Dumb question but does Yang have any remote chance of actually winning or is he just a meme?

no, a chinaman will never be president of the united states, but the point is to force UBI on the democratic nominee

No

The Dems want some corporate stooge like black Hillary or Obama-lite

Literally 0%

Attached: Zqxu6Hav.png (954x342, 238K)

I'm sure wikipedia didn't delete the true statement about his large nipples.

1.) He's a CIS het, so all of the feminists and most LGBTABCDEFG will probably hate him.

2.) He's Asian, which is seen as "2nd-tier whites" by most leftists/niggers, and thus considered evil.

3.) He's running against a female nigger (Kamala) and a bunch of DNC-approved astroturf establishment types, so the competition is stiff.

This is coming from a Korean American but there is no chance he will win. Even if he miraculously wins the Democratic representation seat ( he won't 1% btw ) he will be facing Trump who have record high campaign funding, debunked Mueller report, emergence of the wall, and etc.

Lastly, Asian Americans are very divided and I can assure you guys Koreans won't be voting in a chink.

Did you escape the "hand of the jew?"

Even crazier is william legate spans stormfront with yang bullshit.

William legate is going to end up Like Michael Avenatti

Who does that faggot think he is? Now you're saying he had underaged sex?

Socialists/communists hate him too.

Too moderate for leftists, too liberal for conservatives.

Do you really need to ask that? He's a sideshow dwark.

>the democratic committee will never get behind him
This, the democrats only want to make promises to get votes, they have no intention of actually fulfilling them. They will never run someone who actually wants to follow through.

Just a meme. Do you think any niggers, spics or women will vote for a chink?
Not gonna happen.

He's a literal who meme candidate with zero chance, but it's kinda fun shitting all over the Yangoloid shills.

Attached: YANGTOON.png (933x681, 242K)

he's literally just a meme.

that sounds racist to me

It's a meme you dip.
This. They couldn't get behind Bernie even though he was their best chance to win. What makes you think they'll get behind Yang? They're entirely run on ideology at this point, to the extent that they're hurting themselves.

>This. They couldn't get behind Bernie even though he was their best chance to win. What makes you think they'll get behind Yang? They're entirely run on ideology at this point, to the extent that they're hurting themselves.

to be fair, hillary probably had guns to their heads on that one.

I'm more amazed wangshills waste their time and resources in Jow Forums.

Even if he wins, there is NO CHANCE IN HELL his 1,000 dollars a month plan will get through Congress.

women wanted to vote for a female candidate....

but everyone that understood anything about politics didn't want hillary in office, because she's a cunt.

Dems would do far better fielding tulsi, in my opinion.

I think the Clinton Kill List had less to do with it than the fact that most of them are completely shackled to the party line. The higher ups say "Hillary" and the rest of them have to jump.

it’s impossible. democrats HATE asians because asians are successful and don’t commit much crime which fucks up their white oppressor propaganda. the last thing they want is having a successful asian constantly in the spotlight.

on top of that, high iq is harder for them to manipulate. it’s easy to get AOC to recite their insane talking points because she is a complete low IQ low impulse control moron incapable of processing time or extrapolating into the future. AOC would sincerely tell people we can drop rocks from the moon to earth as a weapon of mass destruction, in exchange for a high 5 and some twitter likes.

but a high iq asian would point out that that’s regarded and ask too many questions. there’s a reason they’re pushing blacks, latinas, muzzies, women etc

besides if they gave everyone $1000/mo, 10 million already employed and successful conservatives would pool their $1000/mo every month and be receiving a $10,000,000,000/mo fund to troll the left with (billboards, IOTBW campaigns, etc) and use to pay content creators to flood YouTube with right wing content ($100,000 to every influencer who covers stats on race realism, islamic pedophilia, the jews, etc) while the jobless lazy left struggled to survive even with that $1000/mo.

yang winning would be the end of the world for the left.

Attached: 0D637F33-209A-4AF5-8E86-E0270C844BD8.gif (451x720, 1.91M)

BUT $1000 SO YOU WON'T GET BORED OF LIFE WHILE THE ROBOTS TAKE OVER

>Even if he wins, there is NO CHANCE IN HELL his 1,000 dollars a month plan will get through Congress.

isn't that basically his only platform at this point?

>Focus on the money

tulsi isn't hawkish enough for democratic leadership to back.
the democratic party is far more united than the gop, so if you don't have official party support you're fucked.

>fielding tulsi
There's two funny things about this statement. The first funny thing is that you're right. The second funny thing is that this will never fucking happen.

>The higher ups say "Hillary" and the rest of them have to jump.

but hillary is white.

>tulsi isn't hawkish enough for democratic leadership to back.

doesn't matter, they need votes to win, not "Leadership approval"

technically, sure, but the dnc is powerful and heavily involved in the media. if you don't have party backing you're not getting airtime.
she's not a social media guru and she's not controversial enough to where they can't afford not to air her like they did trump.

if you keep up with the news at all you'll realize she gets next to no coverage. less than any other mainstream candidate. beto holds failed rallies and gets headlines over it.

>if you don't have party backing you're not getting airtime.

and the party always picks people that no one wants to vote for, which drives lacklusted voter turnout, guaranteeing the opposition a victory.

>always
actually just in 2016. you must be 18 to post, user.

The party also issues the best zingers from the central committee.

>>always

you don't remember the other clinton, huh?

the one that won 2 elections against the opposition?

Attached: william.jpg (2000x1581, 510K)

I LOVE CHIIIIIINKS
SHOW ME THE MONEEEEEEY

Attached: gibsme.gif (500x267, 3.78M)

>spics
>jag är inte klok
"Spic" here, slavshit (pretty obvious). I would vote for Yang over any of the other candidates.

Daily reminder to vote for this babe.

Attached: 1553343787022.jpg (690x518, 81K)

Yeah. Go rinse out your cunt now. Most people don't like blood on the chair.

>the one that won 2 elections against the opposition?

yeah, the one that had charisma and wasn't a she devil harpy creature that the dem leadership tried to force down americans throats.

>a she devil harpy creature

honestly, hillary is just the fucking worst.

I think you missed the part where you said
>and the party always picks people that no one wants to vote for
which has happened on a grand scale one time in the past 2 decades at best and not since the 60s at worst.

also
>replying to your own post to agree with yourself even further
yikes

>>and the party always picks people that no one wants to vote for
>which has happened on a grand scale one time in the past 2 decades at best and not since the 60s at worst.

then why do they lose so often?

>>replying to your own post to agree with yourself even further

I'm establishing a chain of thought, not replying to myself... it's for brevity, I am AWARE that we have ID's.

>then why do they lose so often?
actually being this retarded
i guess the republicans do the same thing too then since they lose just as often
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election#Electoral_college_results

Attached: 1552670081832.png (363x376, 298K)

>i guess the republicans do the same thing too then since they lose just as often

indeed.

so why the constant back and forth?

is it because the american people don't actually WANT the party agendas?

We need to wait until the first debate to find out
If he can btfo the competition, then yeah he has a chance

no. the whole thing is just to raise awareness of his name, pathetic really. he has to hire david brock to get an ounce of exposure.

>(you)
>so why the constant back and forth?
because that's how things typically work in life.
it's pretty well documented. you're a retard.

>that spacing
just go back, you faggot

never been to reddit, you double faggot.

You're going to shit yourself when you find out where the "Reddit spacing" meme originated from.

Attached: koshtruth.jpg (530x345, 186K)

He won't win, but will push the concept of UBI into the mainstream. They will have to do it eventually. It's cheaper for them to pay us to stay at home and automate almost all jobs, than to actually pay workers a good fucking wage that is sustainable for families. That and heading off the violence and riots that eventually millions of unemployed broke people will do - Just look at the niggers.

I cannot wait for my UBI NEETbux, as an asocial misanthrope aspie/introvert, I cannot hold the average piece of shit front-line job anyway and I'd rather not be forced to look for more of the same just to get my 318 a month, plus rent assistance. I live in a city and shouldn't need to commute at 780-2,600 a year. A full grand a month, which covers my 530 in rent and 75 in other bills, would be much more tolerable to live on. I could eat steak more than once a month, at least.

Willoam legate gets 9,000 a month from the Yang campaign that's a lot more then a 1,000 they promise

a this point, i'm thinking the literal ONLY way I'm ever going to see anything for my efforts, is with UBI.

and that so sad I can't even describe it.

Both.

They don't have to. Ever heard of a democracy?

literally who?