Where were you when you realized that Trump, Mueller, Rosenstein, Barr...

It's more complicated than that, but I suspect you're getting warm.

>based Rudy.
kissing trump wearing a dress is based?

bump Jow Forums must see this information

bump

Bump

trump "interviews" mueller for fbi spot (that mueller couldn't even have) 1 days prior to being named SC?
SC is sparked by comey firing which Rosenstein recommended?
Sessions recusal edit Rosenstein in charge of all of this.

/oldpol/ has known since july 2017, way before Q, that mueller and rosenstein were working for trump.

where's assange??

Attached: IMG_6753.png (1242x2208, 842K)

i won't let this be slid

Trump and Gulliani are still complicit in covering up 9-11. They better hope that comes out in the wash, and it turns out they were playing scooby doo all along, otherwise they are still terrorists.

Attached: enough is enough.jpg (707x500, 85K)

how did trump cover up 9/11 exactly? genuinely curious what you're basing that statement off of

bump

stop bumping this shitty thread

no one cares about your ZOG emperor

thanks for the bump leftypol

seriously, thank you

This is the same guy who had stealth Jeff as his name on Twitter as a reference to how stealthy Jeff sessions was and how Jeff sessions was really working behind-the-scenes to take down the deep state. Now we know Jeff sessions actively worked against President Trump and refused to investigate Hillary Clinton. Fuck you and fuck Brian. Or if you are Brian trying to drum up support for you dying Twitter Account then I have one thing to say to you. If you were standing right in front of me I would pour gasoline down your throat and set you on fire because you are so full of shit. You faggots make Trump supporters look like retards. Go ahead and call me a shill but whatever you do don’t look at anything with a critical eye, just keep living in this fairytale.

Attached: image.jpg (512x512, 174K)

but the fairy tale is that mueller is working against trump. i'm more than ok if you don't believe me.
you're attacking some random twitter guy but won't address the point that mueller barr rosenstein gilliani and trump worked together before. you're telling me that it's just a coincidence that they are all the main players again?
lol. honk.
that's fine if you don't believe me user. i'm not that guy who made the thread. don't be so angry. you'll see that i'm right. assume that i'm incorrect obviously. this thread wasn't to sway opinions. it was to inform on something that i recently learned: all 5 of these players have a major history.
you can't admit that fact is intriguing?
you're not a shill you're just a blackpilled moron imo

btw i'm OP. on a different ID because i started the thread on my work comp and had to move to my mobile

These theories are fun to consider but have no concrete basis. Trump of the past might have been a true blue patriot but the trump of now is an old man with a lot of Jewish heirs working in a Jewish run field.

his owing to israel pisses me right off as well. but tbf american opposition to israel has never been higher or more public, a time least not in my lifetime.
this theory does have concrete basis tho. they all worked together before and are also main players now? mueller doesn't hand in a report for 2 years but does within days of Barr being confirmed? don't believe user that's fine. but you know you can't explain away trump interviewing mueller for a job he couldn't have one day before being named SC.
DONT TAKE MY WORD FOR IT. ASSUME IM INCORRECT. i'm not trying to make anyone think anything. just inform on something i found highly coincidental

*bowing to israel

please honestly let me know which part about anything i said is "full of shit"

this thread with actual info gets slid but we can have the same race baiting thread posted 6 times a day and hit at least 250. kek. i won't quit tho.

one of Mueller's few public announcements months ago, most didn't catch it

Attached: IMG_7059.jpg (1242x1556, 293K)

trump wasn't scared to fire sessions. why would he be scared to fire rosenstein if he was a blackhat?

anyone care to explain the fbi director interview with mueller one day before being named SC?
follow my logic:

>if mueller attended the interview, it shows at minimum some desire for the job
>he obviously didn't get the job
>how could he be appointed to investigate the man who just the day before denied him a job?
that's textbook conflict of interest. why would the deepstate play to overthrow trump be so shitty and built on such a weak foundation that any retard lawyer could throw out?

>Where were you when you realized that Trump, Mueller, Rosenstein, Barr, and Gulliani worked together in the late 80s/early 90s to take down organized crime?
The boys are back together!

Attached: Trump-Time-Travel.jpg (4153x1760, 2.69M)

Rosenstein and McCabe were spies FOR TRUMP. Meaning they were finding out who the traitors were in his cabinet!

Attached: higher-loyalty.jpg (1548x1024, 1.34M)

Bump

explain how mccabe was operating for trump. the way i understand the situation, is that rosenstein played mccabe, made out that he (rosenstein) was dirty to encourage mccabe to commit sedition, treason.
i could be wrong for sure. let me know your theory on rosenstein and mccabe and how mccabe is a white hat

read through James Comey's Q&A on this website. All the people the press has been demonizing like McCabe and Rosenstein are because they have been MISDIRECTING away from Obama, and. Brennan, and Lynch and others.

McCabe in his book mentioned that Mike Flynn actually brought up the fact that he knew he was under surveillance and still lied to investigators. ON PURPOSE. So that Mueller could expand the scope.

Attached: FBI Anon.png (1249x4302, 2.79M)

spot on about flynn. i've seen that image and testimony before. hard to accept when we can't be sure it is comey but it would fill in a lot of holes and it does make sense. i try sticking to what i can prove like the cooperation between the 5 mentioned in OP. but you make a valid argument

>Mueller couldn't get the FBI director position
Why do you retards keep spouting BS that was proven BS 2 years ago???

>Mueller couldn't get the Director position again!
Sure he could. The Senate gave him a waiver to exceed 10 years , and the Senate would give him another.

It is 100% false that Mueller couldn't be FBI director again. It was 100% false the first time you said it, and it was 100% false the 100th time you said it.

Having Mueller be FBI director would've been a much quieter way to fuck trump, instead of a special counsel. ALSO they would be able to say that Trump's own handpicked FBI director was the one who busted him.

FBI director was the coup plotters' Plan A, and special counsel was their Plan B.

Stop being fucking retarded with your "couldn't be FBI director again" bullshit

i know that Comey's congressional testimony in may 2017 actually implicates Clapper and the DNI far more than trump. he doesn't even implicate trump and specifically states he was under investigation.

Comey is a white hat.
>we
If you're using that word you don't belong here.

Remember that the deep state wanted to keep Comey in his position because he was compromised and they could stifle investigations. Trump and Comey orchestrated his firing so that from the outside looking in it looked like they opposed each other. Trump interviewed Mueller the day before Rosenstein appointed him. It came out a few days ago that Mueller had been investigating a convicted pedophiles with ties to a ton of JEWS. Get ready for the swamp to be drained.

Attached: Bannon-Traitor2.jpg (1236x2816, 1.84M)

Creepy Porn Lawyer?

he had already served 12 years. he could not hold the job. that is not BS.
you're assuming the senate would have given him another waiver after already giving him one. just stop. or keep going cuz i appreciate the bumps.
why would trump fire comey to replace him with comey's mentor, Mueller? fucking retard just think. or don't. i could care less what morons like you believe.
don't believe me. consider all this bullshit user! can you address this ? if mueller interview actually was legit, why isn't it a conflict of interest to investigate trump?

Trump said during the campaign he would reveal tthe truth about 9/11. Mueller is going after the entire Federal Reserve systetm and those in charge.

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-10-03 at 10.23.54 AM.png (1076x630, 285K)

i used we so i don't belong here? cmon user we're on the same team it's just the word i used. i can't be sure that as comey in that image above. sorry to include you in my assumption that was my fault.

I want to believe.

THIS 100%

The "trust sessions" BS was the precursor to "trust mueller" and then Qanon.

The same people went through those 3 stages.

But yes, Brian Cates started the "quiet executioner" storyline and evolved it from there.

He even refers to himself as a "narrative tester" in his bio. So he "tests narratives" with his writing. That isn't journalism, that's just freelance bullshitting.

None of the secret Sessions crap turned out to be true, and nothing has come from Huber or Horowitz or Mueller.

People on the right were gaslighted just like people on the left were gaslighted about Russia.

BOTH SIDES HAVE BEEN GASLIGHTED FOR 2+ YEARS!!!!

So much bullshit to sift through, and anyone who has taken the last 2 years as truth (on either side) will struggle to see what is happening

>we
>we
kys faggot. Bannon is getting the death penalty.

>they're all working together
>you'll see that I'm right
But you schizos have been coming up with all sorts of theories for 2 years about how everything is happening...and nothing happened.

Its frustrating dealing with you "people" because no matter how many times your theories don't pan out, you just reply with "wait and see"

>2017
Wait and see
>2018
Wait and see
>2019
Wait and see

Trump hasn't done anything as president, and is in danger of getting beat by who ever the the dems nominate.

Your theories keep not happening, and soon trump won't even be president anymore. What will your fucking excuse be then?
>YOU DIDN'T TRUST THE PLAN HARD ENOUGH!
probably this

Do you want to sell kid water for the rest of your life, or do you want to come with me and change the world?”

>Mueller investigates for 2 years
>soon after barr becomes AG, Mueller turns in his report.
>coincidence?
No, it's not a coincidence. Barr made Mueller wrap it up. Where the fuck have you been for the last couple months???

Sessions and Rosenstein are insanely corrupt and allowed everything to go on. Barr comes in and finds that things have gone well past the "acceptable" level of corruption and begins working on bringing it back to Bush-era corruption levels.

I'm not sure how you can take Barr making Mueller wrap it up and turn it into "they're all working together in the biggest takedown ever!!!"

There is simply nothing that connects reality with your theory. Too many leaps of the imagination with no evidence

user i agree on pretty much everything you've said except the mccabe shit, and i kept an open mind about that too. so idk why you're angry cuz i said we. my bad.
Banning is a traitor and was one of the leakers that Mooch identified. i'm not a brannon supporter.
>kys
I AGREE WITH YOU CALM DOWN. sorry i said we. ffs can we get back to the discussion now?
can you link me to the pedos mueller is investigating that you mentioned here

>trump wasnt scared to fire Sessions
Were you hiding under a rock for trumps presidency thus far?
Sessions worked on the deepstate's behalf to fuck trump with rosenkike and Mueller. Trump was afraid to fire anyone, and is still too much of a pussy to fire rosenkike.

Trumps enemies have gotten away with everything because trump was afraid to do anything

Under Mueller, the FBI turned loose 200 Israeli espionage agents, and refused to arrest the anthrax terrorist because hewas a Jew who carried out the mailings in an attempt to cast suspicion on Muslims and generate public hostility against Israel’s enemies.

Why do that for the sake of Israel? Who would protect the FBI people involved if the coverup got blown? The “partnership” between the ADL and the FBI that both ADL National Director Abe Foxman and FBI Director Robert Mueller bragged about about doesn’t seem enough to account for such a flagrant dereliction of duty on the part of the FBI. Surely, someone in the FBI would blow the whistle.

Actually, someone has blown the whistle, but you’d hardly know it from reading the news. There’ was much coverage of FBI whistle-blower, Coleen Rowley, a special agent in the FBI’s Minneapolis field office, in connection with FBI officials ignoring reports she sent to Washington headquarters about a suspected terrorist, Zacarias Moussaoui, who was attempting to learn to fly 747 jets. But there’s been very little coverage of another FBI whistle-blower, Sibel Edmonds.

Despite her name, Edmonds is, in fact, a Jewess. But she is a rare Jewess, without a very strong sense of loyalty to her tribe. Indeed, an alarmingly high percentage of the FBI’s wiretap translators are Jews, and nearly all of them who translate Middle Eastern languages are Jews. Most of these have a much stronger sense of their Jewishness than does Edmonds, as Edmonds found out when they tried to recruit her into the Mossad.

who says "trust mueller"?

Jow Forums actually started the theory that mueller was working for trump back in july 2017. not this guy on twitter. you can disagree with the theory for sure. but what you said is false.
huber and horowitz are still working. but i had and have my doubts about them as well. especially because (((Q))) globbed onto them.
can i ask what you think is happening rn both in the white hat and black hat camps, if it's not the official story or this theory that mueller is working for trump? genuinely curious.

There are many patriotic Americans who would be alarmed to learn that a foreign espionage organization, the Mossad, has infiltrated the FBI and is able to subvert the FBI’s operations, but there are fewer patriotic Americans willing and able to draw the necessary conclusions about the overall role of Jews in America. They see the problem as simply a problem with the Mossad. They resist tying the Mossad problem to the Anti-Defamation League problem and to the problem of Jewish influence in the government generally. They resist seeing the connection between the problem of Jewish influence in the government and Jewish influence in the mass media of news and entertainment.

leftypol, I...

>that's textbook conflict of interest
Trump tweeted about it one time in the summer of 2017, I believe

Paraphrase: "how could a guy who got turned down for a job the day before, and who had an issue with me at one of my golf courses, and (I forget the 3rd thing, but I remember him listing 3)

>conflict of interest
If they insist that they were never investigating trump, and only "collusion" then Mueller could argue there is no conflict. The only way it would be a conflict is if Trump is guilty, in which case his conflict would be forgiven

>"what about your conflict, Mueller?
>I caught the criminals. I did the job. The "good guys" won
That would be good enough for most people.

REMEMBER: the left believes the ends justify the means

but i never mentioned Q. i actually think Q is detrimental because he passified the justified anger of swaths of conservatives leading up the midterms.
but this isn't a Q theory. and i actually said don't believe me. don't wait and see either idc! just trying to share info. assume this isn't the case and that the deep state is in full force and mueller and rosenstein and even gulliani are corrupt. that's the safer option anyway. if i'm correct you can be pleasantly surprised. i'm not trying to get anyone to think this theory is accurate.
trump has done remarkably little to help his base.
>muh tax bill
not that great desu.
>"i want immigrants in higher numbers than ever"
spit in the face of his base. he can be a huge boomer faggot. i agree 1000% with that.

>schizos
>Q
again i didn't mention q. Q is a larp. why call me a schizo? lmao why not just disagree. i'm not trying to recruit anyone to my way of thinking. just informing about the connection between mueller, barr, rosenstein, gulliani, and trump.

don't trust the plan. trust yourselves. i wouldn't disagree with you at all on that.

>dealing with you "people"
kek i'm lower than a person because of my theory? topkek user.

you absolutely could be right! i'd ask why you think trump had no problem firing sessions but hasn't fired rosenstein.

if he was scared then why did he fire him?

THE LIMIT IS 10 YEARS, AND HE RECEIVED A WAIVER FROM THE SENATE TO EXCEED 10 YEARS!

HOW CAN YOU KEEP REPEATING YOUR BS WITHOUT EVEN LOOKING INTO IT????

HOLY SHIT! YOU ARE EITHER INTENTIONALLY TRYING TO GASLIGHT PEOPLE, OR YOU ARE SCHIZOPHRENIC AND DON'T CARE ABOUT REALITY!

FACT: MUELLER ALREADY RECEIVED 1 WAIVER TO EXCEED 10 YEARS

FACT: THE SENATE SUCKED MUELLER'S DICK WHEN HE BECAME SPECIAL COUNSEL, MEANING THEY WOULD LIKELY GRANT MUELLER A 2ND WAIVER.

Mueller already got a waiver you gaslighting shill

i would never argue that mueller or rosenstein or any of these guys are true patriots. just that they have been flipped to save their own asses from U1 and other (9/11?) revelations.

i would love to see that trump tweet from 2017 where trump addresses the interview.

>Jow Forums started the theory
No, the theory was spread on Jow Forums along with the Twitter personalities @drawandstrike, @imperator_rex, and @Thomas_wictor

The theory was spread on Jow Forums but did not originate here. It came from that team of gaslighting faggots.

>don't worry
>sessions has it under control
>and Mueller too!
>they all flipped and worked for trump!
>sit back and enjoy the show!
I was here and watched it.

i'm not a shill and i'm not gaslighting holy fucking shit.
does that waiver continue even after his 2 years served? or would he have needed another?

for about the tenth time i'm not trying to make anyone believe me.

>but I never mentioned Q
The post of mine that you linked also never mentioned Q.

no it did originate here i remember reading the threads. i can't prove it until i look through my archives so people can assume you are correct.

i'm saying go ahead and worry. that's the safer option. worry that they are still trying to coup trump, mueller and rosenstein included! idk why you're so angry at me and sure that i'm a shill. just because i have a theory. i'm not even pushing anyone to believe me. go out and find info that contradicts what i'm saying! i encourage it! just wanted to bring the OP info to light.

>you didn't trust the plan hard enough
>trust the plan
that's Q baby

PS.
I agree with most of what you wrote in this post.

Trump hasn't done shit for his base.
He turned against MAGA and now supports the browning of America. He cares more about black people because he wants to be able to tell everyone how great he is for them. He hasn't done shit for white people.

With all that said, why would people believe that trump is secretly working on a 44d chess plan that takes out the bad guys???

If a wall was wishful thinking, and deportations was wishful thinking, and ending DACA was wishful thinking, then why wouldn't it be wishful thinking that trump is secretly taking out the bad guys when we can CLEARLY see them running around freely committing crimes?

There is no law and order in America under trump. He has neglected it, which makes it impossible to believe theories that any day now he will secretly take them down

>trump has no problem firing sessions
But he did.
Sessions should have been fired the day he recused, and every day after.

Trump was afraid of firing him for over 1.5 years

>go ahead and worry
I'm not worried about a coup attempt anymore, because Trump has proven himself to be one of the bad guys.

Trump is an enemy of MAGA. I actually wish the coup attempt succeeded now.

>why would you believe trumonis working 44d chess
because why would he become president as a billionaire at 70?
he's a civnat boomer/half liberal from NYC. he said not mine ideological avatar, but he does have a history and a family history of working with the government, fbi.
the history of mueller barr trump gulliani and rosenstein outlined in the OP is why i believe it.
all i'm saying is you and i seemingly only disagree on this theory. so why get all assmad and call me a shill because we have one different opinion? i'm even saying don't believe my word.

trump doesn't address censorship too much. yet another thing that pisses me off about him. if he bows down to these national red flag laws, i'm done with him. idc if he does drain the swamp. he'll be spitting in the face of his entire base with that move. i will not vote for him in 2020 if he signs off on red flag laws.

so i think you and i have common ground on most things trump. as for his theory in OP? i'm just going where i see the evidence lead.

so if trump is one of them, why did they try to remove him? or are you of the opinion that this is all a show to keep the goyim distracted?

>that's Q
No, trusting the plan started with the Jeff Session gaslighting.

We've been told to trust the plan since way before Q. It's just that after the sessions theories died out the only "plan" to trust was Q's

sounds like bullshit, but I believe it

Attached: 1476216554788.png (628x399, 170K)

the leftypol cope on all of this is fucking DELICIOUS YES FEED ME MORE SALLLLLT FUCK YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

Attached: Sal.jpg (474x266, 16K)

Ok ok.
You seem fine enough.

Helpful advice: don't let these hopeful theories take up too much of your mind. The bad guys basically have a perfect record of getting away with everything for 50+ years, so I think mentally it's better to be pleasantly surprised if something good happens rather than expecting it.

I believe Democrats will take the house, Senate, and White House in 2020. We can't have a huge chunk of conservatives half-comatose because they spent 4 years believing a lot of things that weren't real.

I actually fell for the Mueller is /ourguy/ theory for about 2 weeks, and I had been hopeful about Sessions.

Then I started to realize most (if not all) of that stuff was BS, and I pretty much had to clear my brain of garbage, which isn't easy.

The bad guys are willing to be more bad than the good guys are willing to be good.
The bad guys have no limit. That puts good guys at a disadvantage.

>its all a show
That is my most recent conclusion.

Bad things are happening in the background IMO, instead of good things. I think the trump presidency is a reality-show type mass psyop while the world takes a massive leap past the point of no return.

I think we're on the precipice of extreme worldwide evil, and they need some more time, which Trump is giving them (whether he 100% realizes it or not)

I don't *know* if trump is bad, but I don't see him taking any actions against bad people. That certainly doesn't make him good.

>I believe Democrats will take the house, Senate, and White House in 2020
With who? President "Gropey" Biden? President "Chief Pants on Fire" Warren?

nah man i really don't wanna argue with you because i'm trying to find what we can agree on but i'm telling you that shit "trust the plan" is Q 100%. started with Q.

if it turns out that there isn't 4d chess being played, then "mass reality show psy op" seems most realistic. we got increased and accelerated censorship and anti white agenda during trump's presidency. so was trump allowed to win to placate whites? i go back and forth between the 4d chess theory and the psyop theory. it's one or the other at this point. a few weeks ago i was blackpilled. before that, whitepilled and full on chess fag. and so on for months at a time. back and forth at least 3-4 times.

i feel you on most of what you say user. i would always, as a pessimist myself, tell everyone to assume this chess theory is incorrect and glowers are distracting us.
but you cannot deny the connection between the 5. that's fact. so that's why i'd say it's psyop or 4d chess one or the other. they are either all playing us goyim, or they are all taking down key points of the deepstate. assume the worst hope for the best.

never underestimate the power of the illegal and nog votes. plus brainwashed whites. that being said i'm not so blackpilled on 2020. i think we don't need to worry about trump winning. but if he's actually on our side. right now i think he's playing chess, but i'm not positive.
even if he is playing chess, i can never forgive his "more immigration than ever" bullshit

bump mueller barr rosenstein trump gulliani cooperation means either we are being played or saved by them all. there are no other logical possibilities.

I'm hoping he's actually trying to "love israel to death", considering he seems to be doing his best to encourage war in the middle east, and the dems hate anything he likes. He really is getting the dems to take a good look at israel, which (((they))) must hate. And hopefully his "more immigration" is to get the RINO's to sign off on his proposals while actually only letting non-shitskins in.

yea whether intentional or not on anyone's part, you can't deny that normie hatred for israel is rising. AIPAC wasn't even discussed on a public level 3-4 years ago. only in alternative circles.

I wanna be reeve, but it's all too much

Proof?

>with who?
Anyone. Literally anyone from the left.

The enthusiasm among the left to go out and vote trump out PLUS illegals voting PLUS typical ballot stuffing and dead people voting is way more than the enthusiasm among the right for 4 more years of trump.

Almost every defense of trump relies on "but what about the Democrats?!?"
If trump was actually doing the shit he campaigned on then people would be able to point to that, but he hasn't.

The trump presidency has not gone the way we wanted, so in reality not even Republicans want 4 more years of Trump, it's just that we don't want 4 years of Democrats either.

The trump presidency has been tiring, and we have nothing to show for it. I'm telling you right now, that when 2020 election comes around, there just won't be enough people who want 4 more years of the shit job Trump has been doing