atheist; some of these are pro-globalist, others are completely unrelated to globalism.

Marxists, if they're consistent, are atheists of the sort you describe.
Marxist socialism is supposed to "transcend national boundaries", and is therefore globalist.
Marxists however, simply replace the dogmatic adherence to a supernatural faith based worldview, with the dogmatic adherence to a political faith-based worldview.
They're in that sense, competing for the same real estate; the human soul.
And so Socialists seek to destroy and subvert religious institutions wherever they go.
Personally, I'm quite happy to go to the church picnic and chat with the vicar, because that's the English thing to do.

Well pardon me.

both kids are degenerate messes and both sets of parents should be whipped.
children should not work in entertainment, period.

And yet you haven't delineated "what" you believe.

Who is the divine ancestor of your people?
Why does the sun rise in the morning?
Do you even know how to conduct a proper sacrifice?

As always fpbp

But only one of them is getting bummed by grown men on the low-low.

>But only one of them is getting bummed by grown men on the low-low.
i wouldn't be so sure. rednecks can be into some creepy shit too...
ever see "deliverance"?
and also cowboy shit in general reeks of queers.

>high-Gothi of Portland
kek, have a (you)

Attached: 1553057292023m.jpg (1024x1024, 61K)

Not when the religion you worship is abrahamic, ie kiked.

You sound like my kind of nigger. Do you practice Theodism?

Atheism is one of the biggest blue pills out there dumb faggot.

for some reason right wingers feel obligated to belong to a religion. the only good thing about religion is that it teaches you consistency and loyalty, but you can learn those traits by yourself.

The Nu-Atheists are too focused on Abrahamic faiths, and have little argument against Mazdaism

Attached: zo2-400x333.jpg (400x333, 25K)

Atheists are all gay. Being pro-gay atomically well...makes you a fucking faggot hahaha!

>Jow Forums will defeat the enemies of the West

What are you, gay? We're just here for the ride

Jews are genetically Southern Italian. You're a pizza kike

Atheism is for degenerate faggots

I don't engage in organized religion.
I've poured out mead at midwinter, and I have a small library of folk-magic and ancient religious texts like Nine Herbs Charm and The Mahabharata.
I thank my ancestors for the land they conquered for me, and I remember and honour great Penda, "Brytenwalda" the last true king of Mercia, who is the get of Woden.

>athiest
>hates faggots and trans people as much as religious people
>just for sound logical reasons and not throw away platitudes
Religion is for degenerate faggots that cant survive without some fear of eternal damnation keeping you in check.
Its ok to be weak, but god wont take care of you.

Attached: 55976000d921.jpg (640x512, 55K)

Godtards. Just imagine being that stupid.

Attached: godtard79.jpg (250x209, 10K)

alienpill > redpill

There was nothing wrong with the Wankle rotary engine.

Wonderful. I am a part of a community who practice our old ways. I wouldn't call it organized religion, just folk gathering to honor the divine. Keep the fires burning, brother. One day the names Þunor, Freá Ing and Tíw will be spoken by our people once again.

And religion is for infantile cowards who, in fear of punishment, lick the ass of the Invisible SuperDaddy

philosophy is a pagan practice, it's religious in nature

Frey bless your loins, wes thu hal my cousin.

Don't conflate religion with (((abrahamic))) jewligion fren

The priest sure is enjoying himself.

i have found that most do not mean they disbelieve in "god", a higher power or creator entity which science would call an alien if it is intelligent and alive in any sense (fire has been argued to meet the requirment of living for example).

what they usually mean is their reliable normal world navigating sensory system has not detected enough evidence of such a beings existence to a degree that they theorize said existence concretely.

they have not found enough panther tracks or bigfoot shit in the yard to come to believe, to think it more probable than not, that either is living in the patch of forest behind their methlab/yoga class/masturbatorium, or "daycare" as the jews say it.

now, recalibrating the anal fissure to account for nerdion farticles we come up with a different sum regarding aetheism, it's popularity or lack thereof, and also it's general intellectual credit score. i hope you brought cash.

>this hollywood movie told me how rednecks are
user...

So-called "atheists" are stupid bastard sons of the very church they denounce. They define "god" in the same exact form that their nemesis does. Why? Because they are ruled by their female mind. Entirely not redpilled.
1st response is best response.

Attached: deus vult.jpg (622x960, 76K)

May fortune and good weather follow you.

Attached: 37215_1285073297920_1562786087_30601508_1662606_n.jpg (504x664, 55K)

Once again, fpbp.

>God doesn't exist because people die
Atheist logic

>Frey bless your loins, wes thu hal my cousin.
what the fuck is this larping lmfao

Attached: kattergatter.jpg (612x612, 36K)

>"atheists"
>They define "god"
*godtard reasoning*

Attached: godtard33.png (957x729, 74K)

Ask me how I know you haven't read any CS Lewis.

Eh, it;s sort of an indirect allusion to the "Problem of Evil".

Which is only a problem is you believe divinity is always benevolent.

Checked and God pilled.

This.

kek

>He doesn't greet his cousin

"Water and towels | and welcoming speech
Should he find who comes, to the feast;
If renown he would get, | and again be greeted,
Wisely and well must he act."

>every philosopher before 1750 is a theist
>some failed abortion dipwad says philosophy started when religion ended

You don't know shit about Hitchens.
>spent his young adulthood as a socialist, visiting Cuba
>became a journalist
>became war correspondent
>wrote brilliant literary criticism
>wrote brilliant political commentary, specifically on US-British relations
>moved to the US because he loved free speech and the constitution so much
>continued journalism work
>helped shelter Salman Rushdie when the 1989 fatwa was issued
>became contributing editor of Vanity Fair
>hated the Clintons before it was cool
>hated and recognized the barbaric toxicity of Islam before it was cool
>mingled with the Washington elite for two decades
>mingled with the global literary elite for three decades
>had an encyclopedic memory of 20th century literature
>had a prodigious memory for historical and political facts
>drank heavy and smoked heavily throughout his life
The fact is, we all envy the life he lived.

Christianity is the purest form of Logic that has ever existed. It's not created by man. It's the self existing moral logic of the universe, expressed through man, Christ, and his followers. All I can say is read CS Lewis Mere Christianity, or listen to it. Once you've heard it, you might still be atheist, but you won't keep repeating their ridiculous, infantile arguments. I have never seen an atheist present an argument that even comes close to refuting the logical arguments presented by Lewis here, and also in Miracles. Only listen if you are interested in mind expanding education. If I could, I'd cannonize him.

youtube.com/watch?v=bgwq09sIpLQ

So-called "atheists" reject the idea their exists any god or gods. Yet when they formulate their ideas of what a god or gods are, they use the same models used by true believers. Despite Jung providing a clear secular model. Making them stupid bastard sons of the same religions they mock. Now ain't that quackin' sumpthin', Jimbo?

Attached: 2so44l.jpg (500x1291, 255K)

fpbp

>"atheists"
>when they formulate their ideas of what a god or gods are
godtard reasoning, volume II

Attached: godtard437.png (550x543, 50K)

>spent his young adulthood as a socialist, visiting Cuba
so a faggot?
>became a journalist
so a faggot?
>became war correspondent
so a faggot?
>wrote brilliant literary criticism
so a faggot?
>wrote brilliant political commentary, specifically on US-British relations
so a faggot?
>moved to the US because he loved free speech and the constitution so much
so a faggot?
>continued journalism work
so a faggot?
>helped shelter Salman Rushdie when the 1989 fatwa was issued
so a faggot?
>became contributing editor of Vanity Fair
so a faggot?
>hated the Clintons before it was cool
so one of 45+ million faggots?
>hated and recognized the barbaric toxicity of Islam before it was cool
so a faggot?
>mingled with the Washington elite for two decades
so a faggot?
>mingled with the global literary elite for three decades
so a faggot?
>had an encyclopedic memory of 20th century literature
so a faggot?
>had a prodigious memory for historical and political facts
so a faggot?
>drank heavy and smoked heavily throughout his life
so one of billions of faggots?

Real convincing arguments...

We are the pure and chosen few
The rest of you are damned
There's lots of room in hell for you
We don't want heaven crammed.

Every different religion believes that anyone who doesn't belong is a damned atheist.
Everyone actually but me and you, and I worry about you.

And what in other religions there is no super daddy?

>gathering to honor the divine
W H Y

You're correct that the logic isn't created by man. But it's presented by man as the capstone project of 100 000 years of somewhat organized existence; this is the wisdom they've collected. The self-existing logic is limited or influenced by biology more than anything else, followed by sociological forces which we still don't fully understand today. But the fact is that the lessons of the Bible create more robust and productive societies. Very little relativism. Lots of compassion.

That's a great, thoughtful response. I hope you find the time to read it over to yourself and then consider whether it was even worth the time it took to type it out.

that just means he was overrated

>whoosh! Vol. II
>words aren't associated with ideas
I could call you retarded or I could kindly inform you that higher ideas require prerequisite actual experience with component ideas before a mind can comprehend. In your case it's obvious enough that not only are you ignorant but also carry the absolute conviction of your errant use of words. Which is typical of so-called "atheists". Making bastard sons of the churches they denounce the most fervent, most devoted religious fanatics of all. Which is why it's so popular with commie filth. It goes hand in hand with ignorance, degeneration, ugliness, and all petty lusts and appetites of the undisciplined, unwashed mass of frustrated losers in life. Verily.

Attached: 87c6164c252c3b7aeee11de98ce2377ffa2b1ceef61198abaec4bde6c6c43b2e.png (236x483, 63K)

it is about understanding persisting human truths and the directions they imply for optimal human social organization
only after those primary and secondary layers does the discussion of transient current events and people become a matter of redpill

Atheists are not capable of higher abstract reasoning, they are stuck in the physical

wrong

right

imgur.com/a/BgAXeWC
pastebin.com/HPVPTX4u

Attached: 1.png (777x2777, 905K)

Fpbp

>every philosopher before 1750 had never heard of cell biology, genetics, natural selection, sub-atomic particles, etc.

Hitchens actually has a very sympathetic view of pre-scientific method theological frameworks for what they contributed to our culture, as the below video shows. Highly recommend, atheist or Christian alike.
youtube.com/watch?v=GnD5RqgVtw0

Sounds like your experience with religion is entirely Abrahamic.

"A snapping bow, a burning flame,
A grinning wolf, a grunting boar,
A raucous crow, a rootless tree,
A breaking wave, a boiling kettle,
A flying arrow, an ebbing tide,
A coiled adder, the ice of a night,
A bride's bed talk, a broad sword,
A bear's play, a prince' s children,
A witch' s welcome, the wit of a slave,
A sick calf, a corpse still fresh,
A brother's killer encountered upon
The highway a house half-burned,
A racing stallion who has wrenched a leg,
Are never safe: let no man trust them."

Attached: godtards1.png (640x639, 501K)

Fpbp

(((Christopher Hitchens)))

Reminder that this kike went full neocon because he was afraid of Muslims coming to the west and exterminating all his fellow kikes.

All true. I agree. None of what you say negates Christ and Christianity, as summarized by CS Lewis. His works bridge the gap between western logic traditions and religious thinking, often seen to be at odds. We are limited in our ability to understand and apply that logic to our own lives, but that doesn't mean that a perfect example has not been presented to us. Google Lewis' "trilemma" for a fun rabbit hole. It's one of the most influential concepts in 20th century theology and Christian apologetics. Briefly: it's the idea that you are in a tough spot when you think of Christ as only a great moral teacher, and not the actual Son of God. Why? Because it forces you to either view him as a total mad man, nutjob or as the literal Son of God, which he repeatedly claimed he was. He's left you no choice, and, as Lewis states, "He didn't intend to."

Ground: Christ was a great moral teacher.
Condition: He also claimed he was literally the Son of God.
Options: Negate the ground (not possible), accept he is the Son of God, or call him a mad man (not compatible with the ground).

This is why the juice are especialy kind of fucked, at least the ones who deny Christ. You have to denigrate the Logos, the fundamental moral law of the universe in order to do so. I don't envy the position they are in, and we all like to think that if we were around at the time of Christ we'd obviously accept him and follow him or at least not reject him. But most people did reject him, and there were very few people present at his crucifixion. We benefit from the long tradition of Christianity molding our cultural mind to be able to even relate with the uncompromising Godly light that Christ represented.

Your baby jesus was plagiarised fiction. How dumb are you, champ?

Attached: godtards.jpg (333x737, 96K)

By the way, if you want a great critique of Marxism and Freudianism, read/listen to Miracles. He labels that whole line of logic as "Naturalism", and argues against it in favor of the Christian, logic based, God-centered understanding. You'll rarely here a more understated yet scathing critique. Those old British academics were gentlemen savages I tell you. He rips to shreds all of the foundations of what came after that: the Frankfurt School, HG Wells, Critical Theory, Socialism, later Feminism. All the bullshit we see in our society can be traced back to those two dudes basically.

youtube.com/watch?v=wtTrxWK521k

Somewhere in the first hour and a half I think.

This

Oh, you ignorant fuck.
1. Yes, Hitchens was half kike. His kike mother killed herself in 1973. Prior to that, he didn't even know he was Jewish.
2. He went "neocon" in 1989 (12 years before almost every prominent American politician) as a direct response to his friend's life being threatened by Ayatollah Khomeini.
3. He was one of the handful of political commentators who had a consistent argument in favour of the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Never invoked 9/11. Invoked nothing more than (congressional) regime change, harbouring terrorists, chemical weapons, and human rights abuses (ALL OF WHICH WERE TRUE ABOUT SADDAM).

Interesting angle. Will check out the trilemma tonight. Thanks!

>gnostic
So you're gay

Attached: jesuits gnostic freemasons.jpg (500x622, 85K)

lol you think Christ was literally born on dec 25? really? And you think the fact that he wasn't invalidates his entire life? Guess what, the declaration of independence wasn't signed on the 4th of July either. Also, you just compared him to 4 deities. Epic own bro. Except he actually did exist. REPENT FOR DENIGRATING THE LORD YOUR GOD!!!!

cringe

atheists are retarded

what if the first religion was actually just a natural philosophy? what if that is what it is to me now

How does it feel knowing that pic related actually existed, and your baby jesus was fake? That's gotta sting, eh godtard?

Attached: IMG_0312.gif (300x300, 128K)

You should cringe. Your faith is retarded, embarrassing and shameful.

Attached: godtards44.jpg (564x470, 52K)

I'm not a christian, you moron, nor am I fan of it. you are just retarded..

Religion was, is and always will be a blue pill: a means of control for the masses, because they are too fucking dumb to think for themselves.