Why is Jow Forums so adamant that men are superior to women?

Why is Jow Forums so adamant that men are superior to women?

youtube.com/watch?v=ggDQXlinbME

The Monty hall math problem was first solved by a high IQ woman and testosterone driven men all had the urge to call in and voice why they thought she was in idiot simply because she was a woman.

Attached: 220px-Monty_Hall_Problem_-_Standard_probabilities.svg.png (220x220, 14K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=OOZ-qG4pMw4
youtube.com/watch?v=YruxhWO8QSY
eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2005-01/uoc--iim012005.php
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>Why is Jow Forums so adamant that men are superior to women?
because a man needs a shower and a shave while a woman needs an entire art supply kit to be presentable.

>The Monty hall math problem was first solved by a high IQ woman

Attached: wrong.jpg (695x720, 66K)

Being the first to solve an easy problem isn't really that much of an accomplishment.
There have been many more interesting problem-solving contests than this.

It's not an easy problem considering that most academics disagreed with her incorrectly.

youtube.com/watch?v=OOZ-qG4pMw4
youtube.com/watch?v=YruxhWO8QSY

Attached: women are retarded.png (1043x627, 408K)

Show me a woman who can solve the Pascal's Mugging problem and I'll concede the point.

>The Monty hall math problem was first solved by a high IQ woman
Pic related

Attached: bell curve fallacy.jpg (1079x534, 50K)

Technically you can’t really answer any ”why” questions with science. It all relies on layers of theory where the fundamental phenomenon is ”it just be like that”

"these points" IQ

Attached: 1519420019089.jpg (625x626, 55K)

eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2005-01/uoc--iim012005.php
I don't know where your statistics came from but women have on average more white matter and men have on average more gray matter. White matter is connective tissue which explains why women a quicker to speak than men meanwhile men take longer to form a response and sometimes forget words but on average bring up more advanced responses. In the end you're still judging groups of women on their gender instead of their character or real IQ.

Because women are retarded and weak children who have been socially engineered to be spoiled, entitled, and lazy.

>Male squads, teams and crews demonstrated better performance on 93 of 134 tasks evaluated (69 percent) than units with women in them. Male units were faster while completing tactical movements in combat situations, especially in units with large "crew-served" weapons such as heavy machine guns and mortars. Male infantry squads had better accuracy than squads with women in them, with "a notable difference between genders for every individual weapons system" used by infantry rifleman units. The M4 carbine, M27 infantry automatic rifle and M203 single-shot grenade launcher were assessed.[79]
>
>Male Marines who had not received infantry training were more accurate than women who had. In removing wounded troops from the battlefield, "notable differences in execution times were found between all-male and gender-integrated groups".[79]

I'm not arguing if women are stronger or more coordinated than men. they are not. A women can be smarter than the smartest man though.

Because you are

Attached: 13968602-a-pink-female-symbol-surrounded-by-ten-male-symbols-all-pointing-towards-it.jpg (1300x919, 86K)

Nigger, the video you used literally proved you wrong 3:19

Attached: 555-come-on-now.jpg (960x882, 59K)

>The Monty hall math problem was first solved by a high IQ woman

There are high IQ women. There are high IQ black people. No question about that.

The question is how many of them are there in the population?

The question is why does pol claim to want to deport/kill all other races when pol really just wants to deport/kill low iq people of other races.

t. Ugly incel

>quick reaction, very little thought given
>slower reaction, a lot more thought given
who is more likely to be right?

>lol women are so inferior to men!

And while you barely employed losers are wasting your lives shitposting female lawyers, doctors, and politicians are changing the world and saving lives. Women are out deadlifting 250+ pounds while your soft weak hands have never felt the touch of metal. Women are veterans and cops who have killed bad guys while you cross the street when you see a lone blackman walking toward you.

You're all so fucking pathetic.

The Monty Hall problem incorrectly assumes that Monty Hall is an ethical upstanding Aryan gentleman. In reality, the goat trick is nothing more than another Jewish scheme to get you to switch your choice, and if it could possibly have benefitted you, the kikes would never have given you the option in the first place.

Didn’t even know it was a woman but I’ve always found this thing fucking bullshit

>The Monty hall math problem was first solved by a high IQ woman a

wow, you have no fucking clue what you are talking about. It was solved many times before "her"

Attached: LOL 12.gif (268x320, 1.44M)

The monty hall problem isnt logical though, its still a 33% chance but the math is fudged due to frame of reference which fucks with peoples heads.

ITt the only reason switching is "better" is a frame of reference swap we dont see initially

Literally just use google image search

The problem is perfectly logical

Who even thought it was a problem.
Was a man asking this question? "Huh, I guess if we have this very specific game what is the best strategy on average? I can't solve this problem!!". You know what? This isn't what happened. I was a woman who constructed the scenario the pitted the two strategies against each other and trivially found the result because her professor, who was a male, taught her about game theory. Now fuck off.

You are confusing equality of importance with equality of function.

Do you walk on your face?
A properly functioning society has different classes of people doing different things.

Attached: image.jpg (1583x2048, 462K)

Why is it obvious that one must genocide a subpopulation if it was found that their IQ was below a certain threshold.

You are supposed to be leading your family, not virtue signaling in a failed attempt to find a mate.

Man up.

Attached: image.jpg (1583x2048, 409K)

>Posting your opinion on some news article
>People shitposted her
>"HUR THUR PEOPLE SHITTED ON WAMEN!"

Oh fuck off.

/thread

That’s actually not true. It’s a statistical advantage to switch.

Why? If having low IQ was bad on an evolutionary level there would not be low IQ people. It looks like nature settled that it was best to have a range of low to high IQ.

low iq people have more kids on average than high iq people. You don't need to be smart to jam your dick into a woman and cum while she's ovulating. If you're smart you want to make sure you can care for your kids before having them. If you are stupid you really don't think and just have kids by mistake.

They are not. They are adamant that you are manufacturing female oppression. They adamant that you are the sexists cunts trying to put down men

The reason this is difficult to grasp has nothing to do with gender PC bullshit or OP's dick gobbling Mossad psyops slide thread, and everything to do with bad math explanations.

People who are good at math are typically really bad at empathy and explaining shit, it's rare that you get someone good at both. As a result they explain the concept in a way that is structurally correct, but doesn't address the root of the student's misunderstanding. You see this all the time in college.

For example with this problem, people are making the mistake of adjusting to a new statistical scenario (50/50) after the reveal, rather than remaining in the previous statistical scenario (33/33/33). This is wrong because the first statistical scenario NEVER ENDED, they just assume it did because the brain is taking the easy way out in solving the problem. Students making this mistake need to be shown that their brain is doing this, not just gender bashed.

You can demonstrate that people are making this error by expanding the number of options: Have it be 4 doors (3 goats, 1 car), with the presenter revealing the other 2 doors with goats. Then do the same thing with 5 doors (4 goats, 1 car, the presenter reveals the 3 remaining doors with goats). Hell do it with a 100 doors (99 goats, 1 car, the presenter reveals the 97 goats). Suddenly you get that the previous statistical scenario never ended, and that your initial guess is much more likely to have landed on a goat than a car.

This is how it's explained, via empathy and caring about the comprehension of your students.

Leave it to Vox and OP's unyielding gayness to gender bait rather than taking 5 seconds to empathize with the people you're trying to teach. On behalf of everyone who struggles to comprehend math because the people that do comprehend it refuse to teach it correctly because they are too busy shoving dildos of self gratification deep into their rectums FUCK YOU.

Attached: 1553368637187.png (645x773, 107K)

She didn't solve it, she explained the solution given by some dude in the 70's, when monty hall was relevent.