Is having children the only way to deradicalize a man?

Is having children the only way to deradicalize a man?

youtu.be/NaL_fhhehjQ

Attached: Screenshot_20190328-075510_1.png (720x541, 353K)

If a man allows his children to raise him then he's not a man

>defoos her after he gets killed by skeletons

>muh pixels

Stefan doesn't understand at all...

Having children forces you to assume the role of an adult full time. It's difficult and not suitable for people who easily succumb to hedonism, nihilism and temptation
People are scared to have children because they don't want to bear the responsibility of bringing somebody into the world and giving them a fighting chance to do something good

Without children, our actions have less consequence, and selfishness is a viable strategy. With children, selfishness becomes a poison

It's a way to make you so tired that you can't muster up the energy to do anything radical. Children are a trap.

Absolutely stupid. You can make the same argument about any attachment. Regardless most people throughout history have had children and there's never been a shortage of selfishness. Having a kid isn't difficult, it doesn't make you a righteous person, and it wont give your pathetic life any meaning.

Agree with this user.

>2019
>having children before the race war

Shiggidy

>Not bolstering the fighting force
All the kids on my estate are racist wee oiks.
Bless their little cotton socks.

kek

Attached: D2TJP4EWsAIeqz8.jpg large.jpg (636x478, 39K)

raising white children and worrying about their future made more radical

This is fantastic.

Found the fucking virgin.

was there a change in stephen lately? I heard something about something where he 180'd on something substantial

If you thought that could deradicalize a man, you haven't seen shit yet. Check out contrapoints

solid observation, people nowadays dont want to grow up and be children for ever. And even if they do get kids and marry someone they end up divorced since they are still mentally children

NOT

It may make people less radical, because they become more concerned with careers so they can support their children and raise them in a safe environment. William Pierce had children however and he didn't seem to deradicalize.

Attached: William_Luther_Pierce.jpg (1200x1786, 237K)

yes because we are basicly radical because our oppertunitys to have children is dminished aka the point of being radical is too enable you to have children

isn't contrapoints a trap?

Good post

It’ll stop you from doing stupid shit, but it should make you care more about these things. Don’t let your children inherit the same mess everyone born after 1990 did.

This is real... nice